u should force me to farm pp more often
[CookieBite's Normal]
01:21:680 (1) - not sure why this is NC'd but not 01:27:165 (5) - imo it'd be better to remove the NC on the former one so you can keep NCs every 2 measures which is simpler to follow at this level, same could be said for 01:23:737 (1) - and 01:37:451 (1) -
01:32:480 (5) - you might want a simpler shape here because beginners have a tendency to try and follow slidershapes 1/1 and this is kinda complex
01:38:822 (1) - colorhax broke @lcfc
[Hobbes2 billion years to finish this Hard]
00:37:108 (1) - 00:42:594 (1) - 00:48:080 (1) - might be nice to have 1/1 sliders here instead so you have little breaks between all the 1/4 gaps
[Nokashi's Insane]
00:03:851 (2) - 00:06:594 (2) - these notes feel very weird here, they're not following any notable sound like everything else in the intro but rather the faint drums that you've been ignoring instead
01:17:908 (5) - disagree with this being 3/4 rhythm, there's a clear violin note on the red tick which has been your focus in the kiai
01:30:080 (4,5,6) - move these 8 pixels right and down so your blanket doesn't get fucked by auto stacking
[Irreversible's Extra]
00:12:937 (1,2) - 00:18:422 (1,2) - i don't rly get the rhythm choice here, these sliders would fit the melody much better if they were ctrl+g'd imo.. i don't hear anything notable starting on the white tick considering you've been following the melody the entire time
00:32:994 - i have concerns regarding that section:
rhythm -
a lot of it just seems very confused and looks like visuals were prioritized over following the song here, it often gets confused whether you follow individual sounds with sliderends or have them on nothing in the song, like 00:33:337 (1,2) - where the first slider follows a single sound, yet the 2nd follows 2 1/4 notes both on its head and tail, which is already inconsistent in itself. then you also have consistent patterns like 00:34:022 (1,2) - where both sliders follow 2 notes each, and right after you have 00:34:365 (1,2,1) - where each slider follows a single sound each which makes it hard to follow what your intent was in that section
using more circles (like 00:38:822 (2,3,4,5) -) to clearly differentiate 1/2 to 1/4 sounds would feel much better than using 1/4 sliders for both, which is very confusing atm
there are also a few inconsistencies, like 00:37:622 (1,2,1,2,3) - vs 00:43:108 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4) -
patterning -
some patterns like 00:35:051 (1,2,3,4) - 00:40:537 (1,2,3,4) - don't seem to reflect the song in any way in my opinion, you're following a lot of different sounds together and patterns like these look like you're following the same (or similar) sounds, disregarding the rhythm issue i mentioned earlier which also applies here
00:43:794 (4) - maybe use a 1/6 repeat here to follow the kicks?
00:38:308 (3) - 00:49:280 (3) - should be 1/6
01:05:908 (1,4,5) - meant to be unstacked?
01:26:137 (3) - not necessarily unreadable like FFI mentioned, but low spacing here bothers me a bit when you could've stacked it on 01:24:765 (3) - for example and kept your symmetric pattern while having a little more spacing for emphasis on snares
01:36:422 (1) - don't think you rly need the NC here, the 1212 comboing since better fit for the melody only
01:38:480 (2,3) - circles here could've been nice to have a little more intense end to the kiai
[Extreme]
00:35:051 (1,2,3) - ctrl+g'd rhythm fits better here imo, you don't really hear the 1/4 wubs until 00:35:222 - so starting with a triple just feels overmapped here, maybe something like this could fit nicely with your patterning
00:37:622 (2,3,1) - vs 00:37:965 (2,3) - why the difference in rhythm when both patterns follow the exact same sounds?
these two repeat quite a few times in the first drop so ya
01:29:051 (9,1) - 01:31:880 - why skip the melody triples here when you followed every other note?
[CookieBite's Normal]
01:21:680 (1) - not sure why this is NC'd but not 01:27:165 (5) - imo it'd be better to remove the NC on the former one so you can keep NCs every 2 measures which is simpler to follow at this level, same could be said for 01:23:737 (1) - and 01:37:451 (1) -
01:32:480 (5) - you might want a simpler shape here because beginners have a tendency to try and follow slidershapes 1/1 and this is kinda complex
01:38:822 (1) - colorhax broke @lcfc
[Hobbes2 billion years to finish this Hard]
00:37:108 (1) - 00:42:594 (1) - 00:48:080 (1) - might be nice to have 1/1 sliders here instead so you have little breaks between all the 1/4 gaps
[Nokashi's Insane]
00:03:851 (2) - 00:06:594 (2) - these notes feel very weird here, they're not following any notable sound like everything else in the intro but rather the faint drums that you've been ignoring instead
01:17:908 (5) - disagree with this being 3/4 rhythm, there's a clear violin note on the red tick which has been your focus in the kiai
01:30:080 (4,5,6) - move these 8 pixels right and down so your blanket doesn't get fucked by auto stacking
[Irreversible's Extra]
00:12:937 (1,2) - 00:18:422 (1,2) - i don't rly get the rhythm choice here, these sliders would fit the melody much better if they were ctrl+g'd imo.. i don't hear anything notable starting on the white tick considering you've been following the melody the entire time
00:32:994 - i have concerns regarding that section:
rhythm -
a lot of it just seems very confused and looks like visuals were prioritized over following the song here, it often gets confused whether you follow individual sounds with sliderends or have them on nothing in the song, like 00:33:337 (1,2) - where the first slider follows a single sound, yet the 2nd follows 2 1/4 notes both on its head and tail, which is already inconsistent in itself. then you also have consistent patterns like 00:34:022 (1,2) - where both sliders follow 2 notes each, and right after you have 00:34:365 (1,2,1) - where each slider follows a single sound each which makes it hard to follow what your intent was in that section
using more circles (like 00:38:822 (2,3,4,5) -) to clearly differentiate 1/2 to 1/4 sounds would feel much better than using 1/4 sliders for both, which is very confusing atm
there are also a few inconsistencies, like 00:37:622 (1,2,1,2,3) - vs 00:43:108 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4) -
patterning -
some patterns like 00:35:051 (1,2,3,4) - 00:40:537 (1,2,3,4) - don't seem to reflect the song in any way in my opinion, you're following a lot of different sounds together and patterns like these look like you're following the same (or similar) sounds, disregarding the rhythm issue i mentioned earlier which also applies here
00:43:794 (4) - maybe use a 1/6 repeat here to follow the kicks?
00:38:308 (3) - 00:49:280 (3) - should be 1/6
01:05:908 (1,4,5) - meant to be unstacked?
01:26:137 (3) - not necessarily unreadable like FFI mentioned, but low spacing here bothers me a bit when you could've stacked it on 01:24:765 (3) - for example and kept your symmetric pattern while having a little more spacing for emphasis on snares
01:36:422 (1) - don't think you rly need the NC here, the 1212 comboing since better fit for the melody only
01:38:480 (2,3) - circles here could've been nice to have a little more intense end to the kiai
[Extreme]
00:35:051 (1,2,3) - ctrl+g'd rhythm fits better here imo, you don't really hear the 1/4 wubs until 00:35:222 - so starting with a triple just feels overmapped here, maybe something like this could fit nicely with your patterning
00:37:622 (2,3,1) - vs 00:37:965 (2,3) - why the difference in rhythm when both patterns follow the exact same sounds?
these two repeat quite a few times in the first drop so ya
01:29:051 (9,1) - 01:31:880 - why skip the melody triples here when you followed every other note?