MugiwaraSekai wrote:

#modreqs

meep

1. 00:06:106 (1) - 00:50:918 (1) - NC is not necessary here on the contrary 00:11:356 (5) - 00:14:168 (4) - here is needed Was NCing to the bell like sounds on 00:03:856 (1,1,1,1,1) -
2. 00:21:293 - it feels weird that you don't map the part where we expect something (hope you understand) while you mapped it at 00:32:918 (7,8,9,10) - 00:03:856 (1,1,1,1,1) -
3. 00:24:481 (9,10,1) - it's not really a good flow (1) has a bit a bad placing, imo 00:03:856 (1,1,1,1,1) - Fixed
4. 00:31:981 (4,5) - inconsistency with 00:19:981 (4,5) - try to make them consistent Fixed
5. 00:36:481 (7,1) - flow is not good, since you started by following the music and you end up by following vocal, I think you have to choose between both Nice catch,fixed
6. 01:04:606 (6,7,8) - I know that you want to emphasize this finish sound, but I think it should be better if you keep the same DS changed for now,i'll see how others look at it and consider
7. 01:11:356 (1) - 01:14:356 (1) - you skip a lot of things here lol and vocal finish at 01:13:231 - true,first thing you said about skipping a lot of things,I wanted to map to the vocals, secondly the vocal finish isn't needed as her voice stretches over to the next part,therefore making a longer slider would make it feel awkward. Normally players in hard diffs don't usually see/experience the beauty of sliderart,so I wanted to implement it here because the vocals were long and nice.
8. you should rework a bit your NC pattern, it seems sometimes a bit messy tbh it's not exactly messy XD it's just that I NC really weird stuff

that's all for me good luck!

http://puu.sh/sJN2s/bed73ff8a1.osu

1. Put same combo colors on at least your two diffs? Different colors on every diff is wild
2. Turn widescreen support off on gds

1. 00:02:918 (5,6,7,1) - don't really like the flow here because you're going at a curve and then it suddenly stops and drops directly down.. maybe move it to the left some or something?
2. 00:22:043 (2) - move this down to avoid overlap?
3. 00:46:793 (4,1) - these two are very close together visually, maybe space this stuff out a bit more?
4. 00:47:356 (1,5) - fix stack
5. 00:48:856 (1) - maybe move this up some to make a custom stack? the upwards motion should continue with the head of the slider imo.
6. 00:59:731 (2) - move this down a tiny bit to follow the motion of 00:59:356 (1)
7. 01:00:106 (4,5) - again these are so close to each other

1. 00:01:418 (3) - move this to the right some?
2. 00:11:356 (5) - nc?
3. 00:14:168 (1) - nc and 00:15:106 (1) remove nc
4. 00:36:668 (1,2) - this jump is pretty big
5. 00:50:918 (1) - remove nc and 00:51:856 (4) nc?
6. 01:29:356 (1,1,1,1) - too much for a hard diff

MugiwaraSekai wrote:

#modreqs nice!

taking flight

1. mmh maybe try to add a soft-sliderslide because sliders are kinda loud D: ; custom hitsounds would be cool especially clap, clap sound is needed
2. 00:08:356 (1,2) - circle between is missing according to 00:00:856 (1,2,3,2,3,4,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - thats because i wanted to give the guitar a bit more emphasis, but I do kinda understand what you mean, maybe if more people suggest ill fix
3. 00:42:668 (7,1) - increasing the spacing will surely show better the emphasize between both and it'll play better, try to reduce spacing between 00:42:481 (6,7) - good idea, changed
4. 00:03:293 (6) - mmh what about replacing this by circles ? it feels when playing that you tried to make as 00:01:606 (5,6) - but I know that you wanted to follow the whistles behind i dont really understand your reasoning behind it, but i have it as a slider because i'm following the guitar mainly here, and there isn't a note change on the white tick
5. 00:11:356 (1) - here circles would fit better, since there are loud drums (?) which deserve being emphasize i disagree here, i don't here any change in the drums?
6. 00:12:856 (1,2) - spacing between both shouldn't be bigger than 00:13:231 (3,4) - imo a bit as 00:27:293 (5,6,7,1) - reduced the spacing a bit
7. 00:19:231 (2,3,4,5,1) - 00:58:418 (2,3,4,5,6) - try to improve this star patterni tried xd
8. 01:15:481 (6,7,1) - why reducing the spacing only here ? because there isn't anything important in the music going on really, and its a nice bridge into the larger spacing that follow the tom/whistle pattern

