1. 00:18:467 (3) - two drum claps sounds a little overdone, maybe remove this one?
2. 00:22:592 (2,3,4) - don't really like the linear flow here, especially since all the other flows you use are curved. i'd move 00:22:780 (3) - up a bit
3. 00:25:405 (1) - so most of the downbeats you use sharp approach angles to emphasize the beat, but this angle is pretty shallow. I'd recommend rotating the slider at least 45 degrees CW, but you'll need to reposition the next few notes as well to keep the spacing
4. 00:29:530 (3) - curve this up for better flow to 00:29:905 (1) - you could also maybe blanket 00:29:342 (2) - but it doesn't matter too much
5. 00:36:092 (1,1,1) - this is just personal preference, but the kick sliders and spacing feels overdone, even if it's more intense here. i'd recommend keeping the flow more smooth http://puu.sh/mH0G9/9991a36d7f.jpg or just using circles instead
6. 00:44:530 (1,2,3,4) - probably just me, but this plays a little strange since both extended sliders and normal 1/2 rhythm are used in the same phrase
7. 01:03:092 (2,3,4) - people only read the approach circles, so the spacing between (2,3) seems much smaller than it actually is. I would add a NC to (3) to make it more readable or change (2) to a note. also the flute doesn't follow the bpm well here :/
8. 01:07:217 (2,3,4,5) - flow is pretty sharp here given the intensity of the song, consider making 01:07:405 (3,4) - a slider instead?
9. 01:13:030 - maybe reduce volume here by ~5%? the soft-hitsounds are pretty noisy
10. 01:15:467 (2,3) - why is this spacing so large?
11. 01:34:967 (4,5) - i'd prefer if this DS was 0.1-0.2 lower than 01:36:092 (4,1) - so the intensity constantly builds to the end

1. 00:13:592 (5,6) - ctrl+g this rhythmically to follow the bell sound
2. 00:08:530 (1) - remove NC? otherwise 00:37:780 (4) - NC here?
3. 01:23:905 (1) - maybe have this curve up to flow into 01:24:467 (2) - better

1. 00:47:905 (1) - move NC to 00:49:030 (3) -
2. 01:00:280 (1) - move NC to 01:01:405 (3) -
3. 01:20:530 (3) - NC?
   Sorry for just short NC mod. Everything else in this diff looks ok.

MokouSmoke wrote:

[Determination]

1. 00:22:592 (2,3,4) - don't really like the linear flow here, especially since all the other flows you use are curved. i'd move 00:22:780 (3) - up a bit i can see your concern. Patern wise it would be kinda cooler to have it like that, but i want to keep it very simple to play, having the slight curve change might mess things up D:
2. 00:25:405 (1) - so most of the downbeats you use sharp approach angles to emphasize the beat, but this angle is pretty shallow. I'd recommend rotating the slider at least 45 degrees CW, but you'll need to reposition the next few notes as well to keep the spacing spaced it out a bit more Q_Q
3. 00:36:092 (1,1,1) - this is just personal preference, but the kick sliders and spacing feels overdone, even if it's more intense here. i'd recommend keeping the flow more smooth http://puu.sh/mH0G9/9991a36d7f.jpg or just using circles instead I undertand, but i just cant find anything better atm, i cant quite recreate yours and will prolly end up using 3 circles instead in the end D:
4. 00:44:530 (1,2,3,4) - probably just me, but this plays a little strange since both extended sliders and normal 1/2 rhythm are used in the same phrase i pu tthe 172 so it doesnt play that wierd
5. 01:03:092 (2,3,4) - people only read the approach circles, so the spacing between (2,3) seems much smaller than it actually is. I would add a NC to (3) to make it more readable or change (2) to a note. also the flute doesn't follow the bpm well here :/ good idea
6. 01:15:467 (2,3) - why is this spacing so large? its roughly the same in the whole part , prolly just looks huge because there isnt anything inbetween
7. 01:34:967 (4,5) - i'd prefer if this DS was 0.1-0.2 lower than 01:36:092 (4,1) - so the intensity constantly builds to the end i partly stacked the one and didnt the other so we get this effect

