CommandoBlack wrote:

Mod from: CommandoBlack's [4k Mania] queue - t/511195

MX

00:36:296 (36296|1) - remove | ok
01:31:702 (91702|1) - move to the right by 1 | Yeah, but then, it'll be more hard so I'm considering
01:58:046 (118046|1) - move to the right by 1 | ^
01:59:546 (119546|1) - ^ | ^
02:01:046 (121046|2) - move to the left by 1 | ^
02:02:546 (122546|2) - move to the right by 1 | ^

Regraz wrote:

Some opinions on lower diffs >w<
[EZ]
00:27:109 (27109|3) - Add a note here? Cymbal sound. | Right
00:46:421 (46421|2) - 1/2 Hold? | nope
00:55:234 (55234|2,55421|1,55609|0,55890|1,56171|2,56359|3) - https://puu.sh/s6i2c/aa01b88f0a.png Try this? | good idea
01:03:109 (63109|2) - Add a note? | ok
01:07:890 (67890|1,68171|2,68359|3) - Seems a bit unsnap here | ok
01:08:734 (68734|0,68921|1,69109|2,69671|1,70234|3,70421|2) - 01:08:734 (68734|0,68921|1,69109|2,69671|1,70234|0,70421|2) - Try this?
01:16:984 (76984|1) - Should add a note here to keep consistent with other parts. | ok
01:40:609 (100609|0) - The hitsounds from here on sounds quite noisy | ok, change into cymbal light
01:57:109 (117109|0,117109|2,117859|3,117859|1) - You should map the 1/2s out between these two. | what that means? IDK

[NM]
00:48:671 (48671|1) - Add a note for cymbal | ok
00:51:109 (51109|3) - ^ | ok
01:57:109 (117109|2,117859|1,117859|3) - 1/2s between these two could be mapped | what that means? IDK

Good luck!

tailsdk wrote:

MX mod

i would add notes from 00:00:202 - across all differculties since there is music but that might just be me but consider it | Nope, actually these parts are unstable it's difficult to map and confusion
00:09:109 - add 1 note
00:38:484 (38484|1) - i would change the stair to 1/12 and make it look like this | But 1/8 will more match, I think

00:41:734 (41734|2,41734|0,41827|3,41921|1,42015|2,42109|0,42109|1,42109|3,42671|2,42671|0,42671|3) - ctrl + H for more variation
00:47:359 (47359|3,47546|3) - make them LN's like 00:46:796 (46796|3,46984|3) -
00:57:296 - add 1 notes | No, not too heavy here
00:57:484 - remove 1 note
00:58:234 - remove 1 note
00:58:609 - add 1 note | same
00:58:984 - remove 1 note
00:59:734 - remove 1 note
01:00:484 - remove 1 note
01:00:109 - add 1 note | same
01:01:234 - remove 1 note
01:01:609 - add 1 note | same
01:01:984 - remove 1 note
01:07:984 - add 1 note | it's same with 01:16:609 (76609|2,76609|1,76609|3) -
01:09:484 - add 1 note | same
01:10:234 - add 1 note | same
01:12:109 - add 1 note | same
01:13:609 - add 1 note | same
01:16:609 (76609|2,76609|1,76609|3) - these should be LN's | it's same with 01:19:609 -
01:19:796 - add 2 notes | I use SVs to replace there
01:22:796 - add 2 notes here | same
01:25:796 - add 2 notes | same
01:27:296 (87296|0,87343|1,87390|2,87437|3,87671|3,87718|2,87765|1,87812|0) - again as last time i would consider making these 1/12 | But 1/8 will more match, I think
01:39:296 (99296|0,99343|1,99390|2,99437|3,99671|3,99718|2,99765|1,99812|0) - same thing here
02:03:859 (123859|0,123859|3,123905|1,123952|2,123999|3,124046|0,124093|1,124140|2,124187|3) - ^

Fun map gl

Rivals_7 wrote:

Hi stan o/
M4M req

1|2|3|4

[MX]

whats up of this HP being 7,5 in an MX diff? Pretty sure its should be 8,5 instead. And So with the OD | ok
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
00:15:859 (15859|3,15952|3) - Actually i dont really get why are you using the jacks all over this same song paces. it doesnt depict its pitch.
while I think all of these was intended, i recommend to repattern those jacks as they doesnt really flow with the song well. Literally speaking.