easy

1. 01:21:856 (2) - what about trying to make a shape as 01:20:356 (1,1) - ? it would be better visually sure
2. fine

[]
that's all for me good luck!

Logic Agent wrote:

[General]

1. Put same combo colors on at least your two diffs? Different colors on every diff is wild but the bgs are all different o.o
2. Turn widescreen support off on gds oops ty

[Taking Flight]

1. 00:02:918 (5,6,7,1) - don't really like the flow here because you're going at a curve and then it suddenly stops and drops directly down.. maybe move it to the left some or something? eee i kinda like this motion since it follows the sharp pitch change in the guitar, altho if more people suggest i'll change it
2. 00:22:043 (2) - move this down to avoid overlap? fixed
3. 00:46:793 (4,1) - these two are very close together visually, maybe space this stuff out a bit more? i think it looks ok
4. 00:47:356 (1,5) - fix stack fixed
5. 00:48:856 (1) - maybe move this up some to make a custom stack? the upwards motion should continue with the head of the slider imo. i think i did what you meant?
6. 00:59:731 (2) - move this down a tiny bit to follow the motion of 00:59:356 (1) fixed
7. 01:00:106 (4,5) - again these are so close to each other fixed

good LUCK

Logic Agent wrote:

[General]

[Meep's Hard]

1. 00:01:418 (3) - move this to the right some? I wanted to make a triangle using 00:01:231 (2,3,4) -
2. 00:11:356 (5) - nc? NCing to the bell sounds
3. 00:14:168 (1) - nc and 00:15:106 (1) remove nc Fixed
4. 00:36:668 (1,2) - this jump is pretty big It is? ;/
5. 00:50:918 (1) - remove nc and 00:51:856 (4) nc? Fixed
6. 01:29:356 (1,1,1,1) - too much for a hard diff can u explain this lul why is it too hard?

good LUCK

http://puu.sh/sKo7t/9cd306a50c.osu

MugiwaraSekai wrote:

#modreqs


HB

1. 00:12:106 (5) - mmh try to make as 00:01:606 (2) - cause same sounds, and drums are kinda too loud to be skipped //reason why im ignoring some notes is to not make it hard for the player since there are quite a lot of rythme going on after, i try to minimize 1/2 spam
2. 00:13:418 (3,4,5) - weird flow to me, you seems follow the whistle rhythm but you skip the whistle sound at 00:14:543 - //same here i ignored that since its not really a loud sound
3. 01:31:606 (1) - NC is not necessary //tbh the music changed and also my patterning and rythme so id rather keep it + 8 combo is kinda big for a normal
4. fine

that's all for me good luck!

1. 00:32:356 (2,1) - I would space these out more, it looks a bit better
2. 01:08:356 (1) - This slider looks a bit awkward, why not make it more even like 00:56:356 (1) -
3. Or you could follow the pattern and make it a wave slider like every other first slider in this section, I don't know why you put such an odd slider out of nowhere
4. 01:27:856 (2,1) - Try to fix this overlap if you can
5. 01:32:356 (1) - You need more recovery time for the spinner I think, make it shorter and move it a bit further?

