forum

Your opinion on American Politics?

posted
Total Posts
770
show more
Matrix
xd
Railey2
see?

That's not how rational discourse works.You aren't interested in learning something about the other persons view, so you might as well not talk to each other. Thanks for wasting everyone's time. And now go away and be ashamed.

Also, how smart you are for writing these messages in so little time. I am impressed, honestly. Teach me please.
Aomi
when did this turn into a grammar and capitalization war
Matrix
xd
Railey2
See, thats the thing. You both post pages of content with lengthy post over lengthy post, and in the end you still claim that the other person basically said nothing. This is an immature political discussion in a nutshell. You're so stuck in your own shit, you can't even begin to see what the other person says.

"im writing these in a minute or less i could give a fuck how they look." That is why I said it. You are not writing 10 paragraphs in a minute or less, that's just bloody obvious. It's just a way of subtly saying how smart you supposedly are, which you are probably not. Now go play. I'm not interested in this. You guys are just flaming each other, and it's sad to see.
DeletedUser_6709840
Matrix says they love to argue but they way they're wording their 'argument' it sounds like they're more aiming to belittle anyone who doesn't agree with them. They're just being confrontational for their own entertainment at this point and not trying to understand any view points. They're basically acting like a child like most Trump supporters and any outspoken and uneducated member of any side does.
This is why we can't have civil discussion.
Aomi

Railey2 wrote:

i like your signature
Railey2
<3
piruchan

Railey2 wrote:

On the other side: If I say something against candidate A, I must automatically be in favor of the complete opposite side, there is nothing in between.

I hate political discussions so much.
This tbh. I just visit this thread for fun.
Matrix
xd
DeletedUser_6709840

piruchan wrote:

Railey2 wrote:

On the other side: If I say something against candidate A, I must automatically be in favor of the complete opposite side, there is nothing in between.

I hate political discussions so much.
This tbh. I just visit this thread for fun.
I visit for the cringe factor. I don't get Trump Supporters sometimes but I understand the issues that make them turn to such a jerk for guidance.
Matrix
xd
Mahogany

Matrix wrote:

i could give a fuck what you think.
Evidently, because you're still replying

Matrix wrote:

i want to know what you know.
I know that he's a racist cunt, that's what I know. I care little for anything about him besides that, but what he says is disgusting and unacceptable from the position of a person who could potentially have power.

Matrix wrote:

you make me fucking sick

Matrix wrote:

you blatantly know absolutely NOTHING.

Matrix wrote:

hahahaha the internet is disgusting

Matrix wrote:

you only look like a dumbass
And this is a significant portion of why I find it hard to agree with anything you've said, because you're acting like a cunt. And, honestly, the reason I find it hard to find any redeeming factors in trump or in anyone who supports him, because every vocal supporter of trump I've met is a cunt just like you're being right now.

RoseusJaeger wrote:

Matrix says they love to argue but they way they're wording their 'argument' it sounds like they're more aiming to belittle anyone who doesn't agree with them. They're just being confrontational for their own entertainment at this point and not trying to understand any view points. They're basically acting like a child like most Trump supporters and any outspoken and uneducated member of any side does.
This is why we can't have civil discussion.
Basically all of this ^

I'd love to have a legitimate sitdown with a chill, nice, friendly, rational and and understanding trump supporter, for once in my life, so I could actually come to understand the appeal some people seem to see in the man and understand their reasonings..

But for as long as the supporters I meet act like matrix, I won't be able to do that.
DeletedUser_6709840

Matrix wrote:

RoseusJaeger wrote:

Matrix says they love to argue but they way they're wording their 'argument' it sounds like they're more aiming to belittle anyone who doesn't agree with them. They're just being confrontational for their own entertainment at this point and not trying to understand any view points. They're basically acting like a child like most Trump supporters and any outspoken and uneducated member of any side does.
This is why we can't have civil discussion.
nope, thats not true at all. if you argue with me and explain your reasoning and it makes sense im completely willing to understand it.
but the person im arguing with unfortunately fails to do any of that. its merely what he thinks, not what he knows.
From the last few posts I've read back and forth, they're trying to explain to you why Trump would be a bad leader. His plans are confrontational to the advancement of the United States as a society and to keeping peace with other nations.
Matrix
xd
DeletedUser_6709840

Matrix wrote:

i use the attitude for a reason, its fun to argue.
That attitude is why the United States is in the shitter.
Railey2
this is not how arguing works. It's fun for you to feel superior by insulting other people, that is what you do.
DeletedUser_6709840

Railey2 wrote:

this is not how arguing works. It's fun for you to feel superior by insulting other people.
^upvoted
Matrix
xd
Mahogany

Matrix wrote:

i use the attitude for a reason, its fun to argue.
So you're happy to damage your own cause for the sake of cheap kicks?

