1. Collab Extra (5,45 stars, 724 notes)
2. Easy (1,77 stars, 178 notes)
3. Hard (3,71 stars, 416 notes)
4. Normal (2,26 stars, 276 notes)
5. Pachiru's Insane (4,58 stars, 514 notes)
6. Virtuosu! (6,12 stars, 847 notes)

Cosmolade wrote:

IRC with xfrac-kun (Spanish)

16:35 xfraczynho: cosmo a todo esto
16:35 xfraczynho: cómo andas de tiempo para una nm req?
16:35 xfraczynho: de la gd que te mostré elo tro día, le hice unos cambios
16:39 Cosmolade: o
16:39 Cosmolade: esta subida?
16:39 xfraczynho: shi
16:39 xfraczynho: en el set de nozhomi
16:40 Cosmolade: np
16:40 *xfraczynho is listening to [http://osu.ppy.sh/b/1432512 Thaehan - Help]
16:45 Cosmolade: hm
16:45 *Cosmolade is editing [https://osu.ppy.sh/b/1432512 Thaehan - Help [xfrac's Extra]]
16:47 Cosmolade: 00:19:019 (5,6) - estos objetos representan un sonido mas potente, ya que el ruido de fondo va en aumento, deberían tener mas spacing para agregar énfasis, igual que el stream deberia tener mas ds para no ser tan monótono
>> Aumenté el ds
16:47 Cosmolade: btw he visto que haces switch entre streams rectos y curvos
16:47 xfraczynho: dame un min
16:48 xfraczynho: reviso todo altiro
16:48 Cosmolade: deberias tener un patrón para ellos, por ejemplo 1 recto luego 1 curvo para hacer mas entretenido el play
>> Mmm debería ser aceptable, los hago más que todo por el flow, igual esperaré otro comentario
16:48 Cosmolade: oh
16:48 Cosmolade: okay
16:50 xfraczynho: si me dejas comentarios los respondo en un ratito
16:50 xfraczynho: :3
16:57 Cosmolade: btw puedo pasarte un gif por el server?
16:57 Cosmolade: que ahi se ve mejor xD
16:58 Cosmolade: es sobre este patrón
16:58 Cosmolade: 02:20:856 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) -
16:59 Cosmolade: que podrías hacerlo mas bonito, sugiero esto(? https://puu.sh/xTeDn/ea6e1d3822.gif
>> Se ve bonito, lo arreglé xD
17:04 Cosmolade: te lo decia ahora porque no tengo tiempo :c
17:05 xfraczynho: jajajaj
17:05 xfraczynho: no te preocupess <3
17:05 xfraczynho: si
17:05 xfraczynho: es que estoy haciendo un fast check
17:06 xfraczynho: pero te responderé las suggest en un ratito
17:06 Cosmolade: oka
17:14 xfraczynho: a todo esto, si quieres posteas el irc
17:14 Cosmolade: o
17:14 Cosmolade: pero esperame un poco, dejame escribir mas(?
17:14 Cosmolade: y luego posteo
17:14 Cosmolade: dw
17:15 Cosmolade: 00:20:703 (5,1) - necesita más énfasis, aumenta el DS, lo mismo en casos similares
17:16 Cosmolade: 00:21:315 (2,3) - este salto no tiene sentido, ni sonido que le respalde, mejor haces el ds igual entre 2,3 y 4
>> Hice más consistentes las distancias
17:17 Cosmolade: 00:24:070 (3,4) - lugar perfecto para un jump por el sonido fuerte
>> Fix
17:19 Cosmolade: 00:37:386 (1,2,3,4) - arregla al angulo y la forma del flow acá, hácelo similar a la secuencia anterior (rosa 1,2,3,4)
>> Hecho
17:20 Cosmolade: 00:43:585 (6) - overmap? no escucho sonido acá D:
17:20 Cosmolade: 00:46:341 (7) - ^
17:21 Cosmolade: 00:53:687 (8) - y asi(?
>> Mmm sí, arreglado el overmap
17:22 Cosmolade: 00:59:121 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - para hacer más consistentes los streams, cada uno que represente el sonido de acá debería ser curvo, somo lo hiciste en - 01:04:937 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12) -
>> Oki, arreglé los dos
17:22 Cosmolade: como*
17:24 Cosmolade: 01:45:422 (2) - no sound
>> 01:45:422 (2) - este sí tiene sonido D:, el drum shake
17:27 Cosmolade: eso sería todo, revisa bien en 25% que tiene sonido y que no, y también quizás mirar un poco como hacer mejor placement de los objetos, no soy experta en eso tampoco, por eso suelo usar flow circular xD
17:27 Cosmolade: ya, eso sería
17:27 Cosmolade: postearé o/
17:27 xfraczynho: oki oki :33
17:28 xfraczynho: muchas gracias =)
17:28 Cosmolade: de nada :3/
17:28 xfraczynho: yo creo que responderé en el foro entonces
17:28 xfraczynho: thank you so much
17:28 xfraczynho: si necesitas algún día tb me dices
17:28 Cosmolade: okas~
17:28 xfraczynho: ojalá no hoy, para limpiar las anteriores xD
17:28 Cosmolade: xD

