Placeholder, going to mod this today.
Wafu wrote:
Placeholder, going to mod this today.
Thanks dude, 16th Jan ranked date hype!Okoratu wrote:
so we changed like 2 patterns in eloquent
and hitsounding in voli's kiai because not completely muting sliderends sounds a l o t better
Memes intensify :^)Hula wrote:
16th Jan ranked date hype!
Fser wrote:
i had a version of this map from 12/23/2015, eloquent was the only diff
if anyone wants? idk
puu.sh/mpnO4/dd24afab0f.rar
gj on the map hula
Are you kidding me guys? Placeholder doesn't mean I am the one who's going to bubble/qualify the map. I placed it here to make you guys aware that something is most likely going to be mentioned/tl;dr I was going to mod the map.Hula wrote:
No need, Okoratu is on the job V:
Youtube is not even 128kbps, nor this mp3. Soundcloud doesn't degrade the quality that much as youtube and converting it from youtube to 192kbps doesn't make sense as you only take mp3 below 128kbps (because youtube won't give you more) and convert it to 192kbps - That is decreasing the quality and increasing filesize with no data at all.Yuii- wrote:
The mp3 was sourced from MitiS own youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=62UPamfk_cc and that this and soundcloud are the only sources of the mp3 on the net, nowhere to buy this song, so if it's 128 kbps, it's 128 kbps, but it's in fact 192 kbps, encoded from 256kbps from youtube using a ripper.
Plus, 128 kbps .mp3s aren't unrankable.
There is absolutely nothing unrankable with the set.
agreeSieg wrote:
skipping mods is no-no
Sieg wrote:
even if you try to download this song from his SC quality will be the same, guess you know how to use Spek :3 So you can't actually blame Hula for the mp3 quality
but of course there is no reason to uprate this to 192kbps while original is in 128kpbs (tho I don't think this is unrankable), and skipping mods is no-no
No re-encoding is needed because SC does have the pause you are requiring and first downbeat is not cut there at all.Hula wrote:
I HAVE to reencode it and place silence at the start cos the offset is something like -2 on both rips because they're uploaded both by the same guy, probably exactly same file, i don't even know. So reencoding will probably cause some quality loss.
Voli's slider is 5/7Krfawy wrote:
I want to say the notes' volume from 00:33:107 - till 01:33:107 - seems inaudible. The music is way louder than the notes so you'll see it's way easier to play the map if you set values between 20 and 23 in the timing sections. This applies to the whole set. These volumes are perfectly audible to me, make sure you got 100/100 on your volume thingies, also you're more than welcome to use lower music volume. I didn't find the volumes an issue
Also how about we stop having an argue about 128kbs because it seems kinda off and stupid to me like it doesn't really change anything. :C Agreed, seems like this mapset is being picked on cos it's like one of 2 or 3 sets to be qualified today
Because probably there's pink on those circles. XDDDKrfawy wrote:
EDIT: However, I like the mapset and the combo colours! :3 They are great! o3o
You have to use headphones, softwhistles are never gonna be that audible with speakers. I map and play with 100/100, soooo, ye.Krfawy wrote:
I used 100% of the volume in-game, however, I am not going to use full volume for my speakers and headphones because the music will make my head explode so I think there's something wrong Hula.
It's none different. You qualified it with 'idc' attitude 10 minutes after I said anything. If you have urge to qualify map while one's modding it and he said he's modding it, you probably should reconsider quality > quantity idea. You're just denying map's potential improvement even before qualification.Okoratu wrote:
Posting placeholders is very different from actual mods, i dont really care if someone plans to mod something if i dont deem it necessary
From an outsider to standard mapping, that looks pretty irrelevant.Monