inb4 black people are naturally more buff and have harder muscle mass not because of genetics but because they're poorer and therefore have to do jobs that require more labourMahogany wrote:
Oh I'm frequently wrongRailey2 wrote:
In his own mind, Mahogany is never wrong.
Just usually not on here, and nobody has ever made a good case to prove it - like right now
ITT: Doing frequent physical activity somehow doesn't lead to being more physically capableEneT wrote:
inb4 black people are naturally more buff and have harder muscle mass not because of genetics but because they're poorer and therefore have to do jobs that require more labour
das racist
Which is trueEneT wrote:
you think the reason for there being a lack of black swimmers in the Olympics was solely because they were poorer and had less access to swimming pools
You can be vain without being narcissistic, I'm not narcissistic.Hika wrote:
I don't need your love you narcissistic prick.
Railey was right thoKisses wrote:
This reminds me of the time when everyone went apeshit in Railey's "some people are more talented than others at osu" thread
This entire issue is extremely visible if you have a fundamental understanding of american history dudeEneT wrote:
It isn't, you made it up directly out of your ass.
Jellyblob56 wrote:
did anyone get the chance to see what the thread said
spboxer3 wrote:
free Her
What the actual fuckEneT wrote:
you argue about competitive Pokemon when you haven't even played and had a good amount of experience in the game.
Do they swim for leisure? How is their economic situation? How well are they educated?EneT wrote:
By your analysis, black people in Jamaica would qualify to be the best swimmers in the Olympics since they're literally surrounded in all sides by Sea.
;_;Jellyblob56 wrote:
lol who tf cares you nerdFaust wrote:
In other news, the Marvel vs. Capcom: Infinite teaser trailer was just released.
Looks great.
Because that really determines how much leisure time someone has and what they spend it onEneT wrote:
And why would their economic situation or education be relevant in this subject?
Which is why I avoided complaining about anything democrat or republicanEneT wrote:
You argued about American Politics when you didn't even know what a Democrat or a Republican was...
i sided with RaileyTornado wrote:
Railey was right thoKisses wrote:
This reminds me of the time when everyone went apeshit in Railey's "some people are more talented than others at osu" thread
sameFaust wrote:
Hey, everyone else but myself is wrong, unless they agree with my points C:
If people on this forum are anything like you, I'm not surprised. Why are you so obsessed with winning, though? I engage in these conversations to expand my mind, but "winning" seems to be the only thing you care about which is fairly disappointing.EneT wrote:
You have failed to change the perspective of anyone in this forum and that is the final conclusion to who wins a debate.
you mean this forum, not the worldEneT wrote:
So either you're delusional or everyone else in the world is.
Wow, you're mad. It's pretty egocentric of you to think the entire world's on your side.EneT wrote:
Must be nice to live in a dream world where everything I say is right and anyone who disagrees must be a deplorable human being that is wrong and most possibly racist
"People who disagree with me are ignorant"EneT wrote:
No one apart from ignorant people like yourself
"If I can't argue against something, it must be made up"EneT wrote:
It's really hard to when you make some random shit up.
Ok??? It's not like I expect you to, because you're proving to be just like him.EneT wrote:
I have never sided with you in any of the arguments you've had with B1rd to give an example.
Why, because you two are alike?EneT wrote:
I can see why he just ignores everything you say
That's extremely hypocriticalEneT wrote:
it's honestly tiring talking to someone so hesitant to accept that people have other opinions other than his.
You complain about me not accepting other opinions, and then continue to imply that I'm always wrong, and you then claim only ignorant people would be likely to agree with me.EneT wrote:
Where do you see my hypocrisy?
Which I don't do, as I've already shownEneT wrote:
when you keep arguing about things you know nothing about
Actually, that's more on you. Are you projecting? That'd make a lot of sense.EneT wrote:
based off of assumptions you shit out of your ass
Correction: I refuse to accept the points of the worst people on the internetEneT wrote:
you refused to accept the points and reasons of Trump supporters
sure, if you say it to enetKisses wrote:
Mahogany, if I may steal a quote from you, "Maybe the problem is you?" xddd
A vote for trump is a vote endorsing racism, and I still stand by that statementEneT wrote:
All you said was
I'm pretty sure they're capable of reading this thread, thanks. Stop trying to shut out everyone you disagree with.EneT wrote:
Don't interrupt Roseus, you don't know the context of the argument.
The KKK-members shop at the local bakery. Fucking racist bakery.RoseusJaeger wrote:
It's hard NOT to think Trump is racist when literally the KKK supports and backs him. It's natural people are going to hate him
now you're hitting a new record of bullshitteryEneT wrote:
how I would have voted for Hillary
I don't talk with Roseus, but I think they're nice, and I consider us to be cool with each-other. I don't believe we've ever had a significant disagreement, so I don't feel compelled to have to get them "on my side" either.EneT wrote:
Oh look, someone who doesn't know the context of this argument. Maybe I can get them on my side
Your point however doesn't add to the argument at hand as the Trump vs Hillary debate is separate from this. The point of using it as an example was to prove how much Mahogany is unwilling to accept people's views. Your point adds nothing, it just adds unnecessary attention to a debate that we have left in the past.RoseusJaeger wrote:
I have been reading the conversation and I was adding a point to the conversation. This IS a public forum, so i an speak whenever the fuck I want, you retarded dish towel.
We're talking about they donated money to his campaign, not domestic stuff that just everyday living. Poor analogy, mate.Railey2 wrote:
The KKK-members shop at the local bakery. Fucking racist bakery.RoseusJaeger wrote:
It's hard NOT to think Trump is racist when literally the KKK supports and backs him. It's natural people are going to hate him
The point was to prove people have reasons for coming to the conclusion he's a racist and nothing more.EneT wrote:
Your point however doesn't add to the argument at hand as the Trump vs Hillary debate is separate from this. The point of using it as an example was to prove how much Mahogany is unwilling to accept people's views. Your point adds nothing, it just adds unnecessary attention to a debate that we have left in the past.RoseusJaeger wrote:
I have been reading the conversation and I was adding a point to the conversation. This IS a public forum, so i an speak whenever the fuck I want, you retarded dish towel.
lol, learning experience my ass. I'm pretty sure you don't think that or you just got that of your ass because it's not a 'learning experience' when you're calling people out for being racist. It would be a learning experience if you had said "Hey guys, I would like to know the opinions of Trump supporters, mind helping me learn the perspective of another individual?" but nah, you didn't. It was more like "Fuck Trump supporters, y'all racist."Mahogany wrote:
But of course, everything's a fight to you, isn't it? It's X vs Y, not a learning experience or anything. That's the same impression I get from a lot of people.
They also give money to the local bakery though.RoseusJaeger wrote:
We're talking about they donated money to his campaign, not domestic stuff that just everyday living. Poor analogy, mate.Railey2 wrote:
The KKK-members shop at the local bakery. Fucking racist bakery.
i also chuckled a bit when I read learning experienceEneT wrote:
lol, learning experience my ass. I'm pretty sure you don't think that or you just got that of your ass because it's not a 'learning experience' when you're calling people out for being racist. It would be a learning experience if you had said "Hey guys, I would like to know the opinions of Trump supporters, mind helping me learn the perspective of another individual?" but nah, you didn't. It was more like "Fuck Trump supporters, y'all racist."Mahogany wrote:
But of course, everything's a fight to you, isn't it? It's X vs Y, not a learning experience or anything. That's the same impression I get from a lot of people.
Railey2 wrote:
They also give money to the local bakery though.RoseusJaeger wrote:
We're talking about they donated money to his campaign, not domestic stuff that just everyday living. Poor analogy, mate.
The point is: Making an inference based on who your supporters are, can be invalid in many cases. Such cases include: when there are only few parties to choose from, like two presidential candidates, or two local bakeries, one of which has shitty cupcakes, so there's really only one to go to.
Are you gonna call Hillary a left-wing terrorist because left-wing extremists endorsed her over trump? That's just stupid.
I can assure you that most racists in the voted against Obama because he is black. Does that mean Mitt Romney and McCain were both racists? Lol.
Well, I mean, as we've established, of course that's what you'd think.EneT wrote:
lol, learning experience my ass
When their reasonings are racist, it's valid to call them out. Tolerance dies when we're tolerant of the intolerant.EneT wrote:
'm pretty sure you don't think that or you just got that of your ass because it's not a 'learning experience' when you're calling people out for being racist.
I have done that beforeEneT wrote:
It would be a learning experience if you had said "Hey guys, I would like to know the opinions of Trump supporters, mind helping me learn the perspective of another individual?"
Solution: Open up your own bakery, or support a new enterprise that's openingRailey2 wrote:
The point is: Making an inference based on who your supporters are, can be invalid in many cases. Such cases include: when there are only few parties to choose from, like two presidential candidates, or two local bakeries, one of which has shitty cupcakes, so there's really only one to go to.
yet clearly you've learned nothing because you're still attacking me instead of trying to have a discussionEneT wrote:
That, is a learning experience
I've been nothing but civil and received nothing but insults in return, yet you keep telling yourself that.EneT wrote:
nothing you have done has been on the civil side and can be considered a 'learning experience'.
Mahogany wrote:
yet clearly you've learned nothing because you're still attacking me instead of trying to have a discussion
lolMahogany wrote:
I've been nothing but civil and received nothing but insults in return, yet you keep telling yourself that.
That's not why I called you an asshole. Have you read anything I've written?EneT wrote:
calling me the same for siding with him over you
If only everyone else was as cool as you Endaris ;cEndaris wrote:
Everyone is so passionate in here.
We need some ice to cool down.
Dude idk why but you somehow reminded me thisEndaris wrote:
Everyone is so passionate in here.
We need some ice to cool down.
Interesting habit there. Sounds like reinforcement.EneT wrote:
I personally used to be addicted to buying Mcflurries during cold days, no idea why.
I love Smarties McFlurries but the McDonalds here stopped doing themEneT wrote:
I personally used to be addicted to buying Mcflurries during cold days, no idea why.
It's actually a strange habit of a good amount of people in England.Faust wrote:
Interesting habit there. Sounds like reinforcement.EneT wrote:
I personally used to be addicted to buying Mcflurries during cold days, no idea why.
Personally I'd be looking for soups.
get. out.Endaris wrote:
I don't like Oreos
I just don't take anything personally on here. It seems to be the nature of anonymous arguments: They turn nasty way faster than arguments IRL.Endaris wrote:
Regarding the discussions:
I have a really hard time participating because I dislike making points being not well informed and also because people are relatively quick in getting personal here.
It's usually nice to read through the stuff though because it opens up some views that I couldn't have imagined being backed up by reasons that I actually find to have some weight.
I don't like it when arguments start off with name calling such as what Jellybean does. I myself don't result to name calling unless the other person has proven themselves to be autistic or uninformed. At that point it's just like, "Okay, why are you even arguing about this...", and I can't resist the urge to call them a retard.Railey2 wrote:
I just don't take anything personally on here. It seems to be the nature of anonymous arguments: They turn nasty way faster than arguments IRL.Endaris wrote:
Regarding the discussions:
I have a really hard time participating because I dislike making points being not well informed and also because people are relatively quick in getting personal here.
It's usually nice to read through the stuff though because it opens up some views that I couldn't have imagined being backed up by reasons that I actually find to have some weight.
Mint chocolate chip ice cream is legit the best ice cream flavor ever (Breyer's 👌)Hika wrote:
Mint chocolate chip ice cream. That's what I'm craving ATM.
the annoying thing is is that the drama is really bleak. Sometimes I wish there were more radical personalities in this forumEndaris wrote:
The annoying thing is just that the personal stuff is derailing the discussion in a way.
fuck youEndaris wrote:
When talking about icecream we can respect each other's opinions at least...or can we?
