Rizen wrote:

please change name in description from rizen to riven, we're not the same people ;(

Okoratu wrote:

idk i don't think having blood on the bg fits how calm this song is lol THIS SONG MAKES ME WANT TO SMASH THINGS tbh tho, it is more if a parallel to its source. blah blah spoiler blah blah. It also shows the different interpretations this piece can have. On one side its this soothing string/violin thing, on the other it has this desperate and kinda helpplessness feel ;( . If you ask me, this is not a happy song.

[insane]
00:17:530 (4,1) - swap nc? why not
00:08:905 (1,2) - clicking these to the ngo and play extended sliders only feels rather odd, tbh 00:26:905 (1) - ignores the same kind of beats The first one dont have a violin whats'o ever. I first had a 3/4 spam there but i removed it since it ignored too much. On the latter i mapped the violin like with all the others. I changed this one to a 1/1 since 3/4 seems kinda meh to me atm (1/2 plays better imo).all the other beats are excuses to put circles so i can map violin :]
00:12:467 (2) - 00:13:592 (2) - i assume these are there for the string instruments that you ignored for like 12 seconds i am guilty
00:31:967 - idk i feel like this sound deserves to be mapped because it's actually quite strong skipping it made me wonder why while playing I share this opinion, but since noone mntioned it i said, "fuck it" and just didnt change it
00:32:905 (3,4) - this seems like a pretty random extend, either extend all sliders or just don't extend 3 lol its kinda shit now that i think about it
00:33:280 - 00:35:530 - shouldn't these have combos o.o first one yes second one will get too colourful unless i remove the shit i did afterwards
00:36:092 (1,1,1) - i don't like that this is a thing but it plays ok just that you need to silence like 3 sliderends might tell you that there are more suitable rhythms for this LOL I like and dislike those at the same time. They will bring up contoversy and might fuck me up, but i just cant change those three... i rly like them D:i will imidiatly change them once they start making more problems
00:41:155 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3) - for these you just continue on with spamming 1/1 slider + 3 circles even though the melody drastically changed from 00:38:905 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - ...? why? the way the melody is built up makes me expect to click the sliderends but it doesn't feel too weird either, just wondering 00:38:905 (1,2,3,4) - this is a strong part so the 3 note thing starts saced, 00:40:030 (1,2,3,4) - is chilled again which took the first one as a reference to make it look like i put some thought behind the patterns. 00:41:155 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3) - Here the violin gradually increases: First there is a bend slider to a incrasingly spaced 3 note thing to a even sharper bend slider. The note goes into that linear slider facing the opposite flow direction for maximum emphasis. It kinda works in my mind
00:44:530 (1,2) - why is 1 extended and 2 isnt alskfjdlakjsdf alsfhkakjasslask. Ok i revisted this one. Actually this is the only part like this with some kind of "bass" which plays on the two single notes. SO i rly want those to be clickable. Thing is i decided to avoid 3/4 extended sliders followed up by a circle (sliders are ok doe cause i like it) since they kinda destry the simplicity.
00:46:780 (4,1) - swap nc this chain of random 3 circles in one combo is really odd lool wat... why was this a thing...
00:58:592 (2,3,4) - this and all the other triplets sound so off that they play terribly i know but how to map that shitty flute thing.. i cant just ignore it.. I ll change this once i get a better idea.
01:13:780 (4) - 01:16:030 (4) - combos zzz actually just recheck your kiai im tired of writing these Noticed myself, but didnt update .-.

[hard] i guess you want me to rename this to "Hard"
ok playing this made me sleepy enough to just post this half done sleep tight :^)


00:04:780 (5) - 00:22:780 (5) - why suddenly decreasing spacing? it felt so lonely out there D: (i did the second one more often in the map so i think its kinda ok)
00:25:405 (1,1) - look rather odd like this, can you either not overlap of find a cleaner way to do it ? :[ fixed it...
00:29:905 (1) - missing 1.7 spacing report ggwp
00:32:155 (1) - removing a repeat and adding a circle at the point where that slider used to end might make for a more interesting pattern changed th ewhole thing
00:34:405 (1) - you usually don't differ from you 1/1 spacing with jumps and fixed this with it
00:45:655 (1) - more space k fam
01:03:092 (5,6,7,1) - when playing this felt super random because you just didn't do that until now but it does make sense so uhhh i ll keep it for now
01:35:717 (2) - id go for circle+slider for this and make 01:36:842 (4,5) - this a repeat slider because the sound on 01:36:842 - supports clicking and holding more so basically http://puu.sh/n9Wr4/b15bc3c9b7.jpg much better