btw
@Nozhomi It seems all in hard diff is unsnapped? D:

gaston_2199 wrote:

Hi!
Quick mod to xfrac in Spanish~
All about my mod is based in my experence in the gameplay, don't give me kudos until xfrac do accept some suggestion

[xfrac's Extra]

1. 00:01:264 (5) - Este slider lo sentí un poco incomodo al jugar, quizás podrías ajustarlo para que haga blanket a 00:02:182 (6) -
   Lo arreglé :p
2. 00:04:478 (4) - Personalmente sliders como estos podrían verse mejor con hitcircles como lo hiciste en 00:08:611 - , aunque sólo es una forma en que lo mapearia
   Mmmm la verdad dejaré como están, el primero enfatiza mejor el ida y vuelta del sonido del piano, el segundo es más una escala
3. 00:20:856 (1) - Ajusta este slider para que haga un "blanket" por así decirlo
   Hice otra cosita
4. 00:34:172 (5,6,1) - Esto me resultó muy incomodo al jugar, podrías darle un Ctrl + G para que lo haga en sentido contrario
   Intentaré dejar este, para crear un flow distinto y que no rompa con todo el esquema, espero otro comentario de todas formas
5. 00:37:693 (3,4) - Yo ajustaría estos 2 circulos para que se parezcan a 00:37:080 (3,4) - pero en el sentido que se está haciendo en 00:37:386 (1,2) - (basta con copiar 00:36:774 (1,2,3,4) - y rotarlo)
   Lo hice arriba :p
6. 01:19:784 (2,3) - Este overlap no puedo llegar a leerlo, creo que podrías moverlo para hacer simetría con 01:19:325 (6) -
   Hecho
7. 02:17:182 - Checkea algunas notas, la distancia en algunas no son consistentes como en 02:17:182 (1,2) - o en 02:19:173 (2,3) -
   Debería estar mejor ahora
   Eso es todo. Como dije antes, éste mod lo hice en base a mi experiencia en expeciencia de juego xD
   Buena suerte!

The mapset looks really good for me, take my star~
Good luck!

1. OD8? OD 7 is way too underwhelming for an extra
2. 00:22:540 (2,3,4) - DS is a bit uneven so move 4 and 5 to (152,336) or similar
3. 00:23:228 (1) - Is that intentional? I bet you wanted this on a downbeat xD
4. 00:24:223 (4) - Same as above, move to (352,248)
5. 00:27:897 (7) - It would be really nice if that's a slider like 00:27:284 (4) - as it's exactly the same sound.
6. 00:37:539 (2,3) - I think you messed up hitsounds here
7. 00:41:825 (2,3) - I don't really like that stack as the sounds are pretty different. Ctrl+G would be a solution
8. 01:04:325 (3,4) - Balancing the DS here would look better
9. 01:21:009 (2,3) - Not the same sound again
10. 01:45:652 (4,7) - Would be cool if both are sliders due to the same sound
11. 02:02:948 (2,3,4,5) - That plays kinda weird especially because before you always used a xxx x pattern instead of x xxx. Also it makes more sense to map the 5-plet in the music with xxx x imo. 02:04:937 (1,2,3) - starting on a downbeat would be more emphasized then as well.
12. 02:11:825 (5,6,7,1) - Some equal DS would be nice here
    
    [Virtuoso]
13. 00:39:223 (1) - That slider is pretty much invisible
    I really struggled with parts like 01:20:091 (3,1,2,3) - as the sliders look extremely similar while being 1/2 and 1/4 so yeah can't say much about them Everything else looks good.