Matrix wrote:

edit: didnt see the portion with trump, show me some proof of his racism.
building a wall around mexico comes to mind immediately
Also banning immigration from countries with a history of terrorism, that too
Matrix
xd
Aomi
you'll never find a human version of waifu if you keep that up man
DeletedUser_6709840

Mahogany wrote:

Matrix wrote:

i use the attitude for a reason, its fun to argue.
So you're happy to damage your own cause for the sake of cheap kicks?

Matrix wrote:

edit: didnt see the portion with trump, show me some proof of his racism.
building a wall around mexico comes to mind immediately
Also banning immigration from countries with a history of terrorism, that too
The wall and banning immigration is racist because he's actively blaming an entire race AND religion for the problems of the US in a way that vilifys people with stereotypes and addressing the issue like they aren't people but as pests. He's not understanding the human part of the issue and his policies aren't helping from the root of the problem and going to cost the US morally and tax-wise
Railey2

Matrix wrote:

Mahogany wrote:

Because I think that money is just going to get hopelessly pumped back into the worthless sinkhole that is the military budget, and he's yet to prove otherwise.
"because i think"

i dont need to read anymore of that nonsense. i could give a fuck what you think. i want to know what you know.

you make me fucking sick, how about you read his healthcare reform and see what he plans to do about it? it doesnt seem bad at all.
you know absolutely nothing i dont even need to talk to you anymore for real. its different if you know how to argue, but you blatantly know absolutely NOTHING. how about you listen to the shit he says about education as well?
I know you don't take what I said seriously, but here. I marked all the parts that give away that you focus more on insulting people than on arguing.

I know that you're young and probably enjoy throwing your opinion around, but please do yourself a favor and stay away from topics that are as emotionally loaded as politics. You clearly don't know how to handle them. Learn how to stay neutral first, then come back.
Yuudachi-kun
What happens if he doesn't listen to you. Because, you know. He doesn't have to. And topics like this are useless because no one changes how they feel about anything ever.
Matrix
xd
DeletedUser_6709840

Matrix wrote:

Railey2 wrote:

I know you don't take what I said seriously, but here. I marked all the parts that give away that you focus more on insulting people than on arguing.

I know that you're young and probably enjoy throwing your opinion around, but please do yourself a favor and stay away from topics that are as emotionally loaded as politics. You clearly don't know how to handle them. Learn how to stay neutral first, then come back.

you try way to hard to sound cool, i already admitted i like insulting people. quit acting like you have authority hahaha
The fact you like insulting people makes your argument invalid, at least to me it does. People who won't take the time to give a civil debate can gtfo.
Mahogany

Matrix wrote:

its racism because he wants to solve the issue of immigration?
It's racism because it makes a broad generalization of a group of people.

Matrix wrote:

refer to the first post when i gave you an example of what happens in muslim countries, its not just a history of terrorism its what their religion believes in.
Are you really this narrow minded? "Countries with a history of terrorism" Isn't just the islamic countries you're used to seeing on the news. You know what country has a history of terrorim? Ireland. You'd support a ban on Irish immigration to America? America has a really fucking rich history inherited from the Irish, better deport a fuckton of your own people.

Such massive sweeping broad generalizations are really fucking stupid, which is why trump is a really poor choice for a president.

Matrix wrote:

im arguing with a bunch of teenagers who cant vote.(including myself)
This is the reason your country is the laughing stock of the world.
Also, fucking speak for yourself, I can vote.
Yuudachi-kun
Tooth since when you could vote in american elections?

