forum

ITT 2: We post shit that is neither funny nor interesting

posted
Total Posts
57,691
show more
Aurani
Well that's just rude then. If I go and take a shit on you and then say "I don't apologise for anything" you probably wouldn't like me, now, would you? Why go and push it that far when you know that the only thing you're gonna achieve is to cause negative attention, unless you specifically want that attention.

I left because I couldn't handle that same safe-space bullshit that tupsu was doing, but I didn't cause a drama over it. Be a man and just leave them be if they want to be retards. They're gonna learn one day that when someone punches them in the face, they won't have a safe space or anyone to come crying to. Life uh..... finds a way.

As for IppE, I'm just sad, nothing to say really.
B1rd
Well it's not like it's my intention to offend anyone; I'm not trying to personally insult anyone. It's just provocative humour. You have to realise that offense isn't given, it's taken. I don't think I over dramaticised anything, I'd prefer to try and change things before I leave. But once my posts get deleted, that's the point I step out. I gave IppE and ultimatum that I wouldn't tolerate my posts being deleted, and he chose to do it.

Anyway, I agree with your sentiments.
Rurree
Everyone has that vivid memory of seeing tupsu go on a massive rage fit and throw profanities at everyone within close proximity for the first time. It's like a ritual. Not like it's rare though, happens almost everyday, I think?
Mahogany
I don't.
Rurree
Could've sworn it happens a lot. Not that I dislike her though. Just think, "Eh, it happens."
kai99
Railey2

B1rd wrote:

http://cfif.org/v/index.php/commentary/54-state-of-affairs/1357-pew-research-republicans-more-knowledgeable-than-democrats

Interesting.
article doesn't even link to the study
study is 7 years old (lol) http://www.pewresearch.org/2010/11/18/p ... specifics/


As the study correctly points out, there are other driving factors such as age and education. Did they ever mention whether or not they accounted for that when they chose their samples? Can a questionnaire consisting of only 13 questions (lol again) really be considered to be an accurate way to measure what they are trying to measure? Are the questions biased?

this piece of research raises some questions about its validity..

not willing to look further into it, though. A major blunder of them to not describe their sample in the very first chart, makes me think they don't know anything about statistics. They don't deserve a second look. Crappy article. Why even bother doing a questionnaire if you're gonna publish it like that? Sloppy journalism of this magnitude is usually reserved for the typical second hand source, like the one that b1rd linked.
Mahogany
Railey, you give everything B1rd says far too much credit. That said, good on you for it.

Also, still love that Renard track <3
Railey2
i mean.. i could very well imagine that the claim of the study holds true. The average republican might know more about these things than the average democrat. But fuck is that one bad article like come on.
Jordan
B1rd
Just what we needed: more entanglements in the Middle East.
Milkshake
good meem
johnmedina999

Milkshake wrote:

good meem

The low quality jpeg effect makes it gold. Or maybe it actually is a low quality jpeg.
Hika
Uh oh, everytime Aurani is here, i'm always out jacking it.
Milkshake
take yer hand out yer vagoogoo damn it
B1rd


Excellent series.
Aurani

Hika wrote:

Uh oh, everytime Aurani is here, i'm always out jacking it.
I secretly wank to your sister every time you're away from home.
Meah

Aurani wrote:

Hika wrote:

Uh oh, everytime Aurani is here, i'm always out jacking it.
I secretly wank to your sister every time you're away from home.
Top 10 Anime betrayals.
Rurree
Send me a picture of Hika's sister asap
Aurani
Yo yo, you can't have both. You can have Hika, but her sister is mine.
Hika
I don't have a sister. Stop cheating on me.
Aurani

Hika wrote:

I don't have a sister. Stop cheating on me.
At least let me dream!
Milkshake
why? you can go and molest the real aurani. he's good at playing the little-sister-role.
Railey2
aurani post pix plz
Meah
Railey is thirsty :^)
Aurani

Railey2 wrote:

aurani post pix plz
Well well, if you want mine, you gotta whip out yours. :V
Railey2
i thought you were a guy

i already posted in me irl some time ago, i can go look for that picture
Aurani
Only Milkman thinks that.

