I'm making fun of of your thought where you think the reason for there being a lack of black swimmers in the Olympics was solely because they were poorer and had less access to swimming pools when it's been scientifically proven that black people have genetically heavier muscle mass making them less efficient swimmers than white people who are genetically fatter and more buoyant. Also your thought that saying such a thing is racist. lel
forum
ITT 2: We post shit that is neither funny nor interesting
posted
Total Posts
57,720
I don't need your love you narcissistic prick.
Which is trueEneT wrote:
you think the reason for there being a lack of black swimmers in the Olympics was solely because they were poorer and had less access to swimming pools
It isn't, you made it up directly out of your ass.
You can be vain without being narcissistic, I'm not narcissistic.Hika wrote:
I don't need your love you narcissistic prick.
Maybe.
This reminds me of the time when everyone went apeshit in Railey's "some people are more talented than others at osu" thread
I don't know why they would, that's true, not everyone has the same hand-eye coordination or the capability to improve in the same speed.
Railey was right thoKisses wrote:
This reminds me of the time when everyone went apeshit in Railey's "some people are more talented than others at osu" thread
This entire issue is extremely visible if you have a fundamental understanding of american history dudeEneT wrote:
It isn't, you made it up directly out of your ass.
Jellyblob56 wrote:
did anyone get the chance to see what the thread said
I actually still had it in my history, this was the contents of the post
spboxer3 wrote:
free Her
No, you literally make shit up and twist things to back up your faulty arguments. You argue about things with no statistical evidence or proof and you argue about competitive Pokemon when you haven't even played and had a good amount of experience in the game.
By your analysis, black people in Jamaica would qualify to be the best swimmers in the Olympics since they're literally surrounded in all sides by Sea.
By your analysis, black people in Jamaica would qualify to be the best swimmers in the Olympics since they're literally surrounded in all sides by Sea.
In other news, the Marvel vs. Capcom: Infinite teaser trailer was just released.
Looks great.
Looks great.
What the actual fuckEneT wrote:
you argue about competitive Pokemon when you haven't even played and had a good amount of experience in the game.
I have played competitive pokemon, you shit.
You accuse me of making stuff up?
What the actual fuck!?
Do they swim for leisure? How is their economic situation? How well are they educated?EneT wrote:
By your analysis, black people in Jamaica would qualify to be the best swimmers in the Olympics since they're literally surrounded in all sides by Sea.
If you seriously think that's the only criteria that's necessary, then I can see that you probably just don't even comprehend what I say most of the time :/
;_;Jellyblob56 wrote:
lol who tf cares you nerdFaust wrote:
In other news, the Marvel vs. Capcom: Infinite teaser trailer was just released.
Looks great.
And why would their economic situation or education be relevant in this subject? Usain Bolt is from Jamaica so why would it matter? It's not that we can't comprehend what you say, it's just that most of what you say is stupid because you lack knowledge about everything you argue about and instead make assumptions out of your ass. If you're going to argue about something at least have a good amount of knowledge about it, like if someone randomly starts talking shit about bronies then go ahead and argue about that. You argued about American Politics when you didn't even know what a Democrat or a Republican was... I didn't know enough about American Politics to argue about it and that's why I didn't, I stayed neutral between Hillary and Trump while you were immediately on people's ass for supporting Trump without concern for their reasoning. You don't see Railey arguing about shit he doesn't know about either; you just love arguing about shit you know close to nothing about.
Because that really determines how much leisure time someone has and what they spend it onEneT wrote:
And why would their economic situation or education be relevant in this subject?
Which is why I avoided complaining about anything democrat or republicanEneT wrote:
You argued about American Politics when you didn't even know what a Democrat or a Republican was...
I complain about trump. I don't complain about republicans.
Hence, I still don't talk about anything I don't know about.