Mahogany wrote:

Matrix wrote:

its racism because he wants to solve the issue of immigration?
It's racism because it makes a broad generalization of a group of people.
So if I think taiko players are all smelly is that racist or did you forget racist has to deal with race as a basis?
DeletedUser_6709840

Matrix wrote:

im arguing with a bunch of teenagers who cant vote.(including myself)
This is the reason your country is the laughing stock of the world.
Also, fucking speak for yourself, I can vote.[/quote]

I agree with mahogany on the fact that the US is a laughing stock at this point for the same reason.
DeletedUser_6709840

Khelly wrote:

So if I think taiko players are all smelly is that racist or did you forget racist has to deal with race as a basis?
If we were to get technically, that would be racist.
Matrix
xd
Yuudachi-kun

RoseusJaeger wrote:

Khelly wrote:

So if I think taiko players are all smelly is that racist or did you forget racist has to deal with race as a basis?
If we were to get technically, that would be racist.
I love how in CURRENT YEAR race doesn't have to be a basis for being racist
Matrix
xd
DeletedUser_6709840

Matrix wrote:

"your country" you are in it too buddy.

you are actually getting really annoying, im going to ignore every post you make. like seriously, why are you trying to join this argument?
I hate my country for being the piece of crap that it is and I don't have the money to leave it.
People like you irritate me because you're one of the reasons our country sucks.
Yuudachi-kun
I wanna move to England
Mahogany

Khelly wrote:

Tooth since when you could vote in american elections?
Since never, I can vote in my own country's elections.

Matrix wrote:

you are in france, good luck voting.
Not in france, I can vote fine, thanks. Do you seriously think this is a french flag? Have you gone to school at all? How am I supposed to take you seriously like this?

Matrix wrote:

you still ignored what i said about religion, the terrorism isnt the problem.
the religion itself believes in killing gays(which is only one of many terrible things).
if you bring in a bunch of people who are for a certain religion, your laws will start to change. eventually you will start seeing sharia law.
you are still being pretty ignorant.
Nah, because despite what they seem to tell you, not every muslim is an extremist suicide bomber, friend. I agree that the extremists must be kept out or eliminated in some way, but putting a blanket ban on immigration from these countries is really fucking stupid, because there are plenty of individuals who would integrate fine, and it's going to do nothing but fuck up the US's relations with other countries irreparably.

Matrix wrote:

you are actually getting really annoying, im going to ignore every post you make. like seriously, why are you trying to join this argument?
"Ugh your points make sense and I can't refute them, just gonna insult you instead"
DeletedUser_6709840

Khelly wrote:

I love how in CURRENT YEAR race doesn't have to be a basis for being racist
We're talking about definition wise but otherwise, I wouldn't consider it racist.
Yuudachi-kun

RoseusJaeger wrote:

Khelly wrote:

I love how in CURRENT YEAR race doesn't have to be a basis for being racist
We're talking about definition wise but otherwise, I wouldn't consider it racist.
Why would something not based on race fit the definition for racist
DeletedUser_6709840

Khelly wrote:

Why would something not based on race fit the definition for racist
I got lost in the conversation, but I think where I was going for was that it was the generalization of a group of people. It's not racist but it would be prejudice.
Matrix
xd
Mahogany
I think he's probably questioning it on the basis of are Taiko players a "race" or if it's not "racism" and rather "class-ism" or something

Like if you said "All koreans are smelly" that's racist, if you said "all women are smelly" that's sexist, what's the "ist" version for taiko players???? Because that is the definition of racism but not necessarily the race part

Matrix wrote:

looked blue instead of green, i know what the french flag looks like i only looked over at it for a second.
you know nothing about muslims, its pretty evident. you probably didnt even watch the video i sent you in my first post.
the guy basically asked them if they were ok with killing gays and litterally all of them raised their hands.
every argument you make fucking sucks, you look like a moron. its pretty funny
These excuses, lmao. The Irish flag looks absolutely nothing like the French flag, and there's no excuse for mistaking the two.

I know plenty about muslims, Religion studies are mandatory for three years in Secondary School here, and Islam was the main focus of my course.

It's hilarious to be called a moron by someone who can't fucking tell the difference between Orange and Red, or Green and Blue, what a hypocrite.
DeletedUser_6709840

Mahogany wrote:

I think he's probably questioning it on the basis of are Taiko players a "race" or if it's not "racism" and rather "class-ism" or something

Like if you said "All koreans are smelly" that's racist, if you said "all women are smelly" that's sexist, what's the "ist" version for taiko players???? Because that is the definition of racism but not necessarily the race part
Yeah, I think it would be more classism but I had gotten lost because of all the conversation happening at once.