1. 00:11:356 (4) - Ctrl+J for flow?
2. 00:24:856 (1,2) - They're not perfectly parallel
3. 00:36:106 (3,4,5) - This is irregular rythm compared to other parts, why not do the same thing as 00:22:606 (2,3,4) -
4. 01:01:231 (4,5) - Could you maybe do something about this bad flow? It kinda sticks out to me, you could curve it

1. 00:01:418 (3,1) - Fix this overlap if you can
2. 00:06:106 (1,1) - I would spread these out more for aesthetics
3. 00:07:418 (2,4) - Blanket these?
4. 00:36:668 (8,9,1) - I think the spacing is inconsistent here
5. 00:55:231 (6,7) - Line up?
6. 00:57:106 (4) - I suggest you remake this slider for better flow
7. 01:11:356 (1) - 01:14:356 (1) - These are so pretty
8. 01:31:606 (4) - What's the point of the clap on the slider body?

1. 00:14:543 (7,5) - Try to fix this overlap? You could move it up more
2. 00:54:856 (1,5) - Stack?
3. 01:03:856 (2) - NC?
4. 01:32:168 (1) - Don't think you need NC

Lucyyyyyyy wrote:

Hey from my queue

[-~(0)~- Meep´s Hard -~(0)~-]

PLEASE (it was a SS DTHD)

Maybe just put CS 4 xD ezpp

00:21:293 (8) - (im not sure at this one) you are stacking 8 with the slider, this could maybe lead into players on this level not beaing able to read it because 8 is under the slider (i let my friend play and he missread it (but he is at 2,8 SR)) let it out a bit :^)

01:11:356 (1) - this slider is so nicely shaped why not the other one,WHY,THE OTHER ONE TOOK A WHOLE HOUR ;w;

01:20:168 (3,4,1) - maybe change the rythm here because you follow with 3 vocal where are no sounds,then the sound on 4 and leave the vocal behind 4 on the red tick empty nah ;'3

~-~Lucyyyyyyy

_orange wrote:

Hi M4M from your q

[Meep's Hard]

1. 00:01:418 (3,1) - Fix this overlap if you can Not going to fix
2. 00:06:106 (1,1) - I would spread these out more for aesthetics Fixed
3. 00:07:418 (2,4) - Blanket these? nah ;/ rather have equal visual distance than blanketing everything
4. 00:36:668 (8,9,1) - I think the spacing is inconsistent here Fixed
5. 00:55:231 (6,7) - Line up? Fixed
6. 00:57:106 (4) - I suggest you remake this slider for better flow I'll consider
7. 01:11:356 (1) - 01:14:356 (1) - These are so pretty thanks <33333333333333333
8. 01:31:606 (4) - What's the point of the clap on the slider body? tbh idk LUL

The aesthetics for this diff are great, but try to avoid overlaps when mapping, there's a few on this diff thanks~

Great map GL!

http://puu.sh/sKHvg/7c65572465.osu

1. 00:18:856 (1) - This flow will be more smooth:
   
   
2. 00:39:856 (1) - why a red node and not like in 00:41:356 (2) - ?? (for consistency)
3. 00:47:356 (2) - ^
4. 01:18:856 (2,1,1) - This flow will be very bad idea in easy diffs:
   
   the why

   

1. 00:42:856 (1,2) - this will feels better:
   
2. <3

1. That BG makes me nervous xD
2. 01:04:793 (7,8) - This does not feels like a jump, but as a bad spaced note , if you wanna a jump, make it betben 01:04:981 (8,9) - please n.n
3. 01:30:481 (1,1) - Consider a Ctrl+J and:
   
   this

   
4. 01:32:168 (2) - This flow feels a bit weird. why not try move a bit up, doing some like a blanket with 01:31:606 (4) - ?
   
   
5. You are good making hards

Lilyanna wrote:

meep's hard !

00:05:356 (4) - nc here NCing to the bells
00:06:106 (1) - remove nc its not even a downbeat ^
00:11:356 (5) - nc No bell = no nc
00:16:418 (3,4) - this hard wierd flow and the movemnet feels forced try this http://puu.sh/sKWeY/225f6cfc95.jpg Fixed in my own way
00:26:168 (1) - remove nc also try be more consistent either each 2 downbeats or one Mapping to a different sound,therefore NC
00:26:356 (3) - nc should be here on the downbeat ^
00:36:762 (9) - move to x:262 y:310 for straight triple its better looking Fixed in my own way
00:44:168 (1,3) - same as before and so on Mapping to a different sound too
01:02:168 (8,2,3) - avoid this overlap maybe recreate the placements Fixed
01:11:356 (1,1) - i love thx <333333333333333333333
01:23:918 (2,3) - stack maybe Fixed

I hope i helped Good luck!