Also the pattern from - 00:15:109 - to - 00:26:546 - seems really similar. the pattern that could be recognized repeating all the time is the pattern with one LN combination ex: 00:23:734 (23734|0,23734|1,23734|3,23827|2,23921|1,24015|0,24109|2,24109|1) -

It isnt wrong, but if possible make it more variative. It wont hurt tho

One more thing, - 00:15:765 (15765|1) - take a look at this and compare its sound and loudness with - 00:15:952 (15952|2,15952|3) - .
The sounds seems pretty similar in term of instrument used yet they have different notecount.
Consistency is one of the core of ideal mapping, so you might take that into consideration.

yeah, I get it, so I remap this part and some problems fixed

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

00:29:734 (29734|1) - why 4 notes? they're literally the same loudness as - 00:28:984 (28984|2,28984|3,28984|0) - these 3 noter. Therefore you might want to delete that note
I recognize you do that at - 00:35:734 (35734|1,35734|0,35734|3) - | ok

00:51:484 (51484|1,51484|3,51484|2) - I'd recommend to reduce these three noter into two notes instead. They doesnt have a really big impact as the song itself are also on its calm part | realized that

00:52:984 (52984|0,52984|2,52984|1) - same thing goes here and etc that are similar | ok

00:52:421 (52421|1,52515|1) - I playtesting this part and i dont think i get the song feels by this jacking. Probavly just move - 00:52:421 (52421|1) - to 3. | ok

00:54:859 (54859|0) - I think you missing a note here. Looking at all your structure here - 00:56:359 (56359|1,56359|3) - 00:53:359 (53359|0,53359|3) - 00:51:859 (51859|1,51859|0) - If you get what i mean | ok

01:04:046 (64046|2) - Well i guess the LN should be stopped at where this SN is placed. The violin literally doesnt reach to - 01:04:234 - | definitely

01:05:546 (65546|3) - same comment | ok

01:07:046 (67046|0) - ^ | ok

01:16:984 - starting here, I think i have the same comment as my first mod above as they literally have an exact similar density | ok

01:57:671 (117671|0,117765|1) - shouldnt this be jacked? Like these - 01:55:984 (115984|0,116077|0,116171|1,116265|1) - | ok

02:01:984 (121984|0,122077|1,122171|2,122265|0) - where's the jacking pattern like you've used before? | ok

I cant think clearly on the last section, that vocal samples hurts my head QwQ QwQ

[HD]

HP OD 8 pls | ok

00:40:421 (40421|2) - Think you can move this to 4? to spice up the drum-like feeling i guess | ok

00:41:921 (41921|1) - literally same ^ but to col 1 | ok

01:03:109 (63109|3) - remember my comment about LN end to perfectly cover violin on MX? that suggestion applies here. (And to all similar LN as well) | ok

01:53:452 (113452|1,113546|2) - ctrl+g. if i'm looking at the pitch it goes down | ok

02:04:609 (124609|3) - idk what are you trying to cover with this LN. The guitar is changed randomly but yet only one LN stand. if its for foreground noise, already covered with these three - 02:04:609 (124609|1,124702|0,124796|1) - . So yea....what is this LN doing actually? | ok

well I saw certain parts have a similar patterning, idk if thats was a copy paste or not lel

Ups..... just two diffs sorry, still in school :u

Good Luck

Gravey- wrote:

Untick > Song setup > Design > 'Widescreen Support' (Only be used for storyboards) | ok
|1|2|3|4|
[EZ]
00:25:609 (25609|3,25984|0) - Ctrl + G for pattern consistency | nope
01:59:359 (119359|3) - Move to |3| for pattern consistency, notice the next pattern. | ok
[NM]
00:45:671 (45671|3) - Move to |3| to give more expressible pattern such in this part the 2 noted Left - right | Right - left rhythmic pattern as you did. | ok
[HD]
00:42:671 (42671|1,42671|2,42671|0) - Move to the right by 1 column for consistency | ok
Lol i am speechless. . Nice map! Good luck!
You may not warrant this post a kudos if my MOD doesn't helps~ I just can't lmao imo it's all good af the consistency, the pattern arrangement skldsjkldsaljk

Joenen wrote:

Nice map, hope its get even better and get ranked

Davin Fortune wrote:

Hello, request from queue
Column : 1-2-3-4

NM

00:30:109 - make it 2, since this sound is similar with 00:24:484 (24484|0,24484|2) - (just take one sample), i am not taking it as seeing it's snare or drum anything else, but see this as a consistency rhythm with first time pattern | ok
00:32:734 - add a note here, make it consistent like 00:20:734 (20734|3,20734|0,21109|2,21109|3) - (one of a sample) | ok
00:35:921 (35921|3,36015|2,36109|1) - the usage of narrow stair pattern at here inconsistent with pattern in 00:20:359 (20359|1,20546|2) - while at | changed00:20:359 (20359|1,20546|2) - should use narrow stair pattern too but you don't, this not only happen in this part but many of it! | nope, I catch another sound
00:43:421 (43421|1,43515|0) - make them like 00:40:421 (40421|0,40515|1) - | ok
00:44:359 - until 00:45:015 - they have same sound and you make notes at 00:44:734 (44734|0,44827|1,44921|2) - , suggest you to delete them and just make them into break time for a moment | ok
00:48:109 - at here make it 2 and the LN should be start at 00:48:296 - ; 2 because to make it consistent like other pattern | no, it's absolutely started at 00:48:103 -
00:53:734 (53734|1) - consider move this note to 00:53:827 - at the same column since i think 2 note it's not necessary with the sound | no it's a beat here and 00:53:827 have no sound, why I make a note here?
00:57:109 - consider you to make this 2 , i think it's a nice pattern and fit with the song is 2 note 1 note 2 note | no it's good now
00:58:609 - ^ | ^
01:00:109 - ^ | ^
01:01:609 - ^ | ^
01:07:984 - Arrange like this the LN, I think this 01:08:359 (68359|0) - (click after u apply) is a sound that appear sudden and happen a moment and then still continue with the main LN 01:07:984 (67984|2) - and continue with the violin sound | that seems great
01:09:859 - until 01:10:046 - add LN here, just like i do in my screenshoot(this LN take sound "tek tek tek") | For NM , it's not neccesery
01:11:359 - until 01:11:546 - ^ | ^
01:23:171 (83171|0) - make this into a pattern with 01:23:359 (83359|2,83546|1,83734|0,83734|3) - just like you do in 01:20:171 (80171|3,80359|2,80546|1) - | ok
01:29:265 - add a note at column 2, i guess these notes 01:29:077 (89077|3,89171|2) - feel lose a note after it, that they shouldn't be seperated with 01:29:359 (89359|0,89452|1) - | no, I catch the light music sounds here
01:29:921 (89921|3) - move to 1 to make it into a pattern with 01:29:640 (89640|3,89734|2,89827|1) - | no, accroding to the music tone, it's high and put it at col 4 is good
01:30:296 (90296|0,90390|1,90577|2,90671|3,90859|1,90952|0,91140|3) - i can't understand the pattern with the song | it's another music, you can hear it cuz it's so light and high
01:45:671 - add a note at column 3, feel lose connection with the note | ok
02:03:109 (123109|1,123109|0) - this part should be the continue with 02:02:827 (122827|1,122921|2,123015|3) - , feel kinda of it | ok
02:06:765 - add a note at column 1 to make it consistent with 02:08:265 (128265|2,128359|1,128452|2,128546|1) -
02:09:015 (129015|2,129109|1,129296|2) - ^(make it consistent) | ok
02:09:859 (129859|1,129952|2,130046|3) - ^ | ok
02:10:609 (130609|3) - move to 02:10:796 - at same column, feel not get if it 2 2 2 | no, i wanna keep same pattern