[Advanced]

1. 00:13:592 (5,6) - ctrl+g this rhythmically to follow the bell sound i ll stick with this cause i m too lazy to change it :^)
2. 01:23:905 (1) - maybe have this curve up to flow into 01:24:467 (2) - better this is intentional

[Normal]

1. 00:47:905 (1) - move NC to 00:49:030 (3) - what the fuck i forgot to update
2. 01:00:280 (1) - move NC to 01:01:405 (3) - ^
3. 01:20:530 (3) - NC? ^
   Sorry for just short NC mod. Everything else in this diff looks ok. its just a normal no problem

Good luck! Have a star for mapping one of my favorite songs MOM I GOT A STAR \(*O*J)

1. 00:04:780 (3) - 00:05:717 (2) - 00:06:842 (2) - The fact that the 3 of those are almost stacking which each other but they are not is rather unpleasant
2. 00:08:530 (1,1,1) - I know the note at 00:08:905 (1) -'s sliderend is stronger than the other notes at the adjacent sliders, but it feels really weird nontheless, either have them all 3/4, or 1/2, or 00:08:905 (1) - switch this slider with 2 circles, this way the player understands why there isn't a long slider.
3. 00:23:717 (2,3,1) - Not a fan of this overlap, but at the very least avoid the touch between the sliderhead and 2.
4. 00:26:530 (1,1,1,1) - Since the overall hitsound volume in this section is pretty low, the sliderends are still audible after reducing the volume there to 5%, you should probably use silent hitsounds for that.
5. 00:26:530 (1,1,1,1) - I understand your intentions with the SV here pretty well, but it feels a bit odd, mainly beacuse it is unexpected, but if you wish to keep it, I think you should revise the velocities a bit, since the changes are a bit drastic, try: 0.85x -> 1.0x -> 0.88x -> 1.0x, there are way many more options, just try to be less drastic.
6. 00:32:905 (3) - Muting sliderend would be nice.
7. 00:33:655 (5) - I feel that the notes here are pretty signifcant that the player should press them both.
8. 00:38:342 (2) - Move slightly to the right to even the spacing - x54 y180.
9. 00:49:030 (1,1,1) - I feel that the SVs here should decrease instead of increase, each slider gets more tense and then it'll get the best emphasization with the fast slider.
10. 00:58:592 (2,3) - 1/6 is really unexpected and odd, you probably ended it on that whistle instrument, but if you wanted to follow it, you should've started the slider at 00:58:842 because that's where the second whistle is, but regardless you should just use 1/4 because it is simply better.
11. 01:03:092 (2,1,2,3) - This is really really awkward, the first note lands on nothing (no, it misses both the indistinct beat and the whistle). The second slider has no beat on the sliderend while the third slider is fine, you should probably just use this rhythm since it is what you did so far when the background instruments weren't clear.
12. 01:05:342 (2,3,4,1) - That's pretty awkward as well, couldn't figure out what it was while playing, I thought those were 1/2 but it was just something unpredictable, the rhythm is awful in my opinion. The first note is fine, then the slider starts on the whistle, ignores the instrument right afterwards, nothing lands on the slider end, the next slider's end is nonexistent as well. A triplet -> 1/2 -> reversed slider works great, or even just 1/2 notes instead of the triplet.
13. 01:12:280 (3,1) - I see what you are trying to do here, but it feels a bit harsh and forced, some alternatives - http://puu.sh/mJzAy/89283dd37a.jpg http://puu.sh/mJzzh/aac16b8874.jpg http://puu.sh/mJzD1/1d1bbc554f.jpg I find the first one of those the best
14. 01:18:655 (2,3) - Those felt forced as well, it doesn't feel like the song is holding onto those notes that much, regular circle or a reversed slider would be cooler imo.
15. 01:20:811 (3) - This is unnecessary, it compensates for the fact that you did follow the whistle at 01:20:530 (2) - but for some reason you didn't at the next sliders, even though they are really significant, if you still wish to ignore those then remove this note and extend 01:20:530 (2) -, because right now the current note feels out of place.
16. 01:29:342 (4) - Try a triplet instead, feels much better.
17. 01:31:592 (5) - There's nothing on the music here.. Just the leftover of 01:31:405 (4) - which is held.
18. 01:32:717 (4) - Triplet is better.
19. 01:33:842 (4,5) - 01:34:967 (4,5) - Why isn't the spacing more or less equal?

