Saturos-fangirl wrote:
out-of-thread discussion is allowed, I'll post the typical rules and such when the game is full.
This vote does not count because it is not in bold. If you want your votes to count, you MUST write them in bold.Nakata Yuji wrote:
Vote Wojjan because I want some action.
Saturos-fangirl wrote:
This vote does not count because it is not in bold. If you want your votes to count, you MUST write them in bold.Nakata Yuji wrote:
Vote Wojjan because I want some action.
dat sharkrust45 wrote:
Random Vote: 0_o
I don't like the name Bruce.
tricky youMashley wrote:
I'm not a fool
How does not lynching anyone benefit the town, again? If you didn't notice, in the last werewolf game half of the wolves had revealing votes day 1. If no one is lynched, we have less information to work with later, on top of the fact that if no one is lynched then wolves get a free kill.Wojjan wrote:
Can't we just nolynch today? We have nothing to go on
That's scum talk brothaWojjan wrote:
Can't we just nolynch today? We have nothing to go on
she wants the killWojjan wrote:
Can't we just nolynch today? We have nothing to go on
i just want the day to end, actuallyWojjan wrote:
Could you maybe, you know, read my other post?
The fact that Nakata Yuji wanted day to end, and basically jumped on the bandwagon to lynch Wojjan seems suspicious, even after Wojjan withdrew her previous statement.Nakata Yuji wrote:
i just want the day to end, actually
also i would consider that a facade
change your vote to wojjan or 0_o and I'll change mine to what you doNow, if we assume that Nataka is scum, then that would make Wojjan and 0_o innocent, wouldn't it?
What exactly are you suggesting? >_<Nakata Yuji wrote:
notice how you can't see what he sent.
nothing, good sir.Mashley wrote:
What exactly are you suggesting? >_<Nakata Yuji wrote:
notice how you can't see what he sent.
IV5. Do not insult other players personally.Mashley wrote:
Want to explain how telling people about a suspicious PM you sent me is suspicious? Or are you just accusing me for the hell of it? And didn't you just admit to being scum a few posts ago? >_<
he wasn't insulting youNakata Yuji wrote:
IV5. Do not insult other players personally.
tread carefully.
I wrote:
so why exactly haven't you posted what you said that he didn't show
just saw this now...Two wrote:
so why exactly haven't you posted what you said that he didn't show
oh.Two wrote:
scum is used to refer to the mafia, wolves, or what have you
it's not derogatory if that's what you interpreted it as
Nah, the guy I voted seems more likely to be scum than them, and even if he isn't he still a sucky player.
think so...?Two wrote:
also that is a really pathetic excuse
12:58 <@stragerLN> Wow
12:58 <@stragerLN> People are REALLY sheeping into nakata
12:59 <@stragerLN> he/she is CLEARLY a joker. He/she has been setting it up from the start.
12:59 <@stragerLN> viewtopic.php?p=496602#p496602
12:59 <@stragerLN> last comment.
13:00 <@stragerLN> viewtopic.php?p=496727#p496727
13:00 <@stragerLN> Blatantly lying, and telling people to vote for someone without voting for them herself?
13:01 <@stragerLN> viewtopic.php?p=497875#p497875
13:01 <@stragerLN> I dunno what to think of this. Probably a newb mistake, though. I don't find it that suspicious, contrary
to some others.
13:01 <@stragerLN> viewtopic.php?p=497879#p497879
13:01 <@stragerLN> == scummy
13:01 <@stragerLN> (as has been pointed out)
13:01 <@stragerLN> viewtopic.php?p=498479#p498479
13:01 <@stragerLN> Gave up "playfully"; Joker tell
13:02 <@stragerLN> viewtopic.php?p=498489#p498489
13:02 <@stragerLN> More joker or vanilla tells
13:02 <@stragerLN> (But we all have special roles so there's no real vanilla ... though maybe I'm wrong)
13:02 <@stragerLN> viewtopic.php?p=498518#p498518
13:03 <@stragerLN> She only brought this up LATER, which means what she said in this post wasn't the reason she posted what she
did post in her previous post.