DarkVortex wrote:

Heyho!
Quick mod as frac asked me to
Thanks for coming vorttt
[xfrac's Extra]

1. OD8? OD 7 is way too underwhelming for an extra
   Forgot to change it, fixed~
2. 00:22:540 (2,3,4) - DS is a bit uneven so move 4 and 5 to (152,336) or similar
   I made other changes here
3. 00:23:228 (1) - Is that intentional? I bet you wanted this on a downbeat xD
   Fix
4. 00:24:223 (4) - Same as above, move to (352,248)
   Other changes aswell
5. 00:27:897 (7) - It would be really nice if that's a slider like 00:27:284 (4) - as it's exactly the same sound.
   Done~
6. 00:37:539 (2,3) - I think you messed up hitsounds here
   Fixed ~
7. 00:41:825 (2,3) - I don't really like that stack as the sounds are pretty different. Ctrl+G would be a solution
   Other changes on here
8. 01:04:325 (3,4) - Balancing the DS here would look better
   Moved 01:04:478 (4) -
9. 01:21:009 (2,3) - Not the same sound again
   Fixed
10. 01:45:652 (4,7) - Would be cool if both are sliders due to the same sound
    Fixed too
11. 02:02:948 (2,3,4,5) - That plays kinda weird especially because before you always used a xxx x pattern instead of x xxx. Also it makes more sense to map the 5-plet in the music with xxx x imo. 02:04:937 (1,2,3) - starting on a downbeat would be more emphasized then as well.
    You're right, swapped x xxx xxx x
12. 02:11:825 (5,6,7,1) - Some equal DS would be nice here
    Agree, fixed~

Thank you so much for the mod

Crissa wrote:

hey, NM as requested by xfrac

remember the mp3 bitrate thing

xfrac's Extra

00:03:713 (3,4,1) - podrias hacer q estos 3 tengan una distancia visual equivalente

00:10:448 (2) - cae una nota alta en los 2 ticks blancos, creo q quedaria mejor representarlo con 2 circulos

00:16:570 (5) - parecido al de arriba pero en esta ocasion con 2 sliders 1/2

00:19:631 (1,2,3) - podrias intercambiar la distancia 1-2 con la 2-3, la intensidad de 2-3 es mas grande

00:21:774 (6,1) - blanket nazi

00:21:774 (6,2) - stack? se ve un poquito off comparado al resto

00:22:846 (4) - podrias moverlo un poco mas arriba para q se note bien el movimiento hacia el 5

00:23:764 (2) - beat fuerte en el blanco, circulo quizas? aunque no esta mal asi

00:24:988 (2,3,4,5) - se queda bastante corto en distancia este patron, podrias buffearlo un poco

00:26:519 (3,4,5) - usas bastante frecuentemente este patron, podrias hacerlo un poco mas unico comparado al resto para acentuar estas notas

00:27:284 (4) - creo q necesita mas distania por la intensidad
00:28:815 (6,7,8) - ^

00:31:723 (7,1) - blanket nazi

00:34:325 (1,3) - creo q deberias esquivar estos overlaps asi, no pegan mucho con el mapa en general donde los usas tan poco

00:40:142 (6,1) - same, si quieres mantener el overlap podrias juntarlos un poco mas, no se ve muy bien cuando estan overlappeados tan poco imo (01:19:325 (6,2) - asi i.e.)

00:53:917 (1) - podrias buffear un poco mas esta parte hacia adelante, las notas son bastante mas altas

01:08:305 (7) - vendria la raja un kickslider aqui

01:34:784 (4,5,6) - ctrl+g 5-6, pegaria mas con la intensidad

01:47:488 (8) - escucho un triple en el tick rojo, podrias considerar ponerlo

02:04:937 (1,2,3) - lo siento muy ghost, podrias dejarlo como 1/2 nomas

I could mod it all when it's finished, don't feel like modding last diff rn cause it's pretty nice but streams could be emphasized a bit better

Love this song, gl~
Perdón por haberte hecho modear wachín, pero hicimos Collab con un rework considerando todo al final <3

1. Fix bitrate audio

1. Check aimod
2. 00:04:630 (5,3,6) - Why did you decide to put these notes here, although there is a calm part here 00:00:040 - 00:14:121 - I think in this part you can do without them
3. 00:28:203 (3) - It can be made curved, for the aesthetic part. imo
4. 00:44:121 (1,2) - imo, Make folds on white tics where there is sound?

