is that so...DiamondCrash wrote:
You lied.
never would have thought of that
forum
Mafia Under the Sea (Game Over)
posted
Total Posts
397
never would have thought of that
Unvote
I have no reason to suspect 0_o, just random voting to spark conversation.
Not going to vote yet though, need to see how this turns out.
I have no reason to suspect 0_o, just random voting to spark conversation.
Not going to vote yet though, need to see how this turns out.
So, if I understand the point of the retarded joker role, it's to help the mafia slightly? Just how likely is the role to appear in a game this size do you all think?
Regardless of what strager gave as evidence, I still don't believe that heshe is the joker. I think it was just something heshe lucked? into, since they admittedly don't know what they are doing.
Regardless of what strager gave as evidence, I still don't believe that heshe is the joker. I think it was just something heshe lucked? into, since they admittedly don't know what they are doing.
DiamondCrash wrote:
You lied.
LS' Big Mafia 1 had a Jester which basically is the joker.
I don't believe this joker crap though. Either Nakata is really really dumb, really really really dumb or really smart.
Judging them I'm inching towards one of the first two.
I don't believe this joker crap though. Either Nakata is really really dumb, really really really dumb or really smart.
Judging them I'm inching towards one of the first two.
the fact that you don't know....Wojjan wrote:
LS' Big Mafia 1 had a Jester which basically is the joker.
I don't believe this joker crap though. Either Nakata is really really dumb, really really really dumb or really smart.
Judging them I'm inching towards one of the first two.
I wouldn't say he's dumb, he's just new to this stuff that's all.Wojjan wrote:
Either Nakata is really really dumb, really really really dumb or really smart.
Judging them I'm inching towards one of the first two.
Anyway, if he is the jester and none of us want a shared win, then a fairly standard way of dealing with it is by not lynching him today and letting the mafia NK him tonight. If he is not NK'd tonight then we lynch him tomorrow. This way, if he is a predator then yay, we lynch a predator tomorrow. If not, the mafia won't want to take a chance that he is a jester and kill him tonight so we don't lynch him tomorrow.
Though again, this is only if nobody wants a shared win. I dunno how the predators would feel about sharing their win in exchange for a human being lynched tomorrow, and I don't know what all of you think either. So DISCUSS.
Why would they nightkill himher? If the game continues even after a joker's death, I don't see the downside for the mafia. I don't even see a point to the joker role existing except to help the mafia... so please tell me how what you said makes sense.0_o wrote:
Anyway, if he is the jester and none of us want a shared win, then a fairly standard way of dealing with it is by not lynching him today and letting the mafia NK him tonight. If he is not NK'd tonight then we lynch him tomorrow. This way, if he is a predator then yay, we lynch a predator tomorrow. If not, the mafia won't want to take a chance that he is a jester and kill him tonight so we don't lynch him tomorrow.
Hopefully someone points out the obvious....
I'm not going to be the one to say it.
I'm not going to be the one to say it.
Two wrote:
Why would they nightkill himher? If the game continues even after a joker's death, I don't see the downside for the mafia. I don't even see a point to the joker role existing except to help the mafia... so please tell me how what you said makes sense.
Basically the only reason for nightkilling the jester would be so if they won, the game would be a "Predator win!" and not "Predator and Jester win!" But then again,0_o wrote:
Though again, this is only if nobody wants a shared win.
Maybe they're greedy and want the game to themselves - maybe not.0_o wrote:
I dunno how the predators would feel about sharing their win in exchange for a human being lynched tomorrow
All I know is that there have been several osu!mafia games with a jester involved, and I wouldn't put it past SFG to throw one into this one.
EDIT:
err.. why? Just say it.Nakata Yuji wrote:
Hopefully someone points out the obvious....
I'm not going to be the one to say it.
It may or may not be to my advantage.
I haven't seen a small game (13 people) have a jester yet. (though I may be wrong since I haven't exactly joined a lot of games)
Though the probability of having a jester are slim, there's still a chance.
Nakata's actions scream Jester to me, yet he's doing it wrong.
(Basically) Openly admitting that you're a jester won't get you lynched.
