Vote: mashley
dat fool
dat fool
forum
Mafia Under the Sea (Game Over)
posted
Total Posts
397
I'm not a fool 
tricky youMashley wrote:
I'm not a fool
!bandwagon
Vote: Wojjan
Vote: Wojjan
How does not lynching anyone benefit the town, again? If you didn't notice, in the last werewolf game half of the wolves had revealing votes day 1. If no one is lynched, we have less information to work with later, on top of the fact that if no one is lynched then wolves get a free kill.Wojjan wrote:
Can't we just nolynch today? We have nothing to go on
Oh right roles are revealed in this game.
Carry on, lose your anemone.
Carry on, lose your anemone.
That's scum talk brothaWojjan wrote:
Can't we just nolynch today? We have nothing to go on
she wants the killWojjan wrote:
Can't we just nolynch today? We have nothing to go on
unvote
vote:Wojjan
gogogoogog
i just want the day to end, actuallyWojjan wrote:
Could you maybe, you know, read my other post?
also i would consider that a facade
The fact that Nakata Yuji wanted day to end, and basically jumped on the bandwagon to lynch Wojjan seems suspicious, even after Wojjan withdrew her previous statement.Nakata Yuji wrote:
i just want the day to end, actually
also i would consider that a facade
Vote: Nakata Yuji
Yeah, this is very suspicious. Nataka seems anxious to get the day over with and have someone out. Here's a PM I recieved from her:
Unvote, Vote Nataka Yuji
change your vote to wojjan or 0_o and I'll change mine to what you doNow, if we assume that Nataka is scum, then that would make Wojjan and 0_o innocent, wouldn't it?
Unvote, Vote Nataka Yuji
Is that all of what was in that message?
damn you got me.
vote for me guys.
vote for me guys.
Yep
Edit: Some stupid rule
Edit: Some stupid rule
Jester, anyone?
notice how you can't see what he sent.
also, i don't really care if i get voted out. i just want to spectate, at most.
let the day end.
vote me out, and that's seriously just a free kill.
but again, i don't care.
also, i don't really care if i get voted out. i just want to spectate, at most.
let the day end.
vote me out, and that's seriously just a free kill.
but again, i don't care.
Topic Starter
Just a note, screenshots of private communications are not allowed because they cannot be easily modified. Paraphrasing or direct quoting is allowed. You have been warned.
What exactly are you suggesting? >_<Nakata Yuji wrote:
notice how you can't see what he sent.
nothing, good sir.Mashley wrote:
What exactly are you suggesting? >_<Nakata Yuji wrote:
notice how you can't see what he sent.
confidentiality was implied, and you kind of broke that.
then you go ahead and protect yourself further.
that's a bit suspicious to me.
so why exactly haven't you posted what you said that he didn't show
Want to explain how telling people about a suspicious PM you sent me is suspicious? Or are you just accusing me for the hell of it? And didn't you just admit to being scum a few posts ago? >_<
IV5. Do not insult other players personally.Mashley wrote:
Want to explain how telling people about a suspicious PM you sent me is suspicious? Or are you just accusing me for the hell of it? And didn't you just admit to being scum a few posts ago? >_<
tread carefully.
and it's exactly as you say it is. think about it.
Topic Starter
Votecount the Second
matthewtck (1) - Wojjan,
pieguy1372 (0)
strager (0)
0_o (2) - rust45, meronmyon
DiamondCrash (0)
Mashley (0)
NoHitter (0)
Oyashiro Beatrice (0)
meronmyon (0)
Nakata Yuji (3) - Two, NoHitter, Mashley
Two (0)
Wojjan (3) - DiamondCrash, Nakata Yuji, Oyashiro Beatrice
rust45 (0)
Not Voting (4) - matthewtck, pieguy1372, strager, 0_o
With 13 alive, it takes 7 to lynch...
matthewtck (1) - Wojjan,
pieguy1372 (0)
strager (0)
0_o (2) - rust45, meronmyon
DiamondCrash (0)
Mashley (0)
NoHitter (0)
Oyashiro Beatrice (0)
meronmyon (0)
Nakata Yuji (3) - Two, NoHitter, Mashley
Two (0)
Wojjan (3) - DiamondCrash, Nakata Yuji, Oyashiro Beatrice
rust45 (0)
Not Voting (4) - matthewtck, pieguy1372, strager, 0_o
With 13 alive, it takes 7 to lynch...
