m4m from your q
lower diffs are good, there is a lot of unused green lines in them however, up to you if you want to get rid of them. i couldn't see any duplicated ones so they should be ok
[Easy]
02:19:355 - 1/1 slider here for consistency with 01:05:069 (2) - ?
02:27:926 (3) - slider end is on a super strong note, maybe try a rhythm like this?
[Normal]
01:59:926 (5) - maybe move slightly left/down for an easier curve?
02:19:355 - circle here for rhythm consistency with 01:05:069 (2) -
02:19:640 - circle here for rhythm consistency with 01:05:355 (3) -
[Hard]
02:19:355 - 02:19:640 - same as other diffs
[Insane]
01:57:069 (1) - this is the only part in this section where you don't follow the rhythm of the 'dododo' vocals. maybe try a rhythm like this?. this rhythm hits each do on a circle and is also a hint of the rhythm used here 01:59:355 (1,2,3,4) -
[Expert]
00:37:212 (2,3,4) - this triple is really hard to read because of the ar, i would stack this triple so it ends on 00:36:498 (4) - to make this easier to read
00:45:355 (2,3) - this slow down feels awkward to play since nothing in music really fits it and the flow going into 00:45:640 (1) - is a bit strange imo. if you want to keep this, i would change the pattern afterwards to a more triangular/circular flow as it feels more intuitive (imo) idea?
00:48:212 (3) - nc sv change? its readable as it is, but just pointing it out since this section only happens twice in the diff
00:49:355 (3) - ^ (same for the other 2 in this section)
02:01:355 (3) - ^
02:02:498 (3) - (same for the other 2 in this section)
02:29:069 (1) - this is so cruel but i love how it plays
02:31:069 (4) - i would actually space this one more than 02:30:640 (2) - because the vocals are rising in pitch. maybe consider placing this behind 2 instead? (i hope that makes sense)
02:35:640 (4) - ^
[toybot]
00:54:212 (1,1,1,1,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - this is such a cool idea
01:02:426 (2) - uh i think you might want to make this hisound audible, it confused me at first
01:35:640 (3,4) - this feels overmapped, i think it would be fine to have these as just circles. this is the only time this pattern comes up in this section
01:41:069 (1) - similar comment as above, i would prefer a circle instead of a slider here
02:16:712 (2) - same as 01:02:426 (2) -
02:25:855 (2) - ^
[Karen]
00:09:069 (1,2,3,4,5) - i would actually take this reverse idea further and suggest you scale up the ds a little bit. this would make it a bit easier to read and also represent the louder sound it follows better (i forgot the instrument name, it sounds like maracas tho) (dont laugh)
02:00:498 (1,2) - any reason why these two are the only ones stacked like this? to keep visual consistency with the rest of the section i would maybe make (2) blanket (1) like this maybe?
[]
im not really confident in modding the 6* diffs since i don't know enough about them so i feel any comments i make wouldn't be useful, sorry!
i hope the rest of this mod helps however, sorry if it wasn't very helpful, no kds if thats the case
gl!
lower diffs are good, there is a lot of unused green lines in them however, up to you if you want to get rid of them. i couldn't see any duplicated ones so they should be ok
[Easy]
02:19:355 - 1/1 slider here for consistency with 01:05:069 (2) - ?
02:27:926 (3) - slider end is on a super strong note, maybe try a rhythm like this?
[Normal]
01:59:926 (5) - maybe move slightly left/down for an easier curve?
02:19:355 - circle here for rhythm consistency with 01:05:069 (2) -
02:19:640 - circle here for rhythm consistency with 01:05:355 (3) -
[Hard]
02:19:355 - 02:19:640 - same as other diffs
[Insane]
01:57:069 (1) - this is the only part in this section where you don't follow the rhythm of the 'dododo' vocals. maybe try a rhythm like this?. this rhythm hits each do on a circle and is also a hint of the rhythm used here 01:59:355 (1,2,3,4) -
[Expert]
00:37:212 (2,3,4) - this triple is really hard to read because of the ar, i would stack this triple so it ends on 00:36:498 (4) - to make this easier to read
00:45:355 (2,3) - this slow down feels awkward to play since nothing in music really fits it and the flow going into 00:45:640 (1) - is a bit strange imo. if you want to keep this, i would change the pattern afterwards to a more triangular/circular flow as it feels more intuitive (imo) idea?
00:48:212 (3) - nc sv change? its readable as it is, but just pointing it out since this section only happens twice in the diff
00:49:355 (3) - ^ (same for the other 2 in this section)
02:01:355 (3) - ^
02:02:498 (3) - (same for the other 2 in this section)
02:29:069 (1) - this is so cruel but i love how it plays
02:31:069 (4) - i would actually space this one more than 02:30:640 (2) - because the vocals are rising in pitch. maybe consider placing this behind 2 instead? (i hope that makes sense)
02:35:640 (4) - ^
[toybot]
00:54:212 (1,1,1,1,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - this is such a cool idea
01:02:426 (2) - uh i think you might want to make this hisound audible, it confused me at first
01:35:640 (3,4) - this feels overmapped, i think it would be fine to have these as just circles. this is the only time this pattern comes up in this section
01:41:069 (1) - similar comment as above, i would prefer a circle instead of a slider here
02:16:712 (2) - same as 01:02:426 (2) -
02:25:855 (2) - ^
[Karen]
00:09:069 (1,2,3,4,5) - i would actually take this reverse idea further and suggest you scale up the ds a little bit. this would make it a bit easier to read and also represent the louder sound it follows better (i forgot the instrument name, it sounds like maracas tho) (dont laugh)
02:00:498 (1,2) - any reason why these two are the only ones stacked like this? to keep visual consistency with the rest of the section i would maybe make (2) blanket (1) like this maybe?
[]
im not really confident in modding the 6* diffs since i don't know enough about them so i feel any comments i make wouldn't be useful, sorry!
i hope the rest of this mod helps however, sorry if it wasn't very helpful, no kds if thats the case
gl!