My common sense works just fine. Since when is the ITT thread not a general thread for everything? And since when has a certain topic been banned from ITT because there is another thread for it? I could have applied this argument to everything else and complained because someone mentioned something to do with food, because there is a food thread. The reality is, Tuuba doesn't have a big enough userbase so segregating topics doesn't work well and it doesn't promote good discussion. There was no valid reason why Trump memes alone should be targeted; the reality is that it was done because it triggered a few people and IppE and a few others thought that their right not to be offended trumped my right to free speech.Aurani wrote:
So let me get this straight - he posted some shit and was warned to post it in the appropriate thread, then ignored it and continued posting it where it doesn't belong?
That's another thing altogether. He is at fault for not adhering to common sense and posting it where it belongs. If what you said is true, it has nothing to do with any rules of the forum or with IppE at all.
In that case it's his common sense that failed completely.
forum
ITT 2: We post shit that is neither funny nor interesting
posted
Total Posts
57,691
am alzo noeledgeable en polleeteks butt aye kep et 2 maiself
When people agreed on it, which happened.B1rd wrote:
My common sense works just fine. Since when is the ITT thread not a general thread for everything? And since when has a certain topic been banned from ITT because there is another thread for it?
Then you should have, and we would have voted on it.B1rd wrote:
I could have applied this argument to everything else and complained because someone mentioned something to do with food, because there is a food thread.
The place has gotten a lot better since you left so not really.B1rd wrote:
The reality is, Tuuba doesn't have a big enough userbase so segregating topics doesn't work well and it doesn't promote good discussion.
Your memes being voted out is a demonstration of OUR free speech.B1rd wrote:
There was no valid reason why Trump memes alone should be targeted; the reality is that it was done because it triggered a few people and IppE and a few others thought that their right not to be offended trumped my right to free speech.
Also, that's not how free speech works. Best XKCD: https://xkcd.com/1357/
Well I've now seen the posts where IppE and Bird were talking about the thing. I still have no idea what Bird posted, but let me put it like this:
I'm COMPLETELY on IppE's side if Bird posted some shit that could start a discussion about politics. So basically something serious.
I'm COMPLETELY on Bird's side if Bird only posted a joke, because a joke that is political in nature is still just a joke and thus has no reason to be posted in its appropriate thread.
It all boils down to what the shit he posted to begin with. I agree that cooking stuff goes into the cooking thread and politics go into the place with politics, but ONLY if it's worth the time and dedication to be there. If I make a joke about Mahogany being homo, I should not need to make a fucking separate LGBT thread to say "Yo Maho mate, yer gay". It would be downright silly...
However, Bird would definitely have no defense against the decision for it to be deleted if he posted something along the lines of "Trump is gay and all his supporters should die because he wants to build a wall". That's not something lighthearted and definitely doesn't belong in ITT.
I'm COMPLETELY on IppE's side if Bird posted some shit that could start a discussion about politics. So basically something serious.
I'm COMPLETELY on Bird's side if Bird only posted a joke, because a joke that is political in nature is still just a joke and thus has no reason to be posted in its appropriate thread.
It all boils down to what the shit he posted to begin with. I agree that cooking stuff goes into the cooking thread and politics go into the place with politics, but ONLY if it's worth the time and dedication to be there. If I make a joke about Mahogany being homo, I should not need to make a fucking separate LGBT thread to say "Yo Maho mate, yer gay". It would be downright silly...
However, Bird would definitely have no defense against the decision for it to be deleted if he posted something along the lines of "Trump is gay and all his supporters should die because he wants to build a wall". That's not something lighthearted and definitely doesn't belong in ITT.
Literally what's happening in OT these days.Aurani wrote:
If I make a joke about Mahogany being homo, I should not need to make a fucking separate LGBT thread to say "Yo Maho mate, yer gay". It would be downright silly...
