Raspberriel wrote:

Or every single JonTron defender I've seen today

Railey2 wrote:

b1rd lets argue about politics, i go first

i want that people give hardcore socialism another shot.

The main problem before was, that a fair regulation of production and distribution of goods was basically impossible, given how difficult the data was to handle and analyse.
Well now we have computers. And the internet. With live updates.

A planned economy could actually succeed if there are live updates and programs that take care of big data within a seconds notice.

The idea that decentralised planning has to be better than centralised planning was certainly true when we didn't have all this amazing technology to collect and handle data, but the playing field changed.

i think we need to rethink our options here. Public owernership! Socialism!

What do you think??

Meah wrote:

Source: 9gag

Blitzfrog wrote:

Railey2 wrote:

b1rd lets argue about politics, i go first

i want that people give hardcore socialism another shot.

The main problem before was, that a fair regulation of production and distribution of goods was basically impossible, given how difficult the data was to handle and analyse.
Well now we have computers. And the internet. With live updates.

A planned economy could actually succeed if there are live updates and programs that take care of big data within a seconds notice.

The idea that decentralised planning has to be better than centralised planning was certainly true when we didn't have all this amazing technology to collect and handle data, but the playing field changed.

i think we need to rethink our options here. Public owernership! Socialism!

What do you think??

Annnnnnnd you just got ignored

If you're gonna bait, at least make it look real

B1rd wrote:

Pantsu-on-head retarded. The economy is far too complex to be reduced to a simple algorithm to simply be calculated. There is no incentive for any central planner to optimise or innovate the means of production like private owners.

B1rd wrote:

Pantsu-on-head retarded. The economy is far too complex to be reduced to a simple algorithm to simply be calculated. There is no incentive for any central planner to optimise or innovate the means of production like private owners.

Railey2 wrote:

all posts after in count! it says so in the rules

Meah wrote:

nodes

Meah wrote:

To all depressed and alone persons out there

Source: 9gag

johnmedina999 wrote:

Meah wrote:

To all depressed and alone persons out there

Source: 9gag

This reminds me of KKK.

B1rd wrote:

Pantsu-on-head retarded. The economy is far too complex to be reduced to a simple algorithm to simply be calculated. There is no incentive for any central planner to optimise or innovate the means of production like private owners.

DryBones81 wrote:

51 million
240 thousand
685 dollars
aaand
53 cents

johnmedina999 wrote:

DryBones81 wrote:

51 million
240 thousand
685 dollars
aaand
53 cents

Is that how much money you blew playing at the casino?

IAmRelapse wrote:

I'm new here, what is this thread for?

IAmRelapse wrote:

Well, there are cats outside screaming... what should i do?

johnmedina999 wrote:

It's for the bingo game, I think.

johnmedina999 wrote:

Bring out the Kitten Cannon.

johnmedina999 wrote:

It's for the bingo game, I think.

Raspberriel wrote:

did someone say... cannon?

Meah wrote:

I wasted two hours for nothing .. Ha Ha Ha I am going crazy.

C:\WINDOWS\system32>diskpart

Microsoft DiskPart version 51240685.53

Copyright (C) 1999-2013 Microsoft Corporation.
On computer: DESKTOP-29760OP

DISKPART> list disk

Disk ### Status Size Free Dyn Gpt
-------- ------------- ------- ------- --- ---
Disk 0 Online 51240685.53 GB 51240685.53 KB *
Disk 1 Online 51240685.53 GB 51240685.53 B

DISKPART> select disk 1

Disk 1 is now the selected disk.

DISKPART> clean

DiskPart succeeded in cleaning the disk.

DISKPART> create partition primary

DiskPart succeeded in creating the specified partition.

DISKPART> format fs=NTFS

51240685.53 percent completed
DiskPart has encountered an error: The parameter is incorrect.
See the System Event Log for more information.

DISKPART> LL

RIP Flash Drive

Raspberriel wrote:

did someone say... cannon?

DaddyCoolVipper wrote:

B1rd wrote:

Pantsu-on-head retarded. The economy is far too complex to be reduced to a simple algorithm to simply be calculated. There is no incentive for any central planner to optimise or innovate the means of production like private owners.

I disagree with this quite a lot, particularly when regarding basic resources (not luxuries). Management of these resources should be fairly simple, you can just restock on them when they get low on stock.

I don't think capitalism has any inherent optimalisation when it comes to resource distribution. People in charge get paid even if they're not maximising efficiency, after all- they have salaries to do their job and that's it. Employers almost never demand optimal efficiency from workers because people tend to be a bit lazy, it's human nature.

Railey2 wrote:

Pantsu-on-head retarded. The economy is far too complex to be reduced to a simple algorithm to simply be calculated. There is no incentive for any central planner to optimise or innovate the means of production like private owners.

I disagree with this quite a lot, particularly when regarding basic resources (not luxuries). Management of these resources should be fairly simple, you can just restock on them when they get low on stock.

I don't think capitalism has any inherent optimalisation when it comes to resource distribution. People in charge get paid even if they're not maximising efficiency, after all- they have salaries to do their job and that's it. Employers almost never demand optimal efficiency from workers because people tend to be a bit lazy, it's human nature.Socialism nowadays is almost like this great evil that nobody wants to have a reasonable discussion about, even though the original idea wasn't so bad at all.

it's just very different from what we're used to, and it failed the test of reality gloriously due to a lack of practicability.

DryBones81 wrote:

Socialism nowadays is 51 million
240 thousand
685 dollars

aand

53 cents

Railey2 wrote:

Socialism nowadays is almost like this great evil that nobody wants to have a reasonable discussion about, even though the original idea wasn't so bad at all.

it's just very different from what we're used to, and it failed the test of reality gloriously due to a lack of practicability.

Endaris wrote:

you can replace almost all of the "we need to stop this" pics with murica
also, where's good ol' fidel?

lol wrote:

not enough shitposting u boring fucks

lol wrote:

not enough 51 million
240 thousand
685 dollars


aand

53 cents u boring fucks

DryBones81 wrote:

lol wrote:

not enough 51 million
240 thousand
685 dollars


aand

53 cents u boring fucks

fixed

Comfy Slippers wrote:

ur mom

Zain Sugieres wrote:

Ur mum

Zain Sugieres wrote:

Ur mum

Mahogany wrote:

Capitalism is a failing model at its best, meanwhile socialism is demonized.

also https://www.reddit.com/r/LateStageCapit ... r_how_its/ for a good explainer's explanation if mine isn't enough for you

Aurani wrote:

I don't know if that guy who posted the reddit thread is just utterly idiotic and immature at best, or if it's satire...

Aurani wrote:

I don't know if that guy who posted the reddit thread is just utterly idiotic and immature at best, or if it's satire...

gracefu wrote:

Which side are you on

CHOOSE

GladiOol wrote:

Aurani wrote:

I don't know if that guy who posted the reddit thread is just utterly idiotic and immature at best, or if it's satire...

Aurani wrote:

I have been converted, thanks Comrades Birdman and Gladi.

Foxtrot wrote:

how do people let Discord get in the way of their daily life

Tae wrote:

Comfy Slippers wrote:

ur mom

who r u

Tae wrote:

Comfy Slippers wrote:

ur mom

who r u

Blitzfrog wrote:

Tae wrote:

who r u

Your husband

Comfy Slippers wrote:

obligatory spam

Brian OA wrote:

BotanicSage puts some nice mashups out there.