>Yuri is the name of the MC and it's a guy
I've never been so disappointed in my life.
I've never been so disappointed in my life.
B1rd wrote:
>Yuri is the name of the MC and it's a guy
I've never been so disappointed in my life.
You had to think of it while you were watching hentai you scrublol wrote:
can i pay someone to do my computer science uni assignments please one of u must be able to do it
isn't computer science your major, though?lol wrote:
can i pay someone to do my computer science uni assignments please one of u must be able to do it
yes but i am busy making mad p $$$$$$$Foxtrot wrote:
isn't computer science your major, though?lol wrote:
can i pay someone to do my computer science uni assignments please one of u must be able to do it
yea, i'll do it if you pay me. can't guarantee correct answers tho.lol wrote:
can i pay someone to do my computer science uni assignments please one of u must be able to do it
oklol wrote:
can i pay someone to do my computer science uni assignments please one of u must be able to do it
how much are you making now?lol wrote:
yes but i am busy making mad p $$$$$$$
is it at least $100/s?lol wrote:
yes but i am busy making mad p $$$$$$$
background story plsRaspberriel wrote:
okay can we just nuke every youtube comment section right now please and thank you
inspired by people circlejerking about how much they hate Colbert because he called out their bullshit, and saying stuff likeKisses wrote:
background story plsRaspberriel wrote:
okay can we just nuke every youtube comment section right now please and thank you
I personally haven't seen it happen on any trending politics video. I've seen it elsewhere on the Internet, though.Railey2 wrote:
you've never seen liberals circlejerking? The whole US selection has been one big liberal circlejerk. Don't say that liberals don't circlejerk. They do it too, they also do it on youtube a lot. Of course it would extend to the internet as well, they've been at it so much people say this is what lost them their election-cycle.
There are some gaming channels where everyone seems to be cool in the comments, I'll say that much.EneT wrote:
You're reading the comment section of the wrong youtube videos, of course you're going to run into cancer. Only read the comments for quality videos such as these. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QP-X84AB034
General rule, just don't read any long reply chains and you're safe.
lmaoRailey2 wrote:
what the fuck
how can people so fundamentally misunderstand what the left is about? Are these people really representing modern day conservatives in the US?
also maniaRoseusJaeger wrote:
yuri on ice, bruh. Thats what has made me so happyJellyblob56 wrote:
what on earth could possibly make you that happy in this day and age
You really can't stand different opinions can you.Rasberriel wrote:
okay can we just nuke every youtube comment section right now please and thank you
how can people so fundamentally misunderstand what the left is about? Are these people really representing modern day conservatives in the US?Seems like you don't understand what the dichotomy of the left and right is about. The left is about big government controlling everything.
libertarians aren't silly enough to believe that a market would just regulate itself and be fine if you add more freeeeeedom. This is what I've gathered from reading youtube comments tonight. What a waste of time, I'm so done with this shitMost libertarians believe in free market ideals.
Neither can /r/the_donald, apparently.B1rd wrote:
You really can't stand different opinions can you.Rasberriel wrote:
okay can we just nuke every youtube comment section right now please and thank you
noB1rd wrote:
how can people so fundamentally misunderstand what the left is about? Are these people really representing modern day conservatives in the US?Seems like you don't understand what the dichotomy of the left and right is about. The left is about big government controlling everything.
Hey, for once a youtube comment said something that makes sense ;^ )Raspberriel wrote:
65 likes for blatantly anti-Semitic crap. The kicker is, he isn't even Jewish!
This cunt wasn't kidding either -- she also said she couldn't possibly be a nazi because she has brown skin
But overall, it just seems like in general, they're where everything annoying about the internet converges into one giant cesspool
On some videos, it's ultra-defensive tumblr fandoms and/or forced memes (aka anything even remotely related to GiIvaSunner and/or JoJo)
On other videos (as in every political video ever), it's conspiracy theorists/alt-righters (it's never liberals or even moderate conservatives) circlejerking themselves and taking up the entire "top comments" section
And, of course, the spammers and scammers blocking replies to their comments so no one can call them out for the pieces of trash that they are
Even on videos about more "cultured" subjects there's always one person that fucks it up
That being said, I still don't like it when a sizable channel disables their comments, especially if they're peddling bullshit about a controversial topic (looking at every video that shits on gamers for no reason), but after seeing the way 95% of YT commenters are, can you really blame them?
