xd
forum
Your opinion on American Politics?
posted
Total Posts
770
DeletedUser_6709840
The fact you like insulting people makes your argument invalid, at least to me it does. People who won't take the time to give a civil debate can gtfo.Matrix wrote:
Railey2 wrote:
I know you don't take what I said seriously, but here. I marked all the parts that give away that you focus more on insulting people than on arguing.
I know that you're young and probably enjoy throwing your opinion around, but please do yourself a favor and stay away from topics that are as emotionally loaded as politics. You clearly don't know how to handle them. Learn how to stay neutral first, then come back.
you try way to hard to sound cool, i already admitted i like insulting people. quit acting like you have authority hahaha
It's racism because it makes a broad generalization of a group of people.Matrix wrote:
its racism because he wants to solve the issue of immigration?
Are you really this narrow minded? "Countries with a history of terrorism" Isn't just the islamic countries you're used to seeing on the news. You know what country has a history of terrorim? Ireland. You'd support a ban on Irish immigration to America? America has a really fucking rich history inherited from the Irish, better deport a fuckton of your own people.Matrix wrote:
refer to the first post when i gave you an example of what happens in muslim countries, its not just a history of terrorism its what their religion believes in.
Such massive sweeping broad generalizations are really fucking stupid, which is why trump is a really poor choice for a president.
This is the reason your country is the laughing stock of the world.Matrix wrote:
im arguing with a bunch of teenagers who cant vote.(including myself)
Also, fucking speak for yourself, I can vote.
Tooth since when you could vote in american elections?
So if I think taiko players are all smelly is that racist or did you forget racist has to deal with race as a basis?Mahogany wrote:
It's racism because it makes a broad generalization of a group of people.Matrix wrote:
its racism because he wants to solve the issue of immigration?
DeletedUser_6709840
This is the reason your country is the laughing stock of the world.Matrix wrote:
im arguing with a bunch of teenagers who cant vote.(including myself)
Also, fucking speak for yourself, I can vote.[/quote]
I agree with mahogany on the fact that the US is a laughing stock at this point for the same reason.
DeletedUser_6709840
I love how in CURRENT YEAR race doesn't have to be a basis for being racistRoseusJaeger wrote:
If we were to get technically, that would be racist.Khelly wrote:
So if I think taiko players are all smelly is that racist or did you forget racist has to deal with race as a basis?
DeletedUser_6709840
I hate my country for being the piece of crap that it is and I don't have the money to leave it.Matrix wrote:
"your country" you are in it too buddy.
you are actually getting really annoying, im going to ignore every post you make. like seriously, why are you trying to join this argument?
People like you irritate me because you're one of the reasons our country sucks.
I wanna move to England
Since never, I can vote in my own country's elections.Khelly wrote:
Tooth since when you could vote in american elections?
Not in france, I can vote fine, thanks. Do you seriously think this is a french flag? Have you gone to school at all? How am I supposed to take you seriously like this?Matrix wrote:
you are in france, good luck voting.
Nah, because despite what they seem to tell you, not every muslim is an extremist suicide bomber, friend. I agree that the extremists must be kept out or eliminated in some way, but putting a blanket ban on immigration from these countries is really fucking stupid, because there are plenty of individuals who would integrate fine, and it's going to do nothing but fuck up the US's relations with other countries irreparably.Matrix wrote:
you still ignored what i said about religion, the terrorism isnt the problem.
the religion itself believes in killing gays(which is only one of many terrible things).
if you bring in a bunch of people who are for a certain religion, your laws will start to change. eventually you will start seeing sharia law.
you are still being pretty ignorant.
"Ugh your points make sense and I can't refute them, just gonna insult you instead"Matrix wrote:
you are actually getting really annoying, im going to ignore every post you make. like seriously, why are you trying to join this argument?
DeletedUser_6709840
Why would something not based on race fit the definition for racistRoseusJaeger wrote:
We're talking about definition wise but otherwise, I wouldn't consider it racist.Khelly wrote:
I love how in CURRENT YEAR race doesn't have to be a basis for being racist
DeletedUser_6709840
I think he's probably questioning it on the basis of are Taiko players a "race" or if it's not "racism" and rather "class-ism" or something
Like if you said "All koreans are smelly" that's racist, if you said "all women are smelly" that's sexist, what's the "ist" version for taiko players???? Because that is the definition of racism but not necessarily the race part
I know plenty about muslims, Religion studies are mandatory for three years in Secondary School here, and Islam was the main focus of my course.