Avishay wrote:

Yo.

[Resoluteness]
Is this an indirect dif name change suggestion ???

1. 00:04:780 (3) - 00:05:717 (2) - 00:06:842 (2) - The fact that the 3 of those are almost stacking which each other but they are not is rather unpleasant It's intended. I rly like doing those off-stacks. I have some unsubmitted maps with 6 of those in a section on the same spot. You stop using the Dog residue... an unpleasant atmospheer fills the room
2. 00:08:530 (1,1,1) - I know the note at 00:08:905 (1) -'s sliderend is stronger than the other notes at the adjacent sliders, but it feels really weird nontheless, either have them all 3/4, or 1/2, or 00:08:905 (1) - switch this slider with 2 circles, this way the player understands why there isn't a long slider. ye waited for someone to complain
3. 00:23:717 (2,3,1) - Not a fan of this overlap, but at the very least avoid the touch between the sliderhead and 2. fixed it a bit
4. 00:26:530 (1,1,1,1) - Since the overall hitsound volume in this section is pretty low, the sliderends are still audible after reducing the volume there to 5%, you should probably use silent hitsounds for that. i can barely hear it with 174th speed , but i ll keep it mind.
5. 00:26:530 (1,1,1,1) - I understand your intentions with the SV here pretty well, but it feels a bit odd, mainly beacuse it is unexpected, but if you wish to keep it, I think you should revise the velocities a bit, since the changes are a bit drastic, try: 0.85x -> 1.0x -> 0.88x -> 1.0x, there are way many more options, just try to be less drastic. i kept the second as drastic but nerfed the first (0.8 to 1.05 wtf was i thinking..)
6. 00:32:905 (3) - Muting sliderend would be nice. noice
7. 00:33:655 (5) - I feel that the notes here are pretty signifcant that the player should press them both. i rly think its ok like this. (i want this to play as smoothly as possible. 2 single notes seem to be too much ):
8. 00:38:342 (2) - Move slightly to the right to even the spacing - x54 y180. k bro
9. 00:49:030 (1,1,1) - I feel that the SVs here should decrease instead of increase, each slider gets more tense and then it'll get the best emphasization with the fast slider. thats the way i had it at first but then decided to keep the part chill. The payoff would be jizzworthy but i like this smooth build up.
10. 00:58:592 (2,3) - 1/6 is really unexpected and odd, you probably ended it on that whistle instrument, but if you wanted to follow it, you should've started the slider at 00:58:842 because that's where the second whistle is, but regardless you should just use 1/4 because it is simply better. ok you got me
11. 01:03:092 (2,1,2,3) - This is really really awkward, the first note lands on nothing (no, it misses both the indistinct beat and the whistle). The second slider has no beat on the sliderend while the third slider is fine, you should probably just use this rhythm since it is what you did so far when the background instruments weren't clear. finally someone who complains properly
12. 01:05:342 (2,3,4,1) - That's pretty awkward as well, couldn't figure out what it was while playing, I thought those were 1/2 but it was just something unpredictable, the rhythm is awful in my opinion. The first note is fine, then the slider starts on the whistle, ignores the instrument right afterwards, nothing lands on the slider end, the next slider's end is nonexistent as well. A triplet -> 1/2 -> reversed slider works great, or even just 1/2 notes instead of the triplet.Just fuck that. Tbh i didnt even read what you wrote i just went and remapped that part. Fuck that flute man.. messes with my brain sometimes..
13. 01:12:280 (3,1) - I see what you are trying to do here, but it feels a bit harsh and forced, some alternatives - http://puu.sh/mJzAy/89283dd37a.jpg http://puu.sh/mJzzh/aac16b8874.jpg http://puu.sh/mJzD1/1d1bbc554f.jpg I find the first one of those the best You are right. This pointy edge feels too forced. This would fit in a rock song or smth. Use some wierd curve now
14. 01:18:655 (2,3) - Those felt forced as well, it doesn't feel like the song is holding onto those notes that much, regular circle or a reversed slider would be cooler imo. I think its fine. (for now)
15. 01:20:811 (3) - This is unnecessary, it compensates for the fact that you did follow the whistle at 01:20:530 (2) - but for some reason you didn't at the next sliders, even though they are really significant, if you still wish to ignore those then remove this note and extend 01:20:530 (2) -, because right now the current note feels out of place. I wanted to emphasize the violin
16. 01:29:342 (4) - Try a triplet instead, feels much better. i feel like a triple is too much tho
17. 01:31:592 (5) - There's nothing on the music here.. Just the leftover of 01:31:405 (4) - which is held. the violin Q_Q
18. 01:32:717 (4) - Triplet is better.
19. 01:33:842 (4,5) - 01:34:967 (4,5) - Why isn't the spacing more or less equal? 01:34:967 (4,5) - have this WOMB sound while 01:33:842 (4,5) -has nothing :v

