Guest
home
beatmaps
rankings
community
store
help
forum
  1. Forums
  2. Other
  3. Off-Topic

ITT 2: We post shit that is neither funny nor interesting

posted
Total Posts
56,186
show more
Yuudachi-kun
5,432 posts
Joined August 2014
Yuudachi-kun

Dulcet wrote:

Khelly wrote:

I'm glad someone else finds it harder to have a job just because a bunch of people who had no interest in a field cried about how they couldn't get into one apparently.
If i'm given an opportunity I'll fucking take it, affirmative action or not. Why would I feel bad about someone else not getting the job that I want?
You shouldn't, but all those people who whined and moaned are absolute fucktards who see a non issue they want fixed.

Hey, there's not that many women in STEM. MORE WOMEN IN STEM. Hey, is anyone here interested in STEM? No? Gee, I wonder why there weren't that many women in STEM to begin with.
IppE
IppE

Khelly wrote:

The actual solution is to never marry because it isn't necessary for much of anything worthwhile.
Have you fapped today?
Yuudachi-kun
5,432 posts
Joined August 2014
Yuudachi-kun

IppE wrote:

Khelly wrote:

The actual solution is to never marry because it isn't necessary for much of anything worthwhile.
Have you fapped today?
Tein sen kahdesti ennenkuin nousin sängystä tänään
FuZ
363 posts
Joined January 2011
FuZ

IppE wrote:

Khelly wrote:

The actual solution is to never marry because it isn't necessary for much of anything worthwhile.
Have you fapped today?
im worried too
Yuudachi-kun
5,432 posts
Joined August 2014
Yuudachi-kun
Worry not
B1rd
2,974 posts
Joined December 2013
B1rd
women have been screwed back by alimony because the husband might have racked up a really bad debt since their marriage and now they have half of it. it's not just half of assets they share, it's half of debts as well. so i guess that's an happy ending right there?
The vast majority of the time this isn't the case, and alimony is beneficial for the woman at the expense of the man. Women also have the advantage in many other related things like child custody.

... and what are the really high percentages?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_accusation_of_rape

According to Wikipedia, lower single digits to 40%+. In any case, still a significant amount.

affirmative action has been shown to be most active in the STEM field jobs, where they want to recruit more women than men now because it sends off a better image of "acceptance" from the science community. I mean I'm glad I might be getting a easier time finding a job but the reason why I am even able to is because some women cried "MORE WOMEN FOR STEM" even though at the end they took women studies.
You're getting an easier time because of a policy that encourages discrimination based on sex. You don't have the opportunity because of some feminist harpy, women have had equal rights for ages. Now they're getting more than equal rights.

Dulcet wrote:

If i'm given an opportunity I'll fucking take it, affirmative action or not. Why would I feel bad about someone else not getting the job that I want?
Because they are more capable than you? Because otherwise you are being detrimental to society? In an undisturbed free market, you will get the job if you're the most capable and well suited. If you're not, don't expect a free ride just because of your pussy.
Jordan
1,037 posts
Joined December 2010
Jordan

Dulcet wrote:

BrokenArrow wrote:

If any of you guys are looking for some quality comedy I would recommend checking out their official subreddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/

hahahahahahahahahahahaha, fuuuuck. if girls cried over men like this you'd all tell us to shut the fuck up.

For example men being screwed over by alimony
women have been screwed back by alimony because the husband might have racked up a really bad debt since their marriage and now they have half of it. it's not just half of assets they share, it's half of debts as well. so i guess that's an happy ending right there?

men being guilty before being proven innocent when being accused of rape (even though a very significant percentage of rape claims from women have been proven false)
... and what are the really high percentages?

affirmative action, favoring women over men for jobs and paying them more to correct an 'imbalance' and to fill a quota.
affirmative action has been shown to be most active in the STEM field jobs, where they want to recruit more women than men now because it sends off a better image of "acceptance" from the science community. I mean I'm glad I might be getting a easier time finding a job but the reason why I am even able to is because some women cried "MORE WOMEN FOR STEM" even though at the end they took women studies.

So in this day and age, associating with women in any sexual or romantic sense is probably a bad idea.
and what, associate men as upper echelons of the system? If you want to be misogynistic prick then go ahead, I'm not too worried at the chances of you procreating, but if you're going to talk about all women as if they're money sucking demons then don't be expected to be treated as more than a walking dildo. Just saying.

oh btw please don't call me a feminist, because I'm not.

