That's pretty impressive, actually.Raspberriel wrote:
jesus christ
this is somehow genius and absolutely fucking pathetic at the same time
B1rd wrote:
You're a bit late. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PeXEWsobJRE
Even Shia LaPoof is no match for the memers on 4 and 8chan.
johnmedina999 wrote:
That's pretty impressive, actually.
it just seems incredibly petty to me, to put in that much collective effort just to be the thorn in the side of one specific person just because he insulted God-Emperor Donald I of the House of Trumpjohnmedina999 wrote:
That's pretty impressive, actually.Raspberriel wrote:
jesus christ
this is somehow genius and absolutely fucking pathetic at the same time
The reason isn't the impressive part, it's the act. It's just so impressive! That flag could have been anywhere on this earth, and they managed to find it within 36 hours.Raspberriel wrote:
it just seems incredibly petty to me, to put in that much collective effort just to be the thorn in the side of one specific person just because he insulted God-Emperor Donald I of the House of Trump
if it was one ordinary person doing this against another ordinary person they'd get a restraining order
that's exactly why they're scaryjohnmedina999 wrote:
The reason isn't the impressive part, it's the act. It's just so impressive! That flag could have been anywhere on this earth, and they managed to find it within 36 hours.Raspberriel wrote:
it just seems incredibly petty to me, to put in that much collective effort just to be the thorn in the side of one specific person just because he insulted God-Emperor Donald I of the House of Trump
if it was one ordinary person doing this against another ordinary person they'd get a restraining order
/pol/ is scary, but you cannot deny the amount of OC they produced during the election, you cannot deny that the times they come together incredible things happen, and this is just one of many.
Raspberriel wrote:
that's exactly why they're scary
they have the power to take down anyone that crosses their path, or at the very least, make their life a living hell
Serraionga wrote:
OT, I need your help. I would like to ask if any of you know what the name of the following soundtrack is.
It's from a shitty flash game I used to play over a decade ago which had a really interesting music selection at the time.
it's been like 12 years since i've been looking for this, please help a Spaniard in need
I agree!Raspberriel wrote:
samelol wrote:
every time you post i want to throw up
lol wrote:
every time you post i want to throw up
Meah wrote:
I agree
95% is S right?
only if you did not miss like 2 time?(idk)Meah wrote:
I agree
95% is S right?
yours is 94.99%Meah wrote:
I agree
95% is S right?
Welcome to the "tfw 90.00% B or 95.00% A" club.Meah wrote:
I agree
95% is S right?
Because you're not playing mania desulevesterz wrote:
Tbh most of my 3* map that i pass with above 90% still counted as b ....
I tried mania before but kinda stop playiñg after 5 min becase i almost break my keyboard (i smashed that leyboard jard)johnmedina999 wrote:
Because you're not playing mania desulevesterz wrote:
Tbh most of my 3* map that i pass with above 90% still counted as b ....
Or every single JonTron defender I've seen todayMahogany wrote:
Looking in to this, apparently everyone is being triggered since this guy has some political beliefs some people don't like. Toughen up.Raspberriel wrote:
Or every single JonTron defender I've seen today
Railey2 wrote:
b1rd lets argue about politics, i go first
i want that people give hardcore socialism another shot.
The main problem before was, that a fair regulation of production and distribution of goods was basically impossible, given how difficult the data was to handle and analyse.
Well now we have computers. And the internet. With live updates.
A planned economy could actually succeed if there are live updates and programs that take care of big data within a seconds notice.
The idea that decentralised planning has to be better than centralised planning was certainly true when we didn't have all this amazing technology to collect and handle data, but the playing field changed.
i think we need to rethink our options here. Public owernership! Socialism!
What do you think??
but i was serious..Blitzfrog wrote:
Railey2 wrote:
b1rd lets argue about politics, i go first
i want that people give hardcore socialism another shot.
The main problem before was, that a fair regulation of production and distribution of goods was basically impossible, given how difficult the data was to handle and analyse.
Well now we have computers. And the internet. With live updates.
A planned economy could actually succeed if there are live updates and programs that take care of big data within a seconds notice.
The idea that decentralised planning has to be better than centralised planning was certainly true when we didn't have all this amazing technology to collect and handle data, but the playing field changed.
i think we need to rethink our options here. Public owernership! Socialism!
What do you think??
Annnnnnnd you just got ignored
If you're gonna bait, at least make it look real
And complicated things, e.g. Women, usually don't get shared evenly. Some get all of them, some never get anyB1rd wrote:
Pantsu-on-head retarded. The economy is far too complex to be reduced to a simple algorithm to simply be calculated. There is no incentive for any central planner to optimise or innovate the means of production like private owners.
you're pantsu on head retarded!B1rd wrote:
Pantsu-on-head retarded. The economy is far too complex to be reduced to a simple algorithm to simply be calculated. There is no incentive for any central planner to optimise or innovate the means of production like private owners.