My interpretation of forum rules is this: provided you aren't literally spamming the forum and making it physically difficult for other people to view posts, or on a focused campaign to harass people, then you can post whatever you want; and people are free to be offended or not, and people are free to scroll past content that they don't want to see. If there were to be some major policy or rule change, I assumed that it could be decided in a democratic fashion with votes. And if people decided with a democratic vote that they wanted a safe space rather than a forum of free discussion, then I'd still leave, but at least I'd know that it was because the people there didn't share my ideals and values, rather than an arbitrary decision by IppE which is what happened.
One of the main reasons I advocated for the migration to Tuuba because I wanted a place of free discussion free from shitty moderators banning people and deleting posts for arbitrary reasons, and getting in the way of discussion which is the primary purpose of forums. Because I'm damned sick of having to save any of my posts that were somewhat controversial because otherwise they might be erased from existence by the 1984-ministry-of-truth-esque moderators.
So it isn't that I couldn't have just "posted in the other thread", which I could have done easily, it's because my ideals were violated in an egregious manner. The fact is, if you agree with IppE, you must also agree that people who are offended have the right to censor the speech of those who are offending them. Either that, or you agree that one person should have dictatorial control over the forum "because he owns the server".
If you want to see the post, here it is: p/5602106
One of the main reasons I advocated for the migration to Tuuba because I wanted a place of free discussion free from shitty moderators banning people and deleting posts for arbitrary reasons, and getting in the way of discussion which is the primary purpose of forums. Because I'm damned sick of having to save any of my posts that were somewhat controversial because otherwise they might be erased from existence by the 1984-ministry-of-truth-esque moderators.
So it isn't that I couldn't have just "posted in the other thread", which I could have done easily, it's because my ideals were violated in an egregious manner. The fact is, if you agree with IppE, you must also agree that people who are offended have the right to censor the speech of those who are offending them. Either that, or you agree that one person should have dictatorial control over the forum "because he owns the server".
I strongly disagree, ITT has never just been for "lighthearted stuff", it's been for everything. And the most serious discussions have almost always happened in ITT. But if we accept that ITT should only be for lighthearted stuff, then why didn't I get to force people posting about LGBT or anything else to post in other threads? I didn't, therefore you can't justify the deletion by saying "you were just posting stuff in the wrong place"Aurani wrote:
Well I've now seen the posts where IppE and Bird were talking about the thing. I still have no idea what Bird posted, but let me put it like this:
I'm COMPLETELY on IppE's side if Bird posted some shit that could start a discussion about politics. So basically something serious.
I'm COMPLETELY on Bird's side if Bird only posted a joke, because a joke that is political in nature is still just a joke and thus has no reason to be posted in its appropriate thread.
It all boils down to what the shit he posted to begin with. I agree that cooking stuff goes into the cooking thread and politics go into the place with politics, but ONLY if it's worth the time and dedication to be there. If I make a joke about Mahogany being homo, I should not need to make a fucking separate LGBT thread to say "Yo Maho mate, yer gay". It would be downright silly...
However, Bird would definitely have no defense against the decision for it to be deleted if he posted something along the lines of "Trump is gay and all his supporters should die because he wants to build a wall". That's not something lighthearted and definitely doesn't belong in ITT.
If you want to see the post, here it is: p/5602106
Yo dawg, I'm happy to deal with all the gay jokes you're willing to throw at me. But (theoretically) if I repeatedly ask you to go post it in another thread because it makes me feel uncomfortable, I'd expect you to do so, because that's basic human decency and helps uphold some sort of order in the forum.Aurani wrote:
If I make a joke about Mahogany being homo, I should not need to make a fucking separate LGBT thread to say "Yo Maho mate, yer gay". It would be downright silly...
Go ahead and joke about something, but if it turns out to be in bad taste and not accepted in the megathread, then you should have enough cop-on to at least be posting it somewhere else. Hell, I know you would.
Bird just stamped his foot on the ground and threw a tantrum, and so his posts were deleted because they were causing disorder and discontent in the forum. He was given a fair chance and he threw it away.
