HolyNightmare wrote:

As requested via pm :3


first off,,, i personally dont like that setting,, ar 9 and od 7 pls ;w;
slow bpm and od 8 is cancer >//< okay .3

00:21:939 (1,2,3) - that sliders are a bit too curvy imo >< fixed to look better

00:49:592 (8) - i think you forget to add that to the next combo :3 I don't feel like doing NC there. but thx for suggest

00:53:368 (2,3,4) - overlaps with 00:53:980 (6) - but i think that is ok,fix it if you want or not Fixed


i really like it how you blanket 02:35:204 (3,4,5) - with 02:34:184 (1) - looks really nice :3 Oh thank you /^^/, tbh it is nice imo too :3


well....i dont really know what else to mod ><
everything already seems pretty well to me and there is no real problem
really like that mapping style,,its mapped really good :3 thx!!!

good luck with getting this ranked >w</

1. 00:30:102 (1) - this looks funny because of the way the combo is split.. but theres not much we can do about that lol. maybe we can make 00:30:511 (2) - using the same shape so it can match with something
2. 00:30:511 (2,3) - fix blanket if you didnt take the suggestion above
3. 00:42:347 (5,6) - this might get confused as 1/4 timing, maybe try putting them like this http://puu.sh/jKcx5/a40ca46332.jpg (you should also move the slider more to the right or the next stream more to the left!)
4. 00:45:613 (4,5,6) - fix the spacing/shape http://puu.sh/jKeqj/efd8a3992b.jpg
5. 01:53:164 (1) - maybe we should split this into two sliders like http://puu.sh/jKcSj/dafedb5b32.jpg because right now this makes the map lose a lot of intensity here. The player only needs to click once over 5 beats... feels weird when i was playing
6. 02:07:858 (6,1) - why is this so close? i cant hear any reason for this.. maybe we can try moving the next combo like this http://puu.sh/jKdo5/1800bdb36d.jpg wrong screenshot here is the right one lol http://puu.sh/jKfX2/fbcb327a70.jpg
7. 02:21:735 (4,5) - maybe put more space between these? remember that playing this is almost the same as playing two single taps so putting them too close feels weird. 03:39:286 (6,1) - like this is good
8. 02:34:184 (1) - maybe we can shorten this to be a 1/1 slider and then add a circle at 02:34:796 - http://puu.sh/jKdMU/c308907cfe.jpg I think it would fit the song better
9. 02:55:409 (1,1) - this spacing should be closer. since the player already has to change angle from the jump to the stream + the large spacing here I think the flow is not so good
10. 02:57:858 (5,6) - try ctrl+g on this, maybe you will like it
11. 03:03:164 (5) - missing a clap here

1. 00:00:715 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - ooh this is really nice shape. but I don't recommend you start the song off with it. Lots of circles + nothing before it to show the beat of the song means many people will hit 100 or miss.
2. 00:24:388 (2,3) - check the spacing here since you were using DS in this section
3. 01:48:470 (1,2) - hmmm I think this might be a confusing pattern since everything else on the map is using small spacing. Sorry I can't think of a ez fix for this though, so just rearrange this section
4. 02:05:817 (6,1) - is the spacing here too small? you can just change the shape of 6 a little
5. 02:14:592 (5) - forgot NC here
6. 03:00:306 (5) - ^
7. 03:00:306 (5) - I think you are also missing some hitsounds here too
8. 04:05:715 - need to put some stuff here so the playtime is the same as insane

eeezzzeee wrote:

Hi, from your M4M request

[Catharisis]
Overall this map is good, its rare that I can enjoy low maps but this was fun

1. 00:30:102 (1) - this looks funny because of the way the combo is split.. but theres not much we can do about that lol. maybe we can make 00:30:511 (2) - using the same shape so it can match with something sorry I didn't now really understand
2. 00:30:511 (2,3) - fix blanket if you didnt take the suggestion above fixed i think
3. 00:42:347 (5,6) - this might get confused as 1/4 timing, maybe try putting them like this http://puu.sh/jKcx5/a40ca46332.jpg (you should also move the slider more to the right or the next stream more to the left!) yea sorry about that, fixed
4. 00:45:613 (4,5,6) - fix the spacing/shape http://puu.sh/jKeqj/efd8a3992b.jpg fixed i think
5. 01:53:164 (1) - maybe we should split this into two sliders like http://puu.sh/jKcSj/dafedb5b32.jpg because right now this makes the map lose a lot of intensity here. The player only needs to click once over 5 beats... feels weird when i was playing yea I have thought same thing, but never wanted to change it... so well I think I'll change it
6. 02:07:858 (6,1) - why is this so close? i cant hear any reason for this.. maybe we can try moving the next combo like this http://puu.sh/jKdo5/1800bdb36d.jpg wrong screenshot here is the right one lol http://puu.sh/jKfX2/fbcb327a70.jpg stacked them
7. 02:21:735 (4,5) - maybe put more space between these? remember that playing this is almost the same as playing two single taps so putting them too close feels weird. 03:39:286 (6,1) - like this is good Oh, fixed
8. 02:34:184 (1) - maybe we can shorten this to be a 1/1 slider and then add a circle at 02:34:796 - http://puu.sh/jKdMU/c308907cfe.jpg I think it would fit the song better I like how it is now, imo it fits, but ofc this is only my opinion so I'll remember your idea
9. 02:55:409 (1,1) - this spacing should be closer. since the player already has to change angle from the jump to the stream + the large spacing here I think the flow is not so good yes you are right
10. 02:57:858 (5,6) - try ctrl+g on this, maybe you will like it k, nice nice, changed
11. 03:03:164 (5) - missing a clap here ehhhheehhe x), "mistake were made"

[Hard]

1. 00:00:715 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - ooh this is really nice shape. but I don't recommend you start the song off with it. Lots of circles + nothing before it to show the beat of the song means many people will hit 100 or miss. Oh haven't thing about that... changed
2. 00:24:388 (2,3) - check the spacing here since you were using DS in this section yes
3. 01:48:470 (1,2) - hmmm I think this might be a confusing pattern since everything else on the map is using small spacing. Sorry I can't think of a ez fix for this though, so just rearrange this section changed somehow xD
4. 02:05:817 (6,1) - is the spacing here too small? you can just change the shape of 6 a little fixed
5. 02:14:592 (5) - forgot NC here oh f*** x)
6. 03:00:306 (5) - ^ eya
7. 03:00:306 (5) - I think you are also missing some hitsounds here too woops
8. 04:05:715 - need to put some stuff here so the playtime is the same as insane eeh... I don't want to map that part of song in hard diff...

That's all from me.

/me gives star owwow thanks <3

(but theres so many SP already! rank pls)

1. 00:01:735 (5,1) - Weird that you don't put a jump here even tho its both a start of a new measure, and emphasized.
2. 00:02:755 (3,4,5) - I don't like this kind of flow . Slider 5 doesn't follow the flow fro 3>4 very well.
3. 00:29:082 (2,3,4) - Yea this flow doesn't look nice either.
   
   Visual flow

   Black = the visual flow of this pattern, its weird because you have a curve on slider 4 that doesn't reflect the flow of the previous two patterns. Red = the idea angle where the flow would fit.
   
4. 00:40:715 (5) - Should NC this for better readability.
5. 00:52:143 (4,5,6) - Larger spacing from 5>6 imo. cuz 6 is a stronger note. Generally white-tick notes are stronger than red ticks anyways.
6. 01:11:327 (5,6,1) - Think of kick-sliders as just circles with a tail. You should have a larger jump from 6>1 for emphasis here, but in stead its a smaller jump than the jump from 5>6 (based on slider-head location).
7. 01:30:102 (7,8,1) - Improper emphasis use here too. 7>8 shouldn't contain a jump when the music is putting emphasis onto 1.
8. 01:44:592 (6,7,8,1) - 8>1 should be give a jump. Like I said earlier, its best to only consider the slider-head when thinking about kicksliders, and 8>1 isn't very impactful like the jump from 6>7
9. 02:14:592 (1,2,3) - Following the drums and 3/4 rhythm would be more straightforward imo but 1/3 snapping also works here. I think the drums are more significant and straightforward tho. Like, players are morelikely to follow the drums than the piano.
10. 02:32:551 (1,2,3) - Again, emphasis is wrong. 1>2 isn't emphasized in the music so the jump feels random and not mapped to the music (or not mapped as well as it could be).

monstrata wrote:

[Catharsis]

1. 00:01:735 (5,1) - Weird that you don't put a jump here even tho its both a start of a new measure, and emphasized. made the jump smaller than
2. 00:02:755 (3,4,5) - I don't like this kind of flow . Slider 5 doesn't follow the flow fro 3>4 very well. fixed
3. 00:29:082 (2,3,4) - Yea this flow doesn't look nice either. I myself like it, so nothing will be changed, thought other BN will come same thing, then I'll change it
   
   Visual flow

   Black = the visual flow of this pattern, its weird because you have a curve on slider 4 that doesn't reflect the flow of the previous two patterns. Red = the idea angle where the flow would fit.
   