Instead people will use reverse psychology and assume that you're just pretending to be a jester.
Though the probability of having a jester are slim, there's still a chance.
Nakata's actions scream Jester to me, yet he's doing it wrong.
(Basically) Openly admitting that you're a jester won't get you lynched.
Instead people will use reverse psychology and assume that you're just pretending to be a jester.
- If they are the joker, they're just going to keep saying annoyingly stupid things
- If they are the joker, they won't get nightkilled (unless the mafia is retarded this game, like the wolves from the past 2 games)
- If they aren't the joker, they won't get nightkilled (unless the mafia is retarded this game, like the wolves from the past 2 games)
- If they are a part of the mafia, they won't get nightkilled obviously.
Basically the only way around being stuck with the bill of lynching them is for someone to investigate them.
- If they are the joker, they won't get nightkilled (unless the mafia is retarded this game, like the wolves from the past 2 games)
- If they aren't the joker, they won't get nightkilled (unless the mafia is retarded this game, like the wolves from the past 2 games)
- If they are a part of the mafia, they won't get nightkilled obviously.
Basically the only way around being stuck with the bill of lynching them is for someone to investigate them.
This is confusing 
We don't even know if there is a joker
We don't even know if there is a joker
Topic Starter
If activity doesn't pick up, I'm going to start trying to replace players and move the deadline for the lynch forwards.
Sorry, it's bugging me: the role's actually called the Jester, not Joker.
Also, mod: If a jester is investigated, would the outcome be Guilty or Not Guilty (assuming investigations don't reveal entire roles)?
Also, mod: If a jester is investigated, would the outcome be Guilty or Not Guilty (assuming investigations don't reveal entire roles)?
*glare*NoHItter wrote:
I haven't seen a small game (13 people) have a jester yet. (though I may be wrong since I haven't exactly joined a lot of games)
Though the probability of having a jester are slim, there's still a chance.
Nakata's actions scream Jester to me, yet he's doing it wrong.
(Basically) Openly admitting that you're a jester won't get you lynched.
Instead people will use reverse psychology and assume that you're just pretending to be a jester.
you got me.
Topic Starter
Possible results of an investigation include "mafia," "neutral," and "town." A jester, along with any other third party, would come up as being "neutral."
WIFOM. A tricky jester could pretend to be a mafia pretending to be a jester. Although seeing as he's a new player, it would seem more likely that if he was the jester then he would bank on everyone else not knowing about the possibility of a jester role.NoHItter wrote:
Nakata's actions scream Jester to me, yet he's doing it wrong.
(Basically) Openly admitting that you're a jester won't get you lynched.
Instead people will use reverse psychology and assume that you're just pretending to be a jester.
I'm not exactly sure what this implies..Nakata wrote:
*glare*
you got me.
What exactly makes you think this?0_o wrote:
Although seeing as he's a new player.
Were you supposed to?0_o wrote:
I'm not exactly sure what this implies..Nakata wrote:
*glare*
you got me.
viewtopic.php?p=498609#p498609Nakata Yuji wrote:
What exactly makes you think this?0_o wrote:
Although seeing as he's a new player.
oh.
*is noob at this*
teehee
If you are saying things that nobody gets then you aren't really adding anything and are only throwing suspicion at yourself.Nakata wrote:
Were you supposed to?0_o wrote:
I'm not exactly sure what this implies..
Would I possibly want to do that?0_o wrote:
If you are saying things that nobody gets then you aren't really adding anything and are only throwing suspicion at yourself.
Also, you're quite trusting.
on principle I'd rather lynch the inactive people, but for the love of god can we get rid of this guy
I agree with the second part of Two's post, especially since lynching, whether or not it's scum, will help the town.
Vote: Nakata Yuji
Vote: Nakata Yuji
Easy buddy, it's just a game.Two wrote:
on principle I'd rather lynch the inactive people, but for the love of god can we get rid of this guy
lynching a townie helps the town? am i missing something here?rust45 wrote:
I agree with the second part of Two's post, especially since lynching, whether or not it's scum, will help the town.
Vote: Nakata Yuji
by all means, though.