Would you mind only showing the people who have votes on them? It's a little cumbersome to have to go through all those zeroes.
he wasn't insulting youNakata Yuji wrote:
IV5. Do not insult other players personally.
tread carefully.
you also completely ignored me
I wrote:
so why exactly haven't you posted what you said that he didn't show
just saw this now...Two wrote:
so why exactly haven't you posted what you said that he didn't show
can't take screenshots..
and likely that anything i say will be rejected by mash.
i'll leave it up to your imagination. look at what i said, then think of something that he would say that would make me say what i said after.
also, i never called myself scum.
scum is used to refer to the mafia, wolves, or what have you
it's not derogatory if that's what you interpreted it as
also that is a really pathetic excuse
it's not derogatory if that's what you interpreted it as
also that is a really pathetic excuse
oh.Two wrote:
scum is used to refer to the mafia, wolves, or what have you
it's not derogatory if that's what you interpreted it as
*is noob at this*
teehee
It'll be rejected unless you say the truth, for obvious reasons. Here's the message I sent:
Nah, the guy I voted seems more likely to be scum than them, and even if he isn't he still a sucky player.
think so...?Two wrote:
also that is a really pathetic excuse
interesting to see sherlock at work
Unvote!
Vote: Nakata Yuji
Vote: Nakata Yuji
might as well lynch me now
Vote: Nakata Yuji
Nataka: why did you want to vote for me? I only had one post at a time, and it was a Finding Nemo quote.
acting as strager's proxy until he is unbanned:
12:58 <@stragerLN> Wow
12:58 <@stragerLN> People are REALLY sheeping into nakata
12:59 <@stragerLN> he/she is CLEARLY a joker. He/she has been setting it up from the start.
12:59 <@stragerLN> viewtopic.php?p=496602#p496602
12:59 <@stragerLN> last comment.
13:00 <@stragerLN> viewtopic.php?p=496727#p496727
13:00 <@stragerLN> Blatantly lying, and telling people to vote for someone without voting for them herself?
13:01 <@stragerLN> viewtopic.php?p=497875#p497875
13:01 <@stragerLN> I dunno what to think of this. Probably a newb mistake, though. I don't find it that suspicious, contrary
to some others.
13:01 <@stragerLN> viewtopic.php?p=497879#p497879
13:01 <@stragerLN> == scummy
13:01 <@stragerLN> (as has been pointed out)
13:01 <@stragerLN> viewtopic.php?p=498479#p498479
13:01 <@stragerLN> Gave up "playfully"; Joker tell
13:02 <@stragerLN> viewtopic.php?p=498489#p498489
13:02 <@stragerLN> More joker or vanilla tells
13:02 <@stragerLN> (But we all have special roles so there's no real vanilla ... though maybe I'm wrong)
13:02 <@stragerLN> viewtopic.php?p=498518#p498518
13:03 <@stragerLN> She only brought this up LATER, which means what she said in this post wasn't the reason she posted what she
did post in her previous post.
13:03 <@stragerLN> viewtopic.php?p=498587#p498587
13:04 <@stragerLN> Avoiding the question; "you already know"; scummy behaviour
13:04 <@stragerLN> viewtopic.php?p=498605#p498605
13:04 <@stragerLN> same
13:04 <@stragerLN> viewtopic.php?p=498612#p498612
13:04 <@stragerLN> She complained about personal insults, and here she is, being insulting
13:04 <@stragerLN> viewtopic.php?p=498618#p498618
13:04 <@stragerLN> More vanilla/joker
oh, it's because i wanted the day to end. tbh you had 2 votes, same as wojjan, which is why0_o wrote:
Nataka: why did you want to vote for me? I only had one post at a time, and it was a Finding Nemo quote.
edit: also bruce is a shark
!Cuddlebun wrote:
acting as strager's proxy until he is unbanned:12:58 <@stragerLN> Wow
12:58 <@stragerLN> People are REALLY sheeping into nakata
12:59 <@stragerLN> he/she is CLEARLY a joker. He/she has been setting it up from the start.