4. 00:40:715 (5) - Should NC this for better readability. okay
5. 00:52:143 (4,5,6) - Larger spacing from 5>6 imo. cuz 6 is a stronger note. Generally white-tick notes are stronger than red ticks anyways.
6. 01:11:327 (5,6,1) - Think of kick-sliders as just circles with a tail. You should have a larger jump from 6>1 for emphasis here, but in stead its a smaller jump than the jump from 5>6 (based on slider-head location). fixed
7. 01:30:102 (7,8,1) - Improper emphasis use here too. 7>8 shouldn't contain a jump when the music is putting emphasis onto 1. ah...
8. 01:44:592 (6,7,8,1) - 8>1 should be give a jump. Like I said earlier, its best to only consider the slider-head when thinking about kicksliders, and 8>1 isn't very impactful like the jump from 6>7 I hope i understood what you meant D:
9. 02:14:592 (1,2,3) - Following the drums and 3/4 rhythm would be more straightforward imo but 1/3 snapping also works here. I think the drums are more significant and straightforward tho. Like, players are morelikely to follow the drums than the piano. yes
10. 02:32:551 (1,2,3) - Again, emphasis is wrong. 1>2 isn't emphasized in the music so the jump feels random and not mapped to the music (or not mapped as well as it could be). :<<< im bad at mapping T_T

I feel like i'm repeating myself. Hate to be that guy, but I think i covered a relevant number of issues in your map. Hopefully i explained them well enough that you can apply them to other places in this difficulty.

Lasse wrote:

m4m reply

Normal
00:15:409 (4,5,6) - that flow from 3->4 could be better and this "half blanket" looks bad imo, how about moving 4 (and following) down to blanket 3? WOuld flow much better and look nicer too I see no problem with this, but made it flow better
00:20:306 (1) - bit left for better flow k
00:23:164 (7) - rotate end a bit down for better flow yes
00:30:919 (2,3) - add red anchors to them to make them shorter versions of 00:30:102 (1) - , would look better/more consistent well that work
00:33:368 (3) - the vocals here are very sdoft and "held" for a long time, I think a longer slider would fit better than a pasue (which would fit if the vocals were "harsher") Yea I agree, but I'm more into spider, sorry
00:36:633 (2,1) - blanket is a bit off fixed
00:43:164 (3,1,2) - ^ fixed
00:49:286 (5) - bit left fixed
00:50:511 (3,4) - that downwards pointing slider suggests a move downwards, but the placement of the next note doesn't support that. I know about using slider leniency etc. but it would be way better if you moved 4 down/left
OR make the slider more like this Uuh that looks cool, better to add that

SPOILER

00:54:592 (4,5) - same issue again, move 5 right or sth did something similar to fix this
01:01:531 (6,7,8) - this angle of movement plays bad here, move 8 to ~235/185 or blanket 01:01:939 (7) - with it eh I don't see the problem :/
01:05:613 (5,3,4) - fix blanket It's good already?
01:20:511 (2,3) - ^ this too

01:19:898 (1,4,5) - shape of 5 makes for a bad flow I don't see the problem with flow
also there is a reallystron vocal/beat on 01:22:347 so you might want to change that I don't feel like changing those, since I like them as they are
01:30:511 same with the vocal


01:23:572 (3,4) - fix blanket kk
01:37:041 (2,3,4) - ^ ^

01:48:470 (1) - ctrl+g for better flow yes
01:48:062 (7,1,2,3,4) - this might be a little confusing for newer players (which this diff is meant for) I don't think even a new player could miss that because it's stacked. When playing the map, it is very clear, where to go next so I won't change anything.

01:52:347 (2) - curve a bit? looks better now!
01:53:164 (4,4,5) - fix blanket k
02:03:164 (4) - curve less okey
02:03:164 (4,5,6) - those change of angle plays a little bad did something...
02:08:062 (1,2) - make 1 point towards 2 k

02:18:674 (3,4,5,6) - flows really weird, mabye move 4 to below/right of 3 and blanket 5 changed other way
02:26:021 (2) - bit down I don't see the problem.
02:31:327 (2,3,4) - try to keep the angle roughly the same here for both movements ?
02:34:184 (1,2,3) - properly blanketing those would look much better okay
02:40:306 (7,1) - blanket fix k
02:42:347 (4,5) - blanket those? I won't do blanket with these
02:45:613 (2,3) - fix blanket yes
02:46:429 (3,1) - make sliderend point towards 1 okay
02:52:960 (5,1,2) - ^towwards 2 fixed
02:59:898 (5,1,2,3) - looks like a failed attempt on a sqaure, move 2 down and 3 down/accordingly or make it a square changed other way
03:08:470 (2) - rotate slightly right to fix blanket it's perfect already?
03:09:694 (3) - straight sldier owuld fit better here Yea, but it's your opinion, and I like this tiny curvy slider
03:17:041 (2,3) - this flow needs some work, ctrl+j 03:17:858 (3,4) - and move them below 2, but that would mean havin much work on the stuff afterwards or maybe sth like this (just an Idea, this can look way better with some work): did somehing like that

SPOILER

03:21:939 (4) - bit left yes
03:32:143 (6,7,1,2) - might confuse new players as before ^
03:37:858 (5) - rotate end down + 03:39:082 (6) - placement of this looks really random changed it completely again
03:41:531 (5) - curve and blanket for 4 better flow nah, it's fine
03:44:388 really strong vocal+beat here this is because of good polarity
03:48:878 (7,1,2) - make both angles the same hmm maybe not
03:53:368 (2,3,4) - make all of the the exact same shape and blanket 03:54:184 (3,4) - and 03:55:817 (1) - too yes
03:58:674 (6,1) - fix blanket fixed

Milan- wrote:

bigboobs.jpg

Normal
-AR 4 is enough i think ar 5 imo better
-Try to avoid using overlaps and stack in your lowest difficulty. Stuff like 00:02:755 (4,5,6,1,2) - or 01:20:511 (2,4) - are pretty much a no-no. kkkk
-00:01:531 (3) - weird that you used this slider tail for the downbeat in addition to ignore the strong melody at 00:02:143 - nothing bad in in, changed a bit
-There are some others spots where you use tails to cover these strong beats, such as 01:02:347 (8,1) - or 01:28:470 (7,1) - ,etc. You could easily invert those rhythms to give a better sound. yea, changed those places
-00:44:796 (1,2) - if (2) was looking towards (1), looks better uu nice :3
-00:56:633 (2,3) - you could follow the vocals better and avoid too much 1/2 by doing something like this http://puu.sh/kcL5l/2d4fd1f371.jpg hmm I like that, but I like mine too, so I won't change this yet, gonna keep this in mind
-01:31:735 - kinda weird that you left this vocals empty when your map is based on this. filled with slider
-01:53:164 (4) - sounds better like this http://puu.sh/kcLo6/de03980850.jpg nice nice
-02:30:102 (2) - just as a circle sound better imo nah, i like mine more
-02:42:347 (4,5) - you could blanket these better, looks bit unpolished as is they are fine
-03:33:368 (2,3) - the reverse should be here 03:33:572 - , sounds better cuz the vocals being faster added slider before it to make it sound as you wanted to
-Sometimes you lose the rhythm and start mapping other intruments, even tho rhythms right before are focused on vocals. Like here 02:06:021 (3,4,5) - where vocals are pretty much ignored but right before this, you're mapping them right. Fixing the stuff above should make it more clear. Trying to fix those