You're the one who's full of shit with your bullshit assumptions and guesses. Stop projecting your shit onto me, lmfao
You're on the same level of ignorance as tupsu if you think you've won all or even one of the arguments you've had here recently. On the level of delusional even.
When someone stops debating points and then starts resorting to attacks and insults such as you are right now, I consider that a victory.
Keep telling yourself that. You have failed to change the perspective of anyone in this forum and that is the final conclusion to who wins a debate. So either you're delusional or everyone else in the world is.
Hey, everyone else but myself is wrong, unless they agree with my points C:
i sided with RaileyTornado wrote:
Railey was right thoKisses wrote:
This reminds me of the time when everyone went apeshit in Railey's "some people are more talented than others at osu" thread
sameFaust wrote:
Hey, everyone else but myself is wrong, unless they agree with my points C:
Must be nice to live in a dream world where everything I say is right and anyone who disagrees must be a deplorable human being that is wrong and most possibly racist
yo enet, what are your interests? other than the osu forums
Women, singing, dancing, playing instruments and games. I also like teaching.
If people on this forum are anything like you, I'm not surprised. Why are you so obsessed with winning, though? I engage in these conversations to expand my mind, but "winning" seems to be the only thing you care about which is fairly disappointing.EneT wrote:
You have failed to change the perspective of anyone in this forum and that is the final conclusion to who wins a debate.
you mean this forum, not the worldEneT wrote:
So either you're delusional or everyone else in the world is.
Difference is people have to actually engage with my points in real life instead of just diving into insults, so stuff actually gets done unlike here.
Wow, you're mad. It's pretty egocentric of you to think the entire world's on your side.EneT wrote:
Must be nice to live in a dream world where everything I say is right and anyone who disagrees must be a deplorable human being that is wrong and most possibly racist
No one apart from ignorant people like yourself such as tupsu has agreed to any of the points you have made in any argument, the arguments you've had recently and the arguments you've had in the past, with B1rd and all. It's really hard to when you make some random shit up. I have never sided with you in any of the arguments you've had with B1rd to give an example. I can see why he just ignores everything you say, it's honestly tiring talking to someone so hesitant to accept that people have other opinions other than his.
"People who disagree with me are ignorant"EneT wrote:
No one apart from ignorant people like yourself
"If I can't argue against something, it must be made up"EneT wrote:
It's really hard to when you make some random shit up.
Ok??? It's not like I expect you to, because you're proving to be just like him.EneT wrote:
I have never sided with you in any of the arguments you've had with B1rd to give an example.
Why, because you two are alike?EneT wrote:
I can see why he just ignores everything you say
That's extremely hypocriticalEneT wrote:
it's honestly tiring talking to someone so hesitant to accept that people have other opinions other than his.
Ha, you think I don't accept the opinions of others?
I think Jordan is racist in general and many of the things he said were racist but I could accept that some of his points weren't racist and in fact true; I can see why he thinks in such a way. That was the origin of my argument against you calling everything he said racist.
I'm against Islam in general but recently I argued FOR Islam, that at it's base, it is not a religion of evil and violence. Do you not remember how much I've slandered Muslims in the past of this thread?
Where do you see my hypocrisy?
I think Jordan is racist in general and many of the things he said were racist but I could accept that some of his points weren't racist and in fact true; I can see why he thinks in such a way. That was the origin of my argument against you calling everything he said racist.
I'm against Islam in general but recently I argued FOR Islam, that at it's base, it is not a religion of evil and violence. Do you not remember how much I've slandered Muslims in the past of this thread?
Where do you see my hypocrisy?
You complain about me not accepting other opinions, and then continue to imply that I'm always wrong, and you then claim only ignorant people would be likely to agree with me.EneT wrote:
Where do you see my hypocrisy?
So there's that. It was all in one post, too, so that's an impressive amount of hypocracy and lack of self-awareness, almost a record! Good job!