Also, where do you guys get all these "horrible" women in your life? That's what happens when you just talk to a bitch who just says yes to everything you say just to get money out of you. Talk about thinking with your dick, really.
>women have been screwed back by alimony
>brings up a "massive debt" example
Do you realize how rare that is?

>Where do you guys get all these horrible women?
When most of them are actually as horrible as I say it's no wonder that I happened to end up with them.
Kappa FrankerZ
3 posts
Joined June 2013
Kappa FrankerZ

Dulcet wrote:

Khelly wrote:

I'm glad someone else finds it harder to have a job just because a bunch of people who had no interest in a field cried about how they couldn't get into one apparently.
If i'm given an opportunity I'll fucking take it, affirmative action or not. Why would I feel bad about someone else not getting the job that I want?
because you may be taking that job away from someone who is more skilled and can do a better job than you. i mean that may not be the case all the time, but affirmative action in general has the potential to take away job opportunities away from the most qualified individuals and give them to people based solely on race/gender.

marriage is simply a tax benefit, nothing more

the happiest married couples are ones where nothing changed after they got married vs. before
Foxtrot
1,165 posts
Joined April 2012
Foxtrot

Kappa FrankerZ wrote:

because you may be taking that job away from someone who is more skilled and can do a better job than you.
Excuse me, and you are who? If they are more skilled than me, then I'm sure they'd have no problem finding another job.
Last edited by Foxtrot , edited 2 times in total.
Yuudachi-kun
5,432 posts
Joined August 2014
Yuudachi-kun

Dulcet wrote:

Kappa FrankerZ wrote:

because you may be taking that job away from someone who is more skilled and can do a better job than you.
Excuse me, and you are who? If they are more skilled than me, then I'm sure they'd have no problem finding another job.
Yeah, when the rest of the jobs in that same field are being pandered to women.

Besides, even if they could find another job, that's not even one of the problems. The problem is that YOU who are under qualified are being put in a position that could better be served by someone else.

e2: This is a problem for the company and how that company benefits the outside world in some small way as a result of your potential incapabilities compared to the other person.
Last edited by Yuudachi-kun , edited 1 time in total.
Railey2
512 posts
Joined February 2015
Railey2

Dulcet wrote:

Khelly wrote:

I'm glad someone else finds it harder to have a job just because a bunch of people who had no interest in a field cried about how they couldn't get into one apparently.
If i'm given an opportunity I'll fucking take it, affirmative action or not. Why would I feel bad about someone else not getting the job that I want?
I'd hope that someone who speaks out against sexism would have the integrity to at least feel bad for getting a job due to sexist discrimination against the opposite gender? Or are you telling us that you only care about it when it works to your own disadvantage? You may not care about it at all, but in every other case you are being very hypocritical.


anyways, B1rd: not all women are assholes. I'd say that the majority of them are actually quite nice and easy to talk to. If you think that most of them are assholes, maybe you make them act towards you that way? As Dulcet said, the reason might just be you.
Foxtrot
1,165 posts
Joined April 2012
Foxtrot
I'd hope that someone who speaks out against sexism would have the integrity to at least feel bad for getting a job due to sexist discrimination against the opposite gender? Or are you telling us that you only care about it when it works to your own disadvantage? You may not care about it at all, but in every other case you are being very hypocritical.
I'd rather be a hypocritical prick than be jobless, sorry. Money is money.

Khelly wrote:

Yeah, when the rest of the jobs in that same field are being pandered to women.

Besides, even if they could find another job, that's not even one of the problems. The problem is that YOU who are under qualified are being put in a position that could better be served by someone else.
Then by that logic everyone is qualified until someone better comes by. Also, the jobs are being pandered to women but there are not enough women willing to apply for them so they just give the job to another qualified person.
Last edited by Foxtrot , edited 4 times in total.
Vuelo Eluko
5,484 posts
Joined October 2013
Vuelo Eluko

Khelly wrote:

The actual solution is to never marry because it isn't necessary for much of anything worthwhile.
except gay marriage
potentially talking about 2 male incomes [almost always gonna be higher than 1 male + neet female or 1 male + 1 female income]
ON TOP of the financial/tax benefits that come with marriage

tbh this is why i think it should stay illegal
marriage is a financial thing in this day and age and means nothing more, gays have no need for it. their butt fucking is just as meaningful emotionally married or not..
Railey2
512 posts
Joined February 2015
Railey2

xxjesus1412fanx wrote:

tbh this is why i think it should stay illegal
marriage is a financial thing, gays have no need for it.
it's not solely a financial thing.
What do you get when you google "marriage", a picture of a tax invoice?
Yuudachi-kun
5,432 posts
Joined August 2014
Yuudachi-kun

xxjesus1412fanx wrote:

Khelly wrote:

The actual solution is to never marry because it isn't necessary for much of anything worthwhile.
except gay marriage
potentially talking about 2 male incomes [almost always gonna be higher than 1 male + neet female or 1 male + 1 female income]
ON TOP of the financial/tax benefits that come with marriage

tbh this is why i think it should stay illegal
marriage is a financial thing in this day and age and means nothing more, gays have no need for it. their butt fucking is just as meaningful emotionally married or not..
So why shouldn't marriage be illegal for straight couples because of the "financial thing"?
Foxtrot
1,165 posts
Joined April 2012
Foxtrot

Railey2 wrote:

xxjesus1412fanx wrote:

tbh this is why i think it should stay illegal
marriage is a financial thing, gays have no need for it.
it's not solely a financial thing.
What do you get when you google "marriage", a picture of a tax invoice?
but marriage is a social contract and a lot of financial things are involved, so yes, marriage IS a financial thing.

Because they are more capable than you? Because otherwise you are being detrimental to society? In an undisturbed free market, you will get the job if you're the most capable and well suited. If you're not, don't expect a free ride just because of your pussy.
jfc what's with this belief that I'm not good enough at what I'm doing? If someone was better than me then they'll be provided with better opportunities.
Yuudachi-kun
5,432 posts
Joined August 2014
Yuudachi-kun

Khelly wrote:

Besides, even if they could find another job, that's not even one of the problems. The problem is that YOU who are under qualified are being put in a position that could better be served by someone else.

e2: This is a problem for the company and how that company benefits the outside world in some small way as a result of your potential incapabilities compared to the other person.
The actual job position and how it's carried out suffers because you're put into it rather than someone better than you.
Foxtrot
1,165 posts
Joined April 2012
Foxtrot

Khelly wrote:

Besides, even if they could find another job, that's not even one of the problems. The problem is that YOU who are under qualified are being put in a position that could better be served by someone else.

e2: This is a problem for the company and how that company benefits the outside world in some small way as a result of your potential incapabilities compared to the other person.
oh yeah as if I would apply for a job that I am under qualified for it already. If I get that job, then I'd agree with you. That's bullshit. But if I get the job I have the credentials for, what's there to complain about?
Railey2
512 posts
Joined February 2015
Railey2

Dulcet wrote:

Railey2 wrote:

it's not solely a financial thing.
What do you get when you google "marriage", a picture of a tax invoice?
but marriage is a social contract and a lot of financial things are involved, so yes, marriage IS a financial thing.
I said not solely. His argument was based on marriage being a solely financial thing, which it is not. I never said that it doesn't have a financial component.

He completely disregards the emotional, the social and the religious part of it. He reduces marriage to a fiscal procedure to try and make his argument work.
Yuudachi-kun
5,432 posts
Joined August 2014
Yuudachi-kun

Dulcet wrote:

Khelly wrote:

Besides, even if they could find another job, that's not even one of the problems. The problem is that YOU who are under qualified are being put in a position that could better be served by someone else.

e2: This is a problem for the company and how that company benefits the outside world in some small way as a result of your potential incapabilities compared to the other person.
oh yeah as if I would apply for a job that I am under qualified for it already. If I get that job, then I'd agree with you. That's bullshit. But if I get the job I have the credentials for, what's there to complain about?
If you get the job with near equal credentials to someone else, it's less of a problem. It's just discrimination for the need to fill some kind of quota just because it looks nice.

But the problem comes when there's a choice of candidates and the employer has to choose the less qualified "affirmative actioned" one because they're required to.


Railey2 wrote:

He completely disregards the emotional, the social and the religious part of it. He reduces marriage to a fiscal procedure to try and make his argument work.
To me, marriage is entirely a fiscal procedure and his opnion in that regard is relevant. It's almost like you can view marriage in different ways to different people!

