hey xfrac, m4m for Redshift o/
That's it, overall the map looks good. It's interesting to see both styles mixed in one map :p
Good luck for you guys o/
Seraphim
00:03:606 - you could add a note here to follow the first keyboard sound. Also it would make a "symmetric" distance between 00:02:748 - and 00:03:606 - , which is the same as 00:03:948 - to 00:04:806 - , that would make it play better.
00:06:520 - and 00:06:863 - add a don to keep up with the flow. the lack of a note on the big white line, while there's a stronger sound than 00:06:691 (5) - , makes it somewhat strange imo.
00:09:091 - same as 00:03:606 - .
00:19:549 (27,28) - those two have different pitches in the sound, would be interesting if you changed to d k or k d to give emphasis on that. kind of how you did here 00:22:291 (41,42) - .
00:43:549 (47) - kat here to follow the snare? or 00:43:377 (46) - to kat. I know you haven't been doing kats on every snare but this is the only quad on this part with more than 2 following notes of the same colour, which makes it stand out in a bad way imo.
01:09:606 - idk if it was intended but you miss some drum sounds on this part (here exactly 01:10:206 - ) and the triples also don't follow the melody so well. I'd suggest doing something like this (the image goes from 01:09:606 - to 01:10:977 -
01:35:834 (87,88) - maybe Ctrl+G so the kat plays when the keyboard(?) sound plays too.
02:45:092 (552) - try this note as kat to follow the guitar sound.
03:27:091 (22) - maybe this as don since it's a heavy beat. If you keep it as kat it wouldn't be as significant because the previous 3 notes are kat too. Another option would be to keep that as kat and change this 03:26:920 (21) - to don.
03:46:120 (138) - same as above. 03:46:291 (139) - Would be stronger if the previous note is from the opposite colour.
04:31:549 (465) - this as kat? the heavy beat stops in the note before this one and the vocal that begins here is high pitch, seems like a nice place for a kat.
If you agree with the above then this to kat too 04:42:520 (550) - to keep consitency (would keep consistency with this too 04:53:491 (636) - ).
00:06:520 - and 00:06:863 - add a don to keep up with the flow. the lack of a note on the big white line, while there's a stronger sound than 00:06:691 (5) - , makes it somewhat strange imo.
00:09:091 - same as 00:03:606 - .
00:19:549 (27,28) - those two have different pitches in the sound, would be interesting if you changed to d k or k d to give emphasis on that. kind of how you did here 00:22:291 (41,42) - .
00:43:549 (47) - kat here to follow the snare? or 00:43:377 (46) - to kat. I know you haven't been doing kats on every snare but this is the only quad on this part with more than 2 following notes of the same colour, which makes it stand out in a bad way imo.
01:09:606 - idk if it was intended but you miss some drum sounds on this part (here exactly 01:10:206 - ) and the triples also don't follow the melody so well. I'd suggest doing something like this (the image goes from 01:09:606 - to 01:10:977 -
01:35:834 (87,88) - maybe Ctrl+G so the kat plays when the keyboard(?) sound plays too.
02:45:092 (552) - try this note as kat to follow the guitar sound.
03:27:091 (22) - maybe this as don since it's a heavy beat. If you keep it as kat it wouldn't be as significant because the previous 3 notes are kat too. Another option would be to keep that as kat and change this 03:26:920 (21) - to don.
03:46:120 (138) - same as above. 03:46:291 (139) - Would be stronger if the previous note is from the opposite colour.
04:31:549 (465) - this as kat? the heavy beat stops in the note before this one and the vocal that begins here is high pitch, seems like a nice place for a kat.
If you agree with the above then this to kat too 04:42:520 (550) - to keep consitency (would keep consistency with this too 04:53:491 (636) - ).
That's it, overall the map looks good. It's interesting to see both styles mixed in one map :p
Good luck for you guys o/