'dat OST is really really guuud, goodluck thanks a lot!!! I was waiting for a good mod to appear to tell me straight that my shit is acctually pretty shitty. I hope my mod wasnt as shitty as i remember it to be and I wish it helped you as much as you helped me!

1. You cannot have different combocolours in one difficulty than the rest, and your hardest difficulty is in question. It's to keep everything consistent in the beatmap. If you have a guest difficulty, the mapper can be have different settings, because it is their choice. But when you make everything by yourself, then you should stick the same colours.
2. If you compressed your backgrounds to JPEG, it would save a lot of space. Although, it is not breaking any rules, but I do suggest you have them JPEG version to gain a little size to the beatmap. In total, PNG minus JPG saves 1.70MB, which is quite lot. So, if you want the compressed files, here are them:
   First BG | Second BG
3. I'm not sure if those tags are with the anime or anything related to the song, but I don't think mermaid and determination have to do with anything to the song. But, from what I see, first, you added mermaid, maybe because there's a mermaid in the background that made you add the tag. I don't follow the anime, so I can't be sure if this is really in the anime or the song itself. Please state if I'm wrong.
   And determination, sounds like an UNDERTALE reference lel. You added the reference in the beatmap description, but how does it relate with the song, anime, or anything? Tags are only words that has something to do with the music, show, where it is coming, and etc. I don't think determination is a suitable tag to the mapset. If I'm still wrong, please say it.
4. I don't see why you want to separate the kiai section into four parts. Personally, I would only them into one since it's only "one section". If you think that what you did is okay, I recommend you to leave a gap of one beat. For example, the first ends on 01:16:780 -, the second on 01:21:280 -, and etc. Nowadays, everyone does that, and it kind of makes more sense to the song as it is more extended, and as I said, it is one part.

1. 00:09:655 (1) - The pattern could be more neater if you blanket with 00:09:280 (3) like this:
   
   Pattern

   
2. 00:17:905 (4) - In my opinion, having it a single hitcircle on 00:17:905 will emphasize better 00:18:280 (5) . Before 00:18:655 kicks in, 00:18:280 (5) introduce it first, and there's the violin that can be heard here which is not heard previously. Why would I suggest to have a circle on 00:17:905 is because of the 1/2 slider 00:18:280 (5) . It's a short and quick thing when you play it. If you start one on 00:17:905 -, that doesn't match well with the music, it starts too early, and the music doesn't suggest it. Like I said before, the violin starts on 00:18:280 . That would make it emphasized and it sounds very nice to the music from my point of view.
3. 00:18:655 to 01:12:655 - I'd rather have a new combo on each two measures. I think it makes better sense to the music and the hitsounds when add a loud hitsound on each first downbeat of each two measures. Here are examples: 00:20:905 (4) - 00:25:405 (4) - 00:29:905 (4) - and many more.
   Half of it done, you'll just need to add a new combo in the middle of your pattern.
4. 00:35:530 (1) - I'm not sure why the new combo here.
5. 01:08:905 (2) - The rhythm doesn't make much sense to me. The louder beat is on 01:09:280 so the start of the slider should instead be here, and I think this is the only slider that does that. I would stick with the constant rhythm you did quite often: a circle on 01:08:905 and a 1/1 slider on 01:09:280 .
6. 01:12:655 (1) - Move this out of the stack? I think it makes a good emphasis on introducing the next section because you have to move to that object to click, instead of staying still. Similar to a jump in harder difficulties, but with the same spacing.