"Go post it in a different thread" isn't censorship.B1rd wrote:
The fact is, if you agree with IppE, you must also agree that people who are offended have the right to censor the speech of those who are offending them.
No, I don't agree with you on that one.
If I want to discuss the social implications of Venezuela currently being in a state of anarchy, I should not need to make a thread about it since it's such a narrow topic to discuss. However, ANY kind of politics-related topic should be kept in the politics thread IF it is of serious nature. It's just fucking common sense, mate.
Now, for the post itself:
If you only put the picture up, I would call that a pretty nice joke and would be on your side, but if you put that text along with the picture, that's something serious and worth discussing, which means it goes to the politics thread and not ITT, simply because that's why the fucking politics thread is there for.
Offtopic - I genuinely laughed at the pic, if Granger took it seriously. :V
Yoyoyoyoyo Maho mate, I don't agree with the part where you get offended and tell me to post something in another thread. If I make a joke and Mara gets offended by it, he has no right to tell me to fuck off to another thread without a valid reason for it. Just because he got offended doesn't mean he can tell me where to post my shit, if it's the appropriate place to do so.
If I want to discuss the social implications of Venezuela currently being in a state of anarchy, I should not need to make a thread about it since it's such a narrow topic to discuss. However, ANY kind of politics-related topic should be kept in the politics thread IF it is of serious nature. It's just fucking common sense, mate.
Now, for the post itself:
If you only put the picture up, I would call that a pretty nice joke and would be on your side, but if you put that text along with the picture, that's something serious and worth discussing, which means it goes to the politics thread and not ITT, simply because that's why the fucking politics thread is there for.
Offtopic - I genuinely laughed at the pic, if Granger took it seriously. :V
Yoyoyoyoyo Maho mate, I don't agree with the part where you get offended and tell me to post something in another thread. If I make a joke and Mara gets offended by it, he has no right to tell me to fuck off to another thread without a valid reason for it. Just because he got offended doesn't mean he can tell me where to post my shit, if it's the appropriate place to do so.
What part of my post is serious in any way? It's just a parody of one of Trump's speeches.
But that's besides the point. You can say "keep politics in political threads", but you still haven't justified why you don't have to apply that to any other major topics.
And by the way, from what I remember, what was banned wasn't political discussion, it was memes. I think I remember IppE stating that quite clearly, that random political discussions in ITT were OK, but no Trump memes because some people from Tuuba were still salty about the election.
So basically, the reason behind it wasn't because the content of my posts weren't appropriate for ITT, it was because IppE wanted to contain my posts in a containment thread so they wouldn't trigger anyone.
But that's besides the point. You can say "keep politics in political threads", but you still haven't justified why you don't have to apply that to any other major topics.
And by the way, from what I remember, what was banned wasn't political discussion, it was memes. I think I remember IppE stating that quite clearly, that random political discussions in ITT were OK, but no Trump memes because some people from Tuuba were still salty about the election.
So basically, the reason behind it wasn't because the content of my posts weren't appropriate for ITT, it was because IppE wanted to contain my posts in a containment thread so they wouldn't trigger anyone.
you're getting too worked up for a stupid trump meme that got deleted. it was not just a trup meme even, you were obviously targeting it at Granger and Tupsu for the sake of being a total ass. he didn't tell you not to post the memes. he did not delete it without warning. he just told you to move it to fucking politics, because you were obviously stating your political opinion in a way or another by pestering people with trump memes. while I, again, don't justify crybabying over frigging memes - if you really wanted to stay in the forums, you'd just post it there. I believe that most tuuba users do check the pol thread, so no "exposure" is lost apart from 2-3 frigging people who didn't want to see it in the first place so it has no value.
@Aurani
If something has merit and value to other users of the forum, I agree with you, as long as something doesn't go overboard. Say what you want about intent, but b1rd was the only one who was enjoying b1rd's posts, nobody else found them funny.
I mean, say I map something in osu and I say here "hey dudes, mapping is fun". If someone replies to me and asks what I mapped, who I took inspiration from, etc...then a discussion is forming and it has merit!