Railey2 wrote:
all posts after in count! it says so in the rules
This reminds me of KKK.Meah wrote:
To all depressed and alone persons out there
Source: 9gag
johnmedina999 wrote:
This reminds me of KKK.Meah wrote:
To all depressed and alone persons out there
Source: 9gag
I disagree with this quite a lot, particularly when regarding basic resources (not luxuries). Management of these resources should be fairly simple, you can just restock on them when they get low on stock.B1rd wrote:
Pantsu-on-head retarded. The economy is far too complex to be reduced to a simple algorithm to simply be calculated. There is no incentive for any central planner to optimise or innovate the means of production like private owners.
DryBones81 wrote:
51 million
240 thousand
685 dollars
aaand
53 cents
that is how much i paid for my pcjohnmedina999 wrote:
Is that how much money you blew playing at the casino?DryBones81 wrote:
51 million
240 thousand
685 dollars
aaand
53 cents
to post random and stupid thingsIAmRelapse wrote:
I'm new here, what is this thread for?
get moneyIAmRelapse wrote:
Well, there are cats outside screaming... what should i do?
ah, so that's why all this baiting is happeningjohnmedina999 wrote:
It's for the bingo game, I think.
which costs as much asjohnmedina999 wrote:
Bring out the Kitten Cannon.
Someone didn't even bother to read the rules. This thread is exempt of bingo fields.johnmedina999 wrote:
It's for the bingo game, I think.
51 millionRaspberriel wrote:
did someone say... cannon?
Meah wrote:
I wasted two hours for nothing .. Ha Ha Ha I am going crazy.C:\WINDOWS\system32>diskpartRIP Flash Drive
Microsoft DiskPart version 51240685.53
Copyright (C) 1999-2013 Microsoft Corporation.
On computer: DESKTOP-29760OP
DISKPART> list disk
Disk ### Status Size Free Dyn Gpt
-------- ------------- ------- ------- --- ---
Disk 0 Online 51240685.53 GB 51240685.53 KB *
Disk 1 Online 51240685.53 GB 51240685.53 B
DISKPART> select disk 1
Disk 1 is now the selected disk.
DISKPART> clean
DiskPart succeeded in cleaning the disk.
DISKPART> create partition primary
DiskPart succeeded in creating the specified partition.
DISKPART> format fs=NTFS
51240685.53 percent completed
DiskPart has encountered an error: The parameter is incorrect.
See the System Event Log for more information.
DISKPART> LL
what the fuck is that deviantart-tier abominationRaspberriel wrote:
did someone say... cannon?
Socialism nowadays is almost like this great evil that nobody wants to have a reasonable discussion about, even though the original idea wasn't so bad at all.DaddyCoolVipper wrote:
I disagree with this quite a lot, particularly when regarding basic resources (not luxuries). Management of these resources should be fairly simple, you can just restock on them when they get low on stock.B1rd wrote:
Pantsu-on-head retarded. The economy is far too complex to be reduced to a simple algorithm to simply be calculated. There is no incentive for any central planner to optimise or innovate the means of production like private owners.
I don't think capitalism has any inherent optimalisation when it comes to resource distribution. People in charge get paid even if they're not maximising efficiency, after all- they have salaries to do their job and that's it. Employers almost never demand optimal efficiency from workers because people tend to be a bit lazy, it's human nature.
Socialism nowadays is 51 millionRailey2 wrote:
Pantsu-on-head retarded. The economy is far too complex to be reduced to a simple algorithm to simply be calculated. There is no incentive for any central planner to optimise or innovate the means of production like private owners.
I disagree with this quite a lot, particularly when regarding basic resources (not luxuries). Management of these resources should be fairly simple, you can just restock on them when they get low on stock.
I don't think capitalism has any inherent optimalisation when it comes to resource distribution. People in charge get paid even if they're not maximising efficiency, after all- they have salaries to do their job and that's it. Employers almost never demand optimal efficiency from workers because people tend to be a bit lazy, it's human nature.Socialism nowadays is almost like this great evil that nobody wants to have a reasonable discussion about, even though the original idea wasn't so bad at all.
it's just very different from what we're used to, and it failed the test of reality gloriously due to a lack of practicability.
Railey2 wrote:
Socialism nowadays is almost like this great evil that nobody wants to have a reasonable discussion about, even though the original idea wasn't so bad at all.
it's just very different from what we're used to, and it failed the test of reality gloriously due to a lack of practicability.
Yeah he could be added, since the US embargo seriously fucked CubaEndaris wrote:
you can replace almost all of the "we need to stop this" pics with murica
also, where's good ol' fidel?
shit we have let lol downlol wrote:
not enough shitposting u boring fucks
lol wrote:
not enough 51 million
240 thousand
685 dollars
aand
53 cents u boring fucks
foring bucksDryBones81 wrote:
lol wrote:
not enough 51 million
240 thousand
685 dollars
aand
53 cents u boring fucks
fixed
who r uComfy Slippers wrote:
ur mom