Go fetch the pic.
Railey2

4 months old
Aurani
I can't believe you look 100% like I imagined you. I'm getting good at guessing.
Also, you sure you have no German blood in you? I sense something German about you. Must be the adorable kitty.:V
Railey2
i'm just happy that neither of us used an instagram filter. All is good.
Aurani
brb lemme put some dog features on your face.
Railey2
i'd rather die than having my face be vandalized like this
Aurani
Tell that to all those children on the IRL thread.
Milkshake

Aurani wrote:

Railey2 wrote:

aurani post pix plz
Well well, if you want mine, you gotta whip out yours. :V
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA
Milkshake
this image sure fits that sexy laughing of yours
Aurani
Please stop mocking my voice. =(
Milkshake
your existence is already mocking yourself
Aurani
I'm not going to take insults from a barely legal kebab.
Milkshake
don't worry, I know your heart is already shattered ;*
Jordan

Aurani wrote:

Railey2 wrote:

aurani post pix plz
Well well, if you want mine, you gotta whip out yours. :V
Comfy Slippers
alive and rested
kai99
ste fan fan kikoeru sama is here
Rurree

Aurani wrote:

Railey2 wrote:

aurani post pix plz
Well well, if you want mine, you gotta whip out yours. :V
I feel betrayed. I always thought you were a black man living in Serbia. While at the back of my mind I knew it was for the lulz, I still clung on to that hope.
Aomi

Aurani wrote:

Railey2 wrote:

aurani post pix plz
Well well, if you want mine, you gotta whip out yours. :V
Ona je posebna, vjeruj mi
Sex manijak, ženski Ron Jeremi
Nisam jedini što ide u intimu
Gufe nisu solo, uvijek su u timu
Ima strašne fore koje radit voli
Ne znam gdje je učila al’ znam da ne u školi
Šta je mislio tvoj tata kad te radio
Onaj ko je stavio, taj nikad ne bi vadio
Aurani

Madvillain wrote:

I feel betrayed. I always thought you were a black man living in Serbia. While at the back of my mind I knew it was for the lulz, I still clung on to that hope.
I'm a really big mexican man with muscles all over the place. That's how I won over the heart of Hika's sister.

Aomi wrote:

Ona je posebna, vjeruj mi
Sex manijak, ženski Ron Jeremi
Nisam jedini što ide u intimu
Gufe nisu solo, uvijek su u timu
Ima strašne fore koje radit voli
Ne znam gdje je učila al’ znam da ne u školi
Šta je mislio tvoj tata kad te radio
Onaj ko je stavio, taj nikad ne bi vadio
Da tek vidis kako je Slippers seksi. =D
Comfy Slippers
Jordan
GladiOol
I always imagined aurani to be Marcus Aurelius incarnate. Actually, I'm still 99% sure that'll end up happening in some form as aurani becomes the leader of a neo roman empire.
Aurani
Hika

Jordan wrote:

This fucking hit me so hard

Please stop
Comfy Slippers
...finna
...niggas


JUST USE PROPER FKN ENGLISH GODFUCKIIASIPGHOASINGDAMMIT........ BEING ALL CHITTY CHITTY BANG BANG DOESNT MAKE YOU SOUDN OCOOL JSAUTASU JUST FUCKIN STOPPPPPPP
Hika
I'm finna fight you if u don't shut up nigga
_handholding
this joke went way over my head
B1rd
Is posting second-rate memes the only thing you come here to do.
kai99

Comfy Slippers wrote:

...finna
...niggas


JUST USE PROPER FKN ENGLISH GODFUCKIIASIPGHOASINGDAMMIT........ BEING ALL CHITTY CHITTY BANG BANG DOESNT MAKE YOU SOUDN OCOOL JSAUTASU JUST FUCKIN STOPPPPPPP
Rurree

Comfy Slippers wrote:

...finna
...niggas


JUST USE PROPER FKN ENGLISH GODFUCKIIASIPGHOASINGDAMMIT........ BEING ALL CHITTY CHITTY BANG BANG DOESNT MAKE YOU SOUDN OCOOL JSAUTASU JUST FUCKIN STOPPPPPPP
YOU KNOW NOTHING COMFY SLIPPERS

Hika wrote:

Jordan wrote:

This fucking hit me so hard

Please stop
At least the chemical attacks will be replaced by codeine attacks 👀👍👌
Milkshake

kai99 wrote:

Comfy Slippers wrote:

...finna
...niggas


JUST USE PROPER FKN ENGLISH GODFUCKIIASIPGHOASINGDAMMIT........ BEING ALL CHITTY CHITTY BANG BANG DOESNT MAKE YOU SOUDN OCOOL JSAUTASU JUST FUCKIN STOPPPPPPP
this shit used to be my jam
Aurani

Comfy Slippers wrote:

...finna
...niggas


JUST USE PROPER FKN ENGLISH GODFUCKIIASIPGHOASINGDAMMIT........ BEING ALL CHITTY CHITTY BANG BANG DOESNT MAKE YOU SOUDN OCOOL JSAUTASU JUST FUCKIN STOPPPPPPP
Hika's a hood nigger, what do you expect? :p
Hika
nah
DryBones81
fookmep
Rurree
imagine calling them second rate memes :khinting:
Comfy Slippers
stefan lock again

ill pay
B1rd
I wonder how many people need to be run over with trucks before people realise that immigrants in Europe pose some issues.
Aurani
You don't even live in Europe, pal.
Not that I'm against your point of view, but you got it easy there you isolated fuck. :V
Mara
Did I just read... TRUCKS?!

Aurani
FUCK YEAH, TRUCKS!
Railey2
remember how they wanted to ban Quake it could be used as training engine for potential school shooters?

Truck simulator ban incoming.
Aurani

Mara on his way to train some Finnish kebabs in the ways of mowing down people with trucks, black and white filter, circa 2015.
Mara


I need to drive some more so I can buy another garage.
Comfy Slippers
Foxtrot
hello people; tuuba drama was an interesting read

for a second I thought ITT 2 was locked due to the presence of ITT 3 and I almost had a heart attack. Now I'm just angery
Mahogany

B1rd wrote:

I wonder how many people need to be run over with trucks before people realise that immigrants in Europe pose some issues.
Statistically speaking, things are going really well. So no, there'd need to be a ridiculous upturn in violence before you could even begin to make that point.
Endaris
Why would you stop immigrants when you can wait for them to get enslaved in north africa or dumped into the Mediterranean Sea?
Aurani
It's actually pretty sad that there is so many of them waiting on the border between Hungary and Serbia, yet we can't fill them with lead. It's like we're willingly letting the cancer that is modern Islam spread through our lands. :V
['90s accordion music intensifies]
DaddyCoolVipper

B1rd wrote:

I wonder how many people need to be run over with trucks before people realise that immigrants in Europe pose some issues.
Hi I'm B1rd and I use people's deaths to push my political agenda
Foxtrot

DaddyCoolVipper wrote:

B1rd wrote:

I wonder how many people need to be run over with trucks before people realise that immigrants in Europe pose some issues.
Hi I'm B1rd and I use people's deaths to push my political agenda
While I don't agree with what he's saying, it's not much different from someone who complains about starving kids in Africa and how people don't think about the problem. Would you tell them that they're using deaths to push their political agenda? Not really, they're just concerned in their own ways. The difference is that blaming immigrants in general for truck accidents is just another correlation versus causation problem.
DaddyCoolVipper

Foxtrot wrote:

While I don't agree with what he's saying, it's not much different from someone who complains about starving kids in Africa and how people don't think about the problem. Would you tell them that they're using deaths to push their political agenda? Not really, they're just concerned in their own ways. The difference is that blaming immigrants in general for truck accidents is just another correlation versus causation problem.
Yeah, perhaps I should've clarified a bit more. I wasn't exactly looking to make a compelling argument in my post, though, it was just frustrating to see that kind of thing being done- especially in a non-anonymous environment (well, less anonymous than 4chan, anyway), which I believe are better suited to such, uh, non-standard "arguments" being made.

