insane
i notice in quite a few places their are issues with spacing emphasis. Notably, these patterns, 00:40:438 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2) - while aesthietically really pleasing, don't really make sense to me, a) i don't feel like the song is really waning in intensity, and you use higher spacing for the same sounds later on. other areas include 00:47:510 (6,7) -, 01:51:153 (2,1) - , 02:13:224 (6,7) - where spacing is really low, even though the song doesn't really justify it.
imo 00:38:724 (3,4) - this pattern, and the othertimes its used, the note following the slider tail is kind of weak and unaccentuated. but the way it currently is looks a lot like a 1/4 gap like 00:58:438 (1,2) - instead. i'd recommend either stacking or increasing the spacing of all of these patterns.
00:35:295 (3,4) - stack 4 under the slider or over 1 for more emphasis?
01:25:653 (7) - stack under 01:24:581 (2) - instead?
hard
stack 00:25:867 (1) - under the tail of 00:25:010 (3) - ? sharper angles are nicer
00:27:581 (1) - this jump is kinda big
00:40:438 (5,1) - this overlap is kind of unsightly
00:51:581 (1,2,3) - this reads like a 1/4 instead of a 1/2, same here 00:58:438 (1,2,3) - and you do use this pattern again. The misleading spacing is really difficult and unifitting.
01:22:438 (1,3) - imo this stack is kinda ugly esp with 01:23:295 (3,4) - after
i notice in quite a few places their are issues with spacing emphasis. Notably, these patterns, 00:40:438 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2) - while aesthietically really pleasing, don't really make sense to me, a) i don't feel like the song is really waning in intensity, and you use higher spacing for the same sounds later on. other areas include 00:47:510 (6,7) -, 01:51:153 (2,1) - , 02:13:224 (6,7) - where spacing is really low, even though the song doesn't really justify it.
imo 00:38:724 (3,4) - this pattern, and the othertimes its used, the note following the slider tail is kind of weak and unaccentuated. but the way it currently is looks a lot like a 1/4 gap like 00:58:438 (1,2) - instead. i'd recommend either stacking or increasing the spacing of all of these patterns.
00:35:295 (3,4) - stack 4 under the slider or over 1 for more emphasis?
01:25:653 (7) - stack under 01:24:581 (2) - instead?
hard
stack 00:25:867 (1) - under the tail of 00:25:010 (3) - ? sharper angles are nicer
00:27:581 (1) - this jump is kinda big
00:40:438 (5,1) - this overlap is kind of unsightly
00:51:581 (1,2,3) - this reads like a 1/4 instead of a 1/2, same here 00:58:438 (1,2,3) - and you do use this pattern again. The misleading spacing is really difficult and unifitting.
01:22:438 (1,3) - imo this stack is kinda ugly esp with 01:23:295 (3,4) - after