1. 00:25:142 (3) - can move to x288 y192 00:24:376 (6,2,3) - do strainght line, looks aesthetically
2. 00:58:509 (1,2,3,4) - Have you specifically not made a straight line? 01:25:754 (1,2) - this too
3. 01:02:488 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - I think it's worth to increase the spacing between them
4. 01:42:131 (2,5) - Miss stack?

• 00:21:774 (8,2) - Maybe stack?
  01:43:356 (2,5) - ^

makisokk wrote:

Hello
[General]

1. Fix bitrate audio - Already answered to that, now in description.

[Easy]

1. Check aimod - Ye
2. 00:04:630 (5,3,6) - Why did you decide to put these notes here, although there is a calm part here 00:00:040 - 00:14:121 - I think in this part you can do without them - Because these transitions are more interesting to play than 1st part where simple rhythm fits more.
3. 00:28:203 (3) - It can be made curved, for the aesthetic part. imo - Ye
4. 00:44:121 (1,2) - imo, Make folds on white tics where there is sound? - The concept is good,
   but I prefer my current aesthetic.

[Collab Extra]

1. 00:25:142 (3) - can move to x288 y192 00:24:376 (6,2,3) - do strainght line, looks aesthetically - I prefer having 00:23:764 (2,3) - stacked.
2. 00:58:509 (1,2,3,4) - Have you specifically not made a straight line? 01:25:754 (1,2) - this too - No I'm just a retard.
3. 01:02:488 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - I think it's worth to increase the spacing between them - Better keeping them consistent across the kiai.
4. 01:42:131 (2,5) - Miss stack? - Probably.

[Virtuosu!]

• 00:21:774 (8,2) - Maybe stack? - Nah would break the flow too much.
  01:43:356 (2,5) - ^ - K

Sorry short mod
Good luck with map
I like this streams

Xayler wrote:

I wonder how I got here. :thinking:

General
As the song starts pretty early then is audioleadin maybe needed? - Explained you why not anymore, so no needed.

Virtuosu!
00:36:162 (3,4) - Imo 4 isn't that much emphasized here, but it would be nicer it would. I can only recommend ctrl+g to 00:36:468 (4) - this slider, but it would break the flow with next stream though. - I moved 00:36:162 (3) - away a bit, it works nicely.
01:40:908 (2,3,4) - This one is really small, but I'd rotate that slider by 5 so the movement from 2 to 3 wont feel that cramped. - Rofl k why not.
02:13:050 (5,6) - I'm sure that you wont agree with that one, but rotating the slider -10 would improve the movement from circle to slider here. It would break the slider pattern here with that change I think though. - The movement is already nice imo, and indeed the change for killing the entire pattern is not worth.

Collab Extra
00:36:162 (3,1) - That overlap seems not really needed imo, and I'd move 00:36:774 (1) - it just here: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/10559606 - k fine.
00:37:999 - Also it feels weird to not have a circle here as you have 3 beat combos here. Would fit like this: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/10559619 with the structure used here. Also in everywhere else there's a combo of 3, 4 and 1. ( 01:55:142 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4,1) - 02:14:734 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4,1) - ) - Fixed that and now consistent.
00:53:458 (5,6,7,2) - There's really smooth spacing overall in this section and then that comes in. Very low spacing and then a big jump. Would expect spacing like 00:51:468 (1,2,3,4) - here or something like that for those smaller spacing ones. - Reduced the jump.
01:36:774 (1,2,3,4) - For example here it works as it builds up here again.
01:41:060 (3,4,5,6,1) - That was really bad to play at first try and I didn't even see the triplet, doesn't flow really good as well. Maybe something like this: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/10559674 ? Makes a great circular flow. - Just simple stacking here is enough.
01:43:968 (5,6,1) - Is this triplet spacing intended to be smaller here than 01:41:519 (5,6,1) - here? - Now it's just a small spaced triplet so is okay.
Also a spinner at the end would be nice like in every other diff. - Was frac choice but ye it's nice.

It's getting late here so I may continue it if I have anything else to share!

YukiZura- wrote:

yay modv1 :eyes:

[Virtuosu!]
00:11:825 (5,6,7) - isnt this flow a bit weird , 00:11:978 (6,7) - i'd ctrl+g this for better flow and better emphasis on this slider 00:12:284 (1) - - Funny, I did that just by reading the 1st part of your suggestion.

[collab extra]
01:41:366 (4,5,6,1) - for me i found this is very uncomforrtable to play , also this patern feel like sudden cuz you didnt do this until , i guess it is already late to introduce that patern tbh xD - Yeah changed for a simple stack.
01:56:366 (1) - i think you should put a note here and start the spinner on the blue tick , feel like it need to be click xD - zzz k due to Xayler mod.