It's hilarious to be called a moron by someone who can't fucking tell the difference between Orange and Red, or Green and Blue, what a hypocrite.
Like if you said "All koreans are smelly" that's racist, if you said "all women are smelly" that's sexist, what's the "ist" version for taiko players???? Because that is the definition of racism but not necessarily the race part
These excuses, lmao. The Irish flag looks absolutely nothing like the French flag, and there's no excuse for mistaking the two.Matrix wrote:
looked blue instead of green, i know what the french flag looks like i only looked over at it for a second.
you know nothing about muslims, its pretty evident. you probably didnt even watch the video i sent you in my first post.
the guy basically asked them if they were ok with killing gays and litterally all of them raised their hands.
every argument you make fucking sucks, you look like a moron. its pretty funny
I know plenty about muslims, Religion studies are mandatory for three years in Secondary School here, and Islam was the main focus of my course.
It's hilarious to be called a moron by someone who can't fucking tell the difference between Orange and Red, or Green and Blue, what a hypocrite.
DeletedUser_6709840
Yeah, I think it would be more classism but I had gotten lost because of all the conversation happening at once.Mahogany wrote:
I think he's probably questioning it on the basis of are Taiko players a "race" or if it's not "racism" and rather "class-ism" or something
Like if you said "All koreans are smelly" that's racist, if you said "all women are smelly" that's sexist, what's the "ist" version for taiko players???? Because that is the definition of racism but not necessarily the race part
But the definition of classism read as this "prejudice against or in favor of people belonging to a particular social class."
So, idk what to tell ya.
How about this:Mahogany wrote:
I think he's probably questioning it on the basis of are Taiko players a "race" or if it's not "racism" and rather "class-ism" or something
Like if you said "All koreans are smelly" that's racist, if you said "all women are smelly" that's sexist, what's the "ist" version for taiko players???? Because that is the definition of racism but not necessarily the race part
You say "People who eat curry are smelly"
Many Indians eat curry
You say "A lot of Indians are smelly" >> In this case your reasoning is from the first statement that isn't based on anything but an action people do and not race itself. It just turns out that a lot of people of that race partake in that activity
Is it racist then?
When you put it like that, I'm unsure, and can't really say.
Though there's a lot to be said for the difference between saying "Indians are smelly" and "A lot of Indians are smelly" in terms of what sort of meaning you're conveying.
Though there's a lot to be said for the difference between saying "Indians are smelly" and "A lot of Indians are smelly" in terms of what sort of meaning you're conveying.
i wonder how people can say things like "youre the reason your country is bad" and blah blah blah
but they think we should let illegal immigrants in and not kick them out because its racist
this chat gave me alot of laughs but ive gotta go for now. il be back to argue more later ! so make sure to have a big long message for me to laugh about !
quick edit:
wtf are you guys talking about now xD
but they think we should let illegal immigrants in and not kick them out because its racist
this chat gave me alot of laughs but ive gotta go for now. il be back to argue more later ! so make sure to have a big long message for me to laugh about !
quick edit:
wtf are you guys talking about now xD
DeletedUser_6709840
Matrix wrote:
i wonder how people can say things like "youre the reason your country is bad" and blah blah blah
but they think we should let illegal immigrants in and not kick them out because its racist
this chat gave me alot of laughs but ive gotta go for now. il be back to argue more later ! so make sure to have a big long message for me to laugh about !
quick edit:
wtf are you guys talking about now xD
It's not kicking out illegal immigrants that's racist, it's how most people who want them gone go about it that is and Donald Trump is a prime example of that.