i live in england not indiaZain Sugieres wrote:
Just go to the designated shit street
???lol wrote:
i live in New India not IndiaZain Sugieres wrote:
Just go to the designated shit street
can u not talk about forum members like thatClose wrote:
yea there are no designated shit streets in first world countries, unless ur talking about where i find dead hookers my neighbor chokeslammed
OI OI YA FUCKIN GAYYYY ILL CHOKESLAM U OFF TRUMP TOWERlol wrote:
can u not talk about forum members like thatClose wrote:
yea there are no designated shit streets in first world countries, unless ur talking about where i find dead hookers my neighbor chokeslammed
tmw you find out Raspberriel has "anything Jordan posts" written in her "ongoing list of triggers" xdJordan wrote:
Hey, for once a youtube comment said something that makes sense ;^ )Raspberriel wrote:
65 likes for blatantly anti-Semitic crap. The kicker is, he isn't even Jewish!
This cunt wasn't kidding either -- she also said she couldn't possibly be a nazi because she has brown skin
But overall, it just seems like in general, they're where everything annoying about the internet converges into one giant cesspool
On some videos, it's ultra-defensive tumblr fandoms and/or forced memes (aka anything even remotely related to GiIvaSunner and/or JoJo)
On other videos (as in every political video ever), it's conspiracy theorists/alt-righters (it's never liberals or even moderate conservatives) circlejerking themselves and taking up the entire "top comments" section
And, of course, the spammers and scammers blocking replies to their comments so no one can call them out for the pieces of trash that they are
Even on videos about more "cultured" subjects there's always one person that fucks it up
That being said, I still don't like it when a sizable channel disables their comments, especially if they're peddling bullshit about a controversial topic (looking at every video that shits on gamers for no reason), but after seeing the way 95% of YT commenters are, can you really blame them?
Railey2 wrote:
no
Accusing people of 'unironic attacks on Jews' holds about as much weight as accusing someone of 'unironic attacks on Nazis'. But basically you just got triggered by Youtube comments, typically libtard lolRaspberriel wrote:
Also, if by "different opinions" you mean "non-ironic attacks on the Jews" and "applying an incredibly arbitrary interpretation to a circle of friends' conversations" or even something as petty as "[Franchise X] is the best/trash" then yes, I guess that's true. But regarding the more serious ones, I'd rather not go down the whole "racist/sexist/etc." rabbit hole, since it just leads to arguments about tolerance of intolerance and where exactly the intolerance even starts (in religions like Islam or in far-right movements).
Apologies if I don't make any sense, it's 3 in the morning and I'm still up for whatever reason...
yeah, I'm pretty sure he'd be the only person in this thread that could unironically say that Hitler did nothing wrongKisses wrote:
tmw you find out Raspberriel has "anything Jordan posts" written in her "ongoing list of triggers" xd
what in the everloving fuck does this meanB1rd wrote:
Accusing people of 'unironic attacks on Jews' holds about as much weight as accusing someone of 'unironic attacks on Nazis'. But basically you just got triggered by Youtube comments, typically libtard lol
*triggering intensifies*Raspberriel wrote:
what in the everloving fuck does this mean
she was 100% serious
excuuuuuuuse me for pointing out that anti-Semites are anti-Semitic, go back to riding Molyneux's dick some more
Telling me I am wrong without providing any sort of argument is a completely useless and pointless thing to do. Obviously. And so is calling me 'dishonest' just because I don't agree with you.Railey2 wrote:
@B1rd:
exactly, I wasn't making an argument, nor did I claim that I was making an argument. I just told you that you were wrong about what approximately half of the population really wants (no, the left does not want an authoritarian state that is strictly in control over most aspects of life, for the most part).
This is why political discourse is impossible in the US. The sides can't even bother to listen each other, so they're just strawmanning each other to oblivion. The same thing you do when you accuse the left of wanting to build an authoritarian regime.
"big government controlling everything", lol. What a joke. Who would want something like that?
As long as you're dishonest like that, there is no point in having an actual argument.
I did now.Rasberriel wrote:
Did you not read the original comment or...?
That's cruel. Sea creatures bumping into tank walls means the tank is much too small for it. ):Faust wrote:
Got to see a huge fucking Manatee up-close, make an intro while not giving a single fuck and then proceed to bump itself face-first into the tanks wall.
