da
Sneaky little unsnapped notes in the difficulty, probably caused due snapping with the function. Gotta pop the bubble for now.
00:22:959 (69) - goes to 00:22:962 - .
01:05:661 (154,155,156,157) - dddkD sounds really odd. Although you want to have the D at the end I think you could have a pattern that's more intuitive, like kdkkD.
01:21:305 (267) - I'd suggest kkddK for a smoother transistion from kat to don.
03:24:894 (1072) - What about k here? It is complementary to 03:25:170 (1073,1074,1075,1076) - with kkkd.
03:29:863 (1111) - ^
03:51:765 (1279) - I don't find that the music gives anything that you do 03:51:581 (1277,1278,1279) - as kkk while 03:51:213 (1273,1274,1275) - is kkd with an actual light sound at 03:51:397 - . Would change it to d.
03:56:458 - Would you really skip this beat? I find it more natural to connect these two combos together.
03:59:403 - ^
04:29:679 (1594,1595) - Either connect the two combo streams or remove these two notes, it currently sounds pretty undone and we either have a longer stream or a break between the streams.
05:23:943 (1964) - It sounds more consistent to me if you map that with kkdkkdk, just check what you think about that.
Also had a quick talk to the mapper and they want to re-check the timing on their own to fix every single timing issue I haven't point out now.
Sneaky little unsnapped notes in the difficulty, probably caused due snapping with the function. Gotta pop the bubble for now.
00:22:959 (69) - goes to 00:22:962 - .
01:05:661 (154,155,156,157) - dddkD sounds really odd. Although you want to have the D at the end I think you could have a pattern that's more intuitive, like kdkkD.
01:21:305 (267) - I'd suggest kkddK for a smoother transistion from kat to don.
03:24:894 (1072) - What about k here? It is complementary to 03:25:170 (1073,1074,1075,1076) - with kkkd.
03:29:863 (1111) - ^
03:51:765 (1279) - I don't find that the music gives anything that you do 03:51:581 (1277,1278,1279) - as kkk while 03:51:213 (1273,1274,1275) - is kkd with an actual light sound at 03:51:397 - . Would change it to d.
03:56:458 - Would you really skip this beat? I find it more natural to connect these two combos together.
03:59:403 - ^
04:29:679 (1594,1595) - Either connect the two combo streams or remove these two notes, it currently sounds pretty undone and we either have a longer stream or a break between the streams.
05:23:943 (1964) - It sounds more consistent to me if you map that with kkdkkdk, just check what you think about that.
Also had a quick talk to the mapper and they want to re-check the timing on their own to fix every single timing issue I haven't point out now.