Basically you're causing mass confusion, and getting rid of the source is a beneficial thing.Nakata Yuji wrote:
lynching a townie helps the town? am i missing something here?
by all means, though.
I thought he was making a blanket statement :30_o wrote:
Basically you're causing mass confusion, and getting rid of the source is a beneficial thing.Nakata Yuji wrote:
lynching a townie helps the town? am i missing something here?
by all means, though.
either way, it's fun doing it, so even if i get lynched, i've had my fun.
Alright I'm gonna be gone from the 13th to the 23rd; I think I will have minimal access to the internet so I'll try to stay on top of the game as much as I can, but I probably won't be as active as usual.
so where is matthewtck, oyashiro beatrice and pieguy1372?
and can you people who aren't voting for nakata yuji please try to convince us not to vote for them, to both stimulate the game and explain why you haven't voted for them yourselves thx
and can you people who aren't voting for nakata yuji please try to convince us not to vote for them, to both stimulate the game and explain why you haven't voted for them yourselves thx
Sorry, been out-of-state for a while....I stopped understanding WTH was going on, so I'll just change my vote to the most obvious person, still got a few things to do IRL and may not be that active.
Vote: Nakata Yuji
Vote: Nakata Yuji
And I am a removed.
Okay, that's actually 6, nvm.
yeah, i should have probably counted before i put up that spoiler, you probably caught that ._.Two wrote:
unvote
let's keep that a secret, mm?
on behalf of strager
I'm curious as why Two unvoted.
Reason please?
Also, what did Nakata post before he "removed" it.
Reason please?
Also, what did Nakata post before he "removed" it.
I haven't posted because I haven't made up my mind yet, especially now that I can assume Nakata Yuji had an important role of sorts. Unless he was a wolf pretending to have such a role, or unless Two and Nakata Yuji are both wolves. (I didn't vote Nakata Yuji previously because I had a hunch it would be a bad idea, but eh.)
That actually seems rather likely, both Two and Nakata Yuji being wolves. o_o If they were two wolves and putting on a show to fool all of us, it would definitely make sense if Nakata Yuji went and confused all of us and then Two played Nakata Yuji off as innocent just now. On the other hand, this situation would make a lot of sense if both of them were townsfolk or of either one of them was a wolf. Now I really can't make up my mind...
Anyway, might as well vote Two since I'm still not sure about lynching Nakata Yuji at this point.
That actually seems rather likely, both Two and Nakata Yuji being wolves. o_o If they were two wolves and putting on a show to fool all of us, it would definitely make sense if Nakata Yuji went and confused all of us and then Two played Nakata Yuji off as innocent just now. On the other hand, this situation would make a lot of sense if both of them were townsfolk or of either one of them was a wolf. Now I really can't make up my mind...
Anyway, might as well vote Two since I'm still not sure about lynching Nakata Yuji at this point.
But you are sure about Two?pieguy1372 wrote:
Anyway, might as well vote Two since I'm still not sure about lynching Nakata Yuji at this point.
Two was the only person that saw it. Both strager and I refreshed just that little too late. I'm not sure what possible reason Two might have for keeping this information hid, other than covering for Nakata.NoHItter wrote:
Also, what did Nakata post before he "removed" it.
@Mashley: If we lynch Nakata Yuji and he turns out to be innocent we'll likely end up losing a very important role given how Two was acting. (Note that Two would act that way regardless of whether he is a wolf or not because if he is he'd want to avoid suspicion.) As a result lynching Two seems like a safer bet.
The problem with your logic is that if they did indeed claim to be a valuable role, and I was a wolf, I could have not only avoided suspicion but I could have lynched that valuable role by simply doing nothing.
This has taken an interesting turn of events.
I see why people are voting for Two as it is, as he's been very aggressive.
Given what I posted, even I don't know why he unvoted.
Unvote, btw.
I see why people are voting for Two as it is, as he's been very aggressive.
Given what I posted, even I don't know why he unvoted.
Unvote, btw.
Topic Starter
At some point I will stop being lazy and put a constantly updated votecount onto the first page. But right now I'm lazy. Activity's better now. Remember that Day 1 will end a week from tomorrow. The long list of names will remain for ease of copying and pasting because I'm a lazy mod, but I will color people with votes on them.
