"yuzu__rinrin"
[JuDa's Kantan]
- 00:53:725 (49) - delete?
drumの音を考慮した感じのノーツですけど、00:54:151 (50,51,1) - でvocalを純粋に取りたいかなっおもった。
kkd続くのと、ddkkD使うのに格好のながれなのでnochange.
それだけ、あと完璧、Kantanのお勉強になる
- 00:09:682 (1) - move to 00:09:895 -
- 00:10:108 (2) - delete,
こういうはいいなんか難しく見えてなあ... いくらか単純にしちゃうのも手だと思いました。
その後難度あるのも続くのでこのままいきます - 01:00:321 (4) - move to 00:59:895 - , and change k?
00:55:853 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - のパターンを少し変えたさ
xxx-xxxも緩和できると思うし良いかと。
密度高めなものがこれまでに多く存在しないのでシンプル化した現状のままでいきます - 01:13:938 (4) - move to 01:13:938 (4) - and change k?^
same. - 01:24:576 (1) - move to 01:24:789 -
- 01:25:002 (2) - delete,
最初のやつと同じなので変えてなかったらナシで
same.
"Kisses"Kantan
Futsuu
- 00:17:555 (15) - finish? To me it's really similar to 00:14:151 (10) 00:20:959 (19) - 00:24:363 (23) - etc
its not unsuitable finish for big accent, ant emphasized for next finish. - 00:48:193 (42) - Imo iif 00:51:597 (47) has a finish then this should have one too. I don't see big differences in intensity, music transition, etc
same reason, not big accent. It's noisy to me to use the finish.
- 01:05:214 (8) - 01:18:831 (8) - you have finishes in this diff but not in Kantan. I think the finishes here don't fit the vocal pattern. They also take epmhasis away form the finishes at 01:06:704 (1)
piano accent seems good for pattern "finish", no use finish feels very airly with kiai plays T_T
Thanks for mod~ (¦3[___]