Railey2 wrote:

Railey2 wrote:

On the other side: If I say something against candidate A, I must automatically be in favor of the complete opposite side, there is nothing in between.

I hate political discussions so much.

piruchan wrote:

Railey2 wrote:

On the other side: If I say something against candidate A, I must automatically be in favor of the complete opposite side, there is nothing in between.

I hate political discussions so much.

This tbh. I just visit this thread for fun.

Matrix wrote:

i could give a fuck what you think.

Matrix wrote:

i want to know what you know.

Matrix wrote:

you make me fucking sick

Matrix wrote:

you blatantly know absolutely NOTHING.

Matrix wrote:

hahahaha the internet is disgusting

Matrix wrote:

you only look like a dumbass

RoseusJaeger wrote:

Matrix says they love to argue but they way they're wording their 'argument' it sounds like they're more aiming to belittle anyone who doesn't agree with them. They're just being confrontational for their own entertainment at this point and not trying to understand any view points. They're basically acting like a child like most Trump supporters and any outspoken and uneducated member of any side does.
This is why we can't have civil discussion.

Matrix wrote:

RoseusJaeger wrote:

Matrix says they love to argue but they way they're wording their 'argument' it sounds like they're more aiming to belittle anyone who doesn't agree with them. They're just being confrontational for their own entertainment at this point and not trying to understand any view points. They're basically acting like a child like most Trump supporters and any outspoken and uneducated member of any side does.
This is why we can't have civil discussion.

nope, thats not true at all. if you argue with me and explain your reasoning and it makes sense im completely willing to understand it.
but the person im arguing with unfortunately fails to do any of that. its merely what he thinks, not what he knows.

Matrix wrote:

i use the attitude for a reason, its fun to argue.

Railey2 wrote:

this is not how arguing works. It's fun for you to feel superior by insulting other people.

Matrix wrote:

i use the attitude for a reason, its fun to argue.

Matrix wrote:

edit: didnt see the portion with trump, show me some proof of his racism.

Mahogany wrote:

Matrix wrote:

i use the attitude for a reason, its fun to argue.

So you're happy to damage your own cause for the sake of cheap kicks?

Matrix wrote:

edit: didnt see the portion with trump, show me some proof of his racism.

building a wall around mexico comes to mind immediately
Also banning immigration from countries with a history of terrorism, that too

Matrix wrote:

Mahogany wrote:

Because I think that money is just going to get hopelessly pumped back into the worthless sinkhole that is the military budget, and he's yet to prove otherwise.

"because i think"

i dont need to read anymore of that nonsense. i could give a fuck what you think. i want to know what you know.

you make me fucking sick, how about you read his healthcare reform and see what he plans to do about it? it doesnt seem bad at all.
you know absolutely nothing i dont even need to talk to you anymore for real. its different if you know how to argue, but you blatantly know absolutely NOTHING. how about you listen to the shit he says about education as well?

Matrix wrote:

Railey2 wrote:

I know you don't take what I said seriously, but here. I marked all the parts that give away that you focus more on insulting people than on arguing.

I know that you're young and probably enjoy throwing your opinion around, but please do yourself a favor and stay away from topics that are as emotionally loaded as politics. You clearly don't know how to handle them. Learn how to stay neutral first, then come back.

you try way to hard to sound cool, i already admitted i like insulting people. quit acting like you have authority hahaha

Matrix wrote:

its racism because he wants to solve the issue of immigration?

Matrix wrote:

refer to the first post when i gave you an example of what happens in muslim countries, its not just a history of terrorism its what their religion believes in.

Matrix wrote:

im arguing with a bunch of teenagers who cant vote.(including myself)

Mahogany wrote:

Matrix wrote:

its racism because he wants to solve the issue of immigration?

It's racism because it makes a broad generalization of a group of people.

Matrix wrote:

im arguing with a bunch of teenagers who cant vote.(including myself)

Khelly wrote:

So if I think taiko players are all smelly is that racist or did you forget racist has to deal with race as a basis?

RoseusJaeger wrote:

Khelly wrote:

So if I think taiko players are all smelly is that racist or did you forget racist has to deal with race as a basis?

If we were to get technically, that would be racist.

Matrix wrote:

"your country" you are in it too buddy.

you are actually getting really annoying, im going to ignore every post you make. like seriously, why are you trying to join this argument?

