SPOILER
Lapis Aoki wrote:
M4M from your Q.
I edited the BG and made it 1366x768. So, here you go.EasyNormal
- 00:11:295 (3,1) - Copy (3) and paste it into (1) (or the opposite) for pattern? Because here at 00:14:724 (3,1) and 00:18:153 (3,1) - they're copy pasted. So, it didn't make sense for me that 00:11:295 (3,1) - are not copy-pasted.. im ok with varying slider shapes
- 00:22:483 (4) - NC here. Because you add an NC here after 2 downbeats.
- 00:55:010 (3,1) - Pretty much the same thing as the first point. same
- 01:49:867 (3,1) - ^
Hard
- 00:01:867 (1,2,3) - I can't say I really like the pattern here, so how about this pattern? Because IMO, its somehow weird to switch from a curvy slider to a less curvy slider. variation
- 00:37:653 - There's no vocal here, its only her breath, meanwhile there's a strong vocal here at 00:37:867 that you skipped. Maybe try this rhythm?
- 01:22:438 (4,5,1) - Also the same thing as the first point in easy, maybe this? i like variation in slider shapes
- 01:32:510 - Same thing as the second point.
- 02:13:653 - ^
- 00:35:081 (4,5) - The flow here seems weird because the two are really close. How about you stack them are move them apart? 01:29:938 (4,5) - I want to keep the same effect of reducing distance like I did at 01:29:938 (4,5) -
- 00:53:295 (3,4) - Kinda same as above.. pointing out similar patterns, here at 00:56:724 (3,4) and 01:00:153 (3,4) - aren't really close as 00:53:295 (3,4) are. Maybe move (3,4) a bit apart like the ones I pointed out?
- 01:48:153 (3,4) - Same as above.
- 02:49:867 (3,4,5) - ^
I have nothing to say for insane, it's solid. Catchy song, good luck. ^^ Also, I miss your maps. <3 aww ty
-NanoRIPE- wrote:
m4m (my english is bad)
[Easy]
00:22:438 (4) - nc
00:49:438 - the beat looks strong here so why not add circle instead? because im keeping a balance between 2/1 and 1/1 gaps for beginners
01:27:581 (1) - the spinner goes well here but you skipped this beat 01:29:724 and 01:30:153 - that needs more emphatize (because the cymbal looks strong here) its realy odd when you leave it blank imo (maybe just map this part i think as you did at 00:32:724 (1,2,3) ) its ok
01:44:295 - same as 00:49:438 same
02:05:295 (1) - finish here? but the finish volume is low
02:08:724 (1) - same issue as 01:27:581 (1) - same response
02:25:438 - same as before same
02:56:295 - why just you map this part? im feel odd when you leave it blank (idk how to explain this one sorry,my english is weak)
[Normal]
00:36:153 (1,2,3,4,5) - i know you try to emphatize the instrumen but player would be confused cause player play,they will focus on the vocal not the instrument (the instrument looks strong but the vocal more strong than instrument and player always based on vocal imo) my suggestion : http://prnt.sc/e7d7bh (ignore the pattern)
00:39:581 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - too dense,especially at (4,5,6,7).try to nerf it.my suggestion http://prnt.sc/e7d6rd
00:44:081 (1,2,3,4,5) - same as first point
01:24:153 (1) - finish here cause cymbal?
01:31:010 (1,2,3,4,5) - same as before
01:34:438 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - same as 00:39:581 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7)
01:37:867 (1,2,3,4,5) - same as before
02:05:295 (1) - same as easy
02:57:581 - i think circle here it would be better cause its a bit awkwward when you leave it blank imo not really
[hard]
00:25:010 (3) - ctrl g for better flow between (2,3,1)
00:34:438 (1,2) - maybe just make the ds same as (3,4)? for consistency? its ok
00:41:724 (2,1,2) - imperfect stack
00:55:010 (1,2,3,4,5) - theres no particular meaning for make the circles closer like this,why not just make 1/2 sliders instead? (and also player would be confused with this pattern) just being creative also its hard difficulty, its not a hard pattern to read
01:29:295 (1,2) - same as 00:34:438 (1,2) no
01:49:867 (1,2,3,4,5) - same as 00:55:010 (1,2,3,4,5) same response
02:05:295 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - i think its quite boring if you just make 1/3 reverse slider,make a variation rhythm here would be better imo i think you mean reverse 1/4 also its fine
02:35:295 (3,1) - bad overlap imo (why not stacked it instead?) its fine
02:41:724 (2,1,2) - overlap a bit not that bad
02:48:581 (2) - 248,174 for blanket?
02:53:724 (1,2,1,2,3) - it looks harder if you just pu circles for emphatize the instrument imo,why not change it to slider instead? circles are fine, changed some NCs to make it easier to readhttp://prnt.sc/e7decv
02:57:795 (1,2) - ^
[Insane]
00:05:295 (1,3,5) - nc this object same as you did on hard diff
00:20:295 (4) - i think 1/1 slider would be better here cause at 00:20:724 (1) - theres no beat so you dont need a circle there is a beat
00:33:581 (5) - nc here? dont think its needed for this pattern
00:48:153 (1,2) - make it farther? cause i think finish would be better if you make a jump or farther like 02:24:153 (1,2) it plays fine so id like to keep it
01:03:367 - i think a circle is enough here (the slider doesnt fit with the music imo) i think it does
01:25:867 (1,2) - too far imo if you compare with previous pattern its just slider jumps and it plays fine
01:43:010 (1,2) - same as before same response
01:47:295 (4,1) - the overlap just make the pattern looks bad imo not everything is about how a pattern looks, i like how this plays
01:58:224 (8) - same as 01:03:367 same
02:05:295 (1) - finish cause cymbal
nice map ~
GL!
Thanks for mods, no reply = fixed