Hard
-The stuff about the rhythms repeats on some spots here too. like 00:47:858 (5,1) - for instance, there's no a good reason to not doing it the other way around. eh?
-00:12:143 (1,2,3) - inconsistent ds in noticiable xd woops x)
-01:05:613 (6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6) - too many circles in a row aaaaa. imo it's better to have 3-4 circles max, specially in these 3 diff set. There are others places, so ya. oh okay
-01:25:000 (3,4,5) - sudden increased distance looks pretty random to me made then smaller
-01:55:817 (5) - ^i'd say the same, but uh up to you. made this also smaller jump
-02:01:123 (4,5,1) - increasing spacing on 4-5 but decreasing in the strongest beat. Isn't a good idea. You should check other similar spots too, not saying that you should keep 1 distance for the whole map, but randomly changing it doesnt look too well my bad

Catharsis
-00:01:531 (4,5) - 00:04:796 (4,5) - the way circle to slider-shape flows isn't too good. Change the slider shape in order to have a better and more natural flow changed them
-You should use more distance on strong beats rather than weak ones. For example 00:06:837 (7,1,2,3) - why (1) isn't properly emphasized tho (3) breaks your constant snapping)?. 00:11:531 (5,1,2) - similar happens here. (1) is way too close to the previous object even tho it shouldn't. This happens a lot in the whole map, so you should go over it and recheck these kind of stuff Ah I see, better to check them
-00:20:102 (4,1,2) - flow between 1 and 2 feels rather forced cuz the previous 1/4 sliders that require more focus. so nothing to change??
-00:36:327 (5) - pretty much overmap ah... changed to other rhythm
-01:27:858 (3,4) - ctrl g this rhythm. Sounds better that way. same 01:50:715 (3,4) - and others similars. Some offbeats sliders are cool tho, like 02:09:082 (6) - 02:18:878 (6) - where it's clear what you're mapping yes
-04:01:123 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2) - you could change some circles to slider cuz this section is pretty much calm, and would make more sense. i think. Ah yes ,ofc
-The rest is just clean up that you should do. For example try to not overuse different sliders shapes in the same verse or rhythm, like here 00:46:837 (3,4,5) - . Or littles overlaps like 01:03:776 (5,3) - 02:39:490 (2,5) - . Or random noticiable distance changes like here 01:53:164 (1,2) - 02:38:572 (4,1) - 03:26:225 (2,1) - .These kind of things make the map looks unpolished. I'm going to do my best

not really a fan of the SVs choices. kinda unbalanced well, it's old my, and I want to get it ranked as old map...

hope it helps a bit. Gl <3

Setsurei wrote:

M4M as discussed
[Catharsis]
00:08:062 (4,5) - switch these two, slider first then the hitcircle
00:44:796 - stream up to 00:45:204 - or maybe up to 00:45:511 - maybe, I'll consider this one
00:47:449 (5) - change to triplets? It would work, but I'll leave it as it is
01:19:490 (3,4) - switch these two, hitcircle first then the slider nah
01:46:225 (6) - change this slider to a pattern like this? since the strong beat is on the white tick y

02:12:347 (5) - ^ fixed
02:18:674 (5,6) - switch, slider then hitcircle Fixed
02:32:551 (1,2) - made them 3/4 slider works!


only found this much, good luck[/color]

Stjpa wrote:

M4M from your queue.
Seems like that this map is pretty well modded, can probably just fix some little things...

[Normal]
00:23:164 (7,1) - This isn't a blanket. it's suppose to be ;_;
01:25:613 (1) - Since you map the vocals completely with sliders you should use one here too. yes you are right
01:59:082 (3,4) - Maybe make (3) to a slider? change to something
02:04:388 (6) - ^ nah
02:08:878 (2,3) - Honestly I would use this pattern here. Sounds better imo. I'd prefer my one. I like that idea too
02:37:449 (1,2) - Maybe use 2 sliders here? used one
02:59:490 (4,5,1) - Maybe use a long slider here. I'll keep mine as it is more rhythmical
03:01:531 (4,5,6) - ^ It would make that part bit boring so I didn't put long slider there
03:17:858 (3) - I don't get why you use this circle here. Theres nothing what makes it fitting. If you don't want to delete it, put it on the red tick, sounds better. never thought it's odd, but I found it to be it. changed

[Hard]
01:09:694 (2) - You should use a triplet here, just for the consistency. it doesn't really matter as I see it
02:31:327 (3,4) - I wouldn't make a "jump" here because it's snapped really close. It would be really confusing if they were really close to each other.
02:37:449 (1,2) - ^ I don't also see problem in these
03:22:347 (3,4) - ^ ^

I don't understand why you increase the DS sometimes. They appear randomly imo. I'll try to look them through

[Catharsis]
00:46:837 (3,4) - Weird transition It is part of the form of 00:46:633 (2,3,4,5,6) - it may look bit odd
00:47:449 (5,6) - ^ same form as ^
01:09:796 (3,4,5,6,7) - ???? it was the mistake... nothing serious D:
01:49:286 (4,5,6) - Weird transition no it's not o-o
02:38:572 (4,1) - Why this spacing? fixed

This map has overall a really strange flow due the DS changes that appear kind of random.
no it's not, this is my "old" mapping style, since this is over 7 months old beatmap.

My map if you didn't find this too bad.

neonat wrote:

Here's a brief look at Carthasis

00:11:327 (4,5) - weird spacing for the pattern, also the angle is a little odd
00:14:388 (4,5,6) - I honestly think it would be better for this to stack rather than be moving in the direction towards 00:14:796 (7)
00:20:511 (2) - the strong beat at 00:20:715 which you emphasized with the clap even, it's weak on the slider end, would be better having something start there instead
00:36:225 (6,1) - the flow here pales in comparison to what was done earlier on
00:40:715 (1) - why NC? Doesn't seem to be a big change in the music, if any at all it's for better readable
00:43:164 (1) - finish?
00:51:531 (2,3) - swap them slider after circle, having the slider start at 00:51:735 is more appropriate for the strong beat
01:05:000 (4,5,6,7) - odd sense of direction here
01:07:449 (8) - it's because of sliders like this, I really doubt all those sliders ending on the white line, especially this big white line. Shouldn't this have been NC as well
01:34:592 (1,2,3,4,5) - you can straighten this
01:38:878 (2,3,4,5) - again odd direction sense
02:40:715 (1) - finish
03:26:021 (1) - normal clap
the sliders are really too inconsistent, you sometimes start, sometimes end, sometimes use the circles to start on certain points, it's no longer any pattern anymore. Places like 03:29:082 (6) - beats 03:28:878 and 03:29:082 are together while 03:29:286 and 03:29:490 are beats that match up to each other: instead you mash a slider in between them both, making the changing intonation weak. I really am not getting why you try to diversify your sliders so much. I know, I know. Making one kind of sliders is imo boring, but I see, that it is "required" to have one kind of sliders whole map (well not whole but like 75% at least.) I'm too lazy and busy to remap all those slider. I'll try to see what I can do for it.

Proper emphasis in the map is just not there.

Good Luck

1. Source must be changed "Kantai Collection~Kan Colle~" or "艦隊これくしょん～艦これ～"

1. This mapset not Easy diff. So AR5 is too fast. I think AR4 or 4.5 better.
2. 00:01:735 (4) - This rhythm is kind of questionable for me. Why not follow vocal ?
   
3. 00:16:225 (5,6) - Same as above. Try this rhythm.
   
4. 00:23:164 (7,1) - More better rhythm,follow with lyrics,like this.
   
5. 00:25:000 (3) - This rhythm is unfavorable in mapset without Easy diff. Please changed other pattern.
   
6. 00:28:062 (3) - This rhythm is kind of questionable for me. Why not follow vocal ?
   
7. 00:30:919 (2,3,4,1,2,3) - This rhythm is unfavorable in mapset without Easy diff. Please changed other pattern.
   
8. 00:33:470 (1) - Spinner bonus 7000. I think too short spinner. please changed slider.
9. 00:53:572 (2) - same as 00:25:000 (3) -
10. 00:57:858 (5,6,1) - Same as above. changed rhythm.
    
11. 01:06:429 (2,3,4,5) - This rhythm is kind of questionable for me. More better rhythm,follow with lyrics,like this.
    
12. 01:09:898 (2) - same as 00:25:000 (3) -
    
13. 01:20:511 (2) - same as 00:25:000 (3) -
    
14. 01:24:592 (5) - same as 00:25:000 (3) -
    
15. 01:26:225 (2) - same as 00:25:000 (3) -
    
16. 01:28:470 (6,1) - changed before your pattern ?
    
17. 01:44:796 (4,1) - Same as above.
18. 01:46:021 (3,4) - More better rhythm,follow with lyrics,like this.
    
19. 01:51:735 (1,2,3) - This rhythm is kind of questionable for me. More better rhythm,follow with lyrics,like this.
    
20. 01:56:633 (4,5,1) - same as 00:57:858 (5,6,1) -
21. 01:59:082 (3,4) - same as 01:28:470 (6,1) -
22. 02:01:327 (8) - same as 00:25:000 (3) -
    
23. 02:02:755 (4) - nazi. missing distance snap. please fix it.
24. 02:04:796 (1,2,3) - same as 01:51:735 (1,2,3) -
25. 02:26:021 - ~ 02:29:286 - This spacing is really awkward. please mapping this.
26. 02:29:286 (1,2,3,1) - This rhythm is unfavorable in mapset without Easy diff. Please changed other pattern.
    
27. 02:59:490 (4,5,1) - Same as above.
    
28. 03:09:694 (3,1) - same as 01:28:470 (6,1) -
29. 03:17:041 (2,3,4) - This rhythm is kind of questionable for me. More better rhythm,follow with lyrics,like this.
    
30. 03:27:245 (3,4) - same as 01:28:470 (6,1) -
31. 03:29:694 (1,2,3) - This rhythm is unfavorable in mapset without Easy diff. Please changed other pattern.
32. 03:39:082 (5,1) - same as 01:28:470 (6,1) -
33. 03:43:572 (3,4) - This rhythm is kind of questionable for me. More better rhythm,follow with lyrics,like this.
    
34. 03:46:021 (1,2,3) - same as 01:51:735 (1,2,3) -
35. 03:49:694 (2,3,4) - This rhythm is kind of questionable for me. More better rhythm,follow with lyrics,like this.
    
36. 03:59:082 (1,2,3) - same as 01:51:735 (1,2,3) -
37. 04:00:511 (4,5) - more better rhythm imo.
    

1. AR changed 7 better. Normal diff AR4 -> AR7.5 diff spread too bad.
2. 00:02:755 (2,3,4,5,6) - placement suggestion
   
   img

   
3. 00:20:715 (3,4) - This rhythm is kind of questionable for me. More better rhythm,follow with lyrics,like this.
   
4. 01:14:388 (1) - Mmm. I think remove note better.
5. 01:24:592 (2,3) - This rhythm is kind of questionable for me. More better rhythm,follow with lyrics,like this.
   
6. 01:36:429 (2,3) - same as above.
   
7. 01:48:062 (4,5,1,2) - unreadable spacing. you are mistake here?
8. 01:49:490 (5,6) - More better rhythm,follow with lyrics,like this.
   
9. 01:59:286 (5,6) - same as above. ( same rhythm
10. 02:03:368 (2,3) - More better rhythm,follow with lyrics,like this.
    
11. 02:04:184 (5,6) - same as above. ( same rhythm
12. 02:07:653 (4,5) - missing distance snap
13. 02:25:613 (6,7) - please changed your pattern 02:22:143 (4,5,1) -
14. 03:56:633 (4,5) - This spacing is really awkward. please changed rhythm / pattern.
    
15. 04:03:980 (1) - please reduce tick clap sound. not much here.

Satellite wrote:

Hello ~ osu! needs more senya <3

[General]

1. Source must be changed "Kantai Collection~Kan Colle~" or "艦隊これくしょん～艦これ～"

[Normal]

1. This mapset not Easy diff. So AR5 is too fast. I think AR4 or 4.5 better.
2. 00:01:735 (4) - This rhythm is kind of questionable for me. Why not follow vocal ?
   
3. 00:16:225 (5,6) - Same as above. Try this rhythm.
   
4. 00:23:164 (7,1) - More better rhythm,follow with lyrics,like this.
   
5. 00:25:000 (3) - This rhythm is unfavorable in mapset without Easy diff. Please changed other pattern.
   
6. 00:28:062 (3) - This rhythm is kind of questionable for me. Why not follow vocal ?
   
7. 00:30:919 (2,3,4,1,2,3) - This rhythm is unfavorable in mapset without Easy diff. Please changed other pattern.
   
8. 00:33:470 (1) - Spinner bonus 7000. I think too short spinner. please changed slider.
9. 00:53:572 (2) - same as 00:25:000 (3) -
10. 00:57:858 (5,6,1) - Same as above. changed rhythm.
    
11. 01:06:429 (2,3,4,5) - This rhythm is kind of questionable for me. More better rhythm,follow with lyrics,like this.
    
12. 01:09:898 (2) - same as 00:25:000 (3) -
    
13. 01:20:511 (2) - same as 00:25:000 (3) -
    
14. 01:24:592 (5) - same as 00:25:000 (3) -
    
15. 01:26:225 (2) - same as 00:25:000 (3) -
    
16. 01:28:470 (6,1) - changed before your pattern ?
    
17. 01:44:796 (4,1) - Same as above.
18. 01:46:021 (3,4) - More better rhythm,follow with lyrics,like this.
    
19. 01:51:735 (1,2,3) - This rhythm is kind of questionable for me. More better rhythm,follow with lyrics,like this.
    
20. 01:56:633 (4,5,1) - same as 00:57:858 (5,6,1) -
21. 01:59:082 (3,4) - same as 01:28:470 (6,1) -
22. 02:01:327 (8) - same as 00:25:000 (3) -
    
23. 02:02:755 (4) - nazi. missing distance snap. please fix it.
24. 02:04:796 (1,2,3) - same as 01:51:735 (1,2,3) -
25. 02:26:021 - ~ 02:29:286 - This spacing is really awkward. please mapping this.
26. 02:29:286 (1,2,3,1) - This rhythm is unfavorable in mapset without Easy diff. Please changed other pattern.
    
27. 02:59:490 (4,5,1) - Same as above.
    
28. 03:09:694 (3,1) - same as 01:28:470 (6,1) -
29. 03:17:041 (2,3,4) - This rhythm is kind of questionable for me. More better rhythm,follow with lyrics,like this.
    
30. 03:27:245 (3,4) - same as 01:28:470 (6,1) -
31. 03:29:694 (1,2,3) - This rhythm is unfavorable in mapset without Easy diff. Please changed other pattern.
32. 03:39:082 (5,1) - same as 01:28:470 (6,1) -
33. 03:43:572 (3,4) - This rhythm is kind of questionable for me. More better rhythm,follow with lyrics,like this.
    
34. 03:46:021 (1,2,3) - same as 01:51:735 (1,2,3) -
35. 03:49:694 (2,3,4) - This rhythm is kind of questionable for me. More better rhythm,follow with lyrics,like this.
    
36. 03:59:082 (1,2,3) - same as 01:51:735 (1,2,3) -
37. 04:00:511 (4,5) - more better rhythm imo.
    

I think Normal diff needs more work =w=
other diff check soon sorry! ;w;

Satellite wrote:

[Hard]

1. AR changed 7 better. Normal diff AR4 -> AR7.5 diff spread too bad.
2. 00:02:755 (2,3,4,5,6) - placement suggestion
   
   img

   
3. 00:20:715 (3,4) - This rhythm is kind of questionable for me. More better rhythm,follow with lyrics,like this.
   
4. 01:14:388 (1) - Mmm. I think remove note better.
5. 01:24:592 (2,3) - This rhythm is kind of questionable for me. More better rhythm,follow with lyrics,like this.
   
6. 01:36:429 (2,3) - same as above.
   
7. 01:48:062 (4,5,1,2) - unreadable spacing. you are mistake here? yea, it seems to be a mistake ;w;
8. 01:49:490 (5,6) - More better rhythm,follow with lyrics,like this.
   
9. 01:59:286 (5,6) - same as above. ( same rhythm
10. 02:03:368 (2,3) - More better rhythm,follow with lyrics,like this.
    
11. 02:04:184 (5,6) - same as above. ( same rhythm
12. 02:07:653 (4,5) - missing distance snap
13. 02:25:613 (6,7) - please changed your pattern 02:22:143 (4,5,1) -
14. 03:56:633 (4,5) - This spacing is really awkward. please changed rhythm / pattern.
    
15. 04:03:980 (1) - please reduce tick clap sound. not much here. yea it was already done

Hard diff. rhythm are fine to me. placement and hitsound needs more work imo.
sorry. insane diff check later. good luck!

1. Next check ~

1. Please do not change speed of Slider. for diff spread.
2. 00:41:123 (4) - Missing Distance Snap
3. 00:56:225 (1) - Being piled up is unfavorable on Normal diff
4. 01:07:041 (3,4,5) - More better rhythm,follow with lyrics,like this.
   
5. 01:21:939 (5,1,2) - Cool pattern, but the flow feels a bit blah. Try an arrange like this. and More better rhythm,follow with lyrics,like this.
   
   
   img

   
6. 01:26:837 (3,4) - More better rhythm,follow with lyrics,like this.
   
7. 02:26:837 - make 1/1 slider
   
8. 02:28:470 - make 1/1 slider
   

1. 00:21:327 (5) - remove note. because not follow melody this note.
2. 00:49:286 (4,1,2,3,4) - More better rhythm,follow with lyrics,like this.
   
3. 01:41:123 (3,4) - move x238 y260 for ds
4. 01:48:062 (4,5) - changed 1/2 slider better. for you r pattern.
5. 02:31:327 (3,4) - not fit on rhythm. More better rhythm,follow with lyrics,like this.
   
6. 02:37:449 (1,2) - It's an overmapped. please changed follow a melody.
   
7. 03:22:347 (3,4) - Overmapped. changed this.
   

Satellite wrote:

before check : p/4710118

[General]

1. Next check ~

[Normal]

1. Please do not change speed of Slider. for diff spread.
2. 00:41:123 (4) - Missing Distance Snap
3. 00:56:225 (1) - Being piled up is unfavorable on Normal diff
4. 01:07:041 (3,4,5) - More better rhythm,follow with lyrics,like this.
   
5. 01:21:939 (5,1,2) - Cool pattern, but the flow feels a bit blah. Try an arrange like this. and More better rhythm,follow with lyrics,like this.
   
   
   img

   
6. 01:26:837 (3,4) - More better rhythm,follow with lyrics,like this.
   
7. 02:26:837 - make 1/1 slider
   
8. 02:28:470 - make 1/1 slider
   

[Hard]

1. 00:21:327 (5) - remove note. because not follow melody this note.
2. 00:49:286 (4,1,2,3,4) - More better rhythm,follow with lyrics,like this.
   
3. 01:41:123 (3,4) - move x238 y260 for ds
4. 01:48:062 (4,5) - changed 1/2 slider better. for you r pattern.
5. 02:31:327 (3,4) - not fit on rhythm. More better rhythm,follow with lyrics,like this.
   
6. 02:37:449 (1,2) - It's an overmapped. please changed follow a melody. To my mind those are not overmapping at all, but the pro knows ;W;
   
7. 03:22:347 (3,4) - Overmapped. changed this. ^, but fixed!
   

Normal and Hard diff need 2~3gets more mod imo. because still requires improvement.
If you want a bubbled. please don't give up! I'll want to support senya. Catharsis diff checked later sorry.

Narcissu wrote:

i random download map when pending …… i don't want to see this map again

[Catharsis]

00:16:225 (5,1) - it's syncopated rhythms , downbeat here → 00:16:225 - ← you should add finish and NC here not 00:17:041 - , if you think the combo too long , you chould add nc 00:17:858 - too Okay, I hope I fixed it right >_>

00:19:490 (1) - it's 1/6 , of course 1/4 slider easy to FC , use 1/6 reversearrow slider or 1/3 slider if you want follow the drum and avoid inflexible QAT Is it really? well it works, I'll see what Satellite will say!

00:30:102 (1,2) - e …… i prefer use click when voice ↓↓↓ true true, fixed it bit own way!



01:59:898 - ^ ， here need click and NC （downbeat），slider tail a bit …… e ……okay

02:39:082 (1) - 1/2 better ?? nah, not really feeling it, since the guitar does right the sound and I want to follow it a bit

02:44:082 - in fact none can see the Storyboard because spinner lol It depends, if you have custom spinner, you might, otherwise it's not my fault they won't see it.

senya no more touhou …… C89 all Collection

Siiilver wrote:

Hi, m4m for #modreqs
I'm sorry for being so short and my bad english, it was the only thing I found.

[Normal]

1. 00:07:653 (2,3,4) - I think it would be better this
2. 00:10:511 (1,2) - ^ Same, Image Here it doesn't seem to fit imo
3. 00:21:531 - Here's a too prominent sound, like this
4. 00:30:919 (2) - It would be better to finish the slider in 00:31:327 - although I'm not sure... Im following holding voice, so no
5. 02:02:347 (2,3) - Replaced by a slider and remove 02:02:755 (3) - like this (^ although I'm not sure...)

[Hard]

1. 00:38:266 (1) - Why do you use such large jumps in such a slow section? Ctrl + G? OOOOOOOOOOOPs it was a mistake!! It should not be like that XD
2. 01:55:409 (2) - Why you use 1/6? This isn't a triple? (Catharsis) Tbh, I don't know what the fu is this rhythm anymore. Ppl are says that it is 1/4, then 1/6, and now 1/3...... I need to ask more opinions about this. Changed it to 1/4 triple cause it imo best rhythm that fits there.
3. 02:08:470 (3) - ^ (Catharsis)

Good luck~

Kami-senpai wrote:

M4M from thine queue.

Let's roll.

General

I'm fairly certain your storyboard isn't finished yet, but just as a reminder, lyrics are great to have and changing the picture throughout would make it much more interesting.

Catharsis

SPOILER

00:02:551 (2,5) - Stack these two Eeeh, I don't see a reason why to stack
00:02:551 (2,5) - These would feel better stacked as well same think twice
00:19:490 (1,2,3) - Since these are 1/6 spacing, having three mini kick sliders is fairly hard to read. It does sound like the drum in the music is indeed 1/6, so my suggestion would be to just make this one single mini kick slider with 1/6. Otherwise, make these 1/4 mini single sliders hmm. maybe...
00:29:286 (3,4,1,2) - Rotate these about -20 degrees so the first slider looks more in line with the circle before it.
00:36:123 (6,7,8,9) - Also rotate these a bit so it doesn't curve up then down. It should keep in line with the slider before since thats what the rest of your slider-to-streams look.
00:40:306 (3,7) - These could be stacked, but not totally necessary Not really necessary
00:59:082 (3,4) - Seem a little out of place with the NC jumps right before. Would be better to continue that jump pattern and NC this
01:09:694 (3,4,5,6) - Would look much better if you ctrl + j the whole stream and rotated it so it is concave up, then moved it to the downward slider so its like a sharp turn.
01:22:347 (1) - Rotate this slightly so it's in line with the jump right before
01:48:470 (1,3) - Stack these. It would make them look messy.
02:22:755 (1,2,3,4) - Throughout this whole section, there is a guitar solo like thing in the music. However, your circles are fairly boring, just 1/2 spaced circles and sliders. I know the solo is quite simple, so my suggestion, which might be a bit hard to do, is to use hitsounds to create a drum so to go along with it. Not completely necessary, but I think it would be amazing. hmm, I hope I understood you right, changed rhythm a bit
02:30:102 (7) - Rotate this a tad to keep in line with jump The slider is mirrored from (8) so it's not needed.
02:56:225 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - I see that you want to do a jump stream here. The problem is that the gap is too small to be noticeable as a jump stream but it is too big to be a continuous stream. Move 02:56:633 (1,2,3,4) - to x:344 y:236 and rotate it a tad for it to look better.
03:52:347 (4,1) - Stack these two, cuz it's hard to read is it? Maybe it is but then it would look bit boring @_@
04:12:245 (1) - Spinner is way too long. End at 4:17:041 or 4:18:674 at the very latest. No it isn't! If you put volume up, you can hear that music end right at that point. I used to had it shorter...

Hard

SPOILER

01:03:164 (3) - Rotate a bit to keep in line It doesn't matter there tbh
01:07:041 (1) - Move down just a tad to keep in line There it would ruin next jump and I like that it is bit higher that previous object
01:10:306 (4) - I think you should add a circle right after this at big white tick and start spinner after that it's fine for now
02:01:327 (6,3) - Maybe this is pushing it a bit, but these should be stacked (?)
02:18:878 (4) - Bad practice to end slider on big white tick
I think you can map the end a bit too.
Overall, can't really find anything for your Hard, besides that some stuff isn't in line with each other (but that just might be my OCD kicking in).

Seems like a fun map! Kancolle is best waifu mine. Kongou for life.

Maakkeli wrote:

No siis nämä doujin jutskat kuuluu mun kirjoos sinne anime yms. juttuun mutta menkööt
Niin sain itte valita kielen millä modaan niin ruotsi/saksa?
Nagato paras

Catharsis
No siis mun mielestä suurin ongelma täs on, että sä et anna tietyille äänille sitä painotusta mitä ne ansaitsee/tarttee. Eli siis se, että sulla on kaikki distance snapattynä samalle distanssille. Toki kyllä kai insane nyt vielä saa olla täysin distance snapattu. Itte en vain satu tykkäämään siitä.
00:00:715 (1) - siis sä käytät 1.0x sv:tä näin rauhallises kohdas. Se ei oikeen mun miälestä tunnu sopivan, että sä sitte käytät samaa sv:tä paljo menevämmäs kohdas hmm okei mä kokeilen nyt sit tota 0,75svtä.
00:32:551 (3) - tää pelais paremmin jos ctrl+g. Mutta triple nyt ei sattuneesta syystä pelaa paremmin ctrl+g ehkä mä ymmärsin tän
00:36:123 (6,7,8,9) - Näin ei näin joo korjattu
00:43:572 (1) - mun mielestä streamit ei tartte tällääsiä nc:tä ellei se sitten ihan oikiasti sovi musiikkiin ja tällä hetkellä siinä on vain yksi virvelin isku joka ei paljoa lämmitä nii, no se on vaa siks et se on helpompi lukee, katotaa mitä aijon tehä asialle
00:44:388 (1) - turha nc täs kans juu
02:08:062 (1) - stäkki vie kaiken painotuksen pois tästä toivottavasti se on nyt paremmin
02:34:184 (1) - eikö olisi järkevämpää lopettaa tää slideri valkooseen tikkiin niin saa tuan virvelin iskun hitsoundattua "järkevämmin" ja punaaselle tikille lisää niitä klikattavia ympyröitä jep
02:37:858 (1) - tässä nyt on hyvä streami nc. Kitara "muuttuu" ja silloon nc anta hyvän painotuksen sille. kiva
03:23:572 (2,3,4) - jos nyt aivan täysin musiikkia kuunnellaan niin eikö näitten pitääsi oll triplejä? totta, korjattu
03:26:225 (2) - tää on vähä jännää että sä yhtäkkiä lämäät tänne tällääsen jättilääshypyn No siiis täähä on kappaleen climax kohta eli se kohta mistä lähetään kohti loppua, joten se jotenkii kutsuu isoon hyppyyn. Jos tää on jotenkii liian iso, teen siit kyl pienemmän

Jotenki tuntuu siltä, että kaikki sun sliderplacementit ei oikeen toimi täs. Esim. 01:52:551 (6) - tuntuu jotenki erittäin oudolta heittää tälläänen, että eka mennään ylöspäin ja sitten flow muuttuu aivan hulluna ja yhtäkkiä alaspäin kun tässä voi toimia vain tälläänen simppeli patterni teen parhaani jotta ne on hyviä >_>

vaikea
00:03:164 (3,4,5,6) - mä en oo ihan varma onko tällaaset patternit ihan järkeviä hard tason mapeis se tais olla vaa vahinko et ne on vääräs järjestyksessä xD
00:35:817 (1) - täs kans mitä mä sanoin jo insanes -
00:36:633 (1) - tää taas ei tunnu sopivan musiikkiin muuten vain -
00:38:266 (1) - pls Joo mä korjaan tän ja noi kaks ylempää oikein ja teen muutenkii jonkin moisen parannuksen tähän osaan :d
01:53:776 - jotenki hirveen randomia, että täs ei oo mitään vaikka biisis ihan selvästi on mapattavaa
02:06:837 - ^ -
03:30919 - ^ -
03:43:980 - ^ se on siksi, koska mä seuraan enimmäkseen laulajaa, joten se on ihan ok jättää vähän taukoa hardissa toisin kuin vaikeimmissa tasoissa
04:05:613 (1) - kyllä sen spinnerin vois varmaan tännekkin loppuun lisätä ehkä, ehkä ei, en tiiä oikee D:

normaali
00:36:633 (3) - ei tunnu taas sopivan musiikkiin aijaa, must se sopii toho normaalii ohi ookoosti D:
joo siistii
osaan modata e/n/h erittäin hyvin. ei hätää, catharsis tarvitsi eniten modeja! xd

1. Storyboard image file dimensions are more than allowed maximum ( 640x1440 or 1920x480 for scrolling images) or (1366x768)
   {sb\yamato.jpg} (1626x1080)

1. 00:07:245 (1,2) - missing ds

1. AR8.9 is too high. so I think AR8.5 better.

Satellite wrote:

[SB]

1. Storyboard image file dimensions are more than allowed maximum ( 640x1440 or 1920x480 for scrolling images) or (1366x768)
   {sb\yamato.jpg} (1626x1080)

[Normal]

1. 00:07:245 (1,2) - missing ds

[Catharsis]

1. AR8.9 is too high. so I think AR8.5 better.

LigerZero wrote:

No kudosu

Tags added "mayumi morinaga" for real name senya

Ok i'm waiting to ranked....

Good bye my bubble ;W;

1. 00:02:960 (4) - stack at x302 y 240 instead for visuals
2. 00:05:000 (5) - This slider seems angled oddly, mind if you rotate with anticlockwise a bit?
3. 00:10:715 (2) - This is sort of blanketing with the previous slider but I feel like spacing this further away would be better
4. 00:15:000 (8) - Blanket?
5. 00:17:858 (1) - You could adjust this into a 3/4 instead as it would be mapped much better since there isn't any strong beats on the red tick. 01:16:633 (1) - Is also viable with what you did here.
6. 00:48:878 (5) - I think mirroring with the next slider would be better
7. 00:50:511 (5,6) - Switch the whistle on these two objects, you're giving it the wrong emphasis
8. 00:53:980 (6) - Ctrl+g and polishing this can switch the flow change the next area
9. 00:54:592 (1,2) - - Stack? I don't think this is very well placed
10. 01:19:694 (4,5) - Ctrl+g, this would suit the rhythm much better and place suitably
11. 01:39:286 (4,5) - ^
12. 01:49:286 (4,5) - Switch whistle hitsound
13. 01:59:082 (4,5) - Switch whistle
14. 02:03:368 (2) - The change in flow is so sharp here and I don't think it needs to be that way. Ctrl+g
15. 02:25:000 (4,5) - Ctrl+g
16. 02:26:429 (3,4) - ^
17. 03:26:225 (2) - Why is this jump so big, you might want to nerf it. rip sr
18. 03:28:878 (5,6) - Ctrl+g
19. 03:40:306 (5) - Blanket?
20. 03:47:041 (6) - Mirror with the next slider
21. 03:47:858 (2,3) - This is one of the places where I feel a red tick slider would much better compliment the song. Ctrl+g

Mikii wrote:

very very late mod, I just kept on forgetting so sorry about that. I see a bubble so gl on the rank!

[Catharsis]

1. 00:02:960 (4) - stack at x302 y 240 instead for visuals oh yea
2. 00:05:000 (5) - This slider seems angled oddly, mind if you rotate with anticlockwise a bit? I don't really see a problem here
3. 00:10:715 (2) - This is sort of blanketing with the previous slider but I feel like spacing this further away would be better okay
4. 00:15:000 (8) - Blanket? y
5. 00:17:858 (1) - You could adjust this into a 3/4 instead as it would be mapped much better since there isn't any strong beats on the red tick. 01:16:633 (1) - Is also viable with what you did here. kk
6. 00:48:878 (5) - I think mirroring with the next slider would be better not really into this
7. 00:50:511 (5,6) - Switch the whistle on these two objects, you're giving it the wrong emphasis It would ruin my overall hitsound orders.
8. 00:53:980 (6) - Ctrl+g and polishing this can switch the flow change the next area yea I changed that a bit
9. 00:54:592 (1,2) - - Stack? I don't think this is very well placed changed somehow
10. 01:19:694 (4,5) - Ctrl+g, this would suit the rhythm much better and place suitably k
11. 01:39:286 (4,5) - ^ k
12. 01:49:286 (4,5) - Switch whistle hitsound ^
13. 01:59:082 (4,5) - Switch whistle ^
14. 02:03:368 (2) - The change in flow is so sharp here and I don't think it needs to be that way. Ctrl+g yea I think that was a mistake
15. 02:25:000 (4,5) - Ctrl+g it would ruin the flow
16. 02:26:429 (3,4) - ^ ^
17. 03:26:225 (2) - Why is this jump so big, you might want to nerf it. rip sr Come on, it's whole song's climax place! ;w;
18. 03:28:878 (5,6) - Ctrl+g changed to something else
19. 03:40:306 (5) - Blanket? no it's not
20. 03:47:041 (6) - Mirror with the next slider changed to something else
21. 03:47:858 (2,3) - This is one of the places where I feel a red tick slider would much better compliment the song. Ctrl+g y

Normal and Hard seems good to me. If you like a mod, just pm me and we can do an irc mod, gl!

Satellite wrote:

[Catharsis]
00:17:858 (1) - 3/4

Prophecy wrote:

senya 4 ever

1. 01:07:041 (3,4) - The major rhythm of this difficulty is following drums, and then this is following vocals. It may be variation, but the transition felt too sudden for a change nor the music changed drastically. Most of all, the clap sound of 01:08:062 getting ignored is annoying. Consider using this rhythm.
2. 01:17:449 (1,1) - Acceptable spinner recovery time. However considering this is the easiest difficulty in this mapset, consider replacing the spinner into a slider instead using a recovery time at the borderline.
3. 02:46:429 - Is this whistle sure? I think it's a mistake. There's no instrument like at 02:49:695.
4. 02:52:143 (4,5,1,2) - Using 3 1/2 rhythms in a row felt little weak in emphasizing. Consider reducing (5) by 1/2.
5. 03:08:470 (2,3) - You'll want to rotate this for like 10˚ for a better blanket with (1).
6. 03:23:164 (1) - Similar suggestion regarding spinner recovery time. Consider ending at 03:24:797 as an easiest difficulty.

1. 00:12:552 (3,4) - 00:20:511 (2,3) - 03:02:552 (2,3) - This small jump feels inconsistent and random.
2. 00:16:225 (4,1,2) - I'd like to recommend using same combo for same rhythms. Accordingly, please make 00:16:225 (4,1) - these 1/3 in one combo, and 00:17:858 (2,3) - these 1/2 in another.
3. 01:15:001 (3,1,2) - ^
4. 02:13:776 (4,1,2) - ^
5. 01:27:858 (2,3,4) - 01:31:327 (2,3,4,5,6) - Actually I couldn't understand why these spacing changes happened. It feels less structured for me. 00:29:082 (2,3,4) - 00:32:348 (2,3,4,5) - refering the counterparts to fet consistent will be good.
6. 02:01:940 (2,3) - The spacing here weakened the emphasis of 02:02:552 (3,1).
7. 02:19:491 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - Since the spacing isn't 1.00x, this note & slider symmetry didn't worked effectively. Just break the symmtry, and keep the distance. That will function better here.
8. 03:59:899 (4) - 1.2x plz.
9. 04:18:674 - There seems to have no sound after here. Please end the spinner here.

1. 00:32:858 - It felt unnatural to ignore this vocal while you followed other ones.
2. 00:59:082 (3) - I'd prefer this having a new combo to discern the previous pattern, but it's up to you.
3. 01:38:878 (2,3,4) - Weird placement. The strong beat is at (3), and the jump happens towards (4).
4. 01:44:592 (6,7,8) - Reading is not cool because the spacing of 1/2 is same with 1/4. Having a larger spacing for (6,7) will be better in reading, and also for consistency. Take a look at 00:45:409 (3,4).
5. 02:22:960 (2,3) - 02:23:776 (6,7) - Spacing of 1/4 is rather similar in numbers, but the visual spacing is pretty inconsistent.
6. 02:31:735 (4) - There is a difference of rhythm inside the slide, but they are just expressed the same as a reverse. Leaving 02:31:838 as a blank would reflect the music better.
7. 02:32:143 (5,6) - Again, it's a weird feeling for (6) to have a jump while (5) has a stronger beat.
8. 02:37:449 (1,2,3,4,5,1) - The transition from drums to guitar here felt less natural. The guitar stream starts 02:37:450, while you decided to follow that rhythm from 02:38:266. That made the empty beat of 02:37:552 - 02:37:960 - 02:38:164 - unnatural. Map those beats, or rather change the rhythm of 02:38:266 (1,2,3,4,1,2) to follow the drums consistently.
9. 03:08:878 (2) - The music was pretty weak here. Maybe it will work better if 03:08:470 (1) was a reverse slider, instead having a note here.
10. 03:52:960 (3,4) - Why is there a jump here?
11. 04:07:245 (1,2,3,1,2) - Please make the pattern more intuitive the read. Using random spacing for 1/3 here is bad to catch the rhythms.

Sonnyc wrote:

I recommend you to reduce the volume of soft-slidertick.wav file. Normally, slidertick has a higher volume than other hitsounds.
[Normal]

1. 01:07:041 (3,4) - The major rhythm of this difficulty is following drums, and then this is following vocals. It may be variation, but the transition felt too sudden for a change nor the music changed drastically. Most of all, the clap sound of 01:08:062 getting ignored is annoying. Consider using this rhythm.
2. 01:17:449 (1,1) - Acceptable spinner recovery time. However considering this is the easiest difficulty in this mapset, consider replacing the spinner into a slider instead using a recovery time at the borderline.
3. 02:46:429 - Is this whistle sure? I think it's a mistake. There's no instrument like at 02:49:695.
4. 02:52:143 (4,5,1,2) - Using 3 1/2 rhythms in a row felt little weak in emphasizing. Consider reducing (5) by 1/2.
5. 03:08:470 (2,3) - You'll want to rotate this for like 10˚ for a better blanket with (1).
6. 03:23:164 (1) - Similar suggestion regarding spinner recovery time. Consider ending at 03:24:797 as an easiest difficulty.

[Hard]

1. 00:12:552 (3,4) - 00:20:511 (2,3) - 03:02:552 (2,3) - This small jump feels inconsistent and random.
2. 00:16:225 (4,1,2) - I'd like to recommend using same combo for same rhythms. Accordingly, please make 00:16:225 (4,1) - these 1/3 in one combo, and 00:17:858 (2,3) - these 1/2 in another.
3. 01:15:001 (3,1,2) - ^
4. 02:13:776 (4,1,2) - ^
5. 01:27:858 (2,3,4) - 01:31:327 (2,3,4,5,6) - Actually I couldn't understand why these spacing changes happened. It feels less structured for me. 00:29:082 (2,3,4) - 00:32:348 (2,3,4,5) - refering the counterparts to fet consistent will be good.
6. 02:01:940 (2,3) - The spacing here weakened the emphasis of 02:02:552 (3,1).
7. 02:19:491 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - Since the spacing isn't 1.00x, this note & slider symmetry didn't worked effectively. Just break the symmtry, and keep the distance. That will function better here.
8. 03:59:899 (4) - 1.2x plz.
9. 04:18:674 - There seems to have no sound after here. Please end the spinner here. no, you are wrong, volume up there and you'll hear that sound continues!

