Arrasou amiga, é tão mágico ver os mappers BR finalmente conseguindo os mapa ranked né non?! Vamo q vamo manas
No kudosuPentori wrote:
hey! there seems to be some incorrect triplet usage in the extra's that could be improved on before this gets moved forward
[Extra]
00:56:253 (1,2,3) - the easiest way to view is to look at triplets like these. sounds such as 00:56:335 (2) - don't actually exist in the music, the piano triplets lead into the dominant beats therefore the sounds are on 00:56:172 - and 00:56:499 . going by this your triplets should look more like:
this also plays more intuitively since the dominant beat's land on the last note of the triplet allowing a short gap come afterwards, providing emphasis.
[]
this occurs very often in extra and oberum primus (00:25:518 - 00:39:251 - 01:01:485 - 01:33:529 - to name a few) so you should redo these to properly reflect the music. for places where you used kick-sliders instead (like at 00:58:869 - in oberum) you should treat the kick slider as the last beat of your triplet so that the piano 00:59:114 - 00:59:441 - can instead be clicked while the less dominant beats 00:58:951 - 00:59:278 - are covered by slider ends
this set has a lot of potential, so when you've replied to this, call me back for a full mod and hopefully we can push this forward!
Pentori wrote:
hey! there seems to be some incorrect triplet usage in the extra's that could be improved on before this gets moved forward okay, let see..
[Extra]
00:56:253 (1,2,3) - the easiest way to view is to look at triplets like these. sounds such as 00:56:335 (2) - don't actually exist in the music, the piano triplets lead into the dominant beats therefore the sounds are on 00:56:172 - and 00:56:499 . going by this your triplets should look more like:
this also plays more intuitively since the dominant beat's land on the last note of the triplet allowing a short gap come afterwards, providing emphasis.
[]
this occurs very often in extra and oberum primus (00:25:518 - 00:39:251 - 01:01:485 - 01:33:529 - to name a few) so you should redo these to properly reflect the music. for places where you used kick-sliders instead (like at 00:58:869 - in oberum) you should treat the kick slider as the last beat of your triplet so that the piano 00:59:114 - 00:59:441 - can instead be clicked while the less dominant beats 00:58:951 - 00:59:278 - are covered by slider ends
then..
Fixed, but the way it is, was is not wrong because the kick-sliders represented in red tick, has a very easy to be given emphasis, hardly anyone would notice the difference because they are quite similar rhythms, as a consequence/or result i had to reformulate some patterns to they adjust with rhythm, i believe that some were irregular, but think of how to fix also this 00:39:251 - 01:01:485 - 01:33:529 - all fixed
this -> 00:25:518 - uuh.. not change because the previous and the notes have represented kicksliders (most of them) on the white tick and also capture the intensity of the piano .. if I apply this change in this note may have a little problem... A little confusion, so that way so I will keep this form
whatever i tried to divide and apply both suggestions like yours and Neto's i think extra, it is a little better.
Insane i applied some triplets, occasionally went up like 0,03* 4,59 * now
this set has a lot of potential, so when you've replied to this, call me back for a full mod and hopefully we can push this forward!
Thanks !
CanadianBaka wrote:
Hey there. Hi!
There seems to be some stuff
[Extra]
00:26:662 (1,1) - not stacked perfectly done
00:33:692 (5) - finish + whistle okay
00:41:866 (1,2,1,2) - inconsistant spacing, no reason to emphasize the spacing 00:42:520 (1,2) - here
00:43:420 - should be a note here imo, it seems too strong k
01:08:188 (2,4) - stack these like 01:08:678 (1,4) - these
01:33:529 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - these should be the same shape for consistency lol this same shape
01:37:452 (2,3) - these should be 1/4 slider do not need, it can be either 2 1/4 notes or 1 kick slider 1/4 which is the same.
[Insane]
00:23:556 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - please make these consistent
other diffs seems to be fine
edit: see's bubble
Pentori wrote:
ok im back. dont kd this AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA It's happening
[Easy]
check distance snap errors in AIMod s-sure all distance errors fixed
00:47:098 (1,2) - can you use a different rhythm here? the red ticks feel really wrong here because there are no dominant beats that land on it. the most dominant beats here are on 00:47:752 - 00:49:060 - so try to include those okay
01:00:177 (1,2) - flow here can be too confusing for an easy since it reverses in on itself. this isn't really appropriate for the difficulty so try simply this flow I think it's resolved if adding a note here 01:01:158 -
01:09:332 (1) - dont think u need this nc Fixed.
01:45:954 (1) - ^ Same.
[Normal]
01:18:488 (1) - finish should be on slider end not on head fixed.
[Hard]
00:24:537 (4,5,1) - the spacing looks a bit closer than normal i increased a bit..
00:25:518 (1) - do u really need the nc? i mean yea you're emphasising the beats but it makes some combos really long and others really short, i think its better if you just stick to nc'ing every measure for a better indication of score. also its kinda inconsistent since u haven't nced 00:28:133 (4) Fixed, kill me for every nc ;_;
00:27:153 (1,2) - swap the nc's here for the finish sure.
00:33:365 (1) - probably dont need the nc Fixed.
00:56:907 (1) - 00:59:523 (1) -01:02:139 (1) - remove these too? the melodies are in beats of 4 so i dont see the need to divide it in two Fixed.
01:14:973 - drag the break back to how it normally would be Done.
01:17:180 (1) - 01:18:488 (1) - 01:20:450 (1) - too many combo's here again, you can remove the ones i highlighted. the other nc's are fine since they emphasise the finish 01:17:834 (1) Fixed again, sorry ;_;
01:42:030 (1,1) - spacing might be a bit too high here since this is a 1/3 gap. maybe move them closer for readability? done, reformed, for something more intuitive, like on others highs diffs
[Insane]
00:20:940 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - i honestly dont think this amount of density is appropriate. there r no sounds on the blue ticks (or if there is, its very feint) so it would probably be better to just make these 1/2 sliders instead. it also provides a nice build up into 00:21:594 (1) - as the players can notice the density increase okay fixed.
00:43:338 (2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - aaaaa too many finishes. can you remove these are they are really jarring and instead add a finish on 00:43:174 (1) . the normal sampleset + whistles already do a good job at emphasising the notes done
01:18:488 - doesn't need finish as the beat isn't really dominant okay.
[Extra]
00:43:501 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - remove finishes okay
00:57:071 (1,2,3,1,2,1) - maybe u could space this a bit more sure.
01:09:332 - finish on head okay
01:33:529 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - these triplets should be the other way around like i mentioned in my other post
01:33:774 - also: the piano is 1/6 here so it might be better to use sliders instead if you dont want to include the 1/6 by doing a rhythm like http://puu.sh/sgwVA/c8c88b8d3d.jpg
Both ahead fixed, i did something quite different from what I had imagined, applying a lot of symmetry to strengthen the flow, and improve aesthetics same on Oberum primus.
[Oberum Primus]
00:21:757 (2,2) - maybe overlap these two in the same way 00:21:594 (1,1) - overlap? makes a nicer pattern uhh.. Is not overlap exactly, i did according to the previous notes, just increased the distance.
00:37:125 (1) - remove finish okay
00:40:068 (1) - would be nicer if you instead made 00:39:904 (3) - a 1/2 slider since 00:40:068 - doesn't really deserve to be clicked as it has no intensity compared to 00:40:232 okay, looks better
00:41:376 (4) - use a 1/4 slider? there are sounds on the blue tick 00:41:458 done.
00:43:828 (1,2,1,2) - doesnt need finishes okay ;_;
00:54:945 (1) - surprised u made this a 1/2 slider when most other diffs have a 3/4 here I left 1/2, because of the kibbleru's mod, according to him: the transition between 1/4, 1/3 and 1/4 again is too complicated to read, I think.. this logic goes to 3/4 as well..
00:55:599 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - there is nothing that supports a stream here, please do something different kinda disagree again.. it's possible to perceive 1/4 with streams in this part, however, the beats are occasioned in white tick and blue tick is perceived by the piano without beats, listen well on 25% ;_;
00:57:561 (1) - 3/4 slider? ^
00:58:215 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - same thing ^
01:00:177 (1) - 01:00:831 (1,2,3,4) - ^ ^
01:16:853 (2,3,4,5) - 01:18:161 (2,3,4,5) - the movement here doesn't really make sense because there are no piano melodies here. it would be better to make these 1/4 repeats and instead have movement for the piano eg. 01:15:872 (1) - 01:17:180 (1) I did something different, see if it was applicable according to your suggestion please.
01:33:692 (3) - see the comment i made in the extra fixed.
call me back AAAAAAAAAAAAAAA again sorry, i.., hype!
Plaudible wrote:
i t s h a p p e n i n g
Plaudible wrote:
i t s h a p p e n i n g
Thanks!! i think "Soon" because pending > qualified > ranked <3 i gonna edit laterPlaudible wrote:
gratz kalindraz!
(might wanna edit description though)
WHAT?Tarrasky wrote:
please fix the unsnap slider in Insane diff
i can't believe (;° ロ°) .. also_DT3 wrote:
Oh wow, I didn't expect that top 5 most played spot, it really deserves it though, nice work!
Gratz again ^^