EZ

00:23:359 (23359|1,23734|2) - ctrl H them , they should not connect with 00:19:609 (19609|3,19984|0) - just like 00:15:859 | ok(15859|1,16234|2,16609|0,16984|3,17359|1,17734|2) -
00:37:796 (37796|0,38171|2) - change them to LN | ok
00:45:109 (45109|0) - just like NM| it's same with NM already...
00:55:890 (55890|0) - shouldn't this should be place at 00:55:984 - | no it is, it's bg sounds.. the pads
01:27:296 (87296|0,87671|2) - change to LN (until 01:27:484 - and until 01:27:859 - ) | ok
01:39:296 (99296|0,99671|2) - ^ | ok

Critical_Star wrote:

Hai Stan, 不好意思来晚了


General
HP/OD suggestion
NM 7.5 7.5 |ok
this would be much balance for all difficulty

-possible unused hitsound > cymbal whistle.wavok, delete it

EZ

00:37:796 (37796|0,38171|2) - missing LR_Snare Hit
01:03:109 (63109|0) - the long sound end at 01:04:046 - i think is better to end here
01:06:109 (66109|0) - end at 01:07:046 -
01:27:859 (87859|3) - how about http://puu.sh/sxhmn/8cb48505ff.jpg ? it gives another pattern variation here
01:39:859 (99859|3) - same thing u can apply here > http://puu.sh/sxhpX/ac565800d9.jpg
01:45:671 - missing note? sound are pretty obvious here
01:53:359 (113359|1,113359|2) - 01:54:859 (114859|1,114859|3) - 01:56:359 (116359|2,116359|3) - 01:57:859 (117859|3,117859|1) - missing hitsound
02:17:171 (137171|3,137171|0) - maybe make them into 2-3 to differentiate the crash sound here with 02:16:609 (136609|0,136609|3) -

all fixed

NM

00:27:671 (27671|1,27765|2,27859|3,27952|2,28046|1,28421|2,28515|1,28609|0,28702|1,28796|2) - i found a little inconsistency here, i see u follow a short 1/4 sound here but u did not follow the same thing again at 00:30:671 (30671|3,30765|2,30859|1,31421|1,31515|2,31609|0) - < for example, but actually i will suggest to reduce 1/4 here to make it a little more friendly for novice player.
00:35:921 (35921|3,36015|2,36109|1,36671|1,36765|2,36859|1,37421|2,37515|1,37609|2) - ^ for example this part is nice for NM
00:44:359 - would be better to add a note here, can't see any difference sound from 00:44:452 (44452|1,44546|2,44640|3,44734|0,44827|1,44921|2) - also player tend to catch the timing at white line easier
00:50:359 - feels a little off to ignore the kick sound here like 00:50:452 (50452|2,50546|3,50640|2) - , would highly suggest to add a note
01:08:359 (68359|2) - to make it simple for NM, i suggest to end at 01:08:546 -
01:28:984 - there is the same sound u are catching here, better not to miss it
01:31:609 - 01:34:984 - same here ^
01:40:609 - till 01:51:109 - i think that sound like 01:41:359 (101359|3,101359|0) - etc could be reduced to single note. i know it is suitable to use double note but i think it would be better to reduce the note density here compared with HD diff and also here is a calm piano part.
02:06:671 - feels a sudden pattern flow break here, i would had expect a 1/2 note here while playing
02:09:015 (129015|2,129109|1) - how about making them into 2-4? just suggestion
02:09:671 - could add another note here like before

all fixed

HD

00:29:452 - missing note?
00:32:827 - why not add the 1/4 sound here?
00:34:702 (34702|2) - remove? is just the wub sound here.
00:49:046 (49046|1,49140|2,49234|3,49234|0,49327|1,49421|2,49515|1,49609|2,49609|0,49609|3) - maybe just CTRL+H to make a mirror pattern from 00:43:046 (43046|1,43140|2,43234|0,43234|3,43327|1,43421|2,43515|1,43609|3,43609|2,43609|0) -
00:55:609 - add another note? sound is a little special here
01:39:484 - would be nice to have a single or double note here for kick
02:02:921 - should be double note here too for kick

