It's a spot-on thingy in small tubes, just like you said. That one tube is enough to kill a kitten, as it's intended for dogs around 8 to 15 kilo, and the poor thing has 400 grams. Thankfully, I actually put just the right amount.
forum
ITT 2: We post shit that is neither funny nor interesting
posted
Total Posts
56,186
who the heck came up with that name anywayFoxtrot wrote:
maine coon is a pretty hilarious name
Very tempted to drop a let-me-google-that-for-you link, since you're apparently too lazy to do a 3sec search.
The first two links immediately talk about theories surrounding the name of the cat.
One is that the name originated from a British captain called Charles Coon, who apparently brought the cats from Europe to New England, America. They were apparently named "Coon's cats".
The other theory is that the brown tabby pattern of the MCs is similar to that of a racoon, hence the name.
Whether or not any of that is actually true is none of my concern, but it's what you can find faster than the time it needed to type that post of yours.
The first two links immediately talk about theories surrounding the name of the cat.
One is that the name originated from a British captain called Charles Coon, who apparently brought the cats from Europe to New England, America. They were apparently named "Coon's cats".
The other theory is that the brown tabby pattern of the MCs is similar to that of a racoon, hence the name.
Whether or not any of that is actually true is none of my concern, but it's what you can find faster than the time it needed to type that post of yours.
that was a rhetorical question though but thanks for the trivia anyway
I did it exactly because I know it was. You don't just diss a beautiful cat name - not when there are names like "Cymric", "Selkirk Rex" and "Turkish Van" to name a few.
The most beautiful breed name imo is Nebelung.
The most beautiful breed name imo is Nebelung.
aurani, are you autistic about cats
See, that's not how it works.
Please explain to me what that even means, as I'm not entirely able to understand what the fuck "being autistic about cats" should be.Foxtrot wrote:
aurani, are you autistic about cats
Solidarity doesn't give me fucks.
Why the hell did the meteor shower rain,
it should've gave me Geminids.
what the fuck is a natural lifestyle,
Why the hell did the meteor shower rain,
it should've gave me Geminids.
what the fuck is a natural lifestyle,
B1rd wrote:
Creating an ideal Libertarian society is really fun.
this triggered my cat loving friend HARDFoxtrot wrote:
maine coon is a pretty hilarious name
"hilarious"
Did you mean
1. extremely amusing
2. merry
- Generesis
Did you mean
1. extremely amusing
2. merry
- Generesis
Nice one Bird, you began the summoning of Maho, so naturally we must speed it up a bit.
i chuckled.
EDIT: I really need to learn how to shut the fuck up sometimes
niceAurani wrote:
Nice one Bird, you began the summoning of Maho, so naturally we must speed it up a bit.
take a deep breath and relax ok ??Raspberriel wrote:
scratch that, NATO should've bombed both of them into oblivion
i know you dont really mean those things and you'll probably feel the need to apologize later so let me just say it's ok to let your anger out, but you do it in a very rough way so please take it easy on yourself
this is now a nice thread. only nice posts are allowed on here. i hope you all have a great day today! <3
You're far too forgiving.Aomi wrote:
take a deep breath and relax ok ??Raspberriel wrote:
scratch that, NATO should've bombed both of them into oblivion
i know you dont really mean those things and you'll probably feel the need to apologize later so let me just say it's ok to let your anger out, but you do it in a very rough way so please take it easy on yourself
When someone goes full mongrel, they tend to not learn from it and stay mongrels forever.
how the hell do channers find joy in putting others down anyway
it just drains every good feeling out of me
I just need more goddamn self-control not to look at stuff I know is gonna make me mad -- especially YouTube comment sections, fuck everyone in them
that's actually what set me off this time
*sigh*
it just drains every good feeling out of me
I just need more goddamn self-control not to look at stuff I know is gonna make me mad -- especially YouTube comment sections, fuck everyone in them
that's actually what set me off this time
*sigh*
i know fam. they're a bunch of sadistic losers anyway myself includedRaspberriel wrote:
how the hell do channers find joy in putting others down anyway
it just drains every good feeling out of me
nevermind that, that devil set pana you have is a total blissRaspberriel wrote:
EDIT: I really need to learn how to shut the fuck up sometimes
you're too mature for your age, shitAomi wrote:
take a deep breath and relax ok ??Raspberriel wrote:
scratch that, NATO should've bombed both of them into oblivion
i know you dont really mean those things and you'll probably feel the need to apologize later so let me just say it's ok to let your anger out, but you do it in a very rough way so please take it easy on yourself
RT is a source of Russian propaganda. Don't forget that.
