Hakurei Yoru wrote:
BG好看的
[Hard]
00:01:283 (3,4) - 这两个whistle要不还是压打击点上吧
00:04:050 (5) - 这个可以删了 把后面6叠7上 没什么特别强的音 在Hard里又有点无谓增加难度了
00:18:030 (6,7) - ↑
00:31:137 (2,3,4) - 感觉这里就挺好的……看了一下你上面那里好像要用来踩clap...大概直接删了还不太方便 不然就用这里类似的处理方法吧?
[Insane]
00:08:273 (5) - NC
后面类似的小节都↑
00:35:652 (2) - 这个可以删 毕竟可以突出00:35:215 (1) - 压的两个重音
[Extra]
00:28:225 (1,2,3,4,5) - 这一节用红点挺丑的 <-留
Highest diff is awesome~
其实整个set都很不错拉 要加油!!
都改了都改了 感謝MOD
HeyItsSins
HeyItsSins wrote:
Hi again! another mod from me (I really like the song btw)[Easy]
- 00:11:914 (1,3) - These look a bit too close. This pattern would look a lot better with equal spacing between all objects and not just consecutive ones
- 00:02:302 (4) - This is on an important sound but it flows really well. Since in Easy's and Normal's you use flow to emphasize certain sounds it would be really nice if you could apply that here. Maybe do something like you did on 00:03:904 (3,1) -
- 00:16:574 (1) - Same thing with being on an important sound but flowing pretty well
- 00:30:263 (4) - ^
- 00:25:603 (4) - ^ (I don't want to be repetitive because I'm guessing you get the idea. Please make sure to look through the diff and check for things like this)
- 00:32:885 (1,3) - These two relate even though being on separate and different sounds. Maybe make them relate less?
- 00:29:535 (3,2) - ^
[Normal]
- 00:11:623 (1) - This slider tail lands on a downbeat (Which is an important sound) maybe make a circle on 00:11:914 -
- 00:18:176 (5) - You should keep this stacked with 00:17:594 (3,4) - because the singer's voice does not change till 00:18:322 (6) - and players might confuse 00:18:176 (5) - for a jump or idk
- 00:29:244 (3) - Slider tails lands on a noticeably louder sound try making 00:29:535 - a circle
- 00:02:594 (1,2) - Make these two relate more since they land on similar sounds. Also because you did it on 00:00:264 (1,2) -
- 00:04:632 (6) - Why isn't this stacked with 00:04:341 (5) - ? seems odd because you always have a rhythm like this stacked and there is no important sound on 00:04:632 (6) - for you to make it so different
- 00:15:846 (5) - This should be stacked with 00:15:555 (4) - because again the singer's voice doesn't change till 00:15:992 (6) -
- 00:18:176 (5) - ^
- 00:21:234 (1,2) - These two are on similar sounds maybe make them relate like you did with 00:18:904 (1,2) -
- 00:30:263 (1) - This slider also lands on a downbeat, make a circle on 00:30:555 -
[Hard]
- 00:02:011 (6) - This slider tail lands on an important sound. Make 00:02:302 - a circle?
- 00:10:021 (2,3) - Why aren't these spaced and 00:11:185 (6,7) - are? You seem to be prioritizing the vocals so making 00:10:166 (3) - stacked is very underwhelming
- 00:11:331 (7) - This slider tail is also on a very strong sound. I think you should listen carefully through the diff and fix any sliders that are like this. I don't want to be repetitive and point every single one out but this is a very big issue
- 00:11:768 (8,1) - Again this is very underwhelming for 00:11:914 (1) - since it is the stronger sound try distancing it away from 00:11:768 (8) - like what you did with 00:10:895 (5,6,7) -
- 00:18:030 (6) - Nc here?
- 00:25:894 (1) - Space this away from 00:25:748 (7) - because 00:25:894 (1) - is more of an important sound and spacing emphasis blah blah.. you get it
- 00:36:527 (2,3) - These both have slider tails on important sounds
- Ar 7 for this seems a bit slow imo. Try 8 or 7.5-ish~
[117's Insane]
- 00:01:283 (1) - The slider tail of this lands on a louder vocal. This should be a stack
- 00:05:797 (6) - This is very underwhelmed considering that you are prioritizing vocals. The player jumps to 00:05:652 (4) - and barely has to move to hit 00:05:725 (5,6) - I would consider changing this rhythm to make 00:05:797 (6) - a jump and removing 00:05:725 (5) - basically making it 1/2 rhythm
- 00:03:322 (4,5,6) - Same thing here
- 00:31:283 (2,3,4) - Same
- 00:04:487 (5,6,7,2,3) - Why do these blanket when they are on completely different sounds. This doesn't represent the music well
- 00:04:924 (1,2) - You should make these two relate because they actually are on sounds that are similar. It also would be consistent with what you did previously 00:00:555 (2,3) - for example.