13:03 <@stragerLN> viewtopic.php?p=498587#p498587
13:04 <@stragerLN> Avoiding the question; "you already know"; scummy behaviour
13:04 <@stragerLN> viewtopic.php?p=498605#p498605
13:04 <@stragerLN> same
13:04 <@stragerLN> viewtopic.php?p=498612#p498612
13:04 <@stragerLN> She complained about personal insults, and here she is, being insulting
13:04 <@stragerLN> viewtopic.php?p=498618#p498618
13:04 <@stragerLN> More vanilla/joker
oh, it's because i wanted the day to end. tbh you had 2 votes, same as wojjan, which is why0_o wrote:
Nataka: why did you want to vote for me? I only had one post at a time, and it was a Finding Nemo quote.
!Cuddlebun wrote:
acting as strager's proxy until he is unbanned:12:58 <@stragerLN> Wow
12:58 <@stragerLN> People are REALLY sheeping into nakata
12:59 <@stragerLN> he/she is CLEARLY a joker. He/she has been setting it up from the start.
12:59 <@stragerLN> viewtopic.php?p=496602#p496602
12:59 <@stragerLN> last comment.
13:00 <@stragerLN> viewtopic.php?p=496727#p496727
13:00 <@stragerLN> Blatantly lying, and telling people to vote for someone without voting for them herself?
13:01 <@stragerLN> viewtopic.php?p=497875#p497875
13:01 <@stragerLN> I dunno what to think of this. Probably a newb mistake, though. I don't find it that suspicious, contrary
to some others.
13:01 <@stragerLN> viewtopic.php?p=497879#p497879
13:01 <@stragerLN> == scummy
13:01 <@stragerLN> (as has been pointed out)
13:01 <@stragerLN> viewtopic.php?p=498479#p498479
13:01 <@stragerLN> Gave up "playfully"; Joker tell
13:02 <@stragerLN> viewtopic.php?p=498489#p498489
13:02 <@stragerLN> More joker or vanilla tells
13:02 <@stragerLN> (But we all have special roles so there's no real vanilla ... though maybe I'm wrong)
13:02 <@stragerLN> viewtopic.php?p=498518#p498518
13:03 <@stragerLN> She only brought this up LATER, which means what she said in this post wasn't the reason she posted what she
did post in her previous post.
13:03 <@stragerLN> viewtopic.php?p=498587#p498587
13:04 <@stragerLN> Avoiding the question; "you already know"; scummy behaviour
13:04 <@stragerLN> viewtopic.php?p=498605#p498605
13:04 <@stragerLN> same
13:04 <@stragerLN> viewtopic.php?p=498612#p498612
13:04 <@stragerLN> She complained about personal insults, and here she is, being insulting
13:04 <@stragerLN> viewtopic.php?p=498618#p498618
13:04 <@stragerLN> More vanilla/joker
i surmise something like a trollTwo wrote:
what the hell is a joker
in my case, i kind of want to play, but i don't mind if i get lynched.0_o wrote:
A joker wins when he is lynched, loses if he is NK'd/alive when the game ends.
i think it's probably self satisfaction.Two wrote:
What does "the joker wins when he is lynched" mean? It's like a third faction (town/mafia/joker)? If so that is really dumb.
[13:39] <stragerLN> Mention that the game still continues if the Joker wins or loses
[13:39] <stragerLN> also
[13:39] <stragerLN> viewtopic.php?p=498675#p498675
[13:39] <stragerLN> Didn't deny it
[13:39] <stragerLN> +1 for being a joker
Yeah, it's a third party. Unvote.Two wrote:
What does "the joker wins when he is lynched" mean? It's like a third faction (town/mafia/joker)? If so that is really dumb.
is that so...DiamondCrash wrote:
You lied.
DiamondCrash wrote:
You lied.
the fact that you don't know....Wojjan wrote:
LS' Big Mafia 1 had a Jester which basically is the joker.