ErunamoJAZZ wrote:

Hi,

[Meep's Hard]

1. That BG makes me nervous xD
2. 01:04:793 (7,8) - This does not feels like a jump, but as a bad spaced note , if you wanna a jump, make it betben 01:04:981 (8,9) - please n.n Fixed
3. 01:30:481 (1,1) - Consider a Ctrl+J and:
   
   this

   
4. 01:32:168 (2) - This flow feels a bit weird. why not try move a bit up, doing some like a blanket with 01:31:606 (4) - ? Fixed with 1.69DS :^)
   
   
5. You are good making hards omg senpai noticed me *dies*

Good luck!!

rehitsound just to be sure
http://puu.sh/sL0Vu/ad4ec20402.osu

1. 00:00:481 (1) - Why this note no have hitsound? the intro is so powerfull to let this note without one, a whistle in soft sample sounds good
2. 00:06:106 (3) - I don't like this slider like a line only, because the sound is not monotone for that, I suggest to make then curvy, and make the point in the center red, like this: https://puu.sh/sLfck/95e19da155.png
   Thats all for this diff, I really like it! very clean

1. 01:19:606 - Don't ignore the sound here, is very important to take the flow and the rhythm of the next note, please put a note here...
   When I play this part, I literally loose combo because of the gap here :'(
   That's all for normal, nice structure!

[ - Zekks - ] wrote:

From my queue.

I'm sorry for the EXTREMELY Small mod, but I am pretty new to modding, but I tried my best.

Also, this mapset is nearly perfect, that idk what to mod.

Meep's Hard

00:33:481 (9,10,1) - These objects are too low.
01:10:231 (6,7) - These objects also seem pretty low.

http://puu.sh/sM8vS/399ed218e6.osu

KappaWealth wrote:

Taking Flight

00:20:356 (1) - This make a triangle with 00:19:981 (4,5) - (i know its already a triangle but make spacing bigger)
because of flow

00:23:168 (7,1) - These can flow better (you can leave it there)

00:24:856 (1) - This can definetly flow better

00:40:137 (2,3) - Imo these look better stacked under 00:39:856 (1) - but it breaks the concept of the notes in the map so your choice.

00:44:168 (5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6) - i like this part.

01:21:856 (1) - blanket?



Easy

00:23:356 (3) - Imo this looks better crtl+j and put back the same place
and it can make flow better