The Mod is Lazy Votecount
matthewtck (1) - Wojjan
pieguy1372 (0)
strager (0)
0_o (0)
DiamondCrash (0)
Mashley (0)
NoHitter (0)
Oyashiro Beatrice (0)
meronmyon (0)
Nakata Yuji (5) - NoHitter, Mashley, mernomyon, rust45, Oyashiro Beatrice
Two (2) - strager, pieguy1372
Wojjan (0)
rust45 (0)
Not Voting (5) - matthewtck, 0_o, DiamondCrash, Two, Nakata Yuji
Nakata Yuji is at L-2!
With 13 alive, it takes 7 to lynch...
The Mod is Lazy Votecount
matthewtck (1) - Wojjan
pieguy1372 (0)
strager (0)
0_o (0)
DiamondCrash (0)
Mashley (0)
NoHitter (0)
Oyashiro Beatrice (0)
meronmyon (0)
Nakata Yuji (5) - NoHitter, Mashley, mernomyon, rust45, Oyashiro Beatrice
Two (2) - strager, pieguy1372
Wojjan (0)
rust45 (0)
Not Voting (5) - matthewtck, 0_o, DiamondCrash, Two, Nakata Yuji
Nakata Yuji is at L-2!
With 13 alive, it takes 7 to lynch...
troll?Wojjan wrote:
Maybe he publicly claimed wolf and gave up?
Anyone else notice that "Jester" Nakata is gone?
People realise Nataka is acting Jester - Nataka stops acting Jester
Cause and effect, NoHItter
Cause and effect, NoHItter
Are you people paying attention at all? This is the most lonely werewolf-esque game I've ever played
He's been acting the same way up until he thought he was lynched. It had nothing to do with what anyone else thought.
He's been acting the same way up until he thought he was lynched. It had nothing to do with what anyone else thought.
After looking back over this thread, I don't think you actually believed what you said. Spoilerboxed since it's a wall of text.
SPOILER
then,
Then, Mashley posted a screenshot of the pm that Nakata sent him. He had to remove it, but this is what was said in response:
and again...:
later he posted:
and finally:
so vote: Mashley^ being cute, relevant later if you read the restNakata Yuji wrote:
Vote: mashley
dat foolMashley wrote:
I'm not a fool
then,
Nakata Yuji wrote:
''Wojjan wrote:
Can't we just nolynch today? We have nothing to go on''
she wants the kill
unvote
vote:Wojjan
gogogoogog
so I voted for him, and was followed by nohitter and mashley; mashley's post was:Nakata Yuji wrote:
''Wojjan wrote:
Could you maybe, you know, read my other post?''
i just want the day to end, actually
also i would consider that a facade
In retrospect, there are several things about this post that rub me the wrong way. The first is the, by itself, innocent fact that they voted as part of a bandwagon. The next part most people will probably disagree with me on, but it's "Yeah, this is very suspicious". Stating things as fact actually is a very effective way to persuade people, as they take it in subconsciously. It's similar to how people say the person's name that they're talking to in order to gain control of a conversation. I think that it was deliberately stated that way, and this is backed up by the last bit, "Now, if we assume that Nataka is scum, then that would make Wojjan and 0_o innocent, wouldn't it?", where he tries to influence the game's perception of not only Nakata, but of Wojjan, 0_o, and himself. Making people believe that x cannot be y because x is opposite of z is extremely valuable for wolves/mafia/whatever, since it allows one of their members to go unsuspected and coast to the finish line.Mashley wrote:
Yeah, this is very suspicious. Nataka seems anxious to get the day over with and have someone out. Here's a PM I recieved from her:
Quote:
change your vote to wojjan or 0_o and I'll change mine to what you do
Now, if we assume that Nataka is scum, then that would make Wojjan and 0_o innocent, wouldn't it?
Unvote, Vote Nataka Yuji
Then, Mashley posted a screenshot of the pm that Nakata sent him. He had to remove it, but this is what was said in response:
^ ">_<" is acting cute/innocent againMashley wrote:
"Nakata Yuji wrote:
notice how you can't see what he sent."