Now, other theoretical situation: Nobody replies to me. I keep saying, "Wow, streams are difficult to map" "Jumps are easy to get right" "My maps are the best" "Play my maps guys" but nobody else is replying or taking part in discussion, it obviously has no place in the topic. At that point, I'm just whoring out my map for visibility and should really be posting somewhere else. ESPECIALLY if someone asks me to shut up about my dumb map. If I still don't shut up about my stupid fucking map, I'd deserve to have my posts deleted.
That's my best example, at least.
If something has merit and value to other users of the forum, I agree with you, as long as something doesn't go overboard. Say what you want about intent, but b1rd was the only one who was enjoying b1rd's posts, nobody else found them funny.
I mean, say I map something in osu and I say here "hey dudes, mapping is fun". If someone replies to me and asks what I mapped, who I took inspiration from, etc...then a discussion is forming and it has merit!
Now, other theoretical situation: Nobody replies to me. I keep saying, "Wow, streams are difficult to map" "Jumps are easy to get right" "My maps are the best" "Play my maps guys" but nobody else is replying or taking part in discussion, it obviously has no place in the topic. At that point, I'm just whoring out my map for visibility and should really be posting somewhere else. ESPECIALLY if someone asks me to shut up about my dumb map. If I still don't shut up about my stupid fucking map, I'd deserve to have my posts deleted.
That's my best example, at least.
Jesus fuck I wish we were all on a voip for this, since there is more than one layer for this shit.
First layer is the discussion of what does or doesn't belong on ITT
Second layer is if Bird meant that as a joke or not
Third layer is people who might have gotten triggered over it
Fourth layer is if IppE had any personal reasons to delete the post
Now, let's fucking discuss it one by one here. Stop mixing shit up since SOMEONE here either isn't understanding the situation correctly or is lying. Both sides seem to have posted some seriously fishy shit - the fishy shit being:
That meme was definitely not a joke; the picture was, but the text was just edgy and worth being discussed over (Bird's side)
People getting offended is NO reason to tell someone to fuck off. That's exactly why I left the place, since tupsu the glorious imbecile was practically ruling the place with how much "she" (it) got triggered by various posts. (Maho's side)
So this shit has to be cleared out layer by layer instead of arguing about everything at fucking once.
First layer is the discussion of what does or doesn't belong on ITT
Second layer is if Bird meant that as a joke or not
Third layer is people who might have gotten triggered over it
Fourth layer is if IppE had any personal reasons to delete the post
Now, let's fucking discuss it one by one here. Stop mixing shit up since SOMEONE here either isn't understanding the situation correctly or is lying. Both sides seem to have posted some seriously fishy shit - the fishy shit being:
That meme was definitely not a joke; the picture was, but the text was just edgy and worth being discussed over (Bird's side)
People getting offended is NO reason to tell someone to fuck off. That's exactly why I left the place, since tupsu the glorious imbecile was practically ruling the place with how much "she" (it) got triggered by various posts. (Maho's side)
So this shit has to be cleared out layer by layer instead of arguing about everything at fucking once.
I don't understand why you haven't understood, as I've already explained it, that it wasn't about the meme. It was about the censorship. Why do you think I care in the slightest about posting the meme? I wouldn't have even posted the fricken thing it it wasn't to test if free speech was going to be maintained or not. In the same way, I couldn't care less about Granger or Tupsu, it was just an intentionally incendiary joke to see whether the forum was to be a safe-space or not. And I see you are of the opinion that ITT should be a safe space.Milkshake wrote:
you're getting too worked up for a stupid trump meme that got deleted. it was not just a trup meme even, you were obviously targeting it at Granger and Tupsu for the sake of being a total ass. he didn't tell you not to post the memes. he did not delete it without warning. he just told you to move it to fucking politics, because you were obviously stating your political opinion in a way or another by pestering people with trump memes. while I, again, don't justify crybabying over frigging memes - if you really wanted to stay in the forums, you'd just post it there. I believe that most tuuba users do check the pol thread, so no "exposure" is lost apart from 2-3 frigging people who didn't want to see it in the first place so it has no value.