It's safe to assume you're wrong on arguments when you keep arguing about things you know nothing about. It's not that people are not willing to accept your opinions, it's that your opinions are based off of assumptions you shit out of your ass. You on the other hand completely refuse the opinions of others, you refused to accept the points and reasons of Trump supporters and just dismissed it to them just being racist
Mahogany, if I may steal a quote from you, "Maybe the problem is you?" xddd
Which I don't do, as I've already shownEneT wrote:
when you keep arguing about things you know nothing about
Actually, that's more on you. Are you projecting? That'd make a lot of sense.EneT wrote:
based off of assumptions you shit out of your ass
Correction: I refuse to accept the points of the worst people on the internetEneT wrote:
you refused to accept the points and reasons of Trump supporters
I'm sure there are plenty of reasonable trump supporters, but the people here and elsewhere online have proven themselves to be horrible people in several ways.
I'd rather speak to the average trump supporter than the hateful legions form the worst recesses of the internet.
sure, if you say it to enetKisses wrote:
Mahogany, if I may steal a quote from you, "Maybe the problem is you?" xddd
Sure, sure, that wasn't what you were saying back then. Ignoring the Trump trolling, B1rd provided decent points as to why he was for Trump yet you ignored every single one of them. All you said was "No, no, no, no, shut up Trump is racist so his supporters must be racist, anyone who supports him is a racist cunt."
Even if the person isn't deserving of reputation, you mustn't discriminate when they provide a point. Take into account the opinions of all people.
Even if the person isn't deserving of reputation, you mustn't discriminate when they provide a point. Take into account the opinions of all people.
DeletedUser_6709840
A vote for trump is a vote endorsing racism, and I still stand by that statementEneT wrote:
All you said was
What it makes me want to know is how much people value these other things to sacrifice equality, which holds such great value
Though it quickly became apparent was that these people did not value that equality at all or are just assholes
like b1rd for example
Don't interrupt Roseus, you don't know the context of the argument. Mahogany believed that every single Trump supporter was racist and dismissed any points anyone made of why he was a better candidate than Hillary. Chalked it up to anyone who supports Trump supports an evil cause.
I'm pretty sure they're capable of reading this thread, thanks. Stop trying to shut out everyone you disagree with.EneT wrote:
Don't interrupt Roseus, you don't know the context of the argument.
"Oh look, someone who doesn't know the context of this argument. Maybe I can get them on my side if I keep talking about how Trump sucks and how I would have voted for Hillary if I was an American even though this has nothing to do with the argument at hand about how I shit things out of my ass and refuse to accept the opinions of others!!!"
DeletedUser_6709840
The KKK-members shop at the local bakery. Fucking racist bakery.RoseusJaeger wrote:
It's hard NOT to think Trump is racist when literally the KKK supports and backs him. It's natural people are going to hate him
now you're hitting a new record of bullshitteryEneT wrote:
how I would have voted for Hillary
I don't endorse hillary. I believe she would be a better choice than trump, but that does not mean I think she is a good candidate, nor does it mean I would have voted for her
I don't talk with Roseus, but I think they're nice, and I consider us to be cool with each-other. I don't believe we've ever had a significant disagreement, so I don't feel compelled to have to get them "on my side" either.EneT wrote:
Oh look, someone who doesn't know the context of this argument. Maybe I can get them on my side
But of course, everything's a fight to you, isn't it? It's X vs Y, not a learning experience or anything. That's the same impression I get from a lot of people.
Your point however doesn't add to the argument at hand as the Trump vs Hillary debate is separate from this. The point of using it as an example was to prove how much Mahogany is unwilling to accept people's views. Your point adds nothing, it just adds unnecessary attention to a debate that we have left in the past.RoseusJaeger wrote:
I have been reading the conversation and I was adding a point to the conversation. This IS a public forum, so i an speak whenever the fuck I want, you retarded dish towel.
