Heya, just some follow up suggestions from IRC.
Good luck
Inner Oni
- I think 00:20:619 (99,100,101,102) - should be something like dkkk, why is there k on 00:20:619 - when there is both a strong clap and increase in pitch on 00:20:769 - ?
- 00:21:744 - d? I think you should make this 5-note slighty different to 00:22:269 (113,114,115,116,117) -.
- I don't think that dkdkddk is good for 00:29:469 - , the dkdk doesn't really feel very intuitive imo because it doesn't highlight anything, how about something like dddkddk instead?
- Some of your triples feel like they don't correspond to well to the song, I guess you're mapping to the high instrument, but at 00:30:369 - for example, there are audible 1/4 starting on 00:30:519 - , so why not map these when the song supports them more? You could also turn this into a 5-note pattern otherwise.
IRC Log
04:41 xfraczynho: hi snow ~
04:41 snowball112: heya
04:41 xfraczynho: how's all goin'?
04:47 snowball112: pretty good, yourself?
04:49 xfraczynho: same here :P
04:49 xfraczynho: well going to the point... I'm looking for some nm / m4m
04:49 xfraczynho: are you accepting reqs?
04:49 snowball112: noi
04:49 snowball112: no*
04:49 snowball112: sorry
04:49 xfraczynho: it's fine ^^
04:49 xfraczynho: thanks anyways :P
04:50 snowball112: is this for tokio summer thing?
04:51 xfraczynho: oh you know it?
04:52 xfraczynho: well tbh that's my priority, but I wasn't going to ask for that
04:53 snowball112: i've seen it and played it once, i just dont like the song very much
04:53 xfraczynho: don't worry... isn't the best song xD
04:53 xfraczynho: it's another one
04:58 xfraczynho: nooooo supernova no!!
04:58 xfraczynho: I'm going to drop that I guess it's so repetitive xD
04:58 snowball112: is that the one you were gonna ask for
04:59 xfraczynho: nop tbh
04:59 xfraczynho: it's my lastest one
05:03 snowball112: hitsounds are soooo quiet
05:03 xfraczynho: yes I love them :3
05:03 snowball112: they're kind of nice
05:03 xfraczynho: btw I forgot to update it (added yu to tags xD)
05:03 snowball112: but you're not reflecting the vol increase as in the song
05:03 snowball112: 01:46:869 -
05:03 snowball112: this does not deserve 1 volume for all
05:04 snowball112: pretty sure this gets slightly louder every 4/1
05:05 xfraczynho: wait
05:05 xfraczynho: you're atlking about Inner rly?
05:05 xfraczynho: well everydiffs has the same volume so nvm
05:05 xfraczynho: tbh I just feel a volume increase here
05:05 xfraczynho: 01:51:669 -
05:05 snowball112: if you listen carefully
05:06 snowball112: the bg stuff gets louder
05:06 snowball112: at 01:46:869 -
05:06 snowball112: then again at 01:48:069 -
05:06 snowball112: 01:49:269 -
05:06 snowball112: at the latest i'd suggest you increase at 01:51:669 -
05:06 snowball112: and increase kiai again
05:07 snowball112: feels a bit quiet imo
05:08 xfraczynho: yeah you're right
05:08 xfraczynho: it was hard for me to get it tbh
05:08 xfraczynho: and yeah
05:08 xfraczynho: second kiai is even louder than first
05:08 xfraczynho: 01:48:069 - I think i'm using 65, 01:49:269 - 70 and 01:51:669 - 75
05:08 xfraczynho: 80 on kiai sounds fine
05:09 xfraczynho: over 80 is kinda too louder D:
05:10 snowball112: maybe just increase all points by 10 or something
05:10 snowball112: and see how it goes
05:11 xfraczynho: I tried it but
05:12 xfraczynho: I think here becames too loud01:51:669 -
05:13 snowball112: did you use 70% from there?
05:14 xfraczynho: now I tried 60% from here01:46:869 -
05:14 xfraczynho: then
05:14 xfraczynho: 70, 80, 90 and 100 on kiai
05:15 xfraczynho: sounds fine imo... hitsounds aren't that louder as I thought
05:16 snowball112: you don't need to go all out for kiai, if you want 80, you could just go up in smaller steps
05:17 snowball112: because the volume increase per step isn't that much
05:17 snowball112: one thing that i'd like to point out though
05:18 xfraczynho: I felt both good but I think i'm gonna keep that +5% increase
05:18 snowball112: some patterns feel a bit weird because you're ignoring some fairly strong claps
05:18 snowball112: like from implied ryhthym
05:18 snowball112: 00:10:869 - should probably be D, and 00:11:169 - k
05:19 snowball112: or 00:10:869 - K, not sure
05:20 snowball112: hang on
05:20 xfraczynho: 00:10:869 (20) - I think this goes fine as D
05:21 xfraczynho: considering next note k
05:22 snowball112: this may or may not be accurate, i'm pretty tired
05:22 snowball112: and it's 5 am lol
05:22 xfraczynho: it's fine bro :P
05:22 xfraczynho: don't force yourself xD
05:23 xfraczynho: can I ask you another day for it? or maybe forum? :c
05:23 xfraczynho: just if you want of course
05:23 xfraczynho: and can xD
05:24 snowball112: but i'm not sure where you get the 2-4 1/4 patterns from
05:24 snowball112: 00:27:969 (166,167,168,169,170,171) -
05:24 snowball112: i'm looking now, so i might as well look now
05:24 snowball112: that sentence made no sense
05:24 snowball112: jesus
05:25 snowball112: like, 00:21:069 (102,103,104,105) - is still somewhat acceptable
05:25 xfraczynho: 00:27:669 -
05:25 xfraczynho: I think if you start hearing from here 50% pr
05:25 xfraczynho: you can get it
05:26 snowball112: but the prominent sounds land on red ticks
05:26 snowball112: not blue
05:26 snowball112: so why 2-4
05:27 xfraczynho: hmm
05:27 xfraczynho: you're right
05:27 snowball112: 00:27:969 - the closest what the music does is https://puu.sh/vUCYp/55fadf7f7e.jpg
05:27 xfraczynho: I should move 00:28:044 (167) - to 00:28:119 (167) -
05:28 snowball112: if you really want some 2-4
05:28 snowball112: just use the similar position as with your doubles
05:29 snowball112: like 00:21:069 (102,103,104,105) -
05:29 snowball112: but i don't think 2-4 is very good tbh
05:30 snowball112: it doesn't really do anything for your map
05:30 xfraczynho: hmmm
05:30 xfraczynho: I think using the same double is kind of better
05:30 xfraczynho: it was my bad since I tried to do something more dynamic
05:31 xfraczynho: and didn't follow the song too well
05:32 snowball112: 01:03:519 (456,457,458,459) - this is not snapped correctly
05:32 snowball112: there is no 1/6, instrument lands on 1/4
05:33 xfraczynho: I doubt so much times about that... ty for noticing
05:33 xfraczynho: also, I'm deleting 01:03:444 (453) -
Good luck