But the definition of classism read as this "prejudice against or in favor of people belonging to a particular social class."

So, idk what to tell ya.
Yuudachi-kun

Mahogany wrote:

I think he's probably questioning it on the basis of are Taiko players a "race" or if it's not "racism" and rather "class-ism" or something

Like if you said "All koreans are smelly" that's racist, if you said "all women are smelly" that's sexist, what's the "ist" version for taiko players???? Because that is the definition of racism but not necessarily the race part
How about this:

You say "People who eat curry are smelly"

Many Indians eat curry

You say "A lot of Indians are smelly" >> In this case your reasoning is from the first statement that isn't based on anything but an action people do and not race itself. It just turns out that a lot of people of that race partake in that activity

Is it racist then?
Mahogany
When you put it like that, I'm unsure, and can't really say.

Though there's a lot to be said for the difference between saying "Indians are smelly" and "A lot of Indians are smelly" in terms of what sort of meaning you're conveying.
Matrix
i wonder how people can say things like "youre the reason your country is bad" and blah blah blah
but they think we should let illegal immigrants in and not kick them out because its racist

this chat gave me alot of laughs but ive gotta go for now. il be back to argue more later ! so make sure to have a big long message for me to laugh about !

quick edit:
wtf are you guys talking about now xD
DeletedUser_6709840

Matrix wrote:

i wonder how people can say things like "youre the reason your country is bad" and blah blah blah
but they think we should let illegal immigrants in and not kick them out because its racist

this chat gave me alot of laughs but ive gotta go for now. il be back to argue more later ! so make sure to have a big long message for me to laugh about !

quick edit:
wtf are you guys talking about now xD

It's not kicking out illegal immigrants that's racist, it's how most people who want them gone go about it that is and Donald Trump is a prime example of that.
Razzy
I come back from cooking and there's already three new pages of this thread

jesus christ this is why I usually don't bother
DeletedUser_6709840

Teffammie Maye wrote:

I come back from cooking and there's already three new pages of this thread

jesus christ this is why I usually don't bother
RIP my friend
Yuudachi-kun

Teffammie Maye wrote:

I come back from cooking and there's already three new pages of this thread

jesus christ this is why I usually don't bother
Will you bake me something
Rilene

Teffammie Maye wrote:

I come back from cooking and there's already three new pages of this thread

jesus christ this is why I usually don't bother
crispy oatmeal cookie please
Navizel
why is this thread still alive. I thought we already agreed that Trump is superior uwu
DeletedUser_6709840

Navizel wrote:

why is this thread still alive. I thought we already agreed that Trump is superior uwu
Not everyone, me included. I still think he's trash.
Navizel

RoseusJaeger wrote:

Navizel wrote:

why is this thread still alive. I thought we already agreed that Trump is superior uwu
Not everyone, me included. I still think he's trash.
takes one to know one

get memed
DeletedUser_6709840
Have I ever denied being trash? No, I haven't.
Yuudachi-kun
I agree
Meah
Is Trump really that good?
DeletedUser_6709840

Meah wrote:

Is Trump really that good?
He's not, imo at least because I don't want a country controlled by a man who doesn't understand that how to coexist with other nations and that's for starters.
Yuudachi-kun
I want a country controlled by a man that puts his nation first and doesn't feel he has to bow down to others.
DeletedUser_6709840

Khelly wrote:

I want a country controlled by a man that puts his nation first and doesn't feel he has to bow down to others.
That would be ideal if that man wasn't doing it in a way that isolates us from the rest of the world and presents himself as a racist, even if it's unintentional.
Yuudachi-kun
Pretty soon someone will say "I don't like that book" and be called racist. It's soon to be a filler word.
DeletedUser_6709840

Khelly wrote:

Pretty soon someone will say "I don't like that book" and be called racist. It's soon to be a filler word.
I don't get how you came to that silly conclusion from me saying that Trump presents himself as a racist.
Yuudachi-kun
I'm not responding to you but expressing a thought I had a few pages back when Tooth said that any generalisations are racist even though they could be not based on, you know, actual race
DeletedUser_6709840

Khelly wrote:

I'm not responding to you but expressing a thought I had a few pages back when Tooth said that any generalisations are racist even though they could be not based on, you know, actual race
Alright, that makes more sense
Yuudachi-kun

DeletedUser_6709840
Cringe
Yuudachi-kun

RoseusJaeger wrote:

Cringe
Im waiting for Stefan to lock this thread
DeletedUser_6709840

Khelly wrote:

RoseusJaeger wrote:

Cringe
Im waiting for Stefan to lock this thread
Same
Faust
Just doing my part.