1. 00:13:967 (6,1) - Similar to a point in Normal. When there's a strong beat on 00:14:155 (1) -, I personally don't make a stack with the previous object because of emphasis.
2. 00:18:655 (3) - It's highly preferable to add a new combo when the music introduces a measure with new rhythms.
3. 00:27:280 (3,1) - Add a little jump just like 00:26:155 (3,1) because the beat 00:27:655 (1) is more strong.
4. 00:33:280 (2) - If there's a gap of one beat like 00:22:030 (4,5) with a distance of 1.0x, you might need 00:33:280 (2) to be closer to objects around.
5. 00:36:280 (6,1) - This is a bad and ugly overlap pattern honestly. Try to move it somewhere like x:49 y:57. It looks better like that in my opinion. Don't forget to move the next objects.
6. 00:43:405 (5) - If I follow your new combo pattern, this needs a new combo.

1. 00:26:530 (1,1,1,1) - I kind of disagree with this type of patterns. Those sliders can be acted as 1/1 sliders. They might look similar to 1/1 slider on a 1.0x SV, but with the sudden SV changes, the length of the sliders varies, and they may be confusing to the players. Also, the spacing between sliders is a little similar to as when there's a one beat gap between 00:26:530 (1,1) for example. They are not overlapped as 00:32:905 (3,4) which is pretty distinguishable to the previous in my opinion. My suggestion here is to close them each other so they could touch the other sliders. Something like this perhaps:
   
   Pattern

   
   This happens elsewhere in this map, like 00:34:030 (6,1) -, so keep an eye.
2. 00:58:592 (2) - This is a pretty sudden rhythm to 00:58:780 (3) because you have to release the key short before 00:58:780 (3) . And that doesn't make sense to the music as I don't see what you're trying to get here because you start it on a low beat. I would get for circles like 01:00:842 (2,3,4) .
3. 00:55:780 (1) - With the sharp angle on the slider, this makes the flow 00:55:592 (4,1) not quite right. Honestly, when I play it, it's uncomfortable. Overall, to go to 00:55:592 (4) to 00:55:780 (1) you move the cursor in a straight line normally, and it's a big direction. But what makes it uncomfortable is how the shape of the slider 00:55:780 (1) is made: you have to move down the sliderslide shortly and continue up to end the slider. The problem is the shape angle you placed in the slider, and that makes us to cross a big to a small and short direction, which is not right me. I think a little curve slider would go better.
4. 01:30:373 (3) - Honestly, this makes the stream 01:30:280 (2,3,4,5,1) sound very weird and it doesn't hit anything. If you remove it, it would emphasize better the flute on 01:30:467 (3,4,1) .

Rizen wrote:

please change name in description from rizen to riven, we're not the same people ;(

Okoratu wrote:

idk i don't think having blood on the bg fits how calm this song is lol THIS SONG MAKES ME WANT TO SMASH THINGS tbh tho, it is more if a parallel to its source. blah blah spoiler blah blah. It also shows the different interpretations this piece can have. On one side its this soothing string/violin thing, on the other it has this desperate and kinda helpplessness feel ;( . If you ask me, this is not a happy song.