A good laugh was had.
not over everything. Free speech is a core value for the left as well.B1rd wrote:
Telling me I am wrong without providing any sort of argument is a completely useless and pointless thing to do. Obviously. And so is calling me 'dishonest' just because I don't agree with you.Railey2 wrote:
@B1rd:
exactly, I wasn't making an argument, nor did I claim that I was making an argument. I just told you that you were wrong about what approximately half of the population really wants (no, the left does not want an authoritarian state that is strictly in control over most aspects of life, for the most part).
This is why political discourse is impossible in the US. The sides can't even bother to listen each other, so they're just strawmanning each other to oblivion. The same thing you do when you accuse the left of wanting to build an authoritarian regime.
"big government controlling everything", lol. What a joke. Who would want something like that?
As long as you're dishonest like that, there is no point in having an actual argument.
I said that you don't understand the dichotomy of the left and right because apparently you don't. No one actually says they want a big government controlling everything, but that is a the result of leftists policies.
The left wants
-higher taxes
-more regulation
-more welfare
-more control on speech
-more control on education/healthcare
the right wants
-lower taxes
-less regulation
-less welfare
-less control on speech
-less government control
Whatever you say, it's demonstrably true that the left wants a bigger government with more control over everything.
If you can't see how accusing an entire demographic (that has already been accused of mounds of other shit for centuries) of being "pedophile apologists" is bad, then there's really no point in continuing this. And I haven't even touched on the fact that even the assumptions she used to make that claim are flawed. But yeah, whatever, keep defending YouTube comments.B1rd wrote:
I did now.Rasberriel wrote:
Did you not read the original comment or...?
Are you actually gonna come up with a coherent response or...?
I'm sure they understand sarcasm. It's about getting views and money. 2016 is the rise of clickbaitRaspberriel wrote:
On a side note, the media coverage of PewDiePie's recent videos is absolutely absurd. It's like journalists have lost the ability to comprehend sarcasm or something. TIME Magazine called it a "temper tantrum" -- anyone who watched the videos knows that's patently false. But then again, they've been doing this crap for years now about anything on the Internet...
Okay, as long as they don't keep any Sharks, Dolphins, Orcas or any other fast, nomadic, open-water sea creature then it's fine.Faust wrote:
It's technically a tank, but it's also FUCKING HUGE, you could put a thousand manatees in there or something. There are also fishes going around.
I don't have pictures with me, but here:
It came up steadily half-asleep or something, drifted through left to right and bumped the wall. Honestly, it was cute.
Saw a Red Panda too. Took this one myself.
Yeah, the face shape is weird, but it pretty much describes how I've felt in several situations the past few daysEneT wrote:
Also, Raspberriel your avatar looks fat, I don't like it.
Said the loserEneT wrote:
Collabs are for losers
you just did exactly what he hates in the video, basically quoted word for word what he said and missed out the part where he said they understand its sarcasm, its just just clickbaitRaspberriel wrote:
On a side note, the media coverage of PewDiePie's recent videos is absolutely absurd. It's like journalists have lost the ability to comprehend sarcasm or something. TIME Magazine called it a "temper tantrum" -- anyone who watched the videos knows that's patently false. But then again, they've been doing this crap for years now about anything on the Internet...
So they know perfectly well what's going on, but they make shit up anyway. Okay yeah, no wonder people don't trust news media anymore. There's a poll where only big business and Congress are less trusted than the media. Nice.lol wrote:
you just did exactly what he hates in the video, basically quoted word for word what he said and missed out the part where he said they understand its sarcasm, its just just clickbaitRaspberriel wrote:
On a side note, the media coverage of PewDiePie's recent videos is absolutely absurd. It's like journalists have lost the ability to comprehend sarcasm or something. TIME Magazine called it a "temper tantrum" -- anyone who watched the videos knows that's patently false. But then again, they've been doing this crap for years now about anything on the Internet...
another example for my claim that freedom isn't always good: Journalism that is solely after money instead of promoting honest argument to confront serious topics, quickly turns into something akin to buzzfeed, fox news, or this. There are easier ways to make money on the free market, after all. If there is nobody to hold journalists to a standard, the quality of overall media will plummet sooner or later.Raspberriel wrote:
So they know perfectly well what's going on, but they make shit up anyway. Okay yeah, no wonder people don't trust news media anymore. There's a poll where only big business and Congress are less trusted than the media. Nice.
Personally, I blame this for kicking it off.
Good luck on that. Whether or not you actually believe what you write, you are just as allowed to say to the public that you believe in what you write and they can't really do shit to you, as long as you are consistent with what you write. Especially in something so subjective, there is no golden rule for saying something is objectively misrepresenting political arguments. And if a law did manage to pass to allow the condemnation of "misrepresented data," then people can just be throwing that at anything that they didn't agree with.Railey2 wrote:
For example by implementing laws that state that you aren't allowed to misrepresent political arguments on purpose to influence your readership in a certain way, etc.
the point is, it should not up to the people. It should be up to a third party organization that hopefully consists of unbiased, qualified people, who can tell the difference between fair coverage and blatant dishonesty.winber1 wrote:
Good luck on that. Whether or not you actually believe what you write, you are just as allowed to say to the public that you believe in what you write and they can't really do shit to you, as long as you are consistent with what you write. Especially in something so subjective, there is no golden rule for saying something is objectively misrepresenting political arguments. And if a law did manage to pass to allow the condemnation of "misrepresented data," then people can just be throwing that at anything that they didn't agree with.Railey2 wrote:
For example by implementing laws that state that you aren't allowed to misrepresent political arguments on purpose to influence your readership in a certain way, etc.
There are differences in journalism.B1rd wrote:
Funny how before you were talking about how the left doesn't want the government controlling things, and now you're already talking about censoring the media. And also claiming that your opinions on climate change and creationism/evolution are facts so opposing viewpoints should be censored.
Just because you think someone is true doesn't make it a fact. And just because a bunch of scientists think something is true doesn't make it true either. They have been wrong before and will be wrong again. There is no 'balance' on this issue. You have free speech or you don't. You dictate what other people are allowed to say or teach, or you don't.Railey2 wrote:
as i said, balance is key. The left is definitely in favour of more governmental control, but nobody wants a dystopian future where everything is censored and controlled.
And no, my views on creationism and climate change denial aren't opinions. It's a fact that climate change is real and that the world is older than 6k years. Those are facts. It's important to get this distinction right. Teachers that teach their students wrong things about the world shouldn't be teachers. News anchors that blatantly lie shouldn't report on the news.
b1rd needs to justify his hate speech somehowsilmarilen wrote:
Luckily the world isn't so black and white as you make it out to be b1rd.
869k, 96.47%Yuudachi-kun wrote:
Raspberry send me your results from playing this by itself:
My best on that is 95.8 and I got 94.8 today. Still suck ass at eyes off of you so no 9th dan for me.Raspberriel wrote:
869k, 96.47%Yuudachi-kun wrote:
Raspberry send me your results from playing this by itself:
yet I have 911k on Sayonara Planet Wars >_>
well d'uh free speech is already restricted in many places and nobody would even think of suggesting something else. He's acting as if only the liberal party has an interest in respecting free speech, but actually.. every single party known to me does.Jellyblob56 wrote:
But it is one of right or wrong. Do or don't. True and false.silmarilen wrote:
Luckily the world isn't so black and white as you make it out to be b1rd.
Then there are theories
You don't have a 100% guarantee for anything in life. If your standards for what constitutes a fact are so high that you think it is valid to ignore decades of well-founded research, then facts might as well not exist in your world.B1rd wrote:
Just because you think someone is true doesn't make it a fact. And just because a bunch of scientists think something is true doesn't make it true either. They have been wrong before and will be wrong again. There is no 'balance' on this issue. You have free speech or you don't. You dictate what other people are allowed to say or teach, or you don't.
That doesn't mean anything unless you have cold, hard evidence for the claims. That's why conspiracy theories often stay are just that, a theory. It may be possible and may some convincing arguments but that doesn't make it fact.B1rd wrote:
Lots of conspiracy theories have more truth to them than you'd like to believe.
http://oregonstate.edu/instruction/bb31 ... ories.htmlRoseusJaeger wrote:
That doesn't mean anything unless you have cold, hard evidence for the claims. That's why conspiracy theories often stay are just that, a theory. It may be possible and may some convincing arguments but that doesn't make it fact.B1rd wrote:
Lots of conspiracy theories have more truth to them than you'd like to believe.
I think its very often the case that someone indeed just pulled a conspiracy theory out of his ass.Jellyblob56 wrote:
Of course but I think what he's trying to say is that conspiracy theories aren't just pulled out of someone ass. They stem from something.