Navizel
hey faust which route in A-1 is the best and why is Azumi's
Yuudachi-kun

Navizel wrote:

hey faust which route in A-1 is the best and why is Azumi's
The A1 is a motorway
Navizel
i thought it's a paper size
Faust
Let's see.

Personally, I like Benkei's the best.
It has everything. It's the real meat of the A-1 fan-disc imo. (But everyone knows that)

Sayaka if you like the little sister types.
Good character introduction/expansion that progresses nicely into a relationship. Short & sweet.

I skipped Azumi because I have no interest at the moment, but will get to it on a future date.



B E N K E I
A P P R E C I A T I O N
N O W
Matrix

Faust wrote:

Let's see.

Personally, I like Benkei's the best.
It has everything. It's the real meat of the A-1 fan-disc imo. (But everyone knows that)

Sayaka if you like the little sister types.
Good character introduction/expansion that progresses nicely into a relationship. Short & sweet.

I skipped Azumi because I have no interest at the moment, but will get to it on a future date.



B E N K E I
A P P R E C I A T I O N
N O W

(ノ゚Д゚)ノ little sister type (ノ゚Д゚)ノ

i prefer developed tbh!

( ╬◣ 益◢)y━・~ ヽ(#゚Д゚)ノ kill all lolis!!!
Navizel
Older girls are better
I never liked any of the younger girls in Majikoi. Except for Monshiro. I don't even feel like going through Sayaka's route. I like Benkei more but Azumi's route is better imo.

WHERE IS THE UMEKO CONTINUATION GODDAMMIT
Yuudachi-kun
If you kill lolis how will any girl develop
Matrix

Khelly wrote:

If you kill lolis how will any girl develop
good point, how about we lock them up until they are adult age?
if they still look like a loli then we kill them
Faust
Yeah I wanted a Kojima-sensei route after-story as well.

It's a real shame.
Mahogany
Well, I came up with a proposition I'm sure we can all agree with

2d grills > dum politics \:D/

Seriously though the speed that any discussion can turn to anime on this forum is damn impressive
Faust
What can I say ?

Sayaka:

FuZ
why are people talking about fucking anime
Faust
Well what do you want to discuss ?
Rilene
trump vs hilary

and popcorns
FuZ
the third crusade
Mahogany
trump is bad, hilary is bad, everybody loses nobody wins the end

Discussion over :^)
Endaris
Wrong, Maho.
The rich win.
Mahogany
You're right, I'm sorry
FuZ
hi sorry
Yuudachi-kun

Mahogany wrote:

trump is bad, hilary is bad, everybody loses nobody wins the end

Discussion over :^)

I win if trump wins
Navizel
^this
Yuudachi-kun
,-、           ,.-、
        ./:::::\        /::::::ヽ
       /::::::::::::;ゝ--──-- 、._/::::::::::::::|
       /,.-‐''"´          \:::::::::|
     /              ヽ、::|
    /    ●                ヽ|
     l   、、、             ●     l
    .|        (_人__丿   、、、  |
     l                   l
    ` 、                    /
      `ー 、__             /
         /`'''ー‐‐──‐‐‐┬---
repr1se
This was on Reddit.

Take your pick.

Faust
Navizel
Bane is the best. Hillary is accurate at least.
Razzy
"It doesn't matter who we are. What matters is our plan."

You could probably twist that to describe a bunch of politicians
Intelli

Navizel wrote:

Bane is the best. Hillary is accurate at least.
Often accurate but so damn inconsistent that she is literally an amorphous blob of whatever the hell the Democratic establishment thinks is popular/will help her win. At least Trump speaks his damn mind, and is also usually accurate too, if you actually take the time to read the stuff he says.

Also, read Hiltery's emails and then you'll realize why everyone wants trump
Navizel
Talking about how Hillary is Two-Face btw
Keldeo
2 party system is trash

send help
DeletedUser_6709840

Hobbes2 wrote:

2 party system is trash

send help
Intelli

Hobbes2 wrote:

2 party system is trash

send help
http://www.lp.org/
show more
Please sign in to reply.

New reply