heelllllooooooooooo
[Easy]
- 00:10:294 (5,1) -
on this difficulty i would avoid a stack like this- 00:28:703 (1,2,3,4,6) - too many different kinds of sliders in the same pattern makes it a bit messy aesthetically
- 00:30:749 - could be a circle instead to avoid a long chain of 1/2 gaps // 01:38:931 (3) - lots of similar places
- 01:03:476 (7) - ^ and to emphasize the next slider?
- 01:21:885 - really sounds like a whistle should go here
- 01:31:431 (1,2) - hmm - implied flow is a bit awkward, how about
http://i.imgur.com/KjDpor6.png- 01:42:340 (1,2) - oh this is a bit weird flow-wise.. idk about having these so obviously break flow on a diff this low
- 03:51:203 (5) - there's a cool bass sound on the blue here you could capitalize on
http://i.imgur.com/HfaO5r0.pngthe main thing i'm not too certain on is the obvious flow breaking sliders along with the amount of different slider shapes used in quick succession. makes the design look a bit too varied
[Normal]
- 00:35:181 (2,3) - could be misread as 1/4 maybe since 00:31:260 (4,1) - was used (happens again in similar places like 01:38:930 (3,4,1) - 01:42:339 (1,2,3) - etc) 00:35:521 (3) - would sound better on 00:35:351 - imo tho.
- 01:20:521 (1,2) - wanna blanket these maybe?
- 02:04:157 (1,2,3) - triangle is a bit off assuming you wanted to make one // 02:10:635 (2,3,4,5,1) -
- 02:31:090 (4,5,1) - stacked triple with a blanket
(please fix)
what concerns me here is this spread is just... no, it's way too dense compared to the easy and stuff like 00:55:635 (5,6,1) - could easily be 1/2 sliders to lower the density and fit the spread more. 3 1/4 clicks in a row is more like an advanced diff
[Hard]
- 00:46:431 (1,2,3,4,5) - is it just me or does this feel overemphasized for such weak sounds // 01:54:612 (1,2,3,4) - sam
- 00:54:442 - 00:57:169 - i feel like this would follow what the song is doing better were it clickable
- 01:52:567 (4,5,6) - this pattern looks almost random and i know it isn't, so maybe something like this
http://i.imgur.com/uBOgFJw.png might work a bit better?
- 02:06:203 (7,8,1) - what is this flow LOL that 8 looks so out of place
// 02:07:567 (3,4,5) -
- 02:08:249 (5,7,8) - ow visual distance
- 02:22:567 (4) - how do you feel about deleting this note and making 02:22:737 (5,6) - a triple? Might follow vocals more actively
- 03:15:067 (1,2,3) - this overlap doesn't look very nice imo
// 03:17:794 (1,2,3) -
- 03:51:544 (3,4) - how do you feel about making these circles or something like
http://i.imgur.com/zniLlaE.jpg instead (ignore placements)?
thats all from me~
good luck!