Because this subforum needs more quality.
forum
How would you make OT great again?
posted
Total Posts
52
Topic Starter
Well for starters this subforum needs higher quality, right now it's terrible
We can elect Jellybob56
We can elect Jellybob56
Flood it with water.
Topic Starter
Idk, he hasn't said much and I barely see him aroundColdTooth wrote:
We can elect Jellybob56
You mean gasoline, right?Fizzn wrote:
Flood it with water.
Make me a GMT
NO! Retire all the GMT!
stop posting.
you either need more people posting, or the people who are already here need to post more quality
recruit new people or encourage old people to post better shit
recruit new people or encourage old people to post better shit
redirect all website off-topic links to osugame for maximum cancer
the mastermindwinber1 wrote:
redirect all website off-topic links to osugame for maximum cancer
Topic Starter
StafanBrian OA wrote:
Nazi moderation
You are recruited to the OT Quality BrigadeRailey2 wrote:
recruit new people or encourage old people to post better shit
what he did doesn't fall under my definition of nazi moderation
mod me, I'll be totally nazi for you guys
It's a moot point; not happening.
Railey has the right idea, but, again, not happening.
Railey has the right idea, but, again, not happening.
Whatever happened to Mr Color?
wat
He changed his name? What an absolute madman
He changed his name? What an absolute madman
I wonder what type of quality do you mean
stupid, stupid or stupid
stupid, stupid or stupid
abraker, you were never around during a time OT was ever considered decent though...
Topic Starter
I do go back and read the ancient scrolls from to time thoughEneT wrote:
abraker, you were never around during a time OT was ever considered decent though...
idk the real content is in ITT 1
but ITT 2 is pretty ok too
but ITT 2 is pretty ok too
This is a thread you'd expect some whiny kid like Sonatora to make.
I can see why the subtlety is lost on you. Truth is, the answer he's looking for is building a giant wall and deporting all the newfags and shitposters out of OT.
Topic Starter
One side of the wall will be covered with shitposts so that the newfags will never know what quality is.Brian OA wrote:
Truth is, the answer he's looking for is building a giant wall and deporting all the newfags and shitposters out of OT.
or you know, there's actually something calledRilene wrote:
I wonder what type of quality do you mean
stupid, stupid or stupid
good quality
but my perception of entertainment is brainless memes so who am i to judge
Guy's just making a painfully trite reference to the re-refreshed ground rules.
But hey, I like to think that good, quality content is the kind that will dissuade someone past their usual tedium by making them think or laugh. Something that's, I don't know, funny or interesting, maybe? It'd be a start.
But hey, I like to think that good, quality content is the kind that will dissuade someone past their usual tedium by making them think or laugh. Something that's, I don't know, funny or interesting, maybe? It'd be a start.
In my opinion, it seems like OT is trying too hard to be good, and that's why it's getting worse each year. Everything feels kind of forced nowadays. It seems like a lot of users have the pressure of making OT a good place, but at the end of the day, this was meant to be a "hang out" spot instead of... whatever you guy are trying to achieve out of this. In other words, this place needs to calm the fuck down. Just throwing my two cents out there.
OT doesn't need to be great.
making quality content is a skill not an instinct
but the internet is full of memers so there's the problem
but the internet is full of memers so there's the problem
allow only supporters to post ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡° )
That is a good point, but that only applies to part of the userbase, which is mostly comprised of bitter oldfags or people that have bought into some utopian view. If things seem "worse" it would only seem that way to someone with that standpoint. At the end of the day, OT is the way it is because it wants to be that way. That's not changing unless something drastic happens.Foxtrot wrote:
In my opinion, it seems like OT is trying too hard to be good, and that's why it's getting worse each year. Everything feels kind of forced nowadays. It seems like a lot of users have the pressure of making OT a good place, but at the end of the day, this was meant to be a "hang out" spot instead of... whatever you guy are trying to achieve out of this. In other words, this place needs to calm the fuck down. Just throwing my two cents out there.
The last problem here is 'people trying too hard to be good'. But trying to artificially create standards is useless anyway because standards naturally result from the userbase. Artificially creating standards will do nothing but alienate people that do not conform to these standards. There is rarely justification for a moderator to use force to censor and mold content to their liking.
A forum benefits from having a core of users who generally post high quality content and discriminate against content that is not high quality. However it also benefits from a regular influx of new users, ideas, and trends, to stop things from becoming stale and repetitive. Moderator action against the 'unwanted' elements of a forum rather than letting the natural social forces do their work would be the way that a forum becomes too insular thus stale and repetitive.
A forum benefits from having a core of users who generally post high quality content and discriminate against content that is not high quality. However it also benefits from a regular influx of new users, ideas, and trends, to stop things from becoming stale and repetitive. Moderator action against the 'unwanted' elements of a forum rather than letting the natural social forces do their work would be the way that a forum becomes too insular thus stale and repetitive.
the standards that naturally result from the userbase are absolute dogshit though, in fact these forums are a prime example of thatB1rd wrote:
But trying to artificially create standards is useless anyway because standards naturally result from the userbase.
this is good, because then you can actually build a ground for discussion instead of having everything be worthless memes and shitpostsB1rd wrote:
Artificially creating standards will do nothing but alienate people that do not conform to these standards.
Actually this keeps a forum alive, and not moderating stuff results it in turning to shit. Example: OT.B1rd wrote:
Moderator action against the 'unwanted' elements of a forum rather than letting the natural social forces do their work would be the way that a forum becomes too insular thus stale and repetitive.
And this is why people are trying too hard to come up with original content.Mahogany wrote:
the standards that naturally result from the userbase are absolute dogshit though, in fact these forums are a prime example of thatB1rd wrote:
But trying to artificially create standards is useless anyway because standards naturally result from the userbase.this is good, because then you can actually build a ground for discussion instead of having everything be worthless memes and shitpostsB1rd wrote:
Artificially creating standards will do nothing but alienate people that do not conform to these standards.Actually this keeps a forum alive, and not moderating stuff results it in turning to shit. Example: OT.B1rd wrote:
Moderator action against the 'unwanted' elements of a forum rather than letting the natural social forces do their work would be the way that a forum becomes too insular thus stale and repetitive.
it's cuz all people know how to do here is argue and shitpost. not that i know better because i don't got time for finding shit. my life's boring yo.
even just sharing images or neat things can make things more interesting. it's not really like you even need to try to make oc
even just sharing images or neat things can make things more interesting. it's not really like you even need to try to make oc