Also if it means anything, Brian more or less agreed with my position.
"oh no, they wanted to move my posts to a different thread, CENSORSHIP!!!!!!!"
Yes it was, very much so.
Mate, you need to get that shit out of the way if you intend to discuss it with me. I'm not like them and won't fall for your distractions of whether it's some kind of safe space or if IppE is protecting Granger or tupsu. All I care about are facts.
Is that post intended to be taken seriously? You just answered with yes.
Is ITT the place to post serious stuff about politics or cooking or your feet? No.
Is the reason your post got deleted TRULY due to you not having posted it in the right thread or if people were butthurt about it? That's what we're here to discuss.
So far, you said you intentionally posted something to see if you can "trigger" Granger/IppE/whoever was there, correct? That goes completely on you. You chose to have your post deleted for pushing it too far, even if it was justified.
However, I also do not like what I heard just now. Did IppE SERIOUSLY tell you to post it in the politics thread NOT because it belongs there, but because it TRIGGERS some people who don't like Trump?
Is that post intended to be taken seriously? You just answered with yes.
Is ITT the place to post serious stuff about politics or cooking or your feet? No.
Is the reason your post got deleted TRULY due to you not having posted it in the right thread or if people were butthurt about it? That's what we're here to discuss.
So far, you said you intentionally posted something to see if you can "trigger" Granger/IppE/whoever was there, correct? That goes completely on you. You chose to have your post deleted for pushing it too far, even if it was justified.
However, I also do not like what I heard just now. Did IppE SERIOUSLY tell you to post it in the politics thread NOT because it belongs there, but because it TRIGGERS some people who don't like Trump?
how come? because 3 people could decide whether to see your posts about trump or not??
I'm pretty sure,though I don't have proof since I'm not going back there to check up on facts. You can look it up yourself if you want.Aurani wrote:
Mate, you need to get that shit out of the way if you intend to discuss it with me. I'm not like them and won't fall for your distractions of whether it's some kind of safe space or if IppE is protecting Granger or tupsu. All I care about are facts.
Is that post intended to be taken seriously? You just answered with yes.
Is ITT the place to post serious stuff about politics or cooking or your feet? No.
Is the reason your post got deleted TRULY due to you not having posted it in the right thread or if people were butthurt about it? That's what we're here to discuss.
So far, you said you intentionally posted something to see if you can "trigger" Granger/IppE/whoever was there, correct? That goes completely on you. You chose to have your post deleted for pushing it too far, even if it was justified.
However, I also do not like what I heard just now. Did IppE SERIOUSLY tell you to post it in the politics thread NOT because it belongs there, but because it TRIGGERS some people who don't like Trump?
I disagree that ITT is not for serious discussions. We're having one right now, and we've had them in the past. And it seems very stupid to split up a forum that might get 12 posts a day into a dozen different threads. Anyway like I said, if it actually was about it "being in the wrong place", then it would have applied to a lot of things and not just politics. And if it were about me posting in the wrong place, then we could have had some sort of civilised discussion and vote about what exactly what was appropriate in the ITT thread. But that didn't happen.
The post was obviously a joke, it was intended as a joke, and it was basically the final straw to see whether IppE was going to follow though on his threats or whether he was just offering his opinion. The latter one I could have accepted.
Yes, that's what censorship is. And you must realise you're being intellectually dishonest when you're trying to simplify the discussion to single statement like that.Milkshake wrote:
how come? because 3 people could decide whether to see your posts about trump or not??
From what I see here, it's just different beliefs that are making this so unnecessarily hard to judge.
Bird believes his post got removed because IppE protected triggered people, while Maho and Milkman here believe it was removed because he posted something out of place.
So, the crux of the problem lies in whether:
Ippe removed it because he was protecting triggered idiots or
Ippe removed it because it was not a joke and was something worth discussing in the politics thread
Bird believes his post got removed because IppE protected triggered people, while Maho and Milkman here believe it was removed because he posted something out of place.