To elaborate then- I really hate it whenever anyone takes a single event, ESPECIALLY a tragedy, and uses it for their own politics. I think it's a pathetic thing to do that speaks a lot more to the person's ridiculous confirmation bias than anything else- they see one thing, it appeals to their emotions, and they use that to further their political agenda by trying to appeal to other people's same emotions. How about we step back from shit like that and actually try to use more meaningful facts and statistics if we want to make big, generalising arguments, instead of: "LOOK AT THIS ONE AWFUL THING, PEOPLE DIED, THIS MEANS I'M RIGHT!"

You know? I just think that kind of thing is bullshit, and I'm sick of seeing anybody using it. Don't be so disrespectful.

edit: Worth mentioning is that this isn't necessarily a simple frustration at "correlation=causation", it's deeper than that.
Railey2
vipper you'd probably make a similar argument if it was about something you supported.

How many more civilians have to die in airstrikes before the US realizes that it is leading a pointless war?
How many people have to die in the war on drugs before the US comes to its senses and legalizes drugs?
How many people have to die before X?

are you telling me you've never made that sort of argument before?
DaddyCoolVipper

Railey2 wrote:

vipper you'd probably make a similar argument if it was about something you supported.

How many more civilians have to die in airstrikes before the US realizes that it is leading a pointless war?
How many people have to die in the war on drugs before the US comes to its senses and legalizes drugs?
How many people have to die before X?
No, I don't make those arguments. I think they're incredibly stupid.
Mara
Thinking of going outside and buy some cola at midnight.
Aurani
What I really don't like about your post, Viper, is that it's extremely shallow when you look at it from a neutral standpoint. You are immediately basing the entire point around the opinion that someone is being emotionally charged up and thus basing their point of view on that.
In a way, it's pretty ironic that you're branding him while you made your own biased and skewed commentary to counter his.
Railey2

DaddyCoolVipper wrote:

Railey2 wrote:

vipper you'd probably make a similar argument if it was about something you supported.

How many more civilians have to die in airstrikes before the US realizes that it is leading a pointless war?
How many people have to die in the war on drugs before the US comes to its senses and legalizes drugs?
How many people have to die before X?
No, I don't make those arguments. I think they're incredibly stupid.
i can see how they could be distasteful but how are they incredibly stupid?

Peoples lives are a VERY important variable for large scale decisions, some people would even argue that they are the most important variable.

''How many people have to die before X'' is just another way of saying: ''hey there are people dying and i feel you should prioritize preventing that, plus i'm also going to try and make you feel a bit bad about it''

it's not a complete argument on its own, but it is a very valid and common sentiment that can easily be extended to be part of a proper argument.

i certainly wouldn't call it incredibly stupid.
DaddyCoolVipper

Railey2 wrote:

i can see how they could be distasteful but how are they incredibly stupid?

Peoples lives are a VERY important variable for large scale decisions, some people would even argue that they are the most important variable.

''How many people have to die before X'' is just another way of saying: ''hey there are people dying and i feel you should prioritize preventing that, plus i'm also going to try and make you feel a bit bad about it''

it's not a complete argument on its own, but it is a very valid and common sentiment that can easily be extended to be part of a proper argument.

i certainly wouldn't call it incredibly stupid.
Simply put, I dislike emotional appeal as the -main- way of trying to push an agenda, for the most part. I do see your point that it can be used as a proper argument though, as well as the fact that there are almost definitely a few exceptions that can be made when it comes to morality- i.e. "It's messed up if we allow this dictator to kill people with no repercussions", or something, but clearly I must see a difference in this case- probably because of how loosely connected the event and the conclusion are. I was thinking of many similar things when I wrote my post; I've seen that style of argument used a lot of times over the years, first from the left (This one thing happened to a black person somewhere, therefore all police are racist!!, things like that), while the right-wing have been using these emotional appeals as justification for anti-immigrant policy for as long as I can remember. Look at Tommy Robinson/the EDL's main points for further context if you'd like to see examples from my own country that I have experience with. I suppose I should learn to state my points in a more isolated manner from things like this, though, for the reason that Aurani gives- I'm clearly involving my own emotions here.

