Thanks for moddingJUDYDANNY wrote:
Hello, via M4M
[Timing]
uum... much red zone...changed all
- 00:21:785 (24,25) - unsnapped, if you want to put there, add more reds.
- 00:31:640 (42,43) - I think its same snapped with 44. try move to ealier red ( 00:31:670 - )?
And will confirm with other modders as well about the timing
[Akatsuki]Sorry, I still cant agree bubble.changed the above two
- 00:01:641 - ~~ 00:11:523 - , remove all? I think its not neccesarry.
I think it's more natural to map the intro in order to bring the effect of vocal after that,no change XDD- 00:14:699 (7,8) - dk ? vocal is too lower begins.
fixed.- 00:23:522 - no k , 00:24:228 - no d? to make a consistent. needs to more cleaned mappping as calmer.
I think the vocal here is quite dominant,removing them is not good...- 00:38:345 - maybe not bad to add finish. instrument needs more power for build up imo.
- 00:41:169 - , 00:43:992 - same as above.
changed all And also change 00:41:169 - to D- 00:44:521 - , 00:44:521 - add k please..? too lack of hitsounds comparing with before patterns.
sure ><- 00:52:374 - remove? over a bit imo.
yes you're right...- 00:54:316 - move to 1/2 left? to consistent with before kkd-k-ddkkd.
move to 00:53:963 - instead,to keep consistency as 00:48:227 -- 01:05:610 - suggest to change k... sounds still high guitar intonation and snare,,
like.. https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7505143 ?- 01:07:992 - no K? or 01:06:492 (277,278) - kd or dd? ... k---D? uum,,,, pitch isnt down.
change both of the above- 01:10:992 (292,293,294,295,296,297,298,299,300,301) - about dkddk-d-k-dkd,
how about change to .... dkd-k-ddkkd-d?
01:11:610 - too airy with plays imo (comparing with 01:10:110 (285,286,287,288) - ).
remap this part...you may check it- 01:14:169 (316,317,318) - how about kdk , to focus the guitar and piano intonation (like 01:12:227 (302,303,304,305,306,307,308,309,310) - ) instead. Its plays too much better than kdkdkdkd.
yes it's funnier- 01:15:051 - uum... how about like these?
https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7505076 or... like https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7505110 ?
Current streams is imcompleted following the accompaniment well.
change to the first one- 01:26:610 - how about add k , or k-ddk change to kkd-k? to catch the variation (bass sounds a little high than usual.)
good.- 01:41:080 (541,543) - either remove? suddenly too long stream, but drums sounds cut at once around there.
- 01:52:374 (646,648) - same.
both removed- 01:43:816 (568,569) - no d?
- 01:44:521 (575,576) - or only 575.
don't want to add dkd...pattern here :l want to keep it simple- 02:02:345 (734) - no k?
changed.- 02:30:669 (179,180) - kd?
nice catch- 02:34:021 - move to 02:33:316 - ? like 1st pattern theory.
ok- 02:37:551 - remove ? over a bit imo.
removed- 02:42:757 (290,291,292,293,294,295,296,297,298,299,300) - k-ddkkd- (kd-dk or kkddk)?
I think the current one has a better effect on focusing the guitar sound...- 02:49:021 - move to 02:48:492 - , 02:50:433 - move to 02:50:080 - , 02:50:698 - remove? (I'll leave the colors to you)
I really want you to make a blank on 02:50:433 - // ;_;
remap this part as well- and , 02:51:227 (370,371,372,373) - change to ddk-d?
nice- 03:02:963 (479,480) - kd seems better with plays. guitar sounds not too high.
fixed- Either ?
- A. 03:07:904 (523,524) - change to kd,
-- to empashized the latter kats 03:09:404 - , 03:10:816 - .
B. 03:08:345 - remove , 03:08:698 - change to d?
-- to focus the more guitar pitch.
I choose B but I didn't remove note at 03:08:345 - as I think doublet here is not good- 03:11:433 - remove?
- 03:15:757 (591,592) - dk? same as 03:12:933 - , and for avoid to same color 03:16:463 - kdkkddk..
03:16:463 - ~~ uumm...how about?All accepted ><
- 03:17:080 (605) - move to 03:17:433 - there
- 03:17:786 - remove
- 03:18:492 - move to 03:18:845 - or add 18:845?
Current 1/4 rhythm is too complex (comparing with around consistency rhythms). Try to change more flowing >_<
03:41:963 - on purpose? not d ?
I thought it was high pitch lol,anyways changed- 03:30:757 - k , 03:31:198 - remove , 03:32:345 - change to k? emphasized for weaker bass part.
[ccept first two points,rejetced the third one as I map to the vocal and drum pitch here.- 03:32:786 - remove....?
seems triplet 1/6 is a bit weird...that's why I connect the triplet and the 1/4 together- 03:47:874 (892,893,894,895,896,897,898) - k seems over, not sounds clear high pitch sounds. ddddddk or ddddkkd seems better for emphasized for bass power imo.
changed to ddddkkd- 04:13:110 (1033,1034,1035,1036) - change 1/4, and from 04:12:933 - , change to... dkkdkkd ? 1/6 isnt enough plet comparing with drums and overall theory.
changed :>
04:35:169 - @Streams. I cant agree the theory, too confused the sounds. How about?may check the pattern soon,changed to this now first
- 04:35:521 (34,35,36,37) - kddk ? 04:35:639 (36) - d sounds much better, and comparing with last 04:58:816 (254,255,256,257,258,259) - , its similar.
- 04:36:051 - k? snare sounds,
- 04:36:404 (45,46,47) - not consistent with drums theory, remove theory.
- 04:36:316 - , 04:36:404 - add 1/4 ? like 04:35:786 (38,39) - .
- 04:37:110 (53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64) - d →k , k→d seems better with drums, accompaniment and much my plays.
- 05:00:933 - D much better with sounds and plays imo ww.
- 05:14:963 - same intro, remove?
I think You can more make up the quality, check the map yourself and try get more modders.
Good Luck (¦3[___]