I watched 3 replays: Yaong, OPJames and someone else i cant recall now, all of them failed that part.hi-mei wrote:
Before I posted the mod I contacted 2 bns and a member of QAT, which both agreed on my concerns. Its not just me tying to bring attention to myself.handsome wrote:
present me better arguments before attempting to give me your two cents. a lot of your arguments are based on how you see the game and how you interpret it. when some of your reasoning is just so egregious it's hard to take you seriously, and on top of that you expect me to reply properly when half the time i don't even understand the point you're trying to make.
Manipulating intent. Do the 2 BN's and QAT really agree with all of your concerns? If not they are irrelevant and are just being used to attempt to give your "concerns" more backbone. Use logic and reasoning, not rhetoric. Unless you can quote the BN's/QAT's saying that at that specific time they also agree with your reasoning, this is just manipulating their words and applying them to whatever context you want.handsome wrote:
3. you're saying everyone fails at every part the most. stop pulling statistics out of your ass to try and back up your reasoning, it's just fluff. read my reply to mir if you want my thoughts on this pattern. and i do think what i've done is sufficient.
I do think that you still HAVE to show what is fast and what is not visually, your arguments like "there are NC" are really weak. Nobody looks at combos at 160 bpm / 3.13x SV.
3 replays = everyone? Also did you talk to those people who failed? Failing a section is literally meaningless without the player's response. It could have played perfectly fine, but they misread. it could have been that they just missed. It could have been because someone walked into their room. etc... This argument is moot without player response. Using that logic to justify your reasoning just demonstrates you're trying to force a change without solid evidence.
[]
Use logical arguments, not rhetoric please... You can use rhetoric on newer mappers and get them to change stuff, but please respect the fact that everyone here is highly experienced and knows what they are doing. There is clearly reasoning and motive to all the patterns used. Best to respond with mapping analysis, not manipulated statistics or broad statements.