It's interesting because we calculate those things by hitting or aiming something, but here we are doing the opposite. What constitutes to be a valid action is boundless because you are not confined to hit or aim a note. I think the only thing you can really use to score is either time or number of onbjects dodged. Combo could be the number of objects dodged in a row. Accuracy could be the % of the object dodged.Aikyuu-Chan wrote:
How do you calculate the score?
How do you calculate the accuracy?
How do you calculate the combo?
So, the lowest % accuracy is the winner?abraker wrote:
It's interesting because we calculate those things by hitting or aiming something, but here we are doing the opposite. What constitutes to be a valid action is boundless because you are not confined to hit or aim a note. I think the only thing you can really use to score is either time or number of onbjects dodged. Combo could be the number of objects dodged in a row. Accuracy could be the % of the object dodged.
or we can just have the beginning like 2m or 5m then "decount" when you dont dodge somethingabraker wrote:
It's interesting because we calculate those things by hitting or aiming something, but here we are doing the opposite. What constitutes to be a valid action is boundless because you are not confined to hit or aim a note. I think the only thing you can really use to score is either time or number of onbjects dodged. Combo could be the number of objects dodged in a row. Accuracy could be the % of the object dodged.Aikyuu-Chan wrote:
How do you calculate the score?
How do you calculate the accuracy?
How do you calculate the combo?
I don't think you read through the thread...Andruchon wrote:
I would really love to hear some Info from peppy about this, at least a "yes" or a "no"
It's been stickied, sign of something coming, maybe.Nurdieruhe wrote:
over 6000 votes and 6 years...Nothing...Borboratharidafeatbboyauftheriderhofxd
Sorry that reading through 28 pages is too much for me. And if you talk about that post-it... thats not really enough for meabraker wrote:
I don't think you read through the thread...
Andruchon wrote:
Sorry that reading through 28 pages is too much for me. And if you talk about that post-it... thats not really enough for meabraker wrote:
I don't think you read through the thread...
Many years ago he already said, that he will do it, but there is still no touhosu.
sameMrSergio wrote:
I'm still waiting for the star priority to reach 9,001 and do the "it's over 9,000 joke" lol
Everything is a mystery, but apparantly he is working on it. This was even sticked a month ago, but unsticked after a day or two :OMatutetute wrote:
Any updates on this?