[normal]
starting the lowest diff with a stacked note is really mean since stacks are harder to read for beginners :\
this diff's density is a bit too high for the lowest diff, i'd recommend making an easy to not kill people who literally play this game for the first time, especially the 1/2 chains like 00:26:530 (3,4,5) - will kill anyone who just started with the game, if i were to check this for a bubble i'd insist on an easy
if you're making an easy consider increasing AR to 5.5 ~ 5.7 on this, that would go better with its density
00:08:530 (1) - don't nc on stuff like this in this diff, just sticking to 2 measure combos is enough already why did i do this..
00:16:405 (1,2) - i think going for http://puu.sh/n9WIP/6ffff5459d.jpg is more intuitive to play because you don't usually do red tick sliders i cant ignore the guitar stroke ther D:
00:50:155 (1,3) - would look better if you actually tried to make them symmetrical symmetrie!

for a normal this diff is cool but as the lowest diff this diff is too hard Time for a green dif (brb learning how2easy)

1. 00:00:280 (1) - Is it me or lowering the volume doesn't work because the hitsound is too loud?

1. 00:01:780 (3) - prefer if the flow started out a little smoother at the beginning of the song before you start emphasizing things with sharp angles such as 00:02:905 (5) - suggestion: http://puu.sh/nerqc/5b0ef3bb11.jpg
2. 00:36:280 (5,1) - I think the angle between the sliderbody and 00:36:280 (5,1) - is a little too harsh. maybe something like this? http://puu.sh/nespI/a06c0e94f8.jpg
3. 00:37:780 (2,3) - could be blanketed better
4. 01:32:905 (1,2) - these look a little strange because it's almost symmetric but not quite.

1. 00:35:530 (4,5,1) - The flow could be improved if they went to a "single direction". If you re-arrange your pattern into something like this, the flow is more intact since it's going in one direction, which is curve. The pattern you created doesn't do that, because you have to move down and up at the same time when you reach 00:36:655 (1) -, so it's breaking the flow here.
2. 00:54:655 (1) - This is more of a personal taste, so it's a minor suggestion. Instead of repeating the same shape of the previous slider, making something different would fit better when the rhythm in the music is changed, which in this case is the violin that changed its rhythm. In my opinion, that also makes an emphasis that part. Maybe a straight would go well, as the circular flow will be instead linear.
3. 01:20:530 (5) - How about you make it as a curve slider? The pattern with 01:19:405 (4) - looks boring when they are plaintively straight, in my opinion.

1. 00:58:780 (4,1) - I thought there was a 1/2 gap between them lol, but I highly suggest you reduce the distance and overlap because the length of the sliders are not evident and players could fall into your trap.

sheela wrote:

[Easy]

1. 00:35:530 (4,5,1) - The flow could be improved if they went to a "single direction". If you re-arrange your pattern into something like this, the flow is more intact since it's going in one direction, which is curve. The pattern you created doesn't do that, because you have to move down and up at the same time when you reach 00:36:655 (1) -, so it's breaking the flow here. I had the exact same idea at first but i didnt do it because it would look identical to 00:06:280 (2,3,4) - . I came up with something else which emphasises that part better while flowing flowing smoother aswell.
2. 00:54:655 (1) - This is more of a personal taste, so it's a minor suggestion. Instead of repeating the same shape of the previous slider, making something different would fit better when the rhythm in the music is changed, which in this case is the violin that changed its rhythm. In my opinion, that also makes an emphasis that part. Maybe a straight would go well, as the circular flow will be instead linear. I see why you wouldnt want to repeat the slider, but i dont think i like the aesthetic of having a curved and a linear one there :/ I would have to change a bunch of patterns afterwards if i wanted to have smth visually appealing (in my eyes)
3. 01:20:530 (5) - How about you make it as a curve slider? The pattern with 01:19:405 (4) - looks boring when they are plaintively straight, in my opinion. Oh yes, this looks a lot better!

[Determination]

1. 00:58:780 (4,1) - I thought there was a 1/2 gap between them lol, but I highly suggest you reduce the distance and overlap because the length of the sliders are not evident and players could fall into your trap. I didn't overlap them but moved them rly close. The distance is low enough not be mistaken with a 1/2 rythm. I dont like those overlaps :/

This map is pretty much ready, so leave me a message when you have applied anything from this recheck! pm'ed

dqs01733 wrote:

Did you change the the overlaps
Can I have a kd for it

Smokeman wrote:

°O°// we did it! Thanks everyone!

woke up in the middle of the night to take piss... and now i see this, lol.

Desperate-kun wrote:

Great! ;3

Mao wrote:

Grats!