I come back from cooking and there's already three new pages of this thread
jesus christ this is why I usually don't bother
jesus christ this is why I usually don't bother
DeletedUser_6709840
Will you bake me somethingTeffammie Maye wrote:
I come back from cooking and there's already three new pages of this thread
jesus christ this is why I usually don't bother
crispy oatmeal cookie pleaseTeffammie Maye wrote:
I come back from cooking and there's already three new pages of this thread
jesus christ this is why I usually don't bother
why is this thread still alive. I thought we already agreed that Trump is superior uwu
DeletedUser_6709840
takes one to know oneRoseusJaeger wrote:
Not everyone, me included. I still think he's trash.Navizel wrote:
why is this thread still alive. I thought we already agreed that Trump is superior uwu
get memed
I agree
DeletedUser_6709840
I want a country controlled by a man that puts his nation first and doesn't feel he has to bow down to others.
DeletedUser_6709840
That would be ideal if that man wasn't doing it in a way that isolates us from the rest of the world and presents himself as a racist, even if it's unintentional.Khelly wrote:
I want a country controlled by a man that puts his nation first and doesn't feel he has to bow down to others.
Pretty soon someone will say "I don't like that book" and be called racist. It's soon to be a filler word.
DeletedUser_6709840
I'm not responding to you but expressing a thought I had a few pages back when Tooth said that any generalisations are racist even though they could be not based on, you know, actual race
DeletedUser_6709840
Im waiting for Stefan to lock this threadRoseusJaeger wrote:
Cringe
DeletedUser_6709840
Just doing my part.
hey faust which route in A-1 is the best and why is Azumi's
The A1 is a motorwayNavizel wrote:
hey faust which route in A-1 is the best and why is Azumi's
i thought it's a paper size
Let's see.
Personally, I like Benkei's the best.
It has everything. It's the real meat of the A-1 fan-disc imo. (But everyone knows that)
Sayaka if you like the little sister types.
Good character introduction/expansion that progresses nicely into a relationship. Short & sweet.
I skipped Azumi because I have no interest at the moment, but will get to it on a future date.
B E N K E I
A P P R E C I A T I O N
N O W
Personally, I like Benkei's the best.
It has everything. It's the real meat of the A-1 fan-disc imo. (But everyone knows that)
Sayaka if you like the little sister types.
Good character introduction/expansion that progresses nicely into a relationship. Short & sweet.
I skipped Azumi because I have no interest at the moment, but will get to it on a future date.
B E N K E I
A P P R E C I A T I O N
N O W
Faust wrote:
Let's see.
Personally, I like Benkei's the best.
It has everything. It's the real meat of the A-1 fan-disc imo. (But everyone knows that)
Sayaka if you like the little sister types.
Good character introduction/expansion that progresses nicely into a relationship. Short & sweet.
I skipped Azumi because I have no interest at the moment, but will get to it on a future date.
B E N K E I
A P P R E C I A T I O N
N O W
(ノﾟДﾟ)ノ little sister type (ノﾟДﾟ)ノ
i prefer developed tbh!
( ╬◣ 益◢）y━･~ ヽ(#ﾟДﾟ)ﾉ kill all lolis!!!
Older girls are better
I never liked any of the younger girls in Majikoi. Except for Monshiro. I don't even feel like going through Sayaka's route. I like Benkei more but Azumi's route is better imo.
WHERE IS THE UMEKO CONTINUATION GODDAMMIT
I never liked any of the younger girls in Majikoi. Except for Monshiro. I don't even feel like going through Sayaka's route. I like Benkei more but Azumi's route is better imo.
WHERE IS THE UMEKO CONTINUATION GODDAMMIT
If you kill lolis how will any girl develop
good point, how about we lock them up until they are adult age?Khelly wrote:
If you kill lolis how will any girl develop
if they still look like a loli then we kill them
Yeah I wanted a Kojima-sensei route after-story as well.
It's a real shame.
It's a real shame.
Well, I came up with a proposition I'm sure we can all agree with
2d grills > dum politics \:D/
Seriously though the speed that any discussion can turn to anime on this forum is damn impressive
2d grills > dum politics \:D/
Seriously though the speed that any discussion can turn to anime on this forum is damn impressive
Well what do you want to discuss ?
trump vs hilary
and popcorns
and popcorns
trump is bad, hilary is bad, everybody loses nobody wins the end
Discussion over :^)
Discussion over :^)
Wrong, Maho.
