estellia-style-post
the map has litaerlly tilted evry1 including mosntrata lol.. all of ur posts r like whAT THE FUCK ? ? ? ?
Broccoly wrote:
Right now, however, you're sacrificing both visuals and playability in an attempt to express the music, which is something that a beatmap should not aim for. Osu! is a rhythm game and not Visual Art.
>sacrificing visuals
>visual art
>basically implying visual art has no visuals
i can tell the point ur tryng 2 make is tht ur killing the map by tryharding visuals but ur sounding rlly contradictory in this sht lo
Monstrata wrote:
I want to stress the part about laughing with the map though, because by laughing with the map, you do embrace it, for all its craziness. If you think I am mapping solely for lolz, then you are mistaken, so please let me explain. This map strives to embrace not merely the prettiness in surface mapping, in aesthetics,... in people... but also their internal elegance.
u contradict/sound like ur contradicting urself A LOT thruout this whole thrd l o this is just the worst 1 imo
Kuki wrote:
the song is ugly so the map is ugly? but ugly is often bad, but we shouldn't look at ugly maps and say they're bad, so bad maps are good, so every map with problems is now ok because we don't want to be rude and force our opinions on you
the fuk is this logic
Spaghetti wrote:
he ignores everyone without particular issues because there isn't any issues to be addressed?
u make it sound lik ppl r stating issues but monstrata is ignoring them cuz he takes them as "not issues"... ur proly tryna say that no1 is even posting issues but u just make it sound lik hes not adressing ppl tht r stating things which is incorrect and gives a bad vibe 2 monstrata l o l
estellia- wrote:
I haven't seen any sound agreement to ranking this map AT ALL, other than the sake of a disgustingly obnoxious statement.
ur post is also an obnoxiOU S STATEMEnt 2... ;/ sry budy. (and so is mine just so wer clear lo.)
--------------------------
Disagree:- "This map is MADE to be around the purpose of being ugly/disgusting." "It's the map's concept." (Partly disagree)
...what the fuck is this Monstrata. This statement itself causes for a whole lot of controversy. Themed mapping is good... usually... but aesthetics play a big role in how WELL the map will play, and can play. Aiming for messy is essentially aiming for a shitfest. Aiming for a shitfest ensures that the map will not play near as well as it could IF it was cleaner (key words:
cleaner and
messy. Looking nice and looking bad have nothing to do with a map's play-ability). Now I read/know that you are aiming for visuals more than you are for play-ability, and that makes obvious sense, but it goes ENTIRELY against what mapping in general has shaped around/innovated on... since forever. Because of this, you will obviously need to have a strong and firm ground to support the shit people are flinging towards your map, but your contradictions in almost every statement you have made are not really helping you. You need to be more clear as to what you are REALLY basing the theme of this on, instead of jumping around to different ideas like, "I mapped this for people to laugh at," to, literally right after, "I didn't map this for people to laugh at, I actually mapped this for a very deep meaning." I can not side with Monstrata on this until he makes it obvious and clear as to what his map is REALLY aiming for, and what the concept is actually supposed to be.
Here is an idea. Make it clear as to what your true intentions are as how you are trying to explain to Sophia, except put it in the map description so everyone can see it. I do not know how effective it will that be, but I am sure it would clear things up a bit..
- "The song's first part is so hard, but the latter part isn't. This is bad."
If we are saying this is objectively bad, then this makes 0 sense. This, first of all, is the song's problem. Second of all, you can't just say that the song's composition is bad just because it has dynamic atmospheres within the song. The song does not fit your taste, so be it. Live with it. IT is NOT going to be the end of the world just because you do not like a song.
- Most of what is in Estellia's mod.
It is a messy, unorganized rant. I can not really say anything about it. It is mostly shit though, and it is not really helping Monstrata.
- "This map is like a beginner map."