12:59 <@stragerLN> viewtopic.php?p=496602#p496602
12:59 <@stragerLN> last comment.
13:00 <@stragerLN> viewtopic.php?p=496727#p496727
13:00 <@stragerLN> Blatantly lying, and telling people to vote for someone without voting for them herself?
13:01 <@stragerLN> viewtopic.php?p=497875#p497875
13:01 <@stragerLN> I dunno what to think of this. Probably a newb mistake, though. I don't find it that suspicious, contrary
to some others.
13:01 <@stragerLN> viewtopic.php?p=497879#p497879
13:01 <@stragerLN> == scummy
13:01 <@stragerLN> (as has been pointed out)
13:01 <@stragerLN> viewtopic.php?p=498479#p498479
13:01 <@stragerLN> Gave up "playfully"; Joker tell
13:02 <@stragerLN> viewtopic.php?p=498489#p498489
13:02 <@stragerLN> More joker or vanilla tells
13:02 <@stragerLN> (But we all have special roles so there's no real vanilla ... though maybe I'm wrong)
13:02 <@stragerLN> viewtopic.php?p=498518#p498518
13:03 <@stragerLN> She only brought this up LATER, which means what she said in this post wasn't the reason she posted what she
did post in her previous post.
13:03 <@stragerLN> viewtopic.php?p=498587#p498587
13:04 <@stragerLN> Avoiding the question; "you already know"; scummy behaviour
13:04 <@stragerLN> viewtopic.php?p=498605#p498605
13:04 <@stragerLN> same
13:04 <@stragerLN> viewtopic.php?p=498612#p498612
13:04 <@stragerLN> She complained about personal insults, and here she is, being insulting
13:04 <@stragerLN> viewtopic.php?p=498618#p498618
13:04 <@stragerLN> More vanilla/joker
i surmise something like a trollTwo wrote:
what the hell is a joker
A joker wins when he is lynched. They lose if they are alive when the game ends, or if they are night killed.
in my case, i kind of want to play, but i don't mind if i get lynched.0_o wrote:
A joker wins when he is lynched, loses if he is NK'd/alive when the game ends.
if anyone wanted to know.
What does "the joker wins when he is lynched" mean? It's like a third faction (town/mafia/joker)? If so that is really dumb.
i think it's probably self satisfaction.Two wrote:
What does "the joker wins when he is lynched" mean? It's like a third faction (town/mafia/joker)? If so that is really dumb.
[13:39] <stragerLN> Mention that the game still continues if the Joker wins or loses
[13:39] <stragerLN> also
[13:39] <stragerLN> viewtopic.php?p=498675#p498675
[13:39] <stragerLN> Didn't deny it
[13:39] <stragerLN> +1 for being a joker
Yeah, it's a third party. Unvote.Two wrote:
What does "the joker wins when he is lynched" mean? It's like a third faction (town/mafia/joker)? If so that is really dumb.
*fist pump*
also, how would i be a joker if i didn't even know what one was in the first place...?
hmmmmmmm
also, how would i be a joker if i didn't even know what one was in the first place...?
hmmmmmmm
You lied.
is that so...DiamondCrash wrote:
You lied.
never would have thought of that
Unvote
I have no reason to suspect 0_o, just random voting to spark conversation.
Not going to vote yet though, need to see how this turns out.
I have no reason to suspect 0_o, just random voting to spark conversation.
Not going to vote yet though, need to see how this turns out.
So, if I understand the point of the retarded joker role, it's to help the mafia slightly? Just how likely is the role to appear in a game this size do you all think?
Regardless of what strager gave as evidence, I still don't believe that heshe is the joker. I think it was just something heshe lucked? into, since they admittedly don't know what they are doing.
Regardless of what strager gave as evidence, I still don't believe that heshe is the joker. I think it was just something heshe lucked? into, since they admittedly don't know what they are doing.
DiamondCrash wrote:
You lied.