The rich win.
The rich win.
You're right, I'm sorry
Mahogany wrote:
trump is bad, hilary is bad, everybody loses nobody wins the end
Discussion over :^)
I win if trump wins
^this
,-､ ,.-､
./:::::＼ ／::::::ヽ
/::::::::::::;ゝ--──-- ､._/::::::::::::::|
/,.-‐''"´ ＼:::::::::|
／ ヽ､::|
/ ● ヽ|
l ､､､ ● l
.| (_人__丿 ､､､ |
l l
` ､ /
`ｰ ､__ ／
/`'''ｰ‐‐──‐‐‐┬---
./:::::＼ ／::::::ヽ
/::::::::::::;ゝ--──-- ､._/::::::::::::::|
/,.-‐''"´ ＼:::::::::|
／ ヽ､::|
/ ● ヽ|
l ､､､ ● l
.| (_人__丿 ､､､ |
l l
` ､ /
`ｰ ､__ ／
/`'''ｰ‐‐──‐‐‐┬---
Bane is the best. Hillary is accurate at least.
"It doesn't matter who we are. What matters is our plan."
You could probably twist that to describe a bunch of politicians
You could probably twist that to describe a bunch of politicians
Often accurate but so damn inconsistent that she is literally an amorphous blob of whatever the hell the Democratic establishment thinks is popular/will help her win. At least Trump speaks his damn mind, and is also usually accurate too, if you actually take the time to read the stuff he says.Navizel wrote:
Bane is the best. Hillary is accurate at least.
Also, read Hiltery's emails and then you'll realize why everyone wants trump
Talking about how Hillary is Two-Face btw
2 party system is trash
send help
send help
http://www.lp.org/Hobbes2 wrote:
2 party system is trash
send help
how American politics works, apparently:
if (surname != 'Clinton')
do getRekt();
else
do nothing();
DeletedUser_6709840
Libertarians arent that great.Intelli wrote:
http://www.lp.org/Hobbes2 wrote:
2 party system is trash
send help
Teffammie Maye wrote:
how American politics works, apparently:if (surname != 'Clinton')
do getRekt();
else
do nothing();
Welp
10 print fuck you with a bug duck
20 goto 10
30 print I love you
20 goto 10
30 print I love you
i think america would be better if we were like japan and banned guns. police shouldn't be able to use them either lmao
2015071
Very nice strawman my friendo
So whenever there is a shooting you call in the military? That seems very efficientLoliPantsu wrote:
i think america would be better if we were like japan and banned guns. police shouldn't be able to use them either lmao
how would there be a shooting if no one had guns
There will always be guns regardless of if they're illegal or not
Am Irish, no guns works fine here, even for police force
LoliPantsu wrote:
how would there be a shooting if no one had guns
This isn't a good comparison because Ireland doesn't already have millions of guns in it already unlike America.Mahogany wrote:
Am Irish, no guns works fine here, even for police force
Yes America has fucked up for a very long time
I'm sorry that we need to retroactively change the past in order to get your good "We have no guns and it's fine here" result.Mahogany wrote:
Yes America has fucked up for a very long time
But gun availability does cause problems in America and that is a thing and Ireland is proof that even an unarmed police force is effective
But yeah, you probably can't take away guns immediately now because that would fuck shit up in america
But yeah, you probably can't take away guns immediately now because that would fuck shit up in america
E m i
dude weed lmao
Prevent using things for harm that are not meant for harmMomiji wrote:
guns
primary purpose: harm
secondary result: deterrence
legal: yes
drugs
primary purpose: utility
secondary result: harm
legal: no
logic where?
So if that logic is correct, then America would ban pencils once people start stabbing other people with them.
That's what I always said with the "zero tolerance for weapons" thing.
You're retriggering the kinder-Überraschungsei-incident mate.abraker wrote:
Prevent using things for harm that are not meant for harmMomiji wrote:
guns
primary purpose: harm
secondary result: deterrence
legal: yes
drugs
primary purpose: utility
secondary result: harm
legal: no
logic where?
So if that logic is correct, then America would ban pencils once people start stabbing other people with them.