[Hard]
00:57:591 (1,2,3,4) - how about extend all of this reverse to blue tick , cuz there sound too on those - They do indeed, but would be a bit too hard and kill the spread if I do that.
01:12:284 (2,1) - this tiny overlap looks ugly hehe xd - The first slider is fully gone when it happens, so you won't see it in game.
01:17:182 (1,2,3,4) - same here - Same tbh.
01:21:315 (2) - i think this fits better with two circle instead of slider to cover the strong soung here 01:21:315 - 01:21:468 - - Hmmmm it could work indeed, but both sounds seems linked so I prefer a slider to represente them. Also cute pattern smth but yeah.
01:32:948 (7,1) - triplet here? sound there tho quite strong to ignore owo - Okay faire enough.

thats all , good map cant say much owo

• 
  pls fix ur mp3 bitrate,or u can use this mp3 : http://puu.sh/zRlAB/3732523716.rar

• 
  00:06:162 (3,1) - blanket pls owo
  00:19:631 (1,2) - better blanket oh (not nazi mod!)
  00:22:999 (4) - maybe make it x:292 y:172 for a great circle between 00:22:693 (3,1) - these objects
  00:25:142 (3,1) - better stack pls
  00:28:203 (1) - can be omitted this object a little lower in order to show a small gap between 00:27:897 (3) - and (1) (for difference in distance)
  00:51:162 (7) - x:484 y:120 and 00:51:468 (1) - x:296 y:124 i think looks better (imo)
  00:58:432 (4,1) - make a smoother transition between circles
  01:25:294 (5) - make a curve? https://puu.sh/zRkV7/b1a9f1ceeb.jpg
  01:53:917 (1) - why this slider repeats only once? it looks weird and unclear!
  02:11:978 (4) - x:180 y:104

• 
  00:48:407 (3,4) - make the distance the same between objects
  02:07:233 (9) - make two circles or make it a curve for a smooth transition to 02:07:386 (1) -

• 
  00:23:917 (4,5) - can be done the same direction with 00:23:305 (3) - ? http://puu.sh/zRliK/5b02856232.jpg
  00:25:754 (4,6) - same ^
  00:41:519 (8,1) - maybe blanket?
  02:08:000 (2,3) - make them the same https://puu.sh/zRlni/73b87214c8.jpg example : 02:11:061 (4,5) -

• 00:30:346 (3,5) - maybe stack them?
  01:03:713 (1,2) - blanket pls

• 
  02:15:959 (3) - Nozhomi's slider (:
  pretty cool diff owo

Gordon123 wrote:

heey from my q ^^

[General]

• 
  pls fix ur mp3 bitrate,or u can use this mp3 : http://puu.sh/zRlAB/3732523716.rar - Look at description.

[Collab Extra]

• 
  00:22:999 (4) - maybe make it x:292 y:172 for a great circle between 00:22:693 (3,1) - these objects - Nah I want that emphasis for snare and stack with 00:24:070 (4) -
  00:28:203 (1) - can be omitted this object a little lower in order to show a small gap between 00:27:897 (3) - and (1) (for difference in distance) - The NC make it easier to get, and people from that lvl won't have any issue reading that rhythm change.
  00:51:162 (7) - x:484 y:120 and 00:51:468 (1) - x:296 y:124 i think looks better (imo) - 1st one yes, 2nd one no that's way to down on the grind and pattern.
  00:58:432 (4,1) - make a smoother transition between circles - That's the point of not doing it smooth, to emphasis the rhythm acceleration.
  01:25:294 (5) - make a curve? https://puu.sh/zRkV7/b1a9f1ceeb.jpg - That's the kind of pattern I like, it flows well and looks cute.
  01:53:917 (1) - why this slider repeats only once? it looks weird and unclear! - Is it ? Unclear I don't think, weird that's questionnable. And why this slider couldn't be done only one time ?
  02:11:978 (4) - x:180 y:104 - Stack with 02:10:754 (5) -

[Hard]

• 
  00:25:754 (4,6) - same ^ - Nah I like that different direction to match the speedup of the song.
  00:41:519 (8,1) - maybe blanket? - Never intended to be blanket.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Good Luck

bigfrog wrote:

hi, m4m from pm :>

[Genera]

1. seems fine

[Easy]

1. 00:37:386 (2) - maybe can try this pattern - So your idea is nice indeed, but since both sliders cover the same type of sound, I want them to stay the same.
   
