xd
i like your signatureRailey2 wrote:
This tbh. I just visit this thread for fun.Railey2 wrote:
On the other side: If I say something against candidate A, I must automatically be in favor of the complete opposite side, there is nothing in between.
I hate political discussions so much.
I visit for the cringe factor. I don't get Trump Supporters sometimes but I understand the issues that make them turn to such a jerk for guidance.piruchan wrote:
This tbh. I just visit this thread for fun.Railey2 wrote:
On the other side: If I say something against candidate A, I must automatically be in favor of the complete opposite side, there is nothing in between.
I hate political discussions so much.
Evidently, because you're still replyingMatrix wrote:
i could give a fuck what you think.
I know that he's a racist cunt, that's what I know. I care little for anything about him besides that, but what he says is disgusting and unacceptable from the position of a person who could potentially have power.Matrix wrote:
i want to know what you know.
Matrix wrote:
you make me fucking sick
Matrix wrote:
you blatantly know absolutely NOTHING.
Matrix wrote:
hahahaha the internet is disgusting
And this is a significant portion of why I find it hard to agree with anything you've said, because you're acting like a cunt. And, honestly, the reason I find it hard to find any redeeming factors in trump or in anyone who supports him, because every vocal supporter of trump I've met is a cunt just like you're being right now.Matrix wrote:
you only look like a dumbass
Basically all of this ^RoseusJaeger wrote:
Matrix says they love to argue but they way they're wording their 'argument' it sounds like they're more aiming to belittle anyone who doesn't agree with them. They're just being confrontational for their own entertainment at this point and not trying to understand any view points. They're basically acting like a child like most Trump supporters and any outspoken and uneducated member of any side does.
This is why we can't have civil discussion.
From the last few posts I've read back and forth, they're trying to explain to you why Trump would be a bad leader. His plans are confrontational to the advancement of the United States as a society and to keeping peace with other nations.Matrix wrote:
nope, thats not true at all. if you argue with me and explain your reasoning and it makes sense im completely willing to understand it.RoseusJaeger wrote:
Matrix says they love to argue but they way they're wording their 'argument' it sounds like they're more aiming to belittle anyone who doesn't agree with them. They're just being confrontational for their own entertainment at this point and not trying to understand any view points. They're basically acting like a child like most Trump supporters and any outspoken and uneducated member of any side does.
This is why we can't have civil discussion.
but the person im arguing with unfortunately fails to do any of that. its merely what he thinks, not what he knows.
So you're happy to damage your own cause for the sake of cheap kicks?Matrix wrote:
i use the attitude for a reason, its fun to argue.
building a wall around mexico comes to mind immediatelyMatrix wrote:
edit: didnt see the portion with trump, show me some proof of his racism.
The wall and banning immigration is racist because he's actively blaming an entire race AND religion for the problems of the US in a way that vilifys people with stereotypes and addressing the issue like they aren't people but as pests. He's not understanding the human part of the issue and his policies aren't helping from the root of the problem and going to cost the US morally and tax-wiseMahogany wrote:
So you're happy to damage your own cause for the sake of cheap kicks?Matrix wrote:
i use the attitude for a reason, its fun to argue.building a wall around mexico comes to mind immediatelyMatrix wrote:
edit: didnt see the portion with trump, show me some proof of his racism.
Also banning immigration from countries with a history of terrorism, that too
I know you don't take what I said seriously, but here. I marked all the parts that give away that you focus more on insulting people than on arguing.Matrix wrote:
"because i think"Mahogany wrote:
Because I think that money is just going to get hopelessly pumped back into the worthless sinkhole that is the military budget, and he's yet to prove otherwise.
i dont need to read anymore of that nonsense. i could give a fuck what you think. i want to know what you know.
you make me fucking sick, how about you read his healthcare reform and see what he plans to do about it? it doesnt seem bad at all.
you know absolutely nothing i dont even need to talk to you anymore for real. its different if you know how to argue, but you blatantly know absolutely NOTHING. how about you listen to the shit he says about education as well?
The fact you like insulting people makes your argument invalid, at least to me it does. People who won't take the time to give a civil debate can gtfo.Matrix wrote:
Railey2 wrote:
I know you don't take what I said seriously, but here. I marked all the parts that give away that you focus more on insulting people than on arguing.
I know that you're young and probably enjoy throwing your opinion around, but please do yourself a favor and stay away from topics that are as emotionally loaded as politics. You clearly don't know how to handle them. Learn how to stay neutral first, then come back.
you try way to hard to sound cool, i already admitted i like insulting people. quit acting like you have authority hahaha
It's racism because it makes a broad generalization of a group of people.Matrix wrote:
its racism because he wants to solve the issue of immigration?
Are you really this narrow minded? "Countries with a history of terrorism" Isn't just the islamic countries you're used to seeing on the news. You know what country has a history of terrorim? Ireland. You'd support a ban on Irish immigration to America? America has a really fucking rich history inherited from the Irish, better deport a fuckton of your own people.Matrix wrote:
refer to the first post when i gave you an example of what happens in muslim countries, its not just a history of terrorism its what their religion believes in.
This is the reason your country is the laughing stock of the world.Matrix wrote:
im arguing with a bunch of teenagers who cant vote.(including myself)
So if I think taiko players are all smelly is that racist or did you forget racist has to deal with race as a basis?Mahogany wrote:
It's racism because it makes a broad generalization of a group of people.Matrix wrote:
its racism because he wants to solve the issue of immigration?