[Insane]

1. 00:32:858 - It felt unnatural to ignore this vocal while you followed other ones.
2. 00:59:082 (3) - I'd prefer this having a new combo to discern the previous pattern, but it's up to you. yea I'm fine with that, since it makes it easier to read.
3. 01:38:878 (2,3,4) - Weird placement. The strong beat is at (3), and the jump happens towards (4).
4. 01:44:592 (6,7,8) - Reading is not cool because the spacing of 1/2 is same with 1/4. Having a larger spacing for (6,7) will be better in reading, and also for consistency. Take a look at 00:45:409 (3,4).
5. 02:22:960 (2,3) - 02:23:776 (6,7) - Spacing of 1/4 is rather similar in numbers, but the visual spacing is pretty inconsistent.
6. 02:31:735 (4) - There is a difference of rhythm inside the slide, but they are just expressed the same as a reverse. Leaving 02:31:838 as a blank would reflect the music better.
7. 02:32:143 (5,6) - Again, it's a weird feeling for (6) to have a jump while (5) has a stronger beat.
8. 02:37:449 (1,2,3,4,5,1) - The transition from drums to guitar here felt less natural. The guitar stream starts 02:37:450, while you decided to follow that rhythm from 02:38:266. That made the empty beat of 02:37:552 - 02:37:960 - 02:38:164 - unnatural. Map those beats, or rather change the rhythm of 02:38:266 (1,2,3,4,1,2) to follow the drums consistently.
9. 03:08:878 (2) - The music was pretty weak here. Maybe it will work better if 03:08:470 (1) was a reverse slider, instead having a note here.
10. 03:52:960 (3,4) - Why is there a jump here?
11. 04:07:245 (1,2,3,1,2) - Please make the pattern more intuitive the read. Using random spacing for 1/3 here is bad to catch the rhythms.

I feel there are improvements compared to your old mapping, but Catharsis especially seemed to lack in quality. Patterns were lacking spacing, resulting in a less structure, and also there were several emphasis issues. Popping the bubble for now due to subjective quality issues. I'd like you to make a further improvement in Catharsis by reorganizing your patterns, and giving proper emphasis in proper spots. Or you can just ask the former BN for a renomination.

Good luck in further process.

• 
  Couldn't find anything ._.

1. 00:19:287 (2) - just suggestion i'd do something like [img=http://puu.sh/qPihu/f5def32ef8.png]this[/img]
2. 00:41:123 (4) - missing clap
3. 01:18:062 (2) - same as first one ^^
4. 01:37:042 (1) - blanket slighty off
5. 01:40:919 - why skipping a beat here ? you don't do it there 01:39:695 (2) - 01:41:736 (3) -
6. 02:33:980 (4) - blanket off seen ingame
7. 04:08:878 (3) - maybe put it lower ? could be missread as 1/2 ?

1. 00:54:389 (7,1,2) - a straight line like this is not really comfortable to play, maybe stack 00:54:592 (1) - to 00:55:817 (5) - tail ?
2. 01:29:898 (5,6,7) - the stacking with 01:29:490 (3) - is really ugly, maybe move it a little bit ?
3. 01:35:307 - Add a note ?
4. 03:27:858 (6) - imo, it play better unstacked, somewhere like x263 y193
5. 03:33:368 (3,4,5) - same about stacking
6. 04:01:123 (1) - i don't hear anything here, maybe just me
7. 04:07:245 (7) - NC

Linada wrote:

Hi ! M4M
As i see it has been modded a lot, i don't expect myself to find many things ^^


[General]
Hitsounds seems loud to me
On normal & hard, since you're mainly following vocals, you skip many claps, especially in kiais since you use 1/1 sliders on them, i don't know about this
I'll try to work it out.
[Normal]

• 
  Couldn't find anything ._. xd

[Hard]

1. 00:19:287 (2) - just suggestion i'd do something like [img=http://puu.sh/qPihu/f5def32ef8.png]this[/img] I like more the way I do it now, sorry :/
2. 00:41:123 (4) - missing clap
3. 01:18:062 (2) - same as first one ^^ ^
4. 01:37:042 (1) - blanket slighty off
5. 01:40:919 - why skipping a beat here ? you don't do it there 01:39:695 (2) - 01:41:736 (3) -
6. 02:33:980 (4) - blanket off seen ingame eh, I don't see that O_O
7. 04:08:878 (3) - maybe put it lower ? could be missread as 1/2 ?

[Catharsis]

1. 00:54:389 (7,1,2) - a straight line like this is not really comfortable to play, maybe stack 00:54:592 (1) - to 00:55:817 (5) - tail ? I don't see problem here, but I'll do my best to improve it.
2. 01:29:898 (5,6,7) - the stacking with 01:29:490 (3) - is really ugly, maybe move it a little bit ?
3. 01:35:307 - Add a note ? nah
4. 03:27:858 (6) - imo, it play better unstacked, somewhere like x263 y193
5. 03:33:368 (3,4,5) - same about stacking
6. 04:01:123 (1) - i don't hear anything here, maybe just me It's mapping piano notes mainly
7. 04:07:245 (7) - NC

Catharsis dif is really fun to play !
Good luck

M4M stuff

Planecakes wrote:

M4M stuff

Catharsis

00:01:735 (5) - Not a big fan of this shape
00:04:797 (4,5) - Fix jump? feels pretty weird when you jump to this slider
01:31:735 (6) - Sound better if you add finish here I don't agree, sorry
01:53:164 (1,2) - Fix DS
01:57:449 (3) - Add finish here for more hype nah
02:34:185 (1) - Add finish There isn't finish sound at the music so I wouldn't put it here.
02:46:429 (1,2,3,4,5) - Change stream shape? somethign wrong with it?
02:57:042 (1) - Place this circle somewhere else or decrease DS? It has same distance as 02:56:633 (1) - so it's right.
03:00:306 (1) - ^? ^
03:01:123 (5,1) - stack
03:08:062 (10) - NC? nope, it doesn't feel right
04:05:613 (1) - Remove finish?

GL with ranking!! osu needs more kancolle

likejaxirl wrote:

m4m senya4senya

catharsis

00:19:490 (1,2,3) - i dont see how these are 1/3, they just feel awkward, especially as the vocals start on 00:19:899 - Tbh those are 1/3 notes in the music
00:26:837 (1,3) - blanket xd
00:36:327 (8) - the piano doesnt play anything on this sound does it. its the same rythm as 00:35:000 (1,2,3,4) - yea but drum does.
00:45:613 (4,5,6,7) - just as weird as 00:19:490 (1,2,3) - , dont really see an easy fix tho mapping drums there
02:14:592 (1,2,3) - pretty awkward, id prefer some slider to ease this rythm here I don't really want to change this, since this is the hardest diff of the mapset.
02:46:429 (1,2,3,4) - maybe curve this a bit? it looks fine to me
02:52:143 (1) - blanket xd
02:54:184 (2,6) - id stack these (not the only time i found an overlap like this, and probably ok since yours are pretty consistent)
04:00:102 (5) - idk this one just looks weird

hard

00:08:878 (1,2) - inconsistent spacing same here 01:02:756 (1,2,3) -
00:26:838 (1) - blanket sorry xd
00:57:858 (1) - pretty sure this isnt quite blanketed xd It's fine
01:38:674 (1) - move 1 left for blanket xd it's good
01:58:266 (1) - i dont think this should be spaced more
overall some weird spacing like ^, and i think you used too many different sliders (and red anchors)

normal

01:58:266 (1) - that red anchor makes it look not smooth ???
03:03:572 (1) - ugh me no like well I like
tldr: same as in hard-too many different sliders. makes it look messy
04:05:613 - maybe map the end?
(i dont really know how to map normals so i cant really comment on this much) there is so much 1/3 notes that idk would it really work.

sorry for blanket xd