Okay. Sorry for late reply, banchobot is mean to me
About the MP3 for 1.16.2016. There are two locations where you can listen/buy/do anything with this song which was uploaded by the artist, that is youtube and his soundcloud, he originally released this on the 20th December which had less samples than it does now, he then sneakily added more samples and re-released it, posting it on his twitter feed. - https://twitter.com/MitisOfficial/statu ... 0587355136 on 30th December. I think the title alludes to his new release with Mahi, but that's just me speculating.
About the mp3 quality, I'm not trying to fool any ranking criteria and stop making it out like we are. If you rip from the youtube video from MitiS' official channel https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=62UPamfk_cc using some HD ripper, it comes as 233 kbps, no idea why, but I ripped it as that, and then added 3 seconds on the front with audacity and reencoded to 192kbps. That reencoding obviously might cause some quality loss, but I'm always going to have to do that as I need to add 3 seconds on the front because the offset is basically 0, iirc is 0.
There is no source for a higher quality mp3, sorry if you're an audiophile, but I don't feel like this mp3 is significantly shitty, seems perfectly acceptable to me.
About the MP3 for 1.16.2016. There are two locations where you can listen/buy/do anything with this song which was uploaded by the artist, that is youtube and his soundcloud, he originally released this on the 20th December which had less samples than it does now, he then sneakily added more samples and re-released it, posting it on his twitter feed. - https://twitter.com/MitisOfficial/statu ... 0587355136 on 30th December. I think the title alludes to his new release with Mahi, but that's just me speculating.
About the mp3 quality, I'm not trying to fool any ranking criteria and stop making it out like we are. If you rip from the youtube video from MitiS' official channel https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=62UPamfk_cc using some HD ripper, it comes as 233 kbps, no idea why, but I ripped it as that, and then added 3 seconds on the front with audacity and reencoded to 192kbps. That reencoding obviously might cause some quality loss, but I'm always going to have to do that as I need to add 3 seconds on the front because the offset is basically 0, iirc is 0.
There is no source for a higher quality mp3, sorry if you're an audiophile, but I don't feel like this mp3 is significantly shitty, seems perfectly acceptable to me.