[insane]
00:17:530 (4,1) - swap nc? why not
00:08:905 (1,2) - clicking these to the ngo and play extended sliders only feels rather odd, tbh 00:26:905 (1) - ignores the same kind of beats The first one dont have a violin whats'o ever. I first had a 3/4 spam there but i removed it since it ignored too much. On the latter i mapped the violin like with all the others. I changed this one to a 1/1 since 3/4 seems kinda meh to me atm (1/2 plays better imo).all the other beats are excuses to put circles so i can map violin :]
00:12:467 (2) - 00:13:592 (2) - i assume these are there for the string instruments that you ignored for like 12 seconds i am guilty
00:31:967 - idk i feel like this sound deserves to be mapped because it's actually quite strong skipping it made me wonder why while playing I share this opinion, but since noone mntioned it i said, "fuck it" and just didnt change it
00:32:905 (3,4) - this seems like a pretty random extend, either extend all sliders or just don't extend 3 lol its kinda shit now that i think about it
00:33:280 - 00:35:530 - shouldn't these have combos o.o first one yes second one will get too colourful unless i remove the shit i did afterwards
00:36:092 (1,1,1) - i don't like that this is a thing but it plays ok just that you need to silence like 3 sliderends might tell you that there are more suitable rhythms for this LOL I like and dislike those at the same time. They will bring up contoversy and might fuck me up, but i just cant change those three... i rly like them D:i will imidiatly change them once they start making more problems
00:41:155 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3) - for these you just continue on with spamming 1/1 slider + 3 circles even though the melody drastically changed from 00:38:905 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - ...? why? the way the melody is built up makes me expect to click the sliderends but it doesn't feel too weird either, just wondering 00:38:905 (1,2,3,4) - this is a strong part so the 3 note thing starts saced, 00:40:030 (1,2,3,4) - is chilled again which took the first one as a reference to make it look like i put some thought behind the patterns. 00:41:155 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3) - Here the violin gradually increases: First there is a bend slider to a incrasingly spaced 3 note thing to a even sharper bend slider. The note goes into that linear slider facing the opposite flow direction for maximum emphasis. It kinda works in my mind
00:44:530 (1,2) - why is 1 extended and 2 isnt alskfjdlakjsdf alsfhkakjasslask. Ok i revisted this one. Actually this is the only part like this with some kind of "bass" which plays on the two single notes. SO i rly want those to be clickable. Thing is i decided to avoid 3/4 extended sliders followed up by a circle (sliders are ok doe cause i like it) since they kinda destry the simplicity.
00:46:780 (4,1) - swap nc this chain of random 3 circles in one combo is really odd lool wat... why was this a thing...
00:58:592 (2,3,4) - this and all the other triplets sound so off that they play terribly i know but how to map that shitty flute thing.. i cant just ignore it.. I ll change this once i get a better idea.
01:13:780 (4) - 01:16:030 (4) - combos zzz actually just recheck your kiai im tired of writing these Noticed myself, but didnt update .-.

[hard] i guess you want me to rename this to "Hard"
ok playing this made me sleepy enough to just post this half done sleep tight :^)


00:04:780 (5) - 00:22:780 (5) - why suddenly decreasing spacing? it felt so lonely out there D: (i did the second one more often in the map so i think its kinda ok)
00:25:405 (1,1) - look rather odd like this, can you either not overlap of find a cleaner way to do it ? :[ fixed it...
00:29:905 (1) - missing 1.7 spacing report ggwp
00:32:155 (1) - removing a repeat and adding a circle at the point where that slider used to end might make for a more interesting pattern changed th ewhole thing
00:34:405 (1) - you usually don't differ from you 1/1 spacing with jumps and fixed this with it
00:45:655 (1) - more space k fam
01:03:092 (5,6,7,1) - when playing this felt super random because you just didn't do that until now but it does make sense so uhhh i ll keep it for now
01:35:717 (2) - id go for circle+slider for this and make 01:36:842 (4,5) - this a repeat slider because the sound on 01:36:842 - supports clicking and holding more so basically http://puu.sh/n9Wr4/b15bc3c9b7.jpg much better


[normal]
starting the lowest diff with a stacked note is really mean since stacks are harder to read for beginners :\
this diff's density is a bit too high for the lowest diff, i'd recommend making an easy to not kill people who literally play this game for the first time, especially the 1/2 chains like 00:26:530 (3,4,5) - will kill anyone who just started with the game, if i were to check this for a bubble i'd insist on an easy
if you're making an easy consider increasing AR to 5.5 ~ 5.7 on this, that would go better with its density
00:08:530 (1) - don't nc on stuff like this in this diff, just sticking to 2 measure combos is enough already why did i do this..
00:16:405 (1,2) - i think going for http://puu.sh/n9WIP/6ffff5459d.jpg is more intuitive to play because you don't usually do red tick sliders i cant ignore the guitar stroke ther D:
00:50:155 (1,3) - would look better if you actually tried to make them symmetrical symmetrie!

for a normal this diff is cool but as the lowest diff this diff is too hard Time for a green dif (brb learning how2easy)

1. 00:00:280 (1) - Is it me or lowering the volume doesn't work because the hitsound is too loud?