I don't think marriage should be barred between any two people because it doesn't fucking matter who gets married to whom and if you say gays shouldn't marry because they can get financial benefit then why does that not apply to straight people?
The Gambler
1,304 posts
Joined September 2013
The Gambler

BrokenArrow wrote:

If any of you guys are looking for some quality comedy I would recommend checking out their official subreddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/

The sidebar on the right has a lot of great points, arguably the best satire I have read in a while. I almost thought they're actually serious, but only a degenerate monkey could believe in such a thing, right? Haha!
Definitely quality, gotta save me some PDFs for the subway rides to uni
Last edited by The Gambler , edited 1 time in total.
Yuudachi-kun
5,432 posts
Joined August 2014
Yuudachi-kun
Brokenarrow has seen my dick before
Foxtrot
1,165 posts
Joined April 2012
Foxtrot

Khelly wrote:

But the problem comes when there's a choice of candidates and the employer has to choose the less qualified "affirmative actioned" one because they're required to.
but there's also times when the person affected by affirmative action is more than qualified. in my opinion letting the government make this policy was a bad idea in the first place, because it should be under the company's choice who to hire or not, and their choice if they want to apply policies similar to affirmative action.

affirmative action is just a shitty band aid to job equality.
Vuelo Eluko
5,484 posts
Joined October 2013
Vuelo Eluko

Railey2 wrote:

He completely disregards the emotional, the social and the religious part of it. He reduces marriage to a fiscal procedure to try and make his argument work.
So does the rest of the world at this point. Look at divorce rates, the very idea of marriage is laughable and not at all backed by human nature. It's a stupid institution and in this day and age the realities of all the hypocrisy behind it are more visible than ever. I'm talking about in general, not as a rule. There are always exceptions, people who live in their own little fantasy worlds together, but you can't generalize based on exceptions.

People can have meaningful relationships without marriage, many meaningful relationships can lead to marriage, but cautious people avoid it because losing half your shit isn't fun.
Railey2
512 posts
Joined February 2015
Railey2

Khelly wrote:

Railey2 wrote:

He completely disregards the emotional, the social and the religious part of it. He reduces marriage to a fiscal procedure to try and make his argument work.
To me, marriage is entirely a fiscal procedure and his opnion in that regard is relevant. It's almost like you can view marriage in different ways to different people!

I don't think marriage should be barred between any two people because it doesn't fucking matter who gets married to whom and if you say gays shouldn't marry because they can get financial benefit then why does that not apply to straight people?
His logic was that men earn more than women, therefore two men have too much of a financial advantage over womanXman (straight) and womanXwoman. Therefore it should be banned for gay couples only, but not for straight couples.

It's a shitty argument, and falls with the premise1 that financial bonuses are everything that matters to people when it comes to marriage, and premise2 that gay couples hold significantly higher financial power than straight or lesbian ones (to a degree that would warrant a strict ban of gay marriage).

Following his logic, it would make more sense to just ban marriage based on shared income, but he never brought that up. Go over a certain $$$ value and you're out. Why discriminate based on sexuality? Makes no fucking sense.

Anyways, his argument is shit and everyone with a brain knows that. I'm glad we agree on that.


Dulcet wrote:

Khelly wrote:

Besides, even if they could find another job, that's not even one of the problems. The problem is that YOU who are under qualified are being put in a position that could better be served by someone else.

e2: This is a problem for the company and how that company benefits the outside world in some small way as a result of your potential incapabilities compared to the other person.
oh yeah as if I would apply for a job that I am under qualified for it already. If I get that job, then I'd agree with you. That's bullshit. But if I get the job I have the credentials for, what's there to complain about?
if Y gets the job over X because of Y's gender, even though X is better qualified to do the job, then you call that sexist.

So, why complain? You could also ask why one should prefer fairness over unfairness.

If that doesn't make it obvious, you might want to take a look at this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_Rule
Most people seem to agree that consistently sticking to this rule contributes to living in a generally better world. I know you wouldn't want to have your job-application shredded just because you are gender X.
Vuelo Eluko
5,484 posts
Joined October 2013
Vuelo Eluko
i'm not bigoted at all, i think gay love is beautiful, but i don't think it's fair to take advantage of an already defunct institution like marriage.
Foxtrot
1,165 posts
Joined April 2012
Foxtrot

Khelly wrote:

if Y gets the job over X because of Y's gender, even though X is better qualified to do the job, then you call that sexist.

