you mean this?Drezi wrote:
why don't you read what I've posted??? how hard is it to understand that it's not the case
X | Y | X | - | Y | X | Y | - | X | Y | X |
tap --- tap --- --- tap --- --- tap --- tap
??? --- 270 ------ 180 ------ 180 --- 270
You seem to be blatantly ignoring the "-" part so it's not really valid. Alternating is to evenly divide the strain on a single pattern between 2 fingers accompanied with mental disadvantages. XYX-XYX is mixed with singletap/improper alternate because of X-X? Nah, it's still proper alternating as long as the perfect 1:1 (with the exceptions being odd numbered patterns singles,triples,quints etc. and the finger you should use at the end note is the one you started with) K1:K2 ratio is followed on a single pattern.
THIS is improper alternating
X | Y | X | X | X | X | Y | Y | X | Y | X |