Ohh
forum
List of OT Regulars, and what they're known for
posted
Total Posts
231
who
wew close call
didn't want to be on this degen list
didn't want to be on this degen list
Remove the space from my name and that's good.
Also I'm more than just gay, I'm gay, but not too gay, but I'm still that kind of gay
Also I'm more than just gay, I'm gay, but not too gay, but I'm still that kind of gay
winber1 wrote:
wew close call
didn't want to be on this degen list
not even in ot much but ok thanks xdBlitzfrog wrote:
Tae - Everyone like
You seriously couldn't even think of anything to put in my space?
Anyway I'm probably even more gay than coldtooth so you can try that unless you have any other ideas
Anyway I'm probably even more gay than coldtooth so you can try that unless you have any other ideas
Nope. Eph confirmed that he wants me gayer than anyone.Mahogany wrote:
You seriously couldn't even think of anything to put in my space?
Anyway I'm probably even more gay than coldtooth so you can try that unless you have any other ideas
You guys are both equally gay. There, now there's no competition.
You really can't be more gay then someone else, nor can you be half-gay. If you are "part gay" or "half-gay" then you are bi, and that's that.
Well I'm 101% gay. How does that sound?johnmedina999 wrote:
You really can't be more gay then someone else, nor can you be half-gay. If you are "part gay" or "half-gay" then you are bi, and that's that.
Pretty fucking gayColdTooth wrote:
Well I'm 101% gay. How does that sound?
winber1 wrote:
wew close call
didn't want to be on this degen list
I'm 102% gayColdTooth wrote:
Well I'm 101% gay. How does that sound?johnmedina999 wrote:
You really can't be more gay then someone else, nor can you be half-gay. If you are "part gay" or "half-gay" then you are bi, and that's that.
Fuck you 102 is a fake number. 101 is the highest.Mahogany wrote:
I'm 102% gayColdTooth wrote:
Well I'm 101% gay. How does that sound?
101.5%
Decimals do not count.Mahogany wrote:
101.5%
101 and 1/2
#alternativefactsColdTooth wrote:
Fuck you 102 is a fake number. 101 is the highest.Mahogany wrote:
I'm 102% gay
#alternativefacts, the new #mansplaining
If Sean "Spicy Hot Takes" Spicer can't even tell the truth about inauguration size, what more do we expect for things that actually matter?
He said it was the largest ever. Can you refute that? You can't, because there aren't any solid numbers about the crowd sizes. I assume that you just saw some picture on Twitter or similar and too that to be undeniable proof.
Picture of the crowds, comparison:
It's ironic that you would use that example and then turn out to be wrong. But though left-wing people try to label right-wing sites as 'fake news', it's actually them who are the source of lots of fake information.
Picture of the crowds, comparison:
It's ironic that you would use that example and then turn out to be wrong. But though left-wing people try to label right-wing sites as 'fake news', it's actually them who are the source of lots of fake information.
I love how that pic circles the building, but fails to notice all the empty space that's there, conveniently minimized by the camera angle.
Remember, this guy put out bogus statistics about the DC Metro's ridership before the actual metro agency had a chance to release their statistics.
He also clearly prides himself for providing "clearly articulated misinformation." Intentional or not, that's not a good sign. Add that to the list of prominent officials taking The Onion seriously.
Another amazing moment from yesterday: "And I think through a lot of the actions and statements that he's going to make, I think the contributions of Frederick Douglass will become more and more." Sounds good, except for the fact that Douglass has been dead for over a hundred years.
Remember, this guy put out bogus statistics about the DC Metro's ridership before the actual metro agency had a chance to release their statistics.
He also clearly prides himself for providing "clearly articulated misinformation." Intentional or not, that's not a good sign. Add that to the list of prominent officials taking The Onion seriously.
Another amazing moment from yesterday: "And I think through a lot of the actions and statements that he's going to make, I think the contributions of Frederick Douglass will become more and more." Sounds good, except for the fact that Douglass has been dead for over a hundred years.
Is b1rd really suffering the effects of second-hand narcissism from his god-emperor? We're reaching new peaks, gentlemen.
It's hard to tell how much space there is, but it's still clear there's more than what the other image shows, in which people are clearly still congregating. I've heard that the crowd grew a lot shortly before the event began, as lot of people had trouble getting in due to trouble at checkpoints. It's pretty clear that these mainstream media sites were trying to mislead people about the crowd sizes. But it's hard to be definite about whether Sean was lying about him thinking that the crowd was the "biggest ever". I think it's likely that the crowds weren't as big as Obama's though, since Washington and the surrounding states are very liberal.
I'm not going to defend him if he was lying about subway statistics or being incompetent.
I'm not going to defend him if he was lying about subway statistics or being incompetent.
fill my ego and add me
what about meee
Topic Starter
I have no idea what to make of you guys, don't know you bois well enough
correct responseboat wrote:
who
Topic Starter
I meant as in you're nice girl, but it turned out the wrong way. I'm ok with thatMeah wrote:
OH GODBlitzfrog wrote:
Meah - Nice chick
So that must mean that I'm not a regular in OT, phew.
Topic Starter
Ahh I forgot about you, so you want to be in this list huhMadvillain wrote:
So that must mean that I'm not a regular in OT, phew.
I got you fam
please fix the typo in my name you blob of blob
HahahahaB1rd wrote:
He said it was the largest ever. Can you refute that? You can't, because there aren't any solid numbers about the crowd sizes. I assume that you just saw some picture on Twitter or similar and too that to be undeniable proof.
Picture of the crowds, comparison:
It's ironic that you would use that example and then turn out to be wrong. But though left-wing people try to label right-wing sites as 'fake news', it's actually them who are the source of lots of fake information.
It's so funny when people use an angle that makes it very hard to give perspective to somehow counter what a very clear angle shows. Basically what the media does all the time. Not say the wrong thing, just give the wrong perspective, as long as people will believe it (altho i guess in the USA it's more common to tell flat out lies as the media nowadays). It's like looking at a cilinder in 2d and saying that it's a rectangle when there is a picture right next to it showing it in 3d. Like holy shit dude, do you actually believe yourself or are you just trolling?
He's like this literally all the time, so I'm pretty sure he actually believes it. It's like they say, repeat a lie often enough and you start to believe it yourself.
that sounded lame as fUCKMahogany wrote:
It's like they say, repeat a lie often enough and you start to believe it yourself.