1. 00:01:780 (3) - prefer if the flow started out a little smoother at the beginning of the song before you start emphasizing things with sharp angles such as 00:02:905 (5) - suggestion: http://puu.sh/nerqc/5b0ef3bb11.jpg
2. 00:36:280 (5,1) - I think the angle between the sliderbody and 00:36:280 (5,1) - is a little too harsh. maybe something like this? http://puu.sh/nespI/a06c0e94f8.jpg
3. 00:37:780 (2,3) - could be blanketed better
4. 01:32:905 (1,2) - these look a little strange because it's almost symmetric but not quite.

1. 00:35:530 (4,5,1) - The flow could be improved if they went to a "single direction". If you re-arrange your pattern into something like this, the flow is more intact since it's going in one direction, which is curve. The pattern you created doesn't do that, because you have to move down and up at the same time when you reach 00:36:655 (1) -, so it's breaking the flow here.
2. 00:54:655 (1) - This is more of a personal taste, so it's a minor suggestion. Instead of repeating the same shape of the previous slider, making something different would fit better when the rhythm in the music is changed, which in this case is the violin that changed its rhythm. In my opinion, that also makes an emphasis that part. Maybe a straight would go well, as the circular flow will be instead linear.
3. 01:20:530 (5) - How about you make it as a curve slider? The pattern with 01:19:405 (4) - looks boring when they are plaintively straight, in my opinion.

1. 00:58:780 (4,1) - I thought there was a 1/2 gap between them lol, but I highly suggest you reduce the distance and overlap because the length of the sliders are not evident and players could fall into your trap.

sheela wrote:

[Easy]

1. 00:35:530 (4,5,1) - The flow could be improved if they went to a "single direction". If you re-arrange your pattern into something like this, the flow is more intact since it's going in one direction, which is curve. The pattern you created doesn't do that, because you have to move down and up at the same time when you reach 00:36:655 (1) -, so it's breaking the flow here. I had the exact same idea at first but i didnt do it because it would look identical to 00:06:280 (2,3,4) - . I came up with something else which emphasises that part better while flowing flowing smoother aswell.
2. 00:54:655 (1) - This is more of a personal taste, so it's a minor suggestion. Instead of repeating the same shape of the previous slider, making something different would fit better when the rhythm in the music is changed, which in this case is the violin that changed its rhythm. In my opinion, that also makes an emphasis that part. Maybe a straight would go well, as the circular flow will be instead linear. I see why you wouldnt want to repeat the slider, but i dont think i like the aesthetic of having a curved and a linear one there :/ I would have to change a bunch of patterns afterwards if i wanted to have smth visually appealing (in my eyes)
3. 01:20:530 (5) - How about you make it as a curve slider? The pattern with 01:19:405 (4) - looks boring when they are plaintively straight, in my opinion. Oh yes, this looks a lot better!

[Determination]

1. 00:58:780 (4,1) - I thought there was a 1/2 gap between them lol, but I highly suggest you reduce the distance and overlap because the length of the sliders are not evident and players could fall into your trap. I didn't overlap them but moved them rly close. The distance is low enough not be mistaken with a 1/2 rythm. I dont like those overlaps :/

This map is pretty much ready, so leave me a message when you have applied anything from this recheck! pm'ed

dqs01733 wrote:

Did you change the the overlaps
Can I have a kd for it

Smokeman wrote:

°O°// we did it! Thanks everyone!

woke up in the middle of the night to take piss... and now i see this, lol.

Desperate-kun wrote:

Great! ;3

Mao wrote:

Grats!