What exactly are you suggesting? >_<
and again...:
Only this time he not only tries to effect your perception with ">_<", but by stating "didn't you just admit to being scum a few posts ago?"Mashley wrote:
Want to explain how telling people about a suspicious PM you sent me is suspicious? Or are you just accusing me for the hell of it? And didn't you just admit to being scum a few posts ago? >_<
later he posted:
again trying to be perceived as ignorant/innocentMashley wrote:
This is confusing
and finally:
This is the post that made me go back and look. It's so painfully ignorant that it's on the same level as Wojjan's troll post. It's to the point where there just has to be an ulterior motive behind it. Yeah the motive could be good, but go back and find evidence in his posts that supports that, cause I couldn't find it.Mashley wrote:
People realise Nataka is acting Jester - Nataka stops acting Jester
Cause and effect, NoHItter
You based an entire argument on my use of smileys? You do realise I use those all the time, right?
And the thing with 0_o and Wojjan, that was an if. If Nataka ia scum, which I reckon she probably is, then her actions would suggest Wojjan and 0_o as innocent. I'm not trying to sway anything, just considering the possibility.
And the thing with 0_o and Wojjan, that was an if. If Nataka ia scum, which I reckon she probably is, then her actions would suggest Wojjan and 0_o as innocent. I'm not trying to sway anything, just considering the possibility.
downplaying things is also an effective tactic, but where does your mind trickery endMashley wrote:
You based an entire argument on my use of smileys? You do realise I use those all the time, right?
>_<?Because being effective makes me scum, right?
Mash dear I think you know enough of mafia games and the like to see that there's this certain tactic called distancing I and 0_o could be doing. If someone acts scummy and we jump on it to accuse him and lo behold it's really a mafia, then people will get townie vibes from us, while it's not certain that I'm actually town. See last game where two blatantly fell for my trickeries.
Since my vote is more or less useless with the almost-majority stck in yay-nay over Nakata, I might as well Unvote and vote at a later date. I'll put up a vote for a no lynch until I decide to drop in again, just to save me a nasty phantom vote for D2.
Oh 2, I really really think you could do better than calling people out on their use of emoticons.
>_<
Since my vote is more or less useless with the almost-majority stck in yay-nay over Nakata, I might as well Unvote and vote at a later date. I'll put up a vote for a no lynch until I decide to drop in again, just to save me a nasty phantom vote for D2.
Oh 2, I really really think you could do better than calling people out on their use of emoticons.
>_<when exactly did i quit acting jester...?
type with proper caps = not jester?
when did one ever say that jesters can't make pseudo-insightful posts?
and 2's speech of emoticons somewhat makes sense to me, I would compare the usage of such to judging one by facial expressions
though i'm probably just going to watch how this works out.
apparently, 2 knows what I am, so you might as well confirm what i am before you label me as scum <3
type with proper caps = not jester?
when did one ever say that jesters can't make pseudo-insightful posts?
and 2's speech of emoticons somewhat makes sense to me, I would compare the usage of such to judging one by facial expressions
though i'm probably just going to watch how this works out.
apparently, 2 knows what I am, so you might as well confirm what i am before you label me as scum <3
Around when it was pointed out that you were acting Jester, Nakata. I thought that was quite obvious.
Topic Starter
For the record, this game does not utilize phantom votes. If you are inactive you will be prodded. If you don't pick up your prod, I will forcibly replace you. If you are prodded repeatedly without any sign of picking up your activity beyond the bare minimum, I will forcibly replace you. If, after a significant period of time, I am unable to fill an inactive slot, that slot will be modkilled.Wojjan wrote:
I'll put up a vote for a no lynch until I decide to drop in again, just to save me a nasty phantom vote for D2.
It was really more or less after I had "give up".Mashley wrote:
Around when it was pointed out that you were acting Jester, Nakata. I thought that was quite obvious.
When I was pointed out as a Jester, I responded:
There could be significance behind all of this.secksey wrote:
*glare*
you got me.
0_o seems to have been right on the whole time, but you know.
How can you know
But you said that before anyone said you might be a jester?