So, the crux of the problem lies in whether:
Ippe removed it because he was protecting triggered idiots or
Ippe removed it because it was not a joke and was something worth discussing in the politics thread
Rather, I think the counter-argument is that by sole virtue of the fact that some people were triggered, I should have posted in the other thread.
Basically, by the same reasoning that people mob Milo speeches at Universities; because it would be easy for him to do it at a private location instead and that way it wouldn't trigger anyone.
Basically, by the same reasoning that people mob Milo speeches at Universities; because it would be easy for him to do it at a private location instead and that way it wouldn't trigger anyone.
Well IppE seems to have stated what I feared - that he removed it because it was triggering others. In that regard I can't stand by his side at all.
Same way, you shouldn't have pushed it as far as you did. It was unnecessary and you knew it would have repercussions, so you can't complain about it. You dug your own grave in that one.
Now, if we want to find out the TRUE root of the issue here, we have to go deeper. We need to find out what you ORIGINALLY posted that started this entire thing.
Same way, you shouldn't have pushed it as far as you did. It was unnecessary and you knew it would have repercussions, so you can't complain about it. You dug your own grave in that one.
Now, if we want to find out the TRUE root of the issue here, we have to go deeper. We need to find out what you ORIGINALLY posted that started this entire thing.
I didn't post anything I shouldn't have had the right to.
Sure you have the right to post it, but you don't have the right to not have it removed
I agree there - you definitely went overboard with that last post, and you said so yourself. You posted it specifically to test other people's patience, so there is no reason for you to complain about it.
So in this regard I think you're both cocknuggets. I simply don't even want to consider being on IppE's side because the reasoning behind his removal of your post was completely and utterly due to personal beliefs and not because he thought the post was in the wrong place.
You just acted like a cocknugget for attention, and I know you like being edgy for others, but you have to see that you will only ever attract children with that sort of show.
So in this regard I think you're both cocknuggets. I simply don't even want to consider being on IppE's side because the reasoning behind his removal of your post was completely and utterly due to personal beliefs and not because he thought the post was in the wrong place.
You just acted like a cocknugget for attention, and I know you like being edgy for others, but you have to see that you will only ever attract children with that sort of show.
I think you misread my post. I don't apologise for anything I posted; if other people are triggered, that's their problem.
Well that's just rude then. If I go and take a shit on you and then say "I don't apologise for anything" you probably wouldn't like me, now, would you? Why go and push it that far when you know that the only thing you're gonna achieve is to cause negative attention, unless you specifically want that attention.
I left because I couldn't handle that same safe-space bullshit that tupsu was doing, but I didn't cause a drama over it. Be a man and just leave them be if they want to be retards. They're gonna learn one day that when someone punches them in the face, they won't have a safe space or anyone to come crying to. Life uh..... finds a way.
As for IppE, I'm just sad, nothing to say really.
I left because I couldn't handle that same safe-space bullshit that tupsu was doing, but I didn't cause a drama over it. Be a man and just leave them be if they want to be retards. They're gonna learn one day that when someone punches them in the face, they won't have a safe space or anyone to come crying to. Life uh..... finds a way.
As for IppE, I'm just sad, nothing to say really.
Well it's not like it's my intention to offend anyone; I'm not trying to personally insult anyone. It's just provocative humour. You have to realise that offense isn't given, it's taken. I don't think I over dramaticised anything, I'd prefer to try and change things before I leave. But once my posts get deleted, that's the point I step out. I gave IppE and ultimatum that I wouldn't tolerate my posts being deleted, and he chose to do it.
Anyway, I agree with your sentiments.
Anyway, I agree with your sentiments.
Everyone has that vivid memory of seeing tupsu go on a massive rage fit and throw profanities at everyone within close proximity for the first time. It's like a ritual. Not like it's rare though, happens almost everyday, I think?
I don't.