all fixed

MX

00:43:515 (43515|2,43609|2) - feels a little uncomfortable to catch it with sv here since this is a 1/4 jack. i would have suggest to remove a LN at 00:43:609 (43609|2) - for a better playabilty, but still it is fine for me play either way | same part in diff HD have 3 notes, so MX should keep it same, and I think it's fine, no too much jacks here
00:48:015 (48015|2,48109|2) - here too, maybe remove 00:48:109 (48109|2) - | ^
00:49:515 (49515|1,49609|1) - and so on if u agree | ^
01:15:015 (75015|3,75109|3) - like before, feels a little uncomfortable for me but still your choice to change it or not | ^
01:19:796 (79796|2,79796|1) - shouldnt here to be a break like 01:16:796 - ? it could be nice with a sv break here | there have FX sounds so I keep it, and I do sv at middle of this part. the position you said have continuous FX sounds so I keep and no change
01:25:796 (85796|1,85796|2) - like before if u agree ^ | ^
01:46:609 - how about reduce a note here? triple hit here should be enough | it's right

Critical_Star wrote:

Recheck

EZ
00:44:734 (44734|2) - add LR_Kick Drop Wet Fast
01:02:171 (62171|1,62546|1,62921|3) - ^
01:08:359 (68359|2,68546|3) - ^
01:09:671 (69671|1) - ^
01:11:171 (71171|2) - ^

NM
00:22:421 (22421|1) - add LR_Kick Drop Wet Fast
00:44:734 - ^
00:44:359 (44359|0,44452|1,44546|2,44640|3,44734|0) - u missed all the hitsound here, u can refer to your MX diff
00:47:171 (47171|3) - add LR_Kick Hard Fast
00:51:765 (51765|2,51952|2) - add LR_Snare Hit
00:53:265 (53265|1,53452|3) - ^
00:54:765 (54765|1,54952|1) - ^
00:56:265 (56265|2,56452|0) - ^
01:28:609 - till 01:37:609 - maybe at least layer LR_Kick Drop Wet Fast for white tick note
01:58:890 (118890|2) - 02:00:390 (120390|1) - add LR_Kick Drop Wet Fast
02:01:890 (121890|2) - 02:02:921 (122921|2,123015|3) - ^

HD
00:12:109 (12109|3) - overlap note
00:28:796 (28796|3) - add LR Kick Hard Fast
00:31:796 (31796|3) - ^
00:34:796 (34796|2) - add LR_Kick Drop Wet Fast
00:36:296 (36296|2) - ^
00:36:952 (36952|2) - add LR_Snare Hit
02:00:390 (120390|2) - 02:01:890 (121890|3) - add LR_Kick Drop Wet Fast
02:02:921 - here should be double too for kick
02:03:015 (123015|1) - add LR_Kick Drop Wet Fast
02:06:109 - add LR_Kick Drop Wet Fast + LR_kick bass
02:06:859 - 02:07:609 - 02:08:359 - ^
02:08:734 - 02:09:484 - 02:10:234 - LR_Drum Hit Echo

MX
00:28:796 (28796|3) - add LR_Kick Hard Fast
00:31:796 (31796|0) - ^
00:34:796 (34796|3) - add LR_Kick Drop Wet Fast
00:36:296 - ^
01:02:921 (62921|0) - add LR_Kick Drop Wet Fast

u might wanna recheck the hitsound again

thank you so much ! cstar~ REALLY

Critical_Star wrote:

Recheck again and seems fine for me BB

Fresh Chicken wrote:

ok

IamKwaN wrote:

Would you link me the metadata source? As I couldn't find any in your post replying Critical_Star's mod.

IamKwaN wrote:

I guess I should just leave it because I couldn't find anything on the web and seems like this song does not exist in this universe. lol

Congratulations on qualification!