oh wait, I forgot that B1rd has no principles as long as he agrees with the content that a source is publishing. Russian govt-funded news service that frequently publishes biased reporting for the sake of Russian political agenda? Nah, he doesn't hate big government spreading lies anymore. How could they be WRONG if he AGREES with what they're saying?
sad!
oh wait, I forgot that B1rd has no principles as long as he agrees with the content that a source is publishing. Russian govt-funded news service that frequently publishes biased reporting for the sake of Russian political agenda? Nah, he doesn't hate big government spreading lies anymore. How could they be WRONG if he AGREES with what they're saying?
sad!
Usually I'd ask where your proof is regarding the claim, but it's already been established that RT is 125% Russian propaganda.
Did it before it was cool.
the beard trend/thing
If you get mad over some comment on the Internet you should go see a psychiatrist
Klocuch12 wrote:
If you get mad over some comment on the Internet you should go see a psychiatrist
I mean, it's not just "some comment on the Internet", is it. I used to enjoy debating B1rd quite a lot, and seeing his opinions on things would be interesting. Sadly, his personality seems to have gone away completely, replaced by being a rightwing propaganda mouthpiece- either for libertarianism in general, but sometimes worse.
I just don't like seeing someone who seems to have enjoyed framing themselves of being critical- now swallowing whatever emotionally-charged crap that "their side" is giving them and regurgitating it in a misguided attempt at doing a good thing (people generally spread their ideology because they see it as an improvement, after all). He's chosen to reject logic, balanced criticism, etc in favour of just repeating propaganda. There's no personality there anymore, nothing worth conversing with. And that is why I say it is sad.
he has become a /pol/tardDaddyCoolVipper wrote:
He's chosen to reject logic, balanced criticism, etc in favour of just repeating propaganda. There's no personality there anymore, nothing worth conversing with. And that is why I say it is sad.
holy shit i feel sorry for him
DaddyCoolVipper wrote:
Klocuch12 wrote:
If you get mad over some comment on the Internet you should go see a psychiatrist
I mean, it's not just "some comment on the Internet", is it. I used to enjoy debating B1rd quite a lot, and seeing his opinions on things would be interesting. Sadly, his personality seems to have gone away completely, replaced by being a rightwing propaganda mouthpiece- either for libertarianism in general, but sometimes worse.
I just don't like seeing someone who seems to have enjoyed framing themselves of being critical- now swallowing whatever emotionally-charged crap that "their side" is giving them and regurgitating it in a misguided attempt at doing a good thing (people generally spread their ideology because they see it as an improvement, after all). He's chosen to reject logic, balanced criticism, etc in favour of just repeating propaganda. There's no personality there anymore, nothing worth conversing with. And that is why I say it is sad.
Raspberriel wrote:
I know is gonna make me mad -- especially YouTube comment sections, fuck everyone in them
that's actually what set me off this time
*sigh*
oh god
In defence of his video, the thing in it is a fact. "No-go zones" are quite real in Sweden and the number keeps rising every year.DaddyCoolVipper wrote:
I mean, it's not just "some comment on the Internet", is it. I used to enjoy debating B1rd quite a lot, and seeing his opinions on things would be interesting. Sadly, his personality seems to have gone away completely, replaced by being a rightwing propaganda mouthpiece- either for libertarianism in general, but sometimes worse.