LS' Big Mafia 1 had a Jester which basically is the joker.
I don't believe this joker crap though. Either Nakata is really really dumb, really really really dumb or really smart.
Judging them I'm inching towards one of the first two.
I don't believe this joker crap though. Either Nakata is really really dumb, really really really dumb or really smart.
Judging them I'm inching towards one of the first two.
the fact that you don't know....Wojjan wrote:
LS' Big Mafia 1 had a Jester which basically is the joker.
I don't believe this joker crap though. Either Nakata is really really dumb, really really really dumb or really smart.
Judging them I'm inching towards one of the first two.
I wouldn't say he's dumb, he's just new to this stuff that's all.Wojjan wrote:
Either Nakata is really really dumb, really really really dumb or really smart.
Judging them I'm inching towards one of the first two.
Anyway, if he is the jester and none of us want a shared win, then a fairly standard way of dealing with it is by not lynching him today and letting the mafia NK him tonight. If he is not NK'd tonight then we lynch him tomorrow. This way, if he is a predator then yay, we lynch a predator tomorrow. If not, the mafia won't want to take a chance that he is a jester and kill him tonight so we don't lynch him tomorrow.
Though again, this is only if nobody wants a shared win. I dunno how the predators would feel about sharing their win in exchange for a human being lynched tomorrow, and I don't know what all of you think either. So DISCUSS.
Why would they nightkill himher? If the game continues even after a joker's death, I don't see the downside for the mafia. I don't even see a point to the joker role existing except to help the mafia... so please tell me how what you said makes sense.0_o wrote:
Anyway, if he is the jester and none of us want a shared win, then a fairly standard way of dealing with it is by not lynching him today and letting the mafia NK him tonight. If he is not NK'd tonight then we lynch him tomorrow. This way, if he is a predator then yay, we lynch a predator tomorrow. If not, the mafia won't want to take a chance that he is a jester and kill him tonight so we don't lynch him tomorrow.
Hopefully someone points out the obvious....
I'm not going to be the one to say it.
I'm not going to be the one to say it.
Two wrote:
Why would they nightkill himher? If the game continues even after a joker's death, I don't see the downside for the mafia. I don't even see a point to the joker role existing except to help the mafia... so please tell me how what you said makes sense.
Basically the only reason for nightkilling the jester would be so if they won, the game would be a "Predator win!" and not "Predator and Jester win!" But then again,0_o wrote:
Though again, this is only if nobody wants a shared win.
Maybe they're greedy and want the game to themselves - maybe not.0_o wrote:
I dunno how the predators would feel about sharing their win in exchange for a human being lynched tomorrow
All I know is that there have been several osu!mafia games with a jester involved, and I wouldn't put it past SFG to throw one into this one.
EDIT:
err.. why? Just say it.Nakata Yuji wrote:
Hopefully someone points out the obvious....
I'm not going to be the one to say it.
It may or may not be to my advantage.
I haven't seen a small game (13 people) have a jester yet. (though I may be wrong since I haven't exactly joined a lot of games)
Though the probability of having a jester are slim, there's still a chance.
Nakata's actions scream Jester to me, yet he's doing it wrong.
(Basically) Openly admitting that you're a jester won't get you lynched.
Instead people will use reverse psychology and assume that you're just pretending to be a jester.
Though the probability of having a jester are slim, there's still a chance.
Nakata's actions scream Jester to me, yet he's doing it wrong.
(Basically) Openly admitting that you're a jester won't get you lynched.
Instead people will use reverse psychology and assume that you're just pretending to be a jester.
- If they are the joker, they're just going to keep saying annoyingly stupid things
- If they are the joker, they won't get nightkilled (unless the mafia is retarded this game, like the wolves from the past 2 games)
- If they aren't the joker, they won't get nightkilled (unless the mafia is retarded this game, like the wolves from the past 2 games)
- If they are a part of the mafia, they won't get nightkilled obviously.
Basically the only way around being stuck with the bill of lynching them is for someone to investigate them.