13:44 KappaWealth: kk which diff
13:45 KappaWealth: you want me to mod
13:45 Log Off Now: whichever you want
13:45 Log Off Now: pref top diff
13:45 Log Off Now: because thats the one that everyone is gonna check the most
13:45 KappaWealth: kk
13:45 KappaWealth: ill do it
13:45 Log Off Now: the easy and normally dont really need modding imo, but bns want to see mods on them
13:45 KappaWealth: i do it here and chat log
13:45 Log Off Now: ty :D
13:45 Log Off Now: oki
13:47 KappaWealth: 00:20:356 (1) - this make a triangle with 00:19:981 (4,5) - (i know its already a triangle but make spacing bigger)
13:48 KappaWealth: because of flow
13:48 Log Off Now: i dont wanna make the spacing bigger, but i fixed the triangle shape
13:48 Log Off Now: just noticed its super wonky xd
13:48 KappaWealth: oh
13:48 KappaWealth: ok
13:48 KappaWealth: yeah
13:49 KappaWealth: 00:23:168 (7,1) - these can flow better
13:49 Log Off Now: how would you change it? i think it looks ok to me tbh
13:49 KappaWealth: well
13:50 KappaWealth: you can leave that there
13:50 KappaWealth: 00:24:856 (1) - this can definetly flow better
13:51 Log Off Now: i changed 5 a bit so it flows better into 1
13:51 Log Off Now: i thought you would pick up on that after mentioning the 7 :P
13:51 KappaWealth: yeah
13:51 KappaWealth: lolz
13:53 KappaWealth: 00:40:137 (2,3) - Imo these look better stacked under 00:39:856 (1) - but it breaks the concept of the notes before it so your choice.
13:53 Log Off Now: yeah i wanna keep the concept
13:53 Log Off Now: as i use that sort of technique throughout the whole map :p
13:53 KappaWealth: yeah
13:54 KappaWealth: 00:44:168 (5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6) - i like this part.
13:54 Log Off Now: thanks :P
13:54 Log Off Now: i spent so long trying to line up the triple
13:54 Log Off Now: so it was a perfect line from the
13:54 Log Off Now: 00:43:981 (4) -  XD
13:55 KappaWealth: lol yeah
13:55 KappaWealth: but how?
13:56 Log Off Now: i just kept on rotating the triple till arrows matched the triple line
13:56 KappaWealth: oh
13:56 KappaWealth: lma
13:56 Log Off Now: [https://i.gyazo.com/3eba68777b970ba07a51fe25ac2fb078.jpg like this]
13:57 Log Off Now: ignore the wonky hand lmao
13:57 KappaWealth: 01:17:356 (1,2,3) - these do not flow good 01:17:918 (3) -  i suggest making a little curve to the left
13:58 Log Off Now: i dont think i wanna do that since thatll ruin the aesthetics of it
13:58 Log Off Now: i guess i can move 2 slightly more left so its a cleaner shape but i dont think it matters that much
13:59 Log Off Now: i also lose the sharper flow which i like going into the dramatic vocal if i curve it
13:59 KappaWealth: well
13:59 KappaWealth: ok then
13:59 KappaWealth: 01:21:856 (1) - this curve is a little bit too strong
13:59 Log Off Now: i guess, i just wanted a blanket XD
14:00 KappaWealth: you can put it a little to the left and make it a straight slider i guess
14:00 KappaWealth: oh xD
14:00 Log Off Now: i changed it
14:01 KappaWealth: 01:21:856 (1) - make it symmetric to 01:22:418 (3) - to not make problems with 01:22:231 (2) -
14:01 Log Off Now: i dont wanna make it identical though because theres already loads of straight sliders :P
14:01 KappaWealth: thats it for that diff
14:02 Log Off Now: :D
14:02 KappaWealth: lets see your easy diff
14:03 KappaWealth: 00:23:356 (3) - Imo this looks better crtl+j and put back the same place
14:03 KappaWealth: and it can make flow better
14:04 Log Off Now: ok, changed
14:04 KappaWealth: 00:39:856 (1,2) - these too should look the same because of concept and stuff..
14:04 Log Off Now: they're consistent with 00:45:856 (1,2) - so i dont wanna change them
14:05 Log Off Now: since both 39 and 45 are the same vocals essentially i wanted them to have the same aesthetic pattern
14:05 KappaWealth: well
14:05 KappaWealth: imo
14:06 KappaWealth: 00:45:856 (1) - you wanna do the same thing with the start?
14:06 Log Off Now: the vocal pattern is also different, so i changed up the slider aesthetics
14:07 KappaWealth: yeah you can do that i guess
14:07 Log Off Now: theyre the same slider (altho i noticed i accidently moved the red point abit on the 2nd one so ill fix that xd)
14:08 KappaWealth: no i meant do 00:45:856 (1) -  like we did with 00:23:356 (3) -
14:08 Log Off Now: if i do that i get a misleading flow coming into 00:47:356 (2) - 
14:08 Log Off Now: since the slider will end up pointing upwards instead of downwards
14:08 Log Off Now: thats why i didnt ctrl j that one :p
14:09 KappaWealth: 00:47:356 (2) - im not sure if it will work if you ctrl+j this tho
14:09 Log Off Now: again, the slider would end up pointing the opposite direction to the next slider :p
14:10 KappaWealth: 00:48:856 (3) -  you can always put this anywhere because of the spinner next to it
14:10 Log Off Now: yea but i dont wanna overlap the 1
14:10 KappaWealth: ah.
14:10 KappaWealth: i see
14:10 Log Off Now: overlaps are bad in easy, and unrankable in some cases i think :p
14:11 KappaWealth: i guess you can also do this https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/6790425
14:12 Log Off Now: i could, but that would be another antiflow
14:14 KappaWealth: 01:26:356 (1) - https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/6790446
14:14 KappaWealth: oops wrong one
14:14 Log Off Now: xd
14:15 Log Off Now: that flow going into 2 would be pretty bad :p
14:15 KappaWealth: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/6790453
14:15 KappaWealth: yeah
14:16 KappaWealth: well
14:16 KappaWealth: i dont think there is a problem
14:16 Log Off Now: :D
14:16 KappaWealth: ok
14:16 Log Off Now: make sure you savelog for kds
14:17 KappaWealth: ok
14:17 KappaWealth: gonna do it now
14:17 Log Off Now: :D
14:17 Log Off Now: ty for modding ^^