2. 00:46:111 (3,1,2) - make the same distance between seems more neat imo - Yes but distance spacing rip so no.
   
3. 00:49:019 (1,3) - blanket? looks nice :> - Wasn't intended to be blanket so no need to.
4. 01:09:836 (3) - i guess the red dot can be put at the curve place of the slider, 01:10:448 - I put it here to fit the drum hit here like on the start.
5. 02:08:612 (3,4) - seems more fit to use a long slider & circle in this part imo xD it's fine to use two slider too tho - Yeah could work, but will keep consistency with 01:58:816 (3,4) - .

[Normal]

1. 00:24:223 (4,3) - stack? just suggestion lol - Would kill all the patterns for not much so nah I won't.
2. 01:27:897 (6) - i think it's more fit to use a slider here to emphasize the tight rhythm :> - Imo would be a bit too hard, we'll see if more complain about it.
3. 01:44:122 (4) - hmm i'm not sure but a little stack the blood strip while playing -wat
4. 02:07:387 (1) - same as 01:44:122 (4) -wat

[Hard]

1. 02:08:000 (2,3) - parallel? - They are, unless you mean parallel the other way but no they're nice like that.

[Collab Extra]
i may give all subjective suggestion so feel free to just reply rejected lol

1. 00:12:131 (4) - stack on 00:11:060 (1) - head? - I feel like flow would be too broken.
2. 00:28:050 - hmm feel a little pity to make a blank here ;u; - There's nothing interesting to play here, and that small blank emphasis more the next sound.
3. 00:48:713 (5,6,7,8,1) - i guess this pattern can be placed better by moving 00:49:019 (1) - to the correct place, i think you want to make the flow to - Tell me the correct place next time XD
   00:49:172 (2,3) - so i also recommend to put (2,3) to 00:48:254 (3) - tail :3 - Don't like the flow it create and ruin spacing.
4. 01:34:019 (5,6) - ctrl+g the place? same reason as 00:41:978 (2,3) - Imo don't work this time.
5. 01:56:213 (1,2) - umm seems very confused ;u; maybe just to me.. - It just follow the movement from before, nothing hard.

[Virtuosu!]
sry i'm not good at modding high star diff but i'll try xD

1. 00:27:284 (5) - ummm seems not very beauty for me maybe can try this way - Will end out of screen and ruin the flow.
   
2. 00:37:386 (6,7) - using stream here maybe more fit this diff imo lol - There's no stream possible here, only 1212 and I don't want that.
3. 01:40:448 (1,3) - blanket? - It is already.

that all i guess xD and i think maybe you can check the hitsound by looking through whole map :3
GL for rank!!

1. Fine

1. 00:17:182 (1) - The speed-up on this slider comes a bit abrupt as it's head still follows the piano like 00:14:733 (1,2,3) - and whatnot, and it's not obvious if it's supposed to follow the increasing sound in the background. Imo just keeping the same speed here as the previous sliders would work better.
2. 00:26:519 (3,1) - Add soft-whistle to both of these? For the high pitched piano.
3. 00:36:774 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - Consider something like this maybe? https://files.catbox.moe/kg7B7b.png It feels odd to have (6) as a slider when there's an added emphasis for the heads on (5,7) in the music, and the stream using 1/4's would emphasize the stronger drum-sounds better as well.
4. 00:41:672 (1) - Possibly lower SV for this, then increase it for 00:42:897 (1) - , to fit with how you've been increasing/decreasing SV based on pitch of that noisething?
5. 00:57:591 (1) - I would change this to 2 notes instead, as at this point you'll be hitting every piano-note at 00:57:897 (1,1,1,1,1,1) - .
6. 00:58:815 - Nice stream.
7. 01:19:172 (4) - This is kinda close to (3) and could look like a 1/4, so maybe space it out a bit more.
8. 01:20:856 (1) - Well same things as previous part, so if you decide to do that, then do the same here.
9. 01:44:887 (3,4,5,1) - Same whistles as 00:26:519, and if you didn't do that, at least add a whistle on (4) for consistency I guess.
10. 01:55:142 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - Hey look it's the same thing again, so apply here too if you did the previous one.
11. 02:00:040 (1,2,3,4,5) - I feel like this rhythm would be more appropriate considering the added drums in this section: https://files.catbox.moe/buu7TB.png

