Hello Garalulu! M4M
[SayaKather]
00:08:886 (8886|4,9053|2) - you should switch notes here, because the second note is higher PR compared to previous?
00:09:553 (9553|3) - in that case, also move this note to col 2 because of a lot lower pitch.
00:10:886 - why single note?
00:15:219 - 00:23:219 - 00:16:886 - 00:17:219 - I recommend you to make this triple note so that the chord pattern you try to make here can signify the piano sound better.. since from the way i see it is that it's 4 note 2 note pattern with lack of diversity for the moment.
For some of the mod above, you may apply on lower diff as well.
00:24:719 - well, i will suggest you try to use this instead:
https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7497908 , it signifies the pitch rising sound better here, and it gives symmetry and complement the pattern you make at 00:25:719 - , which gives double advantages.
00:26:386 (26386|4,26469|5,26553|3,26636|4) - this kind of sound can be made into jack to complement the same snare sound here.. i recommend move 00:26:386 (26386|4,26553|3) - to col 6 and col 5 here, it fit the sound better. or you can arrange to fit the jack there..
00:32:886 - 00:33:219 - this triple is kinda questionable imo, there isn't any piano sound that you follow for 3 notes sound at 00:31:553 - 00:31:886 - ,etc .. makes the double?
00:40:719 - should be 5 notes chord if following what you want at 00:41:053 -
00:41:719 - the bracket stream seem focused on right hand which kinda unnecessary imo.. i think you can spread it a bit more to provide bracket balance
https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/749797600:43:052 (43052|5,43052|4,43052|6,43052|2) - This chord should be Ctrl+H'ed mainly because it's lower pitch chord that should be accented with left hand chord, and it provide variation with 00:44:052 - too.
01:06:217 (66217|1,66551|0,66717|1) - i believe you can make it more symmetrical by make it 1-2-1 , it will mirrored the pattern at 01:05:718 (65718|6,65884|6,66051|6) -
01:16:217 (76217|5,76217|1,76301|4,76301|2) - you miss out the potential sound that can be made jack.
01:20:051 - i find the svs here kinda hard to manage since you make them in the middle of harsh and dense chord, probably you can nerfed the svs?
01:31:383 (91383|6,91549|6,91716|6,91883|6,92049|6,92216|6,92383|6) - please avoid the anchor..
01:41:383 - you can add another note for finish sound, i don't think it will be too hard when it's finish sound..
[Another]
00:33:719 - I find the pattern to be not symmetrical enough, how about try this instead?
https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/749827500:54:385 - well this one has 2 note + 1 LN while the one at 00:52:385 - have 3 note + 1 ln, might wanna make them consistent.
01:01:051 - i suggest to reduce the chord into double to differentiate with other finish sound.
01:23:216 (83216|2,83300|0,83383|1) - not make this col 2,3,1? will be more symmetrical and easier to hit.
01:32:049 - its worth to be added another note for piano i think..
01:42:216 - i suggest differentiate the chord with 01:42:549 - 01:41:716 - because of different pitch.
01:49:049 - 01:49:383 - 01:49:716 - felt underemphasized, you can probably add another note for each of the timeline here..
[Hyper]
00:33:386 - Instead of making them the same as 00:31:886 - , how about
https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7498323 ? give symmetry and other pattern too.
01:00:551 - shouldn't this be double to make it consistent like 01:00:884 - ?
01:22:717 (82717|4,82800|3,82884|2,82967|1) - I prefer this to be trill to differentiate with stair sound from before, it won't be too hard either ..
01:31:716 - 01:32:049 - I sort of hope you make this into single instead to differentiate from strong sound like 01:32:216 - , kinda awkward they have same note chord.. it will be consistent with 00:26:386 - too..
01:52:883 - Random double imo, not kick sound..
Have no time to mod all for a while.. hope this will be suffice :3
This map is quite interesting for me, but I still have my doubt over the SV in hardest diff, which sometimes kinda over the top for me and kinda forced in the middle of dense pattern.. i will watch this one for a while, but if you can tone down the sv / show proof that the SVs are alright, then i can help you push this i think