- If they are the joker, they won't get nightkilled (unless the mafia is retarded this game, like the wolves from the past 2 games)
- If they aren't the joker, they won't get nightkilled (unless the mafia is retarded this game, like the wolves from the past 2 games)
- If they are a part of the mafia, they won't get nightkilled obviously.
Basically the only way around being stuck with the bill of lynching them is for someone to investigate them.
This is confusing We don't even know if there is a joker
We don't even know if there is a joker
Topic Starter
If activity doesn't pick up, I'm going to start trying to replace players and move the deadline for the lynch forwards.
Sorry, it's bugging me: the role's actually called the Jester, not Joker.
Also, mod: If a jester is investigated, would the outcome be Guilty or Not Guilty (assuming investigations don't reveal entire roles)?
Also, mod: If a jester is investigated, would the outcome be Guilty or Not Guilty (assuming investigations don't reveal entire roles)?
*glare*NoHItter wrote:
I haven't seen a small game (13 people) have a jester yet. (though I may be wrong since I haven't exactly joined a lot of games)
Though the probability of having a jester are slim, there's still a chance.
Nakata's actions scream Jester to me, yet he's doing it wrong.
(Basically) Openly admitting that you're a jester won't get you lynched.
Instead people will use reverse psychology and assume that you're just pretending to be a jester.
you got me.
Topic Starter
Possible results of an investigation include "mafia," "neutral," and "town." A jester, along with any other third party, would come up as being "neutral."
WIFOM. A tricky jester could pretend to be a mafia pretending to be a jester. Although seeing as he's a new player, it would seem more likely that if he was the jester then he would bank on everyone else not knowing about the possibility of a jester role.NoHItter wrote:
Nakata's actions scream Jester to me, yet he's doing it wrong.
(Basically) Openly admitting that you're a jester won't get you lynched.
Instead people will use reverse psychology and assume that you're just pretending to be a jester.
I'm not exactly sure what this implies..Nakata wrote:
*glare*
you got me.
What exactly makes you think this?0_o wrote:
Although seeing as he's a new player.
Were you supposed to?0_o wrote:
I'm not exactly sure what this implies..Nakata wrote:
*glare*
you got me.
viewtopic.php?p=498609#p498609Nakata Yuji wrote:
What exactly makes you think this?0_o wrote:
Although seeing as he's a new player.
oh.
*is noob at this*
teehee
If you are saying things that nobody gets then you aren't really adding anything and are only throwing suspicion at yourself.Nakata wrote:
Were you supposed to?0_o wrote:
I'm not exactly sure what this implies..
Would I possibly want to do that?0_o wrote:
If you are saying things that nobody gets then you aren't really adding anything and are only throwing suspicion at yourself.
Also, you're quite trusting.
on principle I'd rather lynch the inactive people, but for the love of god can we get rid of this guy
I agree with the second part of Two's post, especially since lynching, whether or not it's scum, will help the town.
Vote: Nakata Yuji
Vote: Nakata Yuji
Easy buddy, it's just a game.Two wrote:
on principle I'd rather lynch the inactive people, but for the love of god can we get rid of this guy
lynching a townie helps the town? am i missing something here?rust45 wrote:
I agree with the second part of Two's post, especially since lynching, whether or not it's scum, will help the town.
Vote: Nakata Yuji
by all means, though.
Basically you're causing mass confusion, and getting rid of the source is a beneficial thing.Nakata Yuji wrote:
lynching a townie helps the town? am i missing something here?
by all means, though.
I thought he was making a blanket statement :30_o wrote:
Basically you're causing mass confusion, and getting rid of the source is a beneficial thing.Nakata Yuji wrote:
lynching a townie helps the town? am i missing something here?
by all means, though.
either way, it's fun doing it, so even if i get lynched, i've had my fun.
Alright I'm gonna be gone from the 13th to the 23rd; I think I will have minimal access to the internet so I'll try to stay on top of the game as much as I can, but I probably won't be as active as usual.
so where is matthewtck, oyashiro beatrice and pieguy1372?
and can you people who aren't voting for nakata yuji please try to convince us not to vote for them, to both stimulate the game and explain why you haven't voted for them yourselves thx
and can you people who aren't voting for nakata yuji please try to convince us not to vote for them, to both stimulate the game and explain why you haven't voted for them yourselves thx
Sorry, been out-of-state for a while....I stopped understanding WTH was going on, so I'll just change my vote to the most obvious person, still got a few things to do IRL and may not be that active.