Could've sworn it happens a lot. Not that I dislike her though. Just think, "Eh, it happens."
article doesn't even link to the studyB1rd wrote:
http://cfif.org/v/index.php/commentary/54-state-of-affairs/1357-pew-research-republicans-more-knowledgeable-than-democrats
Interesting.
study is 7 years old (lol) http://www.pewresearch.org/2010/11/18/p ... specifics/
As the study correctly points out, there are other driving factors such as age and education. Did they ever mention whether or not they accounted for that when they chose their samples? Can a questionnaire consisting of only 13 questions (lol again) really be considered to be an accurate way to measure what they are trying to measure? Are the questions biased?
this piece of research raises some questions about its validity..
not willing to look further into it, though. A major blunder of them to not describe their sample in the very first chart, makes me think they don't know anything about statistics. They don't deserve a second look. Crappy article. Why even bother doing a questionnaire if you're gonna publish it like that? Sloppy journalism of this magnitude is usually reserved for the typical second hand source, like the one that b1rd linked.
Railey, you give everything B1rd says far too much credit. That said, good on you for it.
Also, still love that Renard track <3
Also, still love that Renard track <3
i mean.. i could very well imagine that the claim of the study holds true. The average republican might know more about these things than the average democrat. But fuck is that one bad article like come on.
Just what we needed: more entanglements in the Middle East.
Milkshake wrote:
good meem
The low quality jpeg effect makes it gold. Or maybe it actually is a low quality jpeg.
Uh oh, everytime Aurani is here, i'm always out jacking it.
Excellent series.
I secretly wank to your sister every time you're away from home.Hika wrote:
Uh oh, everytime Aurani is here, i'm always out jacking it.
Top 10 Anime betrayals.Aurani wrote:
I secretly wank to your sister every time you're away from home.Hika wrote:
Uh oh, everytime Aurani is here, i'm always out jacking it.
Send me a picture of Hika's sister asap
Yo yo, you can't have both. You can have Hika, but her sister is mine.
I don't have a sister. Stop cheating on me.
At least let me dream!Hika wrote:
I don't have a sister. Stop cheating on me.
why? you can go and molest the real aurani. he's good at playing the little-sister-role.
i thought you were a guy
i already posted in me irl some time ago, i can go look for that picture
i already posted in me irl some time ago, i can go look for that picture
I can't believe you look 100% like I imagined you. I'm getting good at guessing.
Also, you sure you have no German blood in you? I sense something German about you. Must be the adorable kitty.:V
Also, you sure you have no German blood in you? I sense something German about you. Must be the adorable kitty.:V
i'm just happy that neither of us used an instagram filter. All is good.
i'd rather die than having my face be vandalized like this
I'm not going to take insults from a barely legal kebab.
don't worry, I know your heart is already shattered ;*
alive and rested
ste fan fan kikoeru sama is here
Ona je posebna, vjeruj miAurani wrote:
Well well, if you want mine, you gotta whip out yours. :VRailey2 wrote:
aurani post pix plz
Sex manijak, ženski Ron Jeremi
Nisam jedini što ide u intimu
Gufe nisu solo, uvijek su u timu
Ima strašne fore koje radit voli
Ne znam gdje je učila al’ znam da ne u školi
Šta je mislio tvoj tata kad te radio
Onaj ko je stavio, taj nikad ne bi vadio
I'm a really big mexican man with muscles all over the place. That's how I won over the heart of Hika's sister.Madvillain wrote:
I feel betrayed. I always thought you were a black man living in Serbia. While at the back of my mind I knew it was for the lulz, I still clung on to that hope.
Da tek vidis kako je Slippers seksi. =DAomi wrote:
Ona je posebna, vjeruj mi
Sex manijak, ženski Ron Jeremi
Nisam jedini što ide u intimu
Gufe nisu solo, uvijek su u timu
Ima strašne fore koje radit voli
Ne znam gdje je učila al’ znam da ne u školi
Šta je mislio tvoj tata kad te radio
Onaj ko je stavio, taj nikad ne bi vadio
I always imagined aurani to be Marcus Aurelius incarnate. Actually, I'm still 99% sure that'll end up happening in some form as aurani becomes the leader of a neo roman empire.