But yeah, in general terms, I don't like it when emotion is the main reason for pushing any particular policy. This applies to every argument that I've actually seen being made in a serious manner over the past, I don't know, 10 years- I haven't been following politics for that much of my life, but from what I've seen, this argument is generally BS used to further an agenda without real facts/data supporting them in an attempt to get people to blindly follow their worldview, which is very stupid indeed.

Sorry if this is hard to understand/rambly, not really in the mood to make a well-constructed post on this subject I guess
kai99
\o/
johnmedina999

kai99 wrote:

\o/
Railey2
well now you just completely changed your point from ''i don't like people using the deaths of others for an argument'' to
''i don't like emotionally charged reasoning''

Nothing is left of the original discussion
Aurani
To be completely honest here, even a disjointed "rambly" discussion is better than whatever the fuck usually goes on in ITT. I do enjoy it when people try to reason with each other, as Viper is doing with you. Don't bash it in just yet.
Railey2
i too don't like it when emotion interferes with decision-making, especially when it matters - like it does in politics.
i'm on vippers side 100 percent here
Aurani
Emotions are a powerful tool in decision-making. After all, they are one of our primal instincts - something that helped us survive and get to where we are now. Pure logical thinking can be as toxic to your being as being overly emotional; there are always extremes that must be avoided, which includes being utterly devoid of emotions.

That being said, there is also blind fanaticism and it's just the other side of the same coin - something to be avoided at all costs.
DaddyCoolVipper

Railey2 wrote:

well now you just completely changed your point from ''i don't like people using the deaths of others for an argument'' to
''i don't like emotionally charged reasoning''

Nothing is left of the original discussion
That's pretty much what I meant, using the deaths of others (as an isolated event, not part of broader statistics used in a non-dishonest manner) was just one example of it. Sorry if that wasn't very clear, like I said, I haven't been in a mood to make big clear arguments right now!


Also yeah I love ITT when it turns into politics or other serious discussion, it's fun and lets people talk to each other on a more meaningful level than the usual spam. God bless
Endaris
For me it is not the emotional part nor the part of using deaths but actively using such events to bloat them so that other important things are covered.
I mean it is not like the situation in Africa was ever good but we only broadcast it when they suddenly want to get a prosperous life or get massacred.
It is a welcome opportunity to say some strong words without negative repercussions and working on your image as a politician.
Mahogany
As long as we can agree bird doesnt know shit then I'm game
Hika
hiya
Aurani

Endaris wrote:

For me it is not the emotional part nor the part of using deaths but actively using such events to bloat them so that other important things are covered.
I mean it is not like the situation in Africa was ever good but we only broadcast it when they suddenly want to get a prosperous life or get massacred.
It is a welcome opportunity to say some strong words without negative repercussions and working on your image as a politician.
Tbh in its current "murricanized" state, Africa is completely lost. There is no reason what-so-ever to sink money into something that's so socially backwards that you'd need to either wipe the land and destroy entire cultures or spend hundreds of trillions to slowly, over the next couple hundred years "force-advance" the culture and traditions those people are influenced by, at which point we're still going to destroy most of the old culture and traditions there, because we see what even slow Westernization (Globalization) does to the rest of the world.