It was pointed out when strager instructed Cuddles to post that he thought that I was an obvious Jester.Mashley wrote:
But you said that before anyone said you might be a jester?
I said that afterwards bro <3
there isn't a jester in this game
you can quote me on that and rub it in my face after this game is over, if I'm wrong
you can quote me on that and rub it in my face after this game is over, if I'm wrong
we'll just have to find out, won't we?
No... you didn't... Go and look back at the postsNakata Yuji wrote:
It was pointed out when strager instructed Cuddles to post that he thought that I was an obvious Jester.Mashley wrote:
But you said that before anyone said you might be a jester?
I said that afterwards bro <3
Nakata Yuji wrote:
damn you got me.
vote for me guys.
page 8 bud
edit: okay, i did say that before strager's post, but still, page 8
edit: okay, i did say that before strager's post, but still, page 8
I'm not sure I follow you... are you trying to roleclaim Jester or what?
Wojjan wrote:
Aha. There's our WIFOM.
unvote, vote Mashley
also can you prod these people thx:
matthewtck
pieguy1372
strager
0_o
DiamondCrash
Oyashiro Beatrice
meronmyon
rust45
also can you prod these people thx:
matthewtck
pieguy1372
strager
0_o
DiamondCrash
Oyashiro Beatrice
meronmyon
rust45
Topic Starter
matthewtck has already been prodded, I will prod the rest within a couple days.
Well well. You've been very very indecisive as of late Two. You just now said there is not a jester in this game, and Nakata is playing against town, be he a townie or predator. I'm all for lynching people playing against tow, how about you?Two wrote:
unvote, vote Mashley
you've been trolling for the past 4+ posts, wojjan
for what?
for what?
let's keep this civil guys
Avoiding prod. Also, my vote still stands.
Claiming Jester as town:
You "protect" yourself, but cause massive confusion for town.
Claiming Jester as scum:
You "protect" yourself, and cause massive confusion for town.
You "protect" yourself, but cause massive confusion for town.
Claiming Jester as scum:
You "protect" yourself, and cause massive confusion for town.
Nakata Yuji; Roleclaim.
wow?DiamondCrash wrote:
Nakata Yuji; Roleclaim.
so are you waiting for the 6th vote to lynch them or what? that's what wolves usually do day 1
I have no plan to vote for Nakata, thanks.
so your plan is to nightkill unless they roleclaim something useless, then?
No, because I don't have any nightkilling abilities.
Silly two.
Silly two.
I don't see how nakata roleclaiming would benefit town at all. You people are already guaranteeing they get night killed anyway, since you wouldn't leave talk about their role alone. It's also made me consider why even after the post they made, thinking they were already dead, all of you are still voting for them. Is it maybe because half of the voters know that nakata is town and won't give up the lynch?
Nakata Yuji (5) - NoHitter, Mashley, mernomyon, rust45, Oyashiro Beatrice
On behalf of strager;
strager wrote:
Or is it because the voters are town and really think Nakata is scum, possibly because they *are* scum? And you're just trying to get votes off them to defend your buddy or some shit?Two wrote:
Is it maybe because half of the voters know that nakata is town and won't give up the lynch?
This is getting interesting.
I can't wait to see the conclusion that you guys come to.
magikarp
I can't wait to see the conclusion that you guys come to.
magikarp
Why would I start the chain of votes on my "buddy"? I'm not stupid enough to not know how sticky votes are on the first day. More importantly, why have you still not posted a reason for voting for me? I thought the vote was just your usual bs so I ignored it, but I guess you have a reason?
This is all a distraction though. While I don't know if nakata was honest when they posted their role, I really think they were because of the circumstances and how they've been playing so far. Please don't be dumb and lynch them thx.
This is all a distraction though. While I don't know if nakata was honest when they posted their role, I really think they were because of the circumstances and how they've been playing so far. Please don't be dumb and lynch them thx.
well, you started the chain previous to the revelation of my role.Two wrote:
Why would I start the chain of votes on my "buddy"? I'm not stupid enough to not know how sticky votes are on the first day. More importantly, why have you still not posted a reason for voting for me? I thought the vote was just your usual bs so I ignored it, but I guess you have a reason?