This fucking hit me so hardJordan wrote:
Please stop
...finna
...niggas
JUST USE PROPER FKN ENGLISH GODFUCKIIASIPGHOASINGDAMMIT........ BEING ALL CHITTY CHITTY BANG BANG DOESNT MAKE YOU SOUDN OCOOL JSAUTASU JUST FUCKIN STOPPPPPPP
...niggas
JUST USE PROPER FKN ENGLISH GODFUCKIIASIPGHOASINGDAMMIT........ BEING ALL CHITTY CHITTY BANG BANG DOESNT MAKE YOU SOUDN OCOOL JSAUTASU JUST FUCKIN STOPPPPPPP
I'm finna fight you if u don't shut up nigga
this joke went way over my head
Is posting second-rate memes the only thing you come here to do.
Comfy Slippers wrote:
...finna
...niggas
JUST USE PROPER FKN ENGLISH GODFUCKIIASIPGHOASINGDAMMIT........ BEING ALL CHITTY CHITTY BANG BANG DOESNT MAKE YOU SOUDN OCOOL JSAUTASU JUST FUCKIN STOPPPPPPP
YOU KNOW NOTHING COMFY SLIPPERSComfy Slippers wrote:
...finna
...niggas
JUST USE PROPER FKN ENGLISH GODFUCKIIASIPGHOASINGDAMMIT........ BEING ALL CHITTY CHITTY BANG BANG DOESNT MAKE YOU SOUDN OCOOL JSAUTASU JUST FUCKIN STOPPPPPPP
At least the chemical attacks will be replaced by codeine attacks 👀👍👌Hika wrote:
This fucking hit me so hardJordan wrote:
Please stop
this shit used to be my jamkai99 wrote:
Comfy Slippers wrote:
...finna
...niggas
JUST USE PROPER FKN ENGLISH GODFUCKIIASIPGHOASINGDAMMIT........ BEING ALL CHITTY CHITTY BANG BANG DOESNT MAKE YOU SOUDN OCOOL JSAUTASU JUST FUCKIN STOPPPPPPP
Hika's a hood nigger, what do you expect? :pComfy Slippers wrote:
...finna
...niggas
JUST USE PROPER FKN ENGLISH GODFUCKIIASIPGHOASINGDAMMIT........ BEING ALL CHITTY CHITTY BANG BANG DOESNT MAKE YOU SOUDN OCOOL JSAUTASU JUST FUCKIN STOPPPPPPP
nah
fookmep
imagine calling them second rate memes :khinting:
stefan lock again
ill pay
ill pay
I wonder how many people need to be run over with trucks before people realise that immigrants in Europe pose some issues.
You don't even live in Europe, pal.
Not that I'm against your point of view, but you got it easy there you isolated fuck. :V
Not that I'm against your point of view, but you got it easy there you isolated fuck. :V
Did I just read... TRUCKS?!
remember how they wanted to ban Quake it could be used as training engine for potential school shooters?
Truck simulator ban incoming.
Truck simulator ban incoming.
Mara on his way to train some Finnish kebabs in the ways of mowing down people with trucks, black and white filter, circa 2015.
I need to drive some more so I can buy another garage.
hello people; tuuba drama was an interesting read
for a second I thought ITT 2 was locked due to the presence of ITT 3 and I almost had a heart attack. Now I'm just angery
for a second I thought ITT 2 was locked due to the presence of ITT 3 and I almost had a heart attack. Now I'm just angery
Statistically speaking, things are going really well. So no, there'd need to be a ridiculous upturn in violence before you could even begin to make that point.B1rd wrote:
I wonder how many people need to be run over with trucks before people realise that immigrants in Europe pose some issues.
Why would you stop immigrants when you can wait for them to get enslaved in north africa or dumped into the Mediterranean Sea?