If you can't even establish what proper alternating is then you have no right to talk about efficiency. It's like a person talking about how hamburgers should be made or else it's not a hamburger when all he does is eat and didn't even bother to learn how to make them.Drezi wrote:
The whole point was to show the advantage of fully alternating those transitions, not to debate which qualifies as "proper alternating". And there are no mental disadvantages to either.
If you don't even know the already obvious mental disadvantage of said playstyle (body part that is used/not used is directly proportional to mental strain) then you have no right to talk about efficiency.