xasuma wrote:

Hey there, m4m from your queue. Sorry if I nitpicked a bit on some things, but that means the maps are good. Take/leave what you choose.

Taking Flight

SPOILER

00:00:481 (1,2,1) - Having played the whole map a couple of times, this spacing is very hype imo. Feels weird that it is the "hardest part of the song" lol. (just to keep in mind) I might nerf the spacing of it if more people don't like it
00:03:856 (1,4) - mirror 4 out of 1 , and crtl+g . I think looks better I prefer the ctrl + h, it also flows a bit better into the next note imo
00:11:356 (1,2) - mirror 2 out of 1 , and crtl+g . I think looks better ^
00:14:168 (1) - NC on Why? these notes are all part of the same phrasing
00:14:731 (3) - NC off < ^ (better)
01:03:293 (3) - NC off NC'd here to indicate that the timing between notes has changed
00:39:668 (9,10,1) - the spacing of < that , should probably be the same as 00:39:856 (1,2,3) . And keep it consistent for the rest of the non kiai time as much as possible. (IE here: 00:41:356 (1,2,3) ) The section gets more intense at this point, so the spacing is increased to emphasize that
01:11:637 - not sound here, slider should end where 01:11:731 (2) is maybe. (doesn't feel bad though so I am not sure). I understand where you're coming from, but the slider ends on the blue tick so the player knows that im switching from the vocals to the instruments starting from the red tick

Thats all I got, this map is very good already.

I hope this helped some.

1. 01:29:356 (1,1,1,1) - easy i wanna see you rank this looks playable for noobs xd
2. looks good
3. meep requestd this mod

zev wrote:

General

1. 01:29:356 (1,1,1,1) - easy i wanna see you rank this looks playable for noobs xd theres no other notation possible without missing out the cymbals
2. looks good
3. meep requestd this mod

Taking flight
00:33:668 (7,8,1) - why not triple into slider 00:33:668 (7,8,1) - this slider felt not that emphasized might be the angle or red tick dunno maybe change if more people mention it, although it doesn't feel that weird to play for me tbh

DJPop wrote:

~General~
• Change 1st timing from 481 to -644 and enable inherited for 2nd timing, so each diff will contain only 1 red timing. ill ask a bn if a negative offset that goes this far negative is ok to use

~Easy~
00:05:356 (2) - change finish to whistle there is a crash cymbal in the music (but it is faint)
01:32:356 (1) - silence the end of spinner 10%, i still want at least some audible hitsound here

~HB's Normal~
00:00:481 - add note here? every other diffs have one hb
00:05:356 (4) - change finish to whistle as easy
00:38:168 (3) - add finish at start
01:32:356 (1) - silence the end of spinner 10%

~Meep's Hard~
00:05:356 (4) - change finish to whistle as easy
00:38:168 (4) - add finish at start fix
00:45:856 (1) - add more curve ? meep
01:32:262 (1) - silence the end of spinner 10%