1. 00:07:386 (4) - Maybe ctrl+g and rotate it like this? https://files.catbox.moe/nb85sB.png The more linear flow of the pattern leads better into the slider this way.
2. 00:16:570 (2) - Move the end to 371;188 to line up the slider-body with (1)?
3. 00:26:978 (1,2,3) - Uhm? If this is intentional, it doesn't look like it. Would just space this regularly.
4. 00:28:050 - Just having a gap here is pretty weird, and also you don't really use these kind of pauses in other parts of this section, and there's still a piano going on that note. Consider adding a note here, maybe by stacking it on 00:28:203 (1) - , then ctrl+g'ing 00:27:897 (3,4) - If not, at least do something with the spacing as the sudden 1/1 kind of comes out of nowhere in a sea of 1/2's.
5. 00:31:876 (1) - This slidershape looks kind of out of place compared to like every other slider. Consider just making it one of those round sliders, since you've been using fairly curved sliders in general through the map.
6. 00:36:774 - I get that it's on the sharper drum that you jump out, but at least imo this should really be NC'd as https://files.catbox.moe/5A0lyC.png, and grouping them with stacks on the (1,2)'s while not on the (3,4), if that makes sense. Basically like this https://files.catbox.moe/xXOCx7.png (as in the logic, not the pattern; that's just some random placing I did for the screenshot.) If you want to keep your current logic going, I'd place 00:37:999 (2) - in the stack as well, since it has the same sound as the other ones, instead of this random note out in the middle of nowhere.
7. 00:56:825 (1) - Not really a need for an NC here, and is inconsistent with your previous NCing.
8. 00:56:825 (1,2,3,4,5) - Also, maybe fix the star pattern so it's an even star? It kinda just looks sloppy righ tnow.
9. 01:03:407 (3) - Make this a note stacked on 01:03:713 (1) - like you do at 01:00:958 (3,1) - and 01:10:754 (3,1) - ?
10. 01:27:897 (5,6,7,8,1) - Straight line pls
11. 01:43:968 (5,6,1) - Maybe point these in the direction of (4) so they lead into the slider better?
12. 01:46:417 - Same as before
13. 01:49:019 (6) - NC
14. 01:55:142 - Same as before
15. 02:06:009 - Same as before
16. 02:06:392 - Would add a note here to follow the drums more properly, since you already have 02:06:698 (3) -, so the pattern is following the drums.
17. 02:10:295 (2,3) - Kind of a random triple that isn't really following anything.
18. 02:14:733 - Well, same as before, NC patterning and whatnot should be 4-4-1 imo.

1. 00:23:764 (2) - Would shorten this to a 1/2 starting at 00:23:917 - , then adding a note at 00:23:764 - to follow the drums here.
2. 00:30:040 (3,4) - I get the extended sliders, but personally would prefer that you don't skip the drum at 00:30:193 - . You also don't extend them at 01:48:407 (3,4) - or 02:07:999 (3,4) - , so it would be more consistent as well.
3. 00:33:560 (2) - Same as 00:23:764
4. 00:37:999 (1,2,3,4) - Slightly increase SV for every slider? Since the music is increasing in pitch and whatnot.
5. 00:38:917 (4) - Well, I guess it's not really a problem, but I do think it would be better to either reduce repeats by 1, or moving this closer to 00:39:223 (1) - (or the other way around). Same with other big 1/4 jumps after repeats like 00:59:733 (4,1) - and 01:02:794 (2,3) - etc.
6. 00:49:325 (2) - Turn this into two notes to be consistent with 00:51:774 (2,3) - ?
7. 01:36:774 (1,2,3,4) - Same as 00:37:999
8. 01:42:131 (2,3) - drum-hitnormal on (2) sliderend and (3)
9. 01:46:876 (2) - Shorten this to 01:47:029 - and add a note at 01:47:106 - so you don't skip the piano sound at 01:47:029?
10. 01:56:366 (1,2,3,4) - Same as 00:37:999
11. 02:14:733 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3) - Could you make this star more star-like xd