- 00:29:244 (1) - This slider tail is on a louder sound as well I think you should listen carefully through the diff and fix any sliders that are like this. I don't want to be repetitive and point every single one out but this is a very big issue
- 00:29:681 (2,4) - You're prioritizing vocals but the jump to 00:29:681 (2) - from 00:29:244 (1) - is a lot larger than from 00:29:827 (3) - to 00:29:972 (4) - even though 00:29:972 (4) - is a vocal, and a lot louder than 00:29:681 (2) -. I suggest that you make the jump to 00:29:972 (4) - larger so it is clear that you're prioritizing vocals
- 00:04:924 (1,2) - Looking back at this I realized that this rhythm is very odd considering for every other situation 00:04:924 (1) - would be a 3/4 slider. 00:02:594 (1,2) - for example. Since the song doesn't change on the sounds they are mapped on I think it is really odd to suddenly change the rhythm. Try being more consistent?
- 00:08:710 (2) - Be more consistent. This slider tail is on a vocal and a loud one at that. This makes it hard to tell what you're prioritizing so just make it 2 circle
- 00:09:584 (1) - Considering that this a downbeat there is barely any spacing emphasis here at all even though 00:09:584 (1) is louder than 00:09:438 (7) -
- 00:09:875 (2,1) - Why do these blanket when they are on different sounds?
- 00:13:516 (3,4) - 00:13:516 (3) - isn't as loud as 00:13:662 (4) - so why is it's spacing so large
[Extra]
- 00:00:700 (2,3) - You should make the spacing of 00:00:846 (3) - larger instead of the same since you're prioritizing vocals here
- 00:02:011 (7) - The slider tail of this is on a pretty loud sound. Make it 2 circles
- 00:15:992 (9) - Same here
- 00:12:933 (5,8) - Why do these blanket when they are on completely different sounds? Make these relate less
- 00:17:011 (2,3,4,5,6) - These are all the same distance apart, basically implying that the singer sings in the same intensity throughout these notes which isn't the case. Use spacing emphasis to reduce or add spacing appropriately to represent the actual intensity of the singer here.
- 00:18:176 (2,3,4,5,6) - Same here but's it's not as bad
- 00:23:419 (10) - Why is the spacing for this so large? There's no sound that supports spacing as large as this
- 00:22:545 (6) - NC
- 00:10:895 (7) - Same
- 00:05:943 (5,6) - Why are these spaced out so much compared to 00:01:283 (4,5) - even though the song remains around the same intensity in this section? Try nerfing these
- 00:00:700 (2,3) - Same thing. Compare it to 00:02:885 (2,3) -
- 00:36:963 (4) - This is the loudest sound but the spacing is very small compared to 00:36:526 (1,2,3) - Make the spacing larger
[Walao's Extra] Song was a lot shorter than I thought so I got to finish it all today ^^ ; gl! also sorry for the trash mod. I'm really biased in this. Maybe in the future I will improve
- 00:01:283 (1) - This slider tail is on a louder vocal
- 00:02:302 (6) - This is a loud vocal but it is barely emphasized at all because it's stacked. Maybe delete 00:02:230 (5) - and make 00:02:302 (6) - a large jump
- 00:02:594 (1,2) - What's with the sudden change or rhythm from 00:00:264 (1,2) - ?
- 00:03:322 (4,5,6) - You don't have to move to hit 00:03:467 (6) - which is actually an important sound. Make this spaced because right now it's really underwhelming
- 00:05:652 (4,5,6) - Same here
- 00:06:817 (5,6,7) - ^
- 00:05:506 (3) - This is an important sound but has barely any spacing emphasis on it. 00:05:215 (2) - Is spaced farther and isn't as important. I think you should try to space it out more
- 00:08:273 (1) - The slider tail lands on a louder vocals (again)
- 00:05:943 (1) - Same here (But It's less noticeable) I think you should listen carefully through the diff and fix any sliders that are like this. I don't want to be repetitive and point every single one out but this is a very big issue (copy and paste)
- 00:11:914 (1,2) - These are on similar sounds make them relate more
- 00:14:244 (1,2) - Same I'm not going to point all of them out so please make sure to look through this diff and fix any I don't mention
thnak you for modding!!