Thanks for your mod JuDa~JUDYDANNY wrote:
Hello~ :3
Here's a Taiko Mod via Juda Taiko Moding Queue
My mod is for suggetions. if you dont like, ignore please.
~Taiko~
d is Red Note.
k is Blue Note.
and, D ,K is finisher .. .
“+ ?” is I like pattern (※example→ add? , remove?
Big text is strong suggestion.To “ Nardo”[Kantan]
uum,Good. Nothing to say for this time but I guess this is hard.
Break times over divisor 2/1 are very few , and I felt density is even flat yet.
I recommend you to change on this density. http://puu.sh/agvdI/a2747abf80.zip
I will come again after check your response. Hmm... To be honest the Kantan is not very hard, as 2/1 breaks are everywhere. (e.g. 01:03:570 (2) - ; 01:41:170 (67) - ; 02:47:170 (58) - , etc.) Anyway, I'll seek further opinion about this.[Futsuu]
- 00:19:970 (39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46) - uum, I recommend to change the strategy to follow simple. These sounds little and I think its not important to follow on this density as futsuu. How about this? I think 1/2 k d and d k is not very hard for Futsuu, so I would like to keep them.
- 00:28:370 (57) – delete? ^
- delete finisher 00:46:170 (3) –lol , fixed
- and if can, 00:45:570 (1) – too. looks hard to play as futsuu..? The stressed sound is so prominent that it cannot be ignored, so no change here.
- 00:59:770 (33,34,35,36,1) - notes>>stream , stream >>>notes sounds better as Vocal slar.but you put 00:59:770 (33,34,35,36) - notes to follow drums. So I recommend to (1) spiiner change to finisher K for decreasing uncomfortable. I think the spinner serves as a good transition to the kiai time and sounds good, so I would like to keep it.
- 01:21:370 (48) - k ?, same as 01:08:570 (15) -, 01:15:170 (32) - . kd>>dk>>kd>dk… fixed
- 01:56:570 (127) – delete the finisher? , same as 1st phrase. fixed
- 02:11:770 (1) – same as 1st phrase. same as 00:59:770 (33,34,35,36,1) -
- 02:31:370 (47,48) – same as 1st phrase. fixed
- 02:41:970 (68) – delete, or change k? no bass drums. sounds better than don imo. changed to k.
- 03:12:770 (121,122,123) – delete these finishers. no change, as they need to be emphasized.
- 03:41:770 (184,185) – change to kk? changed to d k.
- 03:49:170 (199) – add don here? It sounds good, fixed.
[Muzukashii]
- 00:08:170 (4,5,6,7) - listening only 4567, weird for me this (7) k. I think the reason is k makes to cut as previous phrase atmosphere . Try to change Either suggestions? Applied option A+C
A. 00:07:970 (3) – change to k. can linked 00:09:170 (7) –k sound.
B. 00:09:170 (7) – move to 00:10:170 (10) - and, 00:09:370 (7) – change k same as 00:08:570 (5) - this k.
C. 00:09:170 (7) – delete or move to 00:10:170 (10) - , and change 00:09:570 (9) - k.
└――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――- 00:20:170 (8) – delete this ? fixed
- 00:32:170 (47,48,49) – kd*d >> dkdd ? or kddd? changed 00:32:770 (99) - as k instead.
- 01:01:370 (1) – same as Futsuu. refer to the explanation in Futsuu.
- 01:33:970 (98) – same as 1st phrase. fixed
- 02:03:570 (181,182) - swap , same as 02:00:770 (175) – d, that follows 02:03:770 (182) - tinpani . fixed
- 02:11:970 (1) – delete ? refer to the explanation in Futsuu.
- 02:57:170 (120) - k…? fixed
- 03:00:370 (131) - ^? ^
- 03:10:570 (162) – add d? fixed
- 03:21:170 (185,186,187) - how about additions divisor 1/2 note ? like… ddkkk It sounds good, fixed
- 03:54:770 (291) – same as others. fixed using option A.
[Oni]
- 00:12:170 (47) - add don? plays better , I guess. fixed
- 00:13:770 (52) – delete? same as 00:07:370 -. fixed
- 00:41:770 (167) – add d? sounds not cut perfective. fixed
- 01:27:170 (111,112,113,114) – ddd,k >>d,ddk ? fixed
- 01:31:370 (128) - k? no bass sound. It seems to be fine, fixed.
- 01:41:370 (165) – add don. fixed
- 01:41:770 (167) – delete? ^
- 02:00:370 (1,2,3,4) – kkd,d … uum Either? Applied option B.
A. (2,3) delete?
B. (1,2,3,4,) kkd,d >>k,ddd ?
└――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――- 02:04:570 (256) – add don?, feels lonely a bit. fixed
- 02:41:770 (130,131) – change k? remain unchanged, k d d k suits the vocal pitch.
- 02:56:070 (163) - k? fixed
- 02:58:970 (174,175,176,177) – k,kdd> kkd,d ? how about? fixed
- 03:17:770 (232) – delete ? for back sound slar. fixed
- 03:21:870 (250) – delete? unnecessary imo fixed
- 03:52:170 (385) - k? fixed
[Inner Oni]
- 1st playing~
- 00:06:670 (27) - I think you can add d? for harp. fixed
- 00:28:770 (140) – don? no change, as the sound is similar to 00:25:970 (125,126) -
- 01:01:070 (305) – add don? make up more power~. fixed
- 01:03:470 (4) – add don? fixed
- 01:12:770 (57) - k? or 01:12:670 (56) - ? changed the former.
- 02:00:470 (296) – delete this? , unnecessary imo fixed
- 02:02:670 (308) - ^ not sound …? Nope. It pairs with 02:01:870 (303,304) - so that the patterns could be more balanced.
- 02:11:470 (355) – add don? fixed
- 02:17:370 (25,26,27,28,29) - kkddk? Or kkdkk ? changed to kkddk.
- 02:37:570 (129,130,131,132) – ddd,k >>d,ddk ? more increasing vocal power. fixed
- 02:49:570 (165,166,167) – k,d,k? just my opinion. More smoother? Comparing 02:48:770 (164,166) - , 166 is higher-pitched than 164, so d k d is preferred.
- 03:17:570 (269) – finisher? fixed
- good Inner~ Nice to hear that~
ok, That's all. I hope you to get rank this ><.
Good Luck!