1. 00:27:284 (3,4,5) - Move these so that (2,3,5) form a triangle like this https://files.catbox.moe/xnBorh.png ? Will also make spacing between 00:27:131 (2,3) - look more consistent with 00:26:519 (6,1) - and 00:27:284 (3,4) -
2. 00:37:999 (6) - NC here, since you similarly break your NCing pattern at 00:28:203 - and every other place where you go into like a new section of the music.
3. 00:48:713 (7) - Everything should probably have drum-hitnormal on this repeatslider.
4. 00:51:009 (8) - Would stack this on (7) instead so you get two doubles rather than a single + a triple stack.
5. 00:52:386 (3) - Curve this? Looks better in the overall pattern imo https://files.catbox.moe/73Om8p.png
6. 01:11:978 (1) - Remove NC for consistency.
7. 01:27:897 (7) - Same as 00:48:713
8. 01:30:040 (7,8,9,10) - Same as 00:51:009
9. 01:37:080 (2) - Curve this as well? It's like the only straight slider in the combo, so it kinda stands out.
10. 02:01:877 (5) - drum-hitnormal on end
11. 02:03:714 (5,7) - Missing normal-hitnormal on (5) end and (7) repeat.
12. 02:11:826 (7) - Missing normal-hitnormal on end here too. Might be some hitsounds that're missing that I missed (lol nice sentence) so you should probably just listen through it and add whatever's not there.
13. 02:13:510 (5) - ^
14. 02:14:733 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - Well, as you probably figured from the other diffs, I think (4) should stand alone then have (5,6) as a double stack instead: https://files.catbox.moe/h48nqv.png
15. 02:20:856 (3) - I think it would be appropriate to NC here too, since the piano gets significantly stronger and you break the pattern of those repeatsliders here.

1. 00:57:591 (4) - Maybe move this up a bit so it's not as close to 00:56:366 (1) -
2. 01:34:478 (1) - I get that the spinner is following that sound that's increasing in volume and whatnot, but eh, the piano melody here is really strong and in the center, so I think it would be better to map this part rather than just throwing in a spinner.
3. 02:00:653 (2) - Missing normal-hitnormal on end.
4. 02:13:510 (3) - ^
5. 02:19:631 (1,3) - From the way the anchor points look it seems like they're supposed to be symmetrical, but they kinda aren't (and also I personally don't think they look that great, nor do they really fit with the general slider-design of the diff). You also kind of don't capture the difference in intensity for the piano here, like you do in the other diffs. I'd suggest just remapping the pattern in some other way tbf, unless you really, really like how it looks xd

1. 00:22:080 (1) - 00:24:529 (1) - 00:31:876 (1) - etc. should have a soft-hitwhistle on their ends for that piano note. Also makes the hitsounding not sound as boring/bland since you have to skip a lot of the drum-sounds that you use in higher diffs.
2. 01:00:040 (3) - ctrl+g this? The flow from (1,2) suggests entering the slider from the top for a newer player.
3. 01:46:571 (3) - Curve this so it makes a circle with 01:47:795 (1) - around (4)?
4. 02:20:856 (4) - I would personally NC here too just because it's so different from the other 3 sliders

1. 00:23:764 (2) - Would shorten this to a 1/2 starting at 00:23:917 - , then adding a note at 00:23:764 - to follow the drums here.
2. 00:30:040 (3,4) - I get the extended sliders, but personally would prefer that you don't skip the drum at 00:30:193 - . You also don't extend them at 01:48:407 (3,4) - or 02:07:999 (3,4) - , so it would be more consistent as well.
3. 00:33:560 (2) - Same as 00:23:764
4. 00:37:999 (1,2,3,4) - Slightly increase SV for every slider? Since the music is increasing in pitch and whatnot. I prefer to keep it like this, not really fan of the idea of SV changes x_x
5. 00:38:917 (4) - Well, I guess it's not really a problem, but I do think it would be better to either reduce repeats by 1, or moving this closer to 00:39:223 (1) - (or the other way around). Same with other big 1/4 jumps after repeats like 00:59:733 (4,1) - and 01:02:794 (2,3) - etc.
6. 00:49:325 (2) - Turn this into two notes to be consistent with 00:51:774 (2,3) - ?
7. 01:36:774 (1,2,3,4) - Same as 00:37:999 Same as above
8. 01:42:131 (2,3) - drum-hitnormal on (2) sliderend and (3)
9. 01:46:876 (2) - Shorten this to 01:47:029 - and add a note at 01:47:106 - so you don't skip the piano sound at 01:47:029? I really like how this pattern is doing, and I think it's reprensenting the song in my own way, even if it skip a piano sound.
10. 01:56:366 (1,2,3,4) - Same as 00:37:999 Same as above
11. 02:14:733 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3) - Could you make this star more star-like xd