Vote: Nakata Yuji
Vote: Nakata Yuji
And I am a removed.
Okay, that's actually 6, nvm.
yeah, i should have probably counted before i put up that spoiler, you probably caught that ._.Two wrote:
unvote
let's keep that a secret, mm?
on behalf of strager
I'm curious as why Two unvoted.
Reason please?
Also, what did Nakata post before he "removed" it.
Reason please?
Also, what did Nakata post before he "removed" it.
I haven't posted because I haven't made up my mind yet, especially now that I can assume Nakata Yuji had an important role of sorts. Unless he was a wolf pretending to have such a role, or unless Two and Nakata Yuji are both wolves. (I didn't vote Nakata Yuji previously because I had a hunch it would be a bad idea, but eh.)
That actually seems rather likely, both Two and Nakata Yuji being wolves. o_o If they were two wolves and putting on a show to fool all of us, it would definitely make sense if Nakata Yuji went and confused all of us and then Two played Nakata Yuji off as innocent just now. On the other hand, this situation would make a lot of sense if both of them were townsfolk or of either one of them was a wolf. Now I really can't make up my mind...
Anyway, might as well vote Two since I'm still not sure about lynching Nakata Yuji at this point.
That actually seems rather likely, both Two and Nakata Yuji being wolves. o_o If they were two wolves and putting on a show to fool all of us, it would definitely make sense if Nakata Yuji went and confused all of us and then Two played Nakata Yuji off as innocent just now. On the other hand, this situation would make a lot of sense if both of them were townsfolk or of either one of them was a wolf. Now I really can't make up my mind...
Anyway, might as well vote Two since I'm still not sure about lynching Nakata Yuji at this point.
But you are sure about Two?pieguy1372 wrote:
Anyway, might as well vote Two since I'm still not sure about lynching Nakata Yuji at this point.
Two was the only person that saw it. Both strager and I refreshed just that little too late. I'm not sure what possible reason Two might have for keeping this information hid, other than covering for Nakata.NoHItter wrote:
Also, what did Nakata post before he "removed" it.
@Mashley: If we lynch Nakata Yuji and he turns out to be innocent we'll likely end up losing a very important role given how Two was acting. (Note that Two would act that way regardless of whether he is a wolf or not because if he is he'd want to avoid suspicion.) As a result lynching Two seems like a safer bet.
The problem with your logic is that if they did indeed claim to be a valuable role, and I was a wolf, I could have not only avoided suspicion but I could have lynched that valuable role by simply doing nothing.
This has taken an interesting turn of events.
I see why people are voting for Two as it is, as he's been very aggressive.
Given what I posted, even I don't know why he unvoted.
Unvote, btw.
I see why people are voting for Two as it is, as he's been very aggressive.
Given what I posted, even I don't know why he unvoted.
Unvote, btw.
Topic Starter
At some point I will stop being lazy and put a constantly updated votecount onto the first page. But right now I'm lazy. Activity's better now. Remember that Day 1 will end a week from tomorrow. The long list of names will remain for ease of copying and pasting because I'm a lazy mod, but I will color people with votes on them.
The Mod is Lazy Votecount
matthewtck (1) - Wojjan
pieguy1372 (0)
strager (0)
0_o (0)
DiamondCrash (0)
Mashley (0)
NoHitter (0)
Oyashiro Beatrice (0)
meronmyon (0)
Nakata Yuji (5) - NoHitter, Mashley, mernomyon, rust45, Oyashiro Beatrice
Two (2) - strager, pieguy1372
Wojjan (0)
rust45 (0)
Not Voting (5) - matthewtck, 0_o, DiamondCrash, Two, Nakata Yuji
Nakata Yuji is at L-2!
With 13 alive, it takes 7 to lynch...
The Mod is Lazy Votecount
matthewtck (1) - Wojjan
pieguy1372 (0)
strager (0)
0_o (0)
DiamondCrash (0)
Mashley (0)
NoHitter (0)
Oyashiro Beatrice (0)
meronmyon (0)
Nakata Yuji (5) - NoHitter, Mashley, mernomyon, rust45, Oyashiro Beatrice
Two (2) - strager, pieguy1372
Wojjan (0)
rust45 (0)
Not Voting (5) - matthewtck, 0_o, DiamondCrash, Two, Nakata Yuji
Nakata Yuji is at L-2!
With 13 alive, it takes 7 to lynch...
troll?Wojjan wrote:
Maybe he publicly claimed wolf and gave up?
Anyone else notice that "Jester" Nakata is gone?
People realise Nataka is acting Jester - Nataka stops acting Jester
Cause and effect, NoHItter
Cause and effect, NoHItter
Are you people paying attention at all? This is the most lonely werewolf-esque game I've ever played
He's been acting the same way up until he thought he was lynched. It had nothing to do with what anyone else thought.
He's been acting the same way up until he thought he was lynched. It had nothing to do with what anyone else thought.
After looking back over this thread, I don't think you actually believed what you said. Spoilerboxed since it's a wall of text.
SPOILER
then,
Then, Mashley posted a screenshot of the pm that Nakata sent him. He had to remove it, but this is what was said in response:
and again...:
later he posted:
and finally:
so vote: Mashley^ being cute, relevant later if you read the restNakata Yuji wrote:
Vote: mashley
dat foolMashley wrote:
I'm not a fool
then,
Nakata Yuji wrote:
''Wojjan wrote:
Can't we just nolynch today? We have nothing to go on''
she wants the kill
unvote
vote:Wojjan
gogogoogog
so I voted for him, and was followed by nohitter and mashley; mashley's post was:Nakata Yuji wrote:
''Wojjan wrote:
Could you maybe, you know, read my other post?''
i just want the day to end, actually
also i would consider that a facade
In retrospect, there are several things about this post that rub me the wrong way. The first is the, by itself, innocent fact that they voted as part of a bandwagon. The next part most people will probably disagree with me on, but it's "Yeah, this is very suspicious". Stating things as fact actually is a very effective way to persuade people, as they take it in subconsciously. It's similar to how people say the person's name that they're talking to in order to gain control of a conversation. I think that it was deliberately stated that way, and this is backed up by the last bit, "Now, if we assume that Nataka is scum, then that would make Wojjan and 0_o innocent, wouldn't it?", where he tries to influence the game's perception of not only Nakata, but of Wojjan, 0_o, and himself. Making people believe that x cannot be y because x is opposite of z is extremely valuable for wolves/mafia/whatever, since it allows one of their members to go unsuspected and coast to the finish line.Mashley wrote:
Yeah, this is very suspicious. Nataka seems anxious to get the day over with and have someone out. Here's a PM I recieved from her:
Quote:
change your vote to wojjan or 0_o and I'll change mine to what you do
Now, if we assume that Nataka is scum, then that would make Wojjan and 0_o innocent, wouldn't it?
Unvote, Vote Nataka Yuji
Then, Mashley posted a screenshot of the pm that Nakata sent him. He had to remove it, but this is what was said in response:
^ ">_<" is acting cute/innocent againMashley wrote:
"Nakata Yuji wrote:
notice how you can't see what he sent."
What exactly are you suggesting? >_<
and again...:
Only this time he not only tries to effect your perception with ">_<", but by stating "didn't you just admit to being scum a few posts ago?"Mashley wrote:
Want to explain how telling people about a suspicious PM you sent me is suspicious? Or are you just accusing me for the hell of it? And didn't you just admit to being scum a few posts ago? >_<
later he posted:
again trying to be perceived as ignorant/innocentMashley wrote:
This is confusing
and finally:
This is the post that made me go back and look. It's so painfully ignorant that it's on the same level as Wojjan's troll post. It's to the point where there just has to be an ulterior motive behind it. Yeah the motive could be good, but go back and find evidence in his posts that supports that, cause I couldn't find it.Mashley wrote:
People realise Nataka is acting Jester - Nataka stops acting Jester
Cause and effect, NoHItter