Pantsu-on-head retarded. The economy is far too complex to be reduced to a simple algorithm to simply be calculated. There is no incentive for any central planner to optimise or innovate the means of production like private owners.
And complicated things, e.g. Women, usually don't get shared evenly. Some get all of them, some never get anyB1rd wrote:
Pantsu-on-head retarded. The economy is far too complex to be reduced to a simple algorithm to simply be calculated. There is no incentive for any central planner to optimise or innovate the means of production like private owners.
you're pantsu on head retarded!B1rd wrote:
Pantsu-on-head retarded. The economy is far too complex to be reduced to a simple algorithm to simply be calculated. There is no incentive for any central planner to optimise or innovate the means of production like private owners.
Railey2 wrote:
all posts after in count! it says so in the rules
This reminds me of KKK.Meah wrote:
To all depressed and alone persons out there
Source: 9gag
johnmedina999 wrote:
This reminds me of KKK.Meah wrote:
To all depressed and alone persons out there
Source: 9gag
I disagree with this quite a lot, particularly when regarding basic resources (not luxuries). Management of these resources should be fairly simple, you can just restock on them when they get low on stock.B1rd wrote:
Pantsu-on-head retarded. The economy is far too complex to be reduced to a simple algorithm to simply be calculated. There is no incentive for any central planner to optimise or innovate the means of production like private owners.
DryBones81 wrote:
51 million
240 thousand
685 dollars
aaand
53 cents
that is how much i paid for my pcjohnmedina999 wrote:
Is that how much money you blew playing at the casino?DryBones81 wrote:
51 million
240 thousand
685 dollars
aaand
53 cents
to post random and stupid thingsIAmRelapse wrote:
I'm new here, what is this thread for?
get moneyIAmRelapse wrote:
Well, there are cats outside screaming... what should i do?
ah, so that's why all this baiting is happeningjohnmedina999 wrote:
It's for the bingo game, I think.
which costs as much asjohnmedina999 wrote:
Bring out the Kitten Cannon.
Someone didn't even bother to read the rules. This thread is exempt of bingo fields.johnmedina999 wrote:
It's for the bingo game, I think.
51 millionRaspberriel wrote:
did someone say... cannon?
Meah wrote:
I wasted two hours for nothing .. Ha Ha Ha I am going crazy.C:\WINDOWS\system32>diskpartRIP Flash Drive
Microsoft DiskPart version 51240685.53
Copyright (C) 1999-2013 Microsoft Corporation.
On computer: DESKTOP-29760OP
DISKPART> list disk
Disk ### Status Size Free Dyn Gpt
-------- ------------- ------- ------- --- ---
Disk 0 Online 51240685.53 GB 51240685.53 KB *
Disk 1 Online 51240685.53 GB 51240685.53 B
DISKPART> select disk 1
Disk 1 is now the selected disk.
DISKPART> clean
DiskPart succeeded in cleaning the disk.
DISKPART> create partition primary
DiskPart succeeded in creating the specified partition.
DISKPART> format fs=NTFS
51240685.53 percent completed
DiskPart has encountered an error: The parameter is incorrect.
See the System Event Log for more information.
DISKPART> LL
what the fuck is that deviantart-tier abominationRaspberriel wrote:
did someone say... cannon?
Socialism nowadays is almost like this great evil that nobody wants to have a reasonable discussion about, even though the original idea wasn't so bad at all.DaddyCoolVipper wrote:
I disagree with this quite a lot, particularly when regarding basic resources (not luxuries). Management of these resources should be fairly simple, you can just restock on them when they get low on stock.B1rd wrote:
Pantsu-on-head retarded. The economy is far too complex to be reduced to a simple algorithm to simply be calculated. There is no incentive for any central planner to optimise or innovate the means of production like private owners.
I don't think capitalism has any inherent optimalisation when it comes to resource distribution. People in charge get paid even if they're not maximising efficiency, after all- they have salaries to do their job and that's it. Employers almost never demand optimal efficiency from workers because people tend to be a bit lazy, it's human nature.