I just don't like seeing someone who seems to have enjoyed framing themselves of being critical- now swallowing whatever emotionally-charged crap that "their side" is giving them and regurgitating it in a misguided attempt at doing a good thing (people generally spread their ideology because they see it as an improvement, after all). He's chosen to reject logic, balanced criticism, etc in favour of just repeating propaganda. There's no personality there anymore, nothing worth conversing with. And that is why I say it is sad.
I don't know if there are 23 of them, but I KNOW there are at least 7.
As for your post:
Trust me, if we went by the order of people who are "emotionally charged", this place would have a couple of people who I can reliably claim are somewhat neutral.
What do we do with the other 90 percent? Try to show and teach them how to not be idiots? I've been doing that for 3 years now and all I seem to be achieving is damaging my own reputation by even attempting to correct them.
The best course of action seems to be to simply laugh at their idiocy and enjoy life instead of worrying about it too much.
When it comes to Bird, however, I can't agree with you. I'm not at all on his side, as he has some seriously insane ideas, but he's VERY much friendly and listens to whatever I have to say, even going as far as recognising his mistakes if they're shown to him.
That's far more than can be said about some other window lickers here.
I really can't say I've had the same experience. He seems to use the standard impossible-to-converse-with tactics of only listening to other viewpoints for the sole purpose of collecting more ammunition for future arguments. Maybe you're simply seeing him agree with you and re-wording his arguments to be a bit more clear rather than actually admitting faults and changing perspectives, although maybe it just happens so rarely that I haven't seen it. We don't talk too much, after all.
I would be very careful mistaking eloquence with a lack of emotional arguments, though. You can say "fuck this shithead!" or you can write a paragraph of how you respectfully disagree with their opinion- sure, one is a lot preferable to the other for the sake of polite discourse, but both of those people are capable of being just as emotionally-based when they make their statements. It's simply a lot harder to notice when they're written more politely, I guess you could say.
also, as an add-on: There is no such thing as "no go zones" in Sweden. There are some shit, low-income areas that need some more police attention and such, though.
My question to you, and to all who believe that propaganda line, is this- what country is without terrible, low income, high crime rate areas? I'm sure every city in the world has some places like that, never mind entire countries. The fact that Sweden is specifically attacked is INCREDIBLY vitriolic and it sickens me to see that kind of thing cited as evidence of anything. There's a case to be made for refugees' failure to integrate, but the arguments are almost never made in a fair manner, instead trying to use Sweden as some big example of how refugees ruin everything and/or how Swedish welfare is "delusional" or whatever other stupidity they're trying to push.
I would be very careful mistaking eloquence with a lack of emotional arguments, though. You can say "fuck this shithead!" or you can write a paragraph of how you respectfully disagree with their opinion- sure, one is a lot preferable to the other for the sake of polite discourse, but both of those people are capable of being just as emotionally-based when they make their statements. It's simply a lot harder to notice when they're written more politely, I guess you could say.
also, as an add-on: There is no such thing as "no go zones" in Sweden. There are some shit, low-income areas that need some more police attention and such, though.
My question to you, and to all who believe that propaganda line, is this- what country is without terrible, low income, high crime rate areas? I'm sure every city in the world has some places like that, never mind entire countries. The fact that Sweden is specifically attacked is INCREDIBLY vitriolic and it sickens me to see that kind of thing cited as evidence of anything. There's a case to be made for refugees' failure to integrate, but the arguments are almost never made in a fair manner, instead trying to use Sweden as some big example of how refugees ruin everything and/or how Swedish welfare is "delusional" or whatever other stupidity they're trying to push.
You left your freaking bluetooth speakers and we can hear it.
We need to talk.
We need to talk.
I get that you're trying to call me naive for saying that Bird is not as big of a monster as people portray him to be, but trust me, he's not. What I said can be backed up by going back some pages on this thread and reading our discussions.
As for "no-go zones" being merely low income areas, I have some Swedish friends who'd say otherwise (3 of them having even lived there, and they sure as fuck aren't "low income" people).
As for "no-go zones" being merely low income areas, I have some Swedish friends who'd say otherwise (3 of them having even lived there, and they sure as fuck aren't "low income" people).