So, why complain? You could also ask why one should prefer fairness over unfairness.

If that doesn't make it obvious, you might want to take a look at this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_Rule
Most people seem to agree that consistently sticking to this rule contributes to living in a generally better world. I know you wouldn't want to have your job-application shredded just because you are gender X.
I just agreed that if someone gets a job they're under qualified for just because of their gender is sexist. I might have confused some people by saying "if I see an opportunity, I'll take it" but I didn't mean that as in take ANY opportunity. Sorry on my part.

And they teach the Golden Rule at kindergarten, are you seriously going to make fun of me with that?
Jordan
1,037 posts
Joined December 2010
Jordan
Women don't earn less than men as well. Not in the same job and working hours. Men earn ON AVERAGE and without taking their job in consideration more than women because women on average tend to choose jobs that pay less. How many female surgeons are there compared to male surgeons? Retarded feminists literally think that, given the same job, women earn less lol.
Yuudachi-kun
5,432 posts
Joined August 2014
Yuudachi-kun
Yeah so put in more women surgeons theough affirmative action wwwwww
Vuelo Eluko
5,484 posts
Joined October 2013
Vuelo Eluko
due to hormonal mood swings and whatnot females are just not fit to do some jobs
surgeon being one of them
president being another

men can act outside of their emotions consistently and reliably. Not to be sexist that's just how it is, if a man suddenly had the same sort of chemistry that goes on when a female goes on the rag i don't expect him to handle it any better or for it to have no impact on their performance
Last edited by Vuelo Eluko , edited 1 time in total.
The Gambler
1,304 posts
Joined September 2013
The Gambler

Khelly wrote:

Brokenarrow has seen my dick before
Yuudachi-kun
5,432 posts
Joined August 2014
Yuudachi-kun

xxjesus1412fanx wrote:

due to hormonal mood swings and whatnot females are just not fit to do some jobs
that being one of them
president being another

Does this mean I'm a true female now
Foxtrot
1,165 posts
Joined April 2012
Foxtrot

xxjesus1412fanx wrote:

due to hormonal mood swings and whatnot females are just not fit to do some jobs
that being one of them
president being another
and I guess men are just not fit at schools and USPS?
silmarilen
5,579 posts
Joined February 2010
silmarilen
i should really have gotten 200x A and 133337 playcount before i decided to stop playing
Vuelo Eluko
5,484 posts
Joined October 2013
Vuelo Eluko

Dulcet wrote:

xxjesus1412fanx wrote:

due to hormonal mood swings and whatnot females are just not fit to do some jobs
that being one of them
president being another
and I guess men are just not fit at schools and USPS?
They aren't?
Foxtrot
1,165 posts
Joined April 2012
Foxtrot

xxjesus1412fanx wrote:

They aren't?
i wouldn't know, going postal is not exactly a trait my gender would understand.
B1rd
2,974 posts
Joined December 2013
B1rd

Dulcet wrote:

I'd rather be a hypocritical prick than be jobless, sorry. Money is money.
10/10 job at convincing me that women aren't money sucking demons, kek.

Railey2 wrote:

anyways, B1rd: not all women are assholes. I'd say that the majority of them are actually quite nice and easy to talk to. If you think that most of them are assholes, maybe you make them act towards you that way? As Dulcet said, the reason might just be you.
Most women I know are nice, at a superficial level at least. But women in general are the way they are because of biology. Women are less inclined to work and less competent too. I don't form these opinions through personal experiences, but through observation of facts.
Vuelo Eluko
5,484 posts
Joined October 2013
Vuelo Eluko
b1rd is right
Yuudachi-kun
5,432 posts
Joined August 2014
Yuudachi-kun
I think applying basic biological facts in regards to people psycologically is less relevant than to other animals.
Kappa FrankerZ
3 posts
Joined June 2013
Kappa FrankerZ

Dulcet wrote:

affirmative action is just a shitty band aid to job equality.
oh okay we agree. carry on~

and I'd have to disagree with the whole women shouldn't be surgeons or presidents or whatever. not all women have "hormonal mood swings". in fact, men's testosterone levels fluctuate more in one day than women's estrogen levels over an entire month.

we should just judge everyone on individual skill rather than generalize
show more
Please sign in to reply.

New reply

0
36870 / 56,186