I don't believe this joker crap though. Either Nakata is really really dumb, really really really dumb or really smart.
Judging them I'm inching towards one of the first two.
I wouldn't say he's dumb, he's just new to this stuff that's all.Wojjan wrote:
Either Nakata is really really dumb, really really really dumb or really smart.
Judging them I'm inching towards one of the first two.
Why would they nightkill himher? If the game continues even after a joker's death, I don't see the downside for the mafia. I don't even see a point to the joker role existing except to help the mafia... so please tell me how what you said makes sense.0_o wrote:
Anyway, if he is the jester and none of us want a shared win, then a fairly standard way of dealing with it is by not lynching him today and letting the mafia NK him tonight. If he is not NK'd tonight then we lynch him tomorrow. This way, if he is a predator then yay, we lynch a predator tomorrow. If not, the mafia won't want to take a chance that he is a jester and kill him tonight so we don't lynch him tomorrow.
Two wrote:
Why would they nightkill himher? If the game continues even after a joker's death, I don't see the downside for the mafia. I don't even see a point to the joker role existing except to help the mafia... so please tell me how what you said makes sense.
Basically the only reason for nightkilling the jester would be so if they won, the game would be a "Predator win!" and not "Predator and Jester win!" But then again,0_o wrote:
Though again, this is only if nobody wants a shared win.
Maybe they're greedy and want the game to themselves - maybe not.0_o wrote:
I dunno how the predators would feel about sharing their win in exchange for a human being lynched tomorrow
err.. why? Just say it.Nakata Yuji wrote:
Hopefully someone points out the obvious....
I'm not going to be the one to say it.
We don't even know if there is a joker*glare*NoHItter wrote:
I haven't seen a small game (13 people) have a jester yet. (though I may be wrong since I haven't exactly joined a lot of games)
Though the probability of having a jester are slim, there's still a chance.
Nakata's actions scream Jester to me, yet he's doing it wrong.
(Basically) Openly admitting that you're a jester won't get you lynched.
Instead people will use reverse psychology and assume that you're just pretending to be a jester.
WIFOM. A tricky jester could pretend to be a mafia pretending to be a jester. Although seeing as he's a new player, it would seem more likely that if he was the jester then he would bank on everyone else not knowing about the possibility of a jester role.NoHItter wrote:
Nakata's actions scream Jester to me, yet he's doing it wrong.
(Basically) Openly admitting that you're a jester won't get you lynched.
Instead people will use reverse psychology and assume that you're just pretending to be a jester.
I'm not exactly sure what this implies..Nakata wrote:
*glare*
you got me.
What exactly makes you think this?0_o wrote:
Although seeing as he's a new player.
Were you supposed to?0_o wrote:
I'm not exactly sure what this implies..Nakata wrote:
*glare*
you got me.
viewtopic.php?p=498609#p498609Nakata Yuji wrote:
What exactly makes you think this?0_o wrote:
Although seeing as he's a new player.
oh.
*is noob at this*
teehee
If you are saying things that nobody gets then you aren't really adding anything and are only throwing suspicion at yourself.Nakata wrote:
Were you supposed to?0_o wrote:
I'm not exactly sure what this implies..
Would I possibly want to do that?0_o wrote:
If you are saying things that nobody gets then you aren't really adding anything and are only throwing suspicion at yourself.
Easy buddy, it's just a game.Two wrote:
on principle I'd rather lynch the inactive people, but for the love of god can we get rid of this guy
lynching a townie helps the town? am i missing something here?rust45 wrote:
I agree with the second part of Two's post, especially since lynching, whether or not it's scum, will help the town.
Vote: Nakata Yuji
Basically you're causing mass confusion, and getting rid of the source is a beneficial thing.Nakata Yuji wrote:
lynching a townie helps the town? am i missing something here?
by all means, though.
I thought he was making a blanket statement :30_o wrote:
Basically you're causing mass confusion, and getting rid of the source is a beneficial thing.Nakata Yuji wrote:
lynching a townie helps the town? am i missing something here?
by all means, though.