Khelly wrote:

Tooth since when you could vote in american elections?

Matrix wrote:

you are in france, good luck voting.

Matrix wrote:

you still ignored what i said about religion, the terrorism isnt the problem.
the religion itself believes in killing gays(which is only one of many terrible things).
if you bring in a bunch of people who are for a certain religion, your laws will start to change. eventually you will start seeing sharia law.
you are still being pretty ignorant.

Matrix wrote:

you are actually getting really annoying, im going to ignore every post you make. like seriously, why are you trying to join this argument?

Khelly wrote:

I love how in CURRENT YEAR race doesn't have to be a basis for being racist

RoseusJaeger wrote:

Khelly wrote:

I love how in CURRENT YEAR race doesn't have to be a basis for being racist

We're talking about definition wise but otherwise, I wouldn't consider it racist.

Khelly wrote:

Why would something not based on race fit the definition for racist

Matrix wrote:

looked blue instead of green, i know what the french flag looks like i only looked over at it for a second.
you know nothing about muslims, its pretty evident. you probably didnt even watch the video i sent you in my first post.
the guy basically asked them if they were ok with killing gays and litterally all of them raised their hands.
every argument you make fucking sucks, you look like a moron. its pretty funny

Mahogany wrote:

I think he's probably questioning it on the basis of are Taiko players a "race" or if it's not "racism" and rather "class-ism" or something

Like if you said "All koreans are smelly" that's racist, if you said "all women are smelly" that's sexist, what's the "ist" version for taiko players???? Because that is the definition of racism but not necessarily the race part

Mahogany wrote:

I think he's probably questioning it on the basis of are Taiko players a "race" or if it's not "racism" and rather "class-ism" or something

Like if you said "All koreans are smelly" that's racist, if you said "all women are smelly" that's sexist, what's the "ist" version for taiko players???? Because that is the definition of racism but not necessarily the race part

Matrix wrote:

i wonder how people can say things like "youre the reason your country is bad" and blah blah blah
but they think we should let illegal immigrants in and not kick them out because its racist

this chat gave me alot of laughs but ive gotta go for now. il be back to argue more later ! so make sure to have a big long message for me to laugh about !

quick edit:
wtf are you guys talking about now xD

Teffammie Maye wrote:

I come back from cooking and there's already three new pages of this thread

jesus christ this is why I usually don't bother

Teffammie Maye wrote:

I come back from cooking and there's already three new pages of this thread

jesus christ this is why I usually don't bother

Teffammie Maye wrote:

I come back from cooking and there's already three new pages of this thread

jesus christ this is why I usually don't bother

Navizel wrote:

why is this thread still alive. I thought we already agreed that Trump is superior uwu

RoseusJaeger wrote:

Navizel wrote:

why is this thread still alive. I thought we already agreed that Trump is superior uwu

Not everyone, me included. I still think he's trash.

Meah wrote:

Is Trump really that good?

Khelly wrote:

I want a country controlled by a man that puts his nation first and doesn't feel he has to bow down to others.

Khelly wrote:

Pretty soon someone will say "I don't like that book" and be called racist. It's soon to be a filler word.

Khelly wrote:

I'm not responding to you but expressing a thought I had a few pages back when Tooth said that any generalisations are racist even though they could be not based on, you know, actual race

RoseusJaeger wrote:

Cringe

Khelly wrote:

RoseusJaeger wrote:

Cringe

Im waiting for Stefan to lock this thread

Navizel wrote:

hey faust which route in A-1 is the best and why is Azumi's

Faust wrote:

Let's see.

Personally, I like Benkei's the best.
It has everything. It's the real meat of the A-1 fan-disc imo. (But everyone knows that)

Sayaka if you like the little sister types.
Good character introduction/expansion that progresses nicely into a relationship. Short & sweet.

I skipped Azumi because I have no interest at the moment, but will get to it on a future date.



B E N K E I
A P P R E C I A T I O N
N O W

Khelly wrote:

If you kill lolis how will any girl develop

Mahogany wrote:

trump is bad, hilary is bad, everybody loses nobody wins the end

Discussion over :^)

Navizel wrote:

Bane is the best. Hillary is accurate at least.

Hobbes2 wrote:

2 party system is trash

send help

Hobbes2 wrote:

2 party system is trash

send help

if (surname != 'Clinton')
    do getRekt();
else
    do nothing();