WHAT THE FUCK LOL. This looks nowhere near as shit as a usual beginner's first few maps holy FUCK. The same people who are saying that this map is a spit on the face on new mappers are literally talking shit about this map, doing the same thing back. As a comparison, it is like tumblr SJWs complaining about how they are always oppressed, but the next second they go trash talking cishets and sending death threats to them. The oppressed part is true in most cases, but flinging shit just as bad is not making anything better.
This map has OBVIOUS structure and patterning put into it. What the fuck are you guys on?
Timorisu wrote:
This is seriously the worst thing I've ever seen. The only reason this gets attention and people defending it is because a relatively known mapper mapped it, seriously? If some rank 50k made this and tried to rank it there's no way in hell it'd be possible.
This kind of shit is always the worst kind of thing you can see on threads. It has no definite proof, it just sounds whiny as fuck, and it is just downright disrespectful to any mapper.
- "Leave the mapper alone."
As estellia said, "He uploaded this shit-fest, receiving criticism (be it constructive or not) shouldn't be a surprise in any form or manner." This should be no surprise for Monstrata, and he SHOULD HAVE seen this coming if he actually did not expect this backlash.
- "Circlejerk."
What does circlejerk even mean anymore. It has lost definite meaning like how "structure" in mapping jargon has.
--------------------------
Agree:CelsiusLK wrote:
if the map is intend to be ugly then saying this map is so ugly might be a compliment instead xd
This should be obvious. If the map is doing what it is intending to well, then it is probably good in that sense. The problem is that he (Monstrata) has not been justifying it well enough for people to understand and appreciate it in the same sense.
- "The map is shit."
I do not COMPLETELY agree with the statement, but I do dislike the map for what it is. That being said, I can not really do anything about it because that is just my personal opinion about it. Personal opinions at the current state of the ranking system do not matter.
- It's rankable.
Yeah, it is rankable. It is rankable though mostly because of the fact that anything can get ranked. The only thing that stands against the map's rank-ability is if people cause a massive shitstorm and send walls of mods at it each time it is qualified (like in Tengaku, and Routing), up to the point where the mapper gives up.
- Opinions matter at this place.
Yes, this is a huge thing that ranking SHOULD be about, but it is sadly not. You are not mapping solely for yourself when you are ranking a map. You are mapping for the community.. esp. the players in the community.
- "This map should not have been bubbled."
Even though most of this... "discussion," + the extra mods would not have came, the map should not have been bubbled so fast and easily, and I agree that Monstrata should have actively looked for more mods, and possibly more playtests. Even though this was mapped aesthetics > playability, you can not completely ignore playability for a game that people play.
Yeah.
--------------------------
ok le mod
general
- lol ur bg res is FUKD.. hers a bettr version
- tbh u sud get silent sliderslidez for the quiet part :0
lemod
- thx for changign the sliderz 2 1/3 lo
- 00:21:206 (1,2) - switch ncs here wot te fuk u fukd up... (if u dont get y then looka t the ncing on all ur other patterns around it D... also the 2 is the actual "strong beat"/measure so lmoa)
- 00:31:903 (3,4) - can u space thesea bit farthr THX Cx
- 00:56:864 (3,4,5,6) - 01:37:362 (2,3,4,5,6) - y do u do things lik this.. im assuming they play lik complet sht and theyr not rlly adding 2 the 'ugliness' tone of the map anyway :L at least thts wot isee lo
- 01:07:259 (1) - 01:12:060 (1) - 01:16:851 (1) - ir y cant tell if they ractualy off time but theY SOUND rlly offtime so idk
- 02:53:686 (1,1,2) - do u rlly think thts gunna play well for th e ppl tht can play this pattern lol this is lik evilelviss but wors :L
- 04:45:303 (1) - this acutaly sounds a teensy bit late dont u agre also id blanket 04:44:538 (6,1) - lo AESTHETIX XDXDXDXD
fwiw thers a differenc between laughgin at smth and laughign wit something lmoa HOLY FU K U MOSNTRATA ;/
not lookign at this thread anymor until the ranking status changez...... asid for the mod respons lo good nite.
edit: o yhjea plz giv kd.