This is all a distraction though. While I don't know if nakata was honest when they posted their role, I really think they were because of the circumstances and how they've been playing so far. Please don't be dumb and lynch them thx.
(Posting for strager.)
I do have a reason.
You kept Nakata's roleclaim to yourself.
Either you're a Townie trying to cover up Nakata's mistake (in which case, why did you say in IRC that Nakata posted their role?) or you're scum trying to either (1) get the votes off your scum buddy who (oops!) "claimed" to get out of a rough situation, or (2) get votes onto another player by playing "hero" by "protecting" Nakata from "possible scum" (like DC and I, who were in IRC at the time).
If you had not gloated that you saw Nakata claim to DC and I in IRC, I may not have thought so much of your unvote and your keeping the roleclaim private. However, you did gloat, and you did refuse to reveal why you did unvote shortly thereafter. I cannot really see any other alternative than "Two is scum".
Yeah.Two wrote:
More importantly, why have you still not posted a reason for voting for me? I thought the vote was just your usual bs so I ignored it, but I guess you have a reason?
I do have a reason.
You kept Nakata's roleclaim to yourself.
Either you're a Townie trying to cover up Nakata's mistake (in which case, why did you say in IRC that Nakata posted their role?) or you're scum trying to either (1) get the votes off your scum buddy who (oops!) "claimed" to get out of a rough situation, or (2) get votes onto another player by playing "hero" by "protecting" Nakata from "possible scum" (like DC and I, who were in IRC at the time).
If you had not gloated that you saw Nakata claim to DC and I in IRC, I may not have thought so much of your unvote and your keeping the roleclaim private. However, you did gloat, and you did refuse to reveal why you did unvote shortly thereafter. I cannot really see any other alternative than "Two is scum".
This is complete bullshit and you know it as well as I (and any other veterans here, including SFG) do.Two wrote:
Why would I start the chain of votes on my "buddy"? I'm not stupid enough to not know how sticky votes are on the first day.
Prod avoided, I can't believe we're in distress over 1 person....I say eliminate the source of the trouble....
I see 2 controversial people at this point in time.
Either you're a Townie trying to cover up Nakata's mistake (in which case, why did you say in IRC that Nakata posted their role?) or you're scum trying to either (1) get the votes off your scum buddy who (oops!) "claimed" to get out of a rough situation, or (2) get votes onto another player by playing "hero" by "protecting" Nakata from "possible scum" (like DC and I, who were in IRC at the time).strager since we are on the subject of mafia/wwg veterans, why is it that one such as yourself limited the options to three? There are more than that.
are you trying to pull a Mashley here?
Wait, what?
Nice. "There are other options, but I can't think of any right now. You already stated the true case."Two wrote:
Either you're a Townie trying to cover up Nakata's mistake (in which case, why did you say in IRC that Nakata posted their role?) or you're scum trying to either (1) get the votes off your scum buddy who (oops!) "claimed" to get out of a rough situation, or (2) get votes onto another player by playing "hero" by "protecting" Nakata from "possible scum" (like DC and I, who were in IRC at the time).strager since we are on the subject of mafia/wwg veterans, why is it that one such as yourself limited the options to three? There are more than that.
are you trying to pull a Mashley here?
Hi, I can only get the Internet occasionally on my iPod so I won't be active until Monday.
Thank you, and have a great day.
*beeep*
Thank you, and have a great day.
*beeep*
bump?
And so it seems that the discussion has died....
Maybe you should contribute next time?Oyashiro Beatrice wrote:
And so it seems that the discussion has died....
Yeah, complaining when you didn't contribute much is stupid.
Anyway, I'll be out of town starting on the 22 and I won't be back till the 28, during that time I'll have limited access to the internet (if at all).
Anyway, I'll be out of town starting on the 22 and I won't be back till the 28, during that time I'll have limited access to the internet (if at all).
So uh, what's up?
Oh Mashely, strager wants you in the irc channel.
baaaack
I'll read through everything later on today and (hopefully) get back in this.
I'll read through everything later on today and (hopefully) get back in this.