DeletedUser_6709840
We're talking about they donated money to his campaign, not domestic stuff that just everyday living. Poor analogy, mate.Railey2 wrote:
The KKK-members shop at the local bakery. Fucking racist bakery.RoseusJaeger wrote:
It's hard NOT to think Trump is racist when literally the KKK supports and backs him. It's natural people are going to hate him
Edit: A personal favorite
DeletedUser_6709840
The point was to prove people have reasons for coming to the conclusion he's a racist and nothing more.EneT wrote:
Your point however doesn't add to the argument at hand as the Trump vs Hillary debate is separate from this. The point of using it as an example was to prove how much Mahogany is unwilling to accept people's views. Your point adds nothing, it just adds unnecessary attention to a debate that we have left in the past.RoseusJaeger wrote:
I have been reading the conversation and I was adding a point to the conversation. This IS a public forum, so i an speak whenever the fuck I want, you retarded dish towel.
lol, learning experience my ass. I'm pretty sure you don't think that or you just got that of your ass because it's not a 'learning experience' when you're calling people out for being racist. It would be a learning experience if you had said "Hey guys, I would like to know the opinions of Trump supporters, mind helping me learn the perspective of another individual?" but nah, you didn't. It was more like "Fuck Trump supporters, y'all racist."Mahogany wrote:
But of course, everything's a fight to you, isn't it? It's X vs Y, not a learning experience or anything. That's the same impression I get from a lot of people.
They also give money to the local bakery though.RoseusJaeger wrote:
We're talking about they donated money to his campaign, not domestic stuff that just everyday living. Poor analogy, mate.Railey2 wrote:
The KKK-members shop at the local bakery. Fucking racist bakery.
The point is: Making an inference based on who your supporters are, can be invalid in many cases. Such cases include: when there are only few parties to choose from, like two presidential candidates, or two local bakeries, one of which has shitty cupcakes, so there's really only one to go to.
Are you gonna call Hillary a left-wing terrorist because left-wing extremists endorsed her over trump? That's just stupid.
I can assure you that most racists in the voted against Obama because he is black. Does that mean Mitt Romney and McCain were both racists? Lol.
i also chuckled a bit when I read learning experienceEneT wrote:
lol, learning experience my ass. I'm pretty sure you don't think that or you just got that of your ass because it's not a 'learning experience' when you're calling people out for being racist. It would be a learning experience if you had said "Hey guys, I would like to know the opinions of Trump supporters, mind helping me learn the perspective of another individual?" but nah, you didn't. It was more like "Fuck Trump supporters, y'all racist."Mahogany wrote:
But of course, everything's a fight to you, isn't it? It's X vs Y, not a learning experience or anything. That's the same impression I get from a lot of people.
DeletedUser_6709840
Railey2 wrote:
They also give money to the local bakery though.RoseusJaeger wrote:
We're talking about they donated money to his campaign, not domestic stuff that just everyday living. Poor analogy, mate.
The point is: Making an inference based on who your supporters are, can be invalid in many cases. Such cases include: when there are only few parties to choose from, like two presidential candidates, or two local bakeries, one of which has shitty cupcakes, so there's really only one to go to.
Are you gonna call Hillary a left-wing terrorist because left-wing extremists endorsed her over trump? That's just stupid.
I can assure you that most racists in the voted against Obama because he is black. Does that mean Mitt Romney and McCain were both racists? Lol.
You do have a point. Trump has done some other questionable things but I'm too tired to really refute it so I'll just give you that you do have a point for now.
Well, I mean, as we've established, of course that's what you'd think.EneT wrote:
lol, learning experience my ass
When their reasonings are racist, it's valid to call them out. Tolerance dies when we're tolerant of the intolerant.EneT wrote:
'm pretty sure you don't think that or you just got that of your ass because it's not a 'learning experience' when you're calling people out for being racist.
I have done that beforeEneT wrote:
It would be a learning experience if you had said "Hey guys, I would like to know the opinions of Trump supporters, mind helping me learn the perspective of another individual?"
It ended up exactly the same way, primarily because the vocal trump supporters on the internet (I'll use b1rd as my example) are extremely toxic and hateful people
So yeah, I did that and it ended up progressing to that stage
Solution: Open up your own bakery, or support a new enterprise that's openingRailey2 wrote:
The point is: Making an inference based on who your supporters are, can be invalid in many cases. Such cases include: when there are only few parties to choose from, like two presidential candidates, or two local bakeries, one of which has shitty cupcakes, so there's really only one to go to.
I personally don't like trump but trump isn't responsible for the KKK's actions so I don't think it's fair to to label him based off the actions of a small percentage of his supporters
Lemme give you an example of a 'learning experience' Mahogany. Sometime during last year someone made an LGBT thread on GD which resulted in a bunch of people arguing on it. Me having homophobic tendencies, instead of being offensive and joining in the argument I reached out to someone to teach me and explain what it really means to be trans. It resulted in a civil exchange of PMs with a FtM trans teaching me and answering my questions. That, is a learning experience, nothing you have done has been on the civil side and can be considered a 'learning experience'.
yet clearly you've learned nothing because you're still attacking me instead of trying to have a discussionEneT wrote:
That, is a learning experience
I've been nothing but civil and received nothing but insults in return, yet you keep telling yourself that.EneT wrote:
nothing you have done has been on the civil side and can be considered a 'learning experience'.
Mahogany wrote:
yet clearly you've learned nothing because you're still attacking me instead of trying to have a discussion
lolMahogany wrote:
I've been nothing but civil and received nothing but insults in return, yet you keep telling yourself that.
Right, calling B1rd out for being an asshole and calling me the same for siding with him over you doesn't really speak 'civil'. Maybe in your head every time someone talks shit about you it's not civil and every time you talk shit about someone else it is civil, maybe.
Everyone is so passionate in here.
We need some ice to cool down.
We need some ice to cool down.
That's not why I called you an asshole. Have you read anything I've written?EneT wrote:
calling me the same for siding with him over you
If only everyone else was as cool as you Endaris ;cEndaris wrote:
Everyone is so passionate in here.
We need some ice to cool down.
Dude idk why but you somehow reminded me thisEndaris wrote:
Everyone is so passionate in here.
We need some ice to cool down.
What is your favourite Ice Cream? Strange enough, some stores sell more Ice Cream during winter than in Summer.
I admire you EneT. Even in situations like these you still manage to portray yourself as calm and collected whilst looking human. I wish I was capable of that more often
Straciatella is best for me.
Regarding the discussions:
I have a really hard time participating because I dislike making points being not well informed and also because people are relatively quick in getting personal here.
It's usually nice to read through the stuff though because it opens up some views that I couldn't have imagined being backed up by reasons that I actually find to have some weight.
Regarding the discussions:
I have a really hard time participating because I dislike making points being not well informed and also because people are relatively quick in getting personal here.
It's usually nice to read through the stuff though because it opens up some views that I couldn't have imagined being backed up by reasons that I actually find to have some weight.
It's the internet, how can you get riled up over people in the internet? In real life I'd be more willing to throw some hands if someone thought it would be smart to start some shit.
For Ice Creams, I personally can't choose a favourite, they're just all so good my sugar tooth can be a blessing and a curse.
For Ice Creams, I personally can't choose a favourite, they're just all so good my sugar tooth can be a blessing and a curse.
I like a good Watermelon/Chocolate on a thick cone.
I don't think my tastesbuds will ever get used to Bubblegum. It's too good
I personally used to be addicted to buying Mcflurries during cold days, no idea why.
Interesting habit there. Sounds like reinforcement.EneT wrote:
I personally used to be addicted to buying Mcflurries during cold days, no idea why.
Personally I'd be looking for soups.
I love Smarties McFlurries but the McDonalds here stopped doing themEneT wrote:
I personally used to be addicted to buying Mcflurries during cold days, no idea why.
It's actually a strange habit of a good amount of people in England.Faust wrote:
Interesting habit there. Sounds like reinforcement.EneT wrote:
I personally used to be addicted to buying Mcflurries during cold days, no idea why.
Personally I'd be looking for soups.
Oreo was my favourite.
I endorse and am sponsored by the Oreo brand, please go buy a pack at your local store.
I had maybe 2 or 3 Oreo McFlurries in my lifetime thus far (?), and yeah I think they're pretty good stuff.
K sleep time.
K sleep time.
Mint chocolate chip ice cream. That's what I'm craving ATM.
I don't like Oreos
get. out.Endaris wrote:
I don't like Oreos
I just don't take anything personally on here. It seems to be the nature of anonymous arguments: They turn nasty way faster than arguments IRL.Endaris wrote:
Regarding the discussions:
I have a really hard time participating because I dislike making points being not well informed and also because people are relatively quick in getting personal here.
It's usually nice to read through the stuff though because it opens up some views that I couldn't have imagined being backed up by reasons that I actually find to have some weight.
I don't like it when arguments start off with name calling such as what Jellybean does. I myself don't result to name calling unless the other person has proven themselves to be autistic or uninformed. At that point it's just like, "Okay, why are you even arguing about this...", and I can't resist the urge to call them a retard.Railey2 wrote:
I just don't take anything personally on here. It seems to be the nature of anonymous arguments: They turn nasty way faster than arguments IRL.Endaris wrote:
Regarding the discussions:
I have a really hard time participating because I dislike making points being not well informed and also because people are relatively quick in getting personal here.
It's usually nice to read through the stuff though because it opens up some views that I couldn't have imagined being backed up by reasons that I actually find to have some weight.
The annoying thing is just that the personal stuff is derailing the discussion in a way.
to some people that is more interesting than the actual discussion
Mint chocolate chip ice cream is legit the best ice cream flavor ever (Breyer's 👌)Hika wrote:
Mint chocolate chip ice cream. That's what I'm craving ATM.
or New York Cheesecake
Railey I think you're secretly an obese, fat prick and I think you should go kill yourself for having such shitty opinions such as yours 
When talking about icecream we can respect each other's opinions at least...or can we?
the annoying thing is is that the drama is really bleak. Sometimes I wish there were more radical personalities in this forumEndaris wrote:
The annoying thing is just that the personal stuff is derailing the discussion in a way.
FG drama in my experience was way more deep than ITT drama tbh.
DeletedUser_6709840
t/145250/start=28065
Just to let you guys know that this thread was a lot more civil in the era before and arguments were decided much more quickly, granted there were more people with 'radical' views. If you click onto the next page you can also see Railey's first post in ITT ever and during those times he was just a shy guy that never posted essay long posts.
Just to let you guys know that this thread was a lot more civil in the era before and arguments were decided much more quickly, granted there were more people with 'radical' views. If you click onto the next page you can also see Railey's first post in ITT ever and during those times he was just a shy guy that never posted essay long posts.
DeletedUser_6709840
fuck youEndaris wrote:
When talking about icecream we can respect each other's opinions at least...or can we?
jk yes
ah my first ITT post. It's been almost two years. No regrets!
Hika is FFXV good? All I've heard is that it's nothing but mediocre and this is the only gameplay footage I've seen of it. Don't want to spoil myself.
Apparently McDonalds is very integral to the plot. I want to see how it turns out.
yo railey, would you be interested in any age of empires sometime soon?
It's really good. Already finished the game and everything. Just working on side quests now.EneT wrote:
Hika is FFXV good? All I've heard is that it's nothing but mediocre and this is the only gameplay footage I've seen of it. Don't want to spoil myself.
The main storyline isn't similar to any other storyline's in the franchise but I can tell you that the very last scene is beautiful. MADE ME CRY.