Realazy wrote:

[Irreversible's Extra]

00:12:937 (1,2) - 00:18:422 (1,2) - i don't rly get the rhythm choice here, these sliders would fit the melody much better if they were ctrl+g'd imo.. i don't hear anything notable starting on the white tick considering you've been following the melody the entire time fix

00:32:994 - i have concerns regarding that section:
rhythm -
a lot of it just seems very confused and looks like visuals were prioritized over following the song here, it often gets confused whether you follow individual sounds with sliderends or have them on nothing in the song, like 00:33:337 (1,2) - where the first slider follows a single sound, yet the 2nd follows 2 1/4 notes both on its head and tail, which is already inconsistent in itself. then you also have consistent patterns like 00:34:022 (1,2) - where both sliders follow 2 notes each, and right after you have 00:34:365 (1,2,1) - where each slider follows a single sound each which makes it hard to follow what your intent was in that section
using more circles (like 00:38:822 (2,3,4,5) -) to clearly differentiate 1/2 to 1/4 sounds would feel much better than using 1/4 sliders for both, which is very confusing atm

there are also a few inconsistencies, like 00:37:622 (1,2,1,2,3) - vs 00:43:108 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4) -

patterning -
some patterns like 00:35:051 (1,2,3,4) - 00:40:537 (1,2,3,4) - don't seem to reflect the song in any way in my opinion, you're following a lot of different sounds together and patterns like these look like you're following the same (or similar) sounds, disregarding the rhythm issue i mentioned earlier which also applies here Well.. thanks for your concerns, but sometimes I can't really understand where you're coming from - you mention a lot of consistency issues, but I'm asking myself, do I need to map every rhythm the same way? Things would become really boring then, and since this is a rather "confused" dubstep part from my point of view, there definitely is logic going on - I can assure you though that this is not only visual based, but follows the rhythm in a proper manner.

00:43:794 (4) - maybe use a 1/6 repeat here to follow the kicks? yeah. adjusted spacing too so the timeline's correct
00:38:308 (3) - 00:49:280 (3) - should be 1/6 yea
01:05:908 (1,4,5) - meant to be unstacked? well no but now it's stacked
01:26:137 (3) - not necessarily unreadable like FFI mentioned, but low spacing here bothers me a bit when you could've stacked it on 01:24:765 (3) - for example and kept your symmetric pattern while having a little more spacing for emphasis on snares yea
01:36:422 (1) - don't think you rly need the NC here, the 1212 comboing since better fit for the melody only yea
01:38:480 (2,3) - circles here could've been nice to have a little more intense end to the kiai increased spacing instead.

Irreversible wrote:

Well.. thanks for your concerns, but sometimes I can't really understand where you're coming from - you mention a lot of consistency issues, but I'm asking myself, do I need to map every rhythm the same way? Things would become really boring then, and since this is a rather "confused" dubstep part from my point of view, there definitely is logic going on - I can assure you though that this is not only visual based, but follows the rhythm in a proper manner.

Realazy wrote:

Uberzolik#5241 on discord for free anime

Trynna wrote:

Ascendance