Socialism nowadays is 51 millionRailey2 wrote:
Pantsu-on-head retarded. The economy is far too complex to be reduced to a simple algorithm to simply be calculated. There is no incentive for any central planner to optimise or innovate the means of production like private owners.
I disagree with this quite a lot, particularly when regarding basic resources (not luxuries). Management of these resources should be fairly simple, you can just restock on them when they get low on stock.
I don't think capitalism has any inherent optimalisation when it comes to resource distribution. People in charge get paid even if they're not maximising efficiency, after all- they have salaries to do their job and that's it. Employers almost never demand optimal efficiency from workers because people tend to be a bit lazy, it's human nature.Socialism nowadays is almost like this great evil that nobody wants to have a reasonable discussion about, even though the original idea wasn't so bad at all.
it's just very different from what we're used to, and it failed the test of reality gloriously due to a lack of practicability.
Railey2 wrote:
Socialism nowadays is almost like this great evil that nobody wants to have a reasonable discussion about, even though the original idea wasn't so bad at all.
it's just very different from what we're used to, and it failed the test of reality gloriously due to a lack of practicability.
Yeah he could be added, since the US embargo seriously fucked CubaEndaris wrote:
you can replace almost all of the "we need to stop this" pics with murica
also, where's good ol' fidel?
shit we have let lol downlol wrote:
not enough shitposting u boring fucks
lol wrote:
not enough 51 million
240 thousand
685 dollars
aand
53 cents u boring fucks
foring bucksDryBones81 wrote:
lol wrote:
not enough 51 million
240 thousand
685 dollars
aand
53 cents u boring fucks
fixed
who r uComfy Slippers wrote:
ur mom
damn u got me there famZain Sugieres wrote:
Ur mum
this is supposed to be satirical, right?Mahogany wrote:
Capitalism is a failing model at its best, meanwhile socialism is demonized.
also https://www.reddit.com/r/LateStageCapit ... r_how_its/ for a good explainer's explanation if mine isn't enough for you
its a prankAurani wrote:
I don't know if that guy who posted the reddit thread is just utterly idiotic and immature at best, or if it's satire...
Aurani wrote:
I don't know if that guy who posted the reddit thread is just utterly idiotic and immature at best, or if it's satire...
tatoegracefu wrote:
Which side are you on
CHOOSE
wtf I hate capitalism now.GladiOol wrote:
Aurani wrote:
I don't know if that guy who posted the reddit thread is just utterly idiotic and immature at best, or if it's satire...
Stfu.Aurani wrote:
I have been converted, thanks Comrades Birdman and Gladi.
Foxtrot wrote:
how do people let Discord get in the way of their daily life
ur dadTae wrote:
who r uComfy Slippers wrote:
ur mom
Your husbandTae wrote:
who r uComfy Slippers wrote:
ur mom
im your waifuBlitzfrog wrote:
Your husbandTae wrote:
who r u
Comfy Slippers wrote:
obligatory spam
Brian OA wrote:
BotanicSage puts some nice mashups out there.
NOooooooooo my fucking warm and fuzzy childhood feels are all goneAutoMedic wrote:
Brian OA wrote:
BotanicSage puts some nice mashups out there.
also hi
ugh im wondering what your sig says but the most basic ciphers i remember of are vignere, caesar and substitutionAutoMedic wrote:
A fading kingdom
Blissful like a reverence
Fading in the night
Finally my beloved pseudo-virgin noticed me. How are you, Mrs. Flat Ass? =DMilkshake wrote:
aurani u fucking cockwaffle
i usually use vignere because it's easier to drop clues onkai99 wrote:
ugh im wondering what your sig says but the most basic ciphers i remember of are vignere, caesar and substitutionAutoMedic wrote:
A fading kingdom
Blissful like a reverence
Fading in the night