~Taking Flight~
00:05:356 (1) - change finish to whistle as easy
00:08:731 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - looks ugly because they're packed into one spot, should be more clear to read like 00:06:856 part fixed the overlap a bit
00:13:418 (4,5,6) - sliders didn't end on any obvious sounds, their volume should be a bit lower following the bell sounds here, although i might lower the slider end volumes if more people suggest it
00:38:168 (1) - add finish at start how did i miss this o.o, fixed
00:44:168 (5,6,1) - they weren't aligned properly, just saying fixed
00:48:856 (1) - sliders didn't end on any obvious sounds, their volume should be a bit lower follows the vocal/violins here, dont think it needs volume lowering
00:49:418 (3) - ^ ^
01:18:668 (1) - ^ ^
01:28:418 (3) - ^ ^
01:31:418 (3) - add new combo why? i dont think it needs an nc since its all part of the same phrase
01:32:168 (1) - remove new combo its helps signal the end of the song
01:32:262 (1) - silence the end of spinner 10%

Nao Tomori wrote:

m4m.

[meep hard]
think od 6 or 6.5 make more sense considering that the next diff is od8 and normal is 4 Fixed

00:21:293 (8) - looks like missed stack For vision,some people said they didn't see the note at all
flow into 00:21:481 (9) - not too good imo, you could rotate 9 a bit and solve this issue Fixed

00:28:981 (4) - seems like should be a triple here, you did it later at 00:33:762 (10) - vocals,so no

00:42:293 (8) - seems like angle from 7 > 8 should be same as 8 end > 9 Fixed

01:11:356 (1,1) - ;3
i like these better than what lon did >>

01:17:918 (2,1) - lower 1 red point a bit to avoid this imo Fixed

01:28:418 (4) - why stack on top of this? it isn't thaaat much emphasis needed imo meh >_>

01:30:481 - tbh i think all of these should be stacked on the same place Works either way tbh,

very bodacious background

xasuma wrote:

Hey there, m4m from your queue. Sorry if I nitpicked a bit on some things, but that means the maps are good. Take/leave what you choose.

meep's hard
00:00:856 (2) - NC off Nah,wanted the first reverse slider as NC as it is a sudden and different sound
00:00:856 (2) - try moving them all to where (4) is at x:256 y:144 . It was a little awkward where it was. Nah XD
00:27:856 (1,2) - I think the distance here should not be consistent with the spacing from before. Either make it larger or stack/overlap them imo, to let the player know that something changed. Fixed
00:33:106 (8) - x:304 y:208 so it stacks perfectly with the coming notes (lol this is not really important though ) remapped that part XD
00:36:668 (8,9,1) - a 0.45 distance between these looks better and is more consistent with the prevous ones imo. remapped
01:11:356 (1) - this slider should end at 01:13:231 , feels much better I think I'll consider this. nice catch
01:14:356 (1) - consider the same for this one. I know there is a sound on the last red tick of each slider, but I feel it plays/sounds better without that there.
I'll consider too

I hope this helped some.

zev wrote:

General

meep
00:21:293 (8) - overlaps still delay reading with that ar, would it hurt to place them more open? Fixed
00:21:481 (9) - turn like 45 degrees clockwise for visual flow aesthetics? idk if fixed
00:42:106 (7,9) - what spacing concept is this in a hard? remapped that part
00:42:856 (1) - blanket slightly off remapped too
00:58:231 (7) - which spacign concept? the meep concept

Ayucchi wrote:

i know meep hasnt updated his diff yet xd but i found some stuff in his diff while playing that i wanted to point out

sorry about formatting im a bit lazy

Meep's Hard:

00:18:856 (1) - You put an NC here so
00:20:356 (5) - why not here? cuz it looks better :^)
00:21:482 (9,1) - like wise here, Ctrl+G this Fixed
00:23:356 (5) - no NC? yea no nc XD im not going on a 'per big white tick' basis
00:30:856 (1) - likewise, you NC'd this
00:32:356 (5) - so why not this as well ^
00:41:168 (5) - personal prefence to NC this, up to you tbh no need
00:44:168 (1) - remove NC, put it here 00:44:356 (3) - instead , like you did for 00:45:668 (7,8,1) - Fixed
00:58:418 (8) - feels like it could be remapped to 4 notes instead of a repeating slider because the vocal sort of get "stronger" xd my vocab isnt the best nah,vocal is bae
01:17:356 (1) - idk if you what you're following but in case it's the vocal, missed sth here 01:17:543 (2) -

the other diffs plays fine but i havent went into editor yet

pls rank this i love this song and map

DJPop wrote:

~General~
~Meep's Hard~
00:05:356 (4) - change finish to whistle Fixed
00:38:168 (4) - add finish at start Fixed
00:45:856 (1) - add more curve ? Nah
01:32:262 (1) - silence the end of spinner 20%'s quite low o-o

thanks for modding,all of u

freddofrog wrote:

flying:
01:08:437 (1,2,3) - over mapped, make it a slider I think it's fine, I really enjoy the cross movement that follow the violins and they act as a nice build up into the bigger back and forth jumps for the guitar

Underdogs wrote:

get mod scammed xd mfw

Easy

00:14:625 (1) - the break after the spinner is kind of unnecessary. Extending the slider could be good, because 160 bpm with 3 second slider would help newbies to spin more rapidly imo i think its ok, its a good way to section out the intro from the verses, also if i extended the slider it would finish on a big note

00:29:250 (4) - drag this to x:216 y:228 to make it more flow-ish moved note but not there

00:33:750 (2) - Just a flow suggestion. Put this at x:152 y:8 . Otherwise feel free to ignore that breaks ds, altho i like the flow, i might think about changing this later on

00:54:750 (1) - the start of the spinner should be clickable as the finisher suggests it. Spinner should start at 00:55:500 i think its ok since the rhythm might be a bit complicated if i made it clickable, starting the spinner at your starting point feels like its too short for it to be a spinner

01:05:625 (3) - if i were to map this part, i think reversing would be ideal as well as a circle on sliderend of 01:06:375 (4) - to actually help holding onto 01:07:125 (1) - since you make long 1/2 slider i understand where you're coming from, but because the vocal starts again on the (4) i can't really ignore it

01:26:625 (2) - ctrl+j ok

other diff looks good

meep mod my snow hala when

Nao Tomori wrote:

Hello!

Well, I gotta say i am disappointed, this song had potential to have an amazing map, but what i played, it just wasn't how it was supposed to be... Unfortunately, i have to say that you don't have enough skill as a mapper to pull this off, and here is why:

- The map style for this really isn't fitting for an eroge song, even if it has slow inherited points and fast ones, the sliders themselves are the biggest problem: being round and circular. It needed some squared points or just overall having bends to fit the bassline.
- The spacing looked too simple for any Insane difficulty map, looked like a beginner map at first.
- Lots of patterns don't really follow the song that well, and just seem to be filler objects, like 00:26:531 (7) - or 01:17:906 (2) - , i still dont get what those part were supposed to follow.
- Also there appears to be some overmapping, places like these 00:38:531 (8) - or 01:33:187 (3) - where it just adds more objects for no apparent reason (none other than making the map more difficult on purpose that is).

Lastly, it needed new combo colors, but probably an even better idea: a Storyboard. If made properly, the storyboard could be something like changing BG color to warn about sudden slider velocities or simply different spacing changes that can be too hard to read out. Or simply something more enterntaining than a static BG that didn't really fit the song :\

Well I'll just have to say this: If you really want to continue with this map, i suggest practicing alot more with pattern creativity on complicated songs, mostly eroge, creating also lots of different sliders as experience, and most importantly, play more maps. Because if you can play this map correctly everytime, it's even easier to detect it's flaws and looking for better ways to improve it.

Sorry if I wasn't helpful at all, i tried ;_;