02:47:139 (3) - consider making 02:47:257 clickable since it's quite a strong beat. maybe making (2) a reverse slider and adding a note could be an alternative.
02:48:668 (3,1,2) - remove nc for (1), add nc at (3,2).
02:51:316 (2) - It feels weird for this slider not being 1/3 since the beat of 02:50:786 (1,1,1) is pretty consistent. Look 02:54:139 (2).
02:58:198 (1,2) - starting nc from (2) will fit the song better.
03:31:899 (1) - I don't think this snapping is accurate.
03:36:808 (1,2,3) - Spacing lacks organization.
03:42:648 (1) - remove NC? I think that's what you did.
03:47:427 (2) - add nc? 03:30:262 (1) -
03:53:533 (4) - doubling the length would fit better imo.
05:04:594 (10) - consider nc.
05:17:594 (1) - check snapping.
05:21:325 (1,1,2) - 05:29:628 (1,2,3) - spacing could be better imo.
05:44:099 - This not being clickable felt weird, compared to 05:43:393.
05:46:274 (1) - I don't feel a beat here at the head.
05:51:319 (3) - I don't think the snapping changes at here.
02:48:668 (3,1,2) - remove nc for (1), add nc at (3,2).
02:51:316 (2) - It feels weird for this slider not being 1/3 since the beat of 02:50:786 (1,1,1) is pretty consistent. Look 02:54:139 (2).
02:58:198 (1,2) - starting nc from (2) will fit the song better.
03:31:899 (1) - I don't think this snapping is accurate.
03:36:808 (1,2,3) - Spacing lacks organization.
03:42:648 (1) - remove NC? I think that's what you did.
03:47:427 (2) - add nc? 03:30:262 (1) -
03:53:533 (4) - doubling the length would fit better imo.
05:04:594 (10) - consider nc.
05:17:594 (1) - check snapping.
05:21:325 (1,1,2) - 05:29:628 (1,2,3) - spacing could be better imo.
05:44:099 - This not being clickable felt weird, compared to 05:43:393.
05:46:274 (1) - I don't feel a beat here at the head.
05:51:319 (3) - I don't think the snapping changes at here.