Speaking of which, I now feel like rewatching "The gods must be crazy"... the only movie I've watched so far that makes me feel happy at my very core. Such a lighthearted thing.
DaddyCoolVipper

Aurani wrote:

Endaris wrote:

For me it is not the emotional part nor the part of using deaths but actively using such events to bloat them so that other important things are covered.
I mean it is not like the situation in Africa was ever good but we only broadcast it when they suddenly want to get a prosperous life or get massacred.
It is a welcome opportunity to say some strong words without negative repercussions and working on your image as a politician.
Tbh in its current "murricanized" state, Africa is completely lost. There is no reason what-so-ever to sink money into something that's so socially backwards that you'd need to either wipe the land and destroy entire cultures or spend hundreds of trillions to slowly, over the next couple hundred years "force-advance" the culture and traditions those people are influenced by, at which point we're still going to destroy most of the old culture and traditions there, because we see what even slow Westernization (Globalization) does to the rest of the world.

Speaking of which, I now feel like rewatching "The gods must be crazy"... the only movie I've watched so far that makes me feel happy at my very core. Such a lighthearted thing.
Africa has actually been going through a shitload of improvement in the last 20-30 years, hasn't it? I thought there were huge technological/cultural advances there.
Aurani
Only in specific (read: westernized) regions. Mostly Southern and Western Africa. Central and Eastern parts are still on the same technological and cultural level as they were back in late 1920s...
It also doesn't help that most regions can't be controlled and are completely anarchic in nature. The situation is far, far worse there than it is in the Middle East, but media don't give a shit, as it brings no money to talk about it.
B1rd
The West has spent billions of dollars in Africa through aid programs and charity; all it does is boost the population to an unsustainable level. Also, Africa was 100x better off under the apartheid that after it. Liberation of Rhodesia when?

DaddyCoolVipper wrote:

Hi I'm B1rd and I use people's deaths to push my political agenda
Hi I'm a left-winger and I try and shift the blame to the other party by insulting them when they point out clear examples of deaths caused by immigrants.

Also reminds me of something:


"let's just move him a few times to get the best shot"

Foxtrot wrote:

While I don't agree with what he's saying, it's not much different from someone who complains about starving kids in Africa and how people don't think about the problem. Would you tell them that they're using deaths to push their political agenda? Not really, they're just concerned in their own ways. The difference is that blaming immigrants in general for truck accidents is just another correlation versus causation problem.
What part of my statement exactly don't you agree with? Why is it so difficult to causation in the correlation of the large amounts of terrorist by immigrants in the countries that has accepted large amounts of immigrants? You would have to do some serious mental gymnastics to try and blame them on something else and say that the immigrants are not part of the problem.

These terrorist attacks and trucks running over people is not an isolated incident. It's just that some people are too ideologically biased to see or solve the problem.

edit: I stand corrected, looks like Sweden is right on track https://translate.google.com/translate? ... t=&act=url
Railey2
All of africas problems could be solved by the free market
DaddyCoolVipper

B1rd wrote:

Hi I'm a left-winger and I try and shift the blame to the other party by insulting them when they point out clear examples of deaths caused by immigrants.

Also reminds me of something:


[i]"let's just move him a few times to get the best shot"

Okay, there's a few things I'd like to talk about here.

Firstly, for the record, I never supported or cared for that emotional appeal either. Don't just assume I did because I identify with the left wing, or whatever. Secondly, "deaths caused by immigrants" isn't something you want to point at isolated cases for if you'd like to make any kind of meaningful point. This is ESPECIALLY true with the Stockholm attack, the one that you just used as your "evidence".

Do you know anything about the attacker, or his motivations? The guy was a nut, for sure. He wasn't a refugee and Swedish authorities recognised that- which is why they denied his application. The guy was probably just trying to economically migrate without paying any of the usual costs, which of course doesn't fly there. So he became frustrated, and immediately turned to ISIS because now he suddenly hates Sweden/the West... Even though he literally just wanted to go there because it's better than his home country. He was a fucking stupid and irrational guy with a grudge, not someone you can simply paint with the same brush for your argument of "immigration causes deaths!!". Especially since his application for refugee status was rejected.

Also, I think civilian walkways should have the kind of temporary metal pole things you can find in use in Germany. They prevent vehicles from driving on them, not just in case of terrorist attacks, but also stopping any legitimate accidents/idiocy like driving down the wrong street.
show more
Please sign in to reply.

New reply