Haha another kors k map, damn how unoriginal. I hope this map never makes it out of the depths of hell you little legged white kid. Go back to flaming on Call of Duty
so when is it happening?Naitoshi wrote:
All rejected, fuck you
Monstrata wrote:
Complex
01:18:823 (6,1) - 01:21:647 (6,1) - Try and make the spacing between these transitions a bit different to indicate its a 1/4 gap between jumps instead of a 1/2 like 01:21:382 (5) - . A larger jump 01:24:470 (6,1) - like this is fine. As long as you can give some visual hint outside of NC'ing because that's not really reliable here. I changed the first one to make 6 closer to 1, but I feel the second one has enough left velocity to just flow into 1
01:35:235 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - Im not really a fan of how linear this stream becomes. Like, it kinda loses its flow and aesthetic from earlier. Try and make this S pattern more curved? I agree, that part of the stream deviates from its original premise. I change stream to be more curvy there
01:50:764 (1,2) - Not really liking how the curve of 2 doesn't really follow the visual flow from 1. Try stacking the slider with 01:50:059 (1) - 's head. Similar sound for similar location could work here. It was like this at first, but I changed it because I really like the cursor movements I can pull off from circle to slider. Something I couldn't pull off it was how it was originally
01:52:529 (2,3) - The sounds here are different from 01:52:176 (1) - because they have beats on the red tick too. I think you could try something different like kicksliders or something instead of using the same shape. I think the hitsounds and repeated motions are enough to emphasize the beats. I'd like to remain strictly 1/2 there
02:15:117 (2,3) - ^ 03:45:470 (2,3) - etc... if you apply
02:34:529 (1,2,3) - Not a good idea to do overlaps here. You are changing to a really different SV and that causes the slider to appear like it's on a different snap initially. If you overlap, it becomes even harder for players to tell that these are actually the same snaps as 02:34:176 (2) - I think this is a nice transition moment for the overall concept. The approach circles are close enough and the ar is high enough to where the player can read it just like the other transition 00:41:588 -
02:57:823 (1,1) - Really easy to break here due to the slider-tick at the end of 1. Can you arrange it in a way where it the player can play through the whole slider? Right now it benefits the player not to play it out, but the slider-tick creates breaks if they do. This is like the major complaint I've received from anyone about this map, unfortunately these sliders are a big part of the map's premise and there are much worse ones than this. It's something I can't really change because of the individual map's fundamentals >~> I really like the fast snapping and impact/hitsound slider flow though
03:19:706 (1,2) - Doubles instead? The red tick is the weakest beat here. Doublets are more interesting in terms of rhythm choice, and this map is all about non-standard rhythm choices. Would prepare the player for the doubles you use just after too. Hell yeah, edgy af
03:54:294 (1) - Huh... weird slider design but okay i guess xd Hell yeah
04:05:470 (3,1) - Unless you're expecting players to singletap those 1/3's, this jump is going to be really sudden for players xP. Can you make it less drastic? I feel its a really easy place to break. Yeah I understand the concerns here. This is probably the part that most will miss on, but I think players will do well on it if they alternate it tbh xd
04:16:176 (4) - No NC? Nah, we're still in wub mode. The other part wasn't nc'd either
[]
Interesting song. Allows for some very unusual rhythms that you rarely ever see in ranked maps nowadays. I don't really have any major concerns about this map. Some 3/4 patterns like towards the intro and outro seem a bit hard to read initially, but I think because of the nature of the song, players will naturally be more careful and aware of their rhythm. Call me back when you're ready then! Also, if you have metadata, would you mind linking it in your reply, thanks!
Naitoshi wrote:
nah
you don't get it lol
Did you just say boring? exucse me? do you think you have the right to just say what ever you want whenever you want just because you don't have a solid foundation of what mapping is. DOn't just go around talking smack to my name like that dude or I'll have to hold you down and suck on you...Naitoshi wrote:
nah
you don't get it lol