This is the reason your country is the laughing stock of the world.Matrix wrote:
im arguing with a bunch of teenagers who cant vote.(including myself)
I love how in CURRENT YEAR race doesn't have to be a basis for being racistRoseusJaeger wrote:
If we were to get technically, that would be racist.Khelly wrote:
So if I think taiko players are all smelly is that racist or did you forget racist has to deal with race as a basis?
I hate my country for being the piece of crap that it is and I don't have the money to leave it.Matrix wrote:
"your country" you are in it too buddy.
you are actually getting really annoying, im going to ignore every post you make. like seriously, why are you trying to join this argument?
Since never, I can vote in my own country's elections.Khelly wrote:
Tooth since when you could vote in american elections?
Not in france, I can vote fine, thanks. Do you seriously think this is a french flag? Have you gone to school at all? How am I supposed to take you seriously like this?Matrix wrote:
you are in france, good luck voting.
Nah, because despite what they seem to tell you, not every muslim is an extremist suicide bomber, friend. I agree that the extremists must be kept out or eliminated in some way, but putting a blanket ban on immigration from these countries is really fucking stupid, because there are plenty of individuals who would integrate fine, and it's going to do nothing but fuck up the US's relations with other countries irreparably.Matrix wrote:
you still ignored what i said about religion, the terrorism isnt the problem.
the religion itself believes in killing gays(which is only one of many terrible things).
if you bring in a bunch of people who are for a certain religion, your laws will start to change. eventually you will start seeing sharia law.
you are still being pretty ignorant.
"Ugh your points make sense and I can't refute them, just gonna insult you instead"Matrix wrote:
you are actually getting really annoying, im going to ignore every post you make. like seriously, why are you trying to join this argument?
Why would something not based on race fit the definition for racistRoseusJaeger wrote:
We're talking about definition wise but otherwise, I wouldn't consider it racist.Khelly wrote:
I love how in CURRENT YEAR race doesn't have to be a basis for being racist
These excuses, lmao. The Irish flag looks absolutely nothing like the French flag, and there's no excuse for mistaking the two.Matrix wrote:
looked blue instead of green, i know what the french flag looks like i only looked over at it for a second.
you know nothing about muslims, its pretty evident. you probably didnt even watch the video i sent you in my first post.
the guy basically asked them if they were ok with killing gays and litterally all of them raised their hands.
every argument you make fucking sucks, you look like a moron. its pretty funny
Yeah, I think it would be more classism but I had gotten lost because of all the conversation happening at once.Mahogany wrote:
I think he's probably questioning it on the basis of are Taiko players a "race" or if it's not "racism" and rather "class-ism" or something
Like if you said "All koreans are smelly" that's racist, if you said "all women are smelly" that's sexist, what's the "ist" version for taiko players???? Because that is the definition of racism but not necessarily the race part
How about this:Mahogany wrote:
I think he's probably questioning it on the basis of are Taiko players a "race" or if it's not "racism" and rather "class-ism" or something
Like if you said "All koreans are smelly" that's racist, if you said "all women are smelly" that's sexist, what's the "ist" version for taiko players???? Because that is the definition of racism but not necessarily the race part
Matrix wrote:
i wonder how people can say things like "youre the reason your country is bad" and blah blah blah
but they think we should let illegal immigrants in and not kick them out because its racist
this chat gave me alot of laughs but ive gotta go for now. il be back to argue more later ! so make sure to have a big long message for me to laugh about !
quick edit:
wtf are you guys talking about now xD
Will you bake me somethingTeffammie Maye wrote:
I come back from cooking and there's already three new pages of this thread
jesus christ this is why I usually don't bother
crispy oatmeal cookie pleaseTeffammie Maye wrote:
I come back from cooking and there's already three new pages of this thread
jesus christ this is why I usually don't bother
takes one to know oneRoseusJaeger wrote:
Not everyone, me included. I still think he's trash.Navizel wrote:
why is this thread still alive. I thought we already agreed that Trump is superior uwu
That would be ideal if that man wasn't doing it in a way that isolates us from the rest of the world and presents himself as a racist, even if it's unintentional.Khelly wrote:
I want a country controlled by a man that puts his nation first and doesn't feel he has to bow down to others.
Im waiting for Stefan to lock this threadRoseusJaeger wrote:
Cringe
The A1 is a motorwayNavizel wrote:
hey faust which route in A-1 is the best and why is Azumi's
Faust wrote:
Let's see.
Personally, I like Benkei's the best.
It has everything. It's the real meat of the A-1 fan-disc imo. (But everyone knows that)
Sayaka if you like the little sister types.
Good character introduction/expansion that progresses nicely into a relationship. Short & sweet.
I skipped Azumi because I have no interest at the moment, but will get to it on a future date.
B E N K E I
A P P R E C I A T I O N
N O W
good point, how about we lock them up until they are adult age?Khelly wrote:
If you kill lolis how will any girl develop
Mahogany wrote:
trump is bad, hilary is bad, everybody loses nobody wins the end
Discussion over :^)
Often accurate but so damn inconsistent that she is literally an amorphous blob of whatever the hell the Democratic establishment thinks is popular/will help her win. At least Trump speaks his damn mind, and is also usually accurate too, if you actually take the time to read the stuff he says.Navizel wrote:
Bane is the best. Hillary is accurate at least.
http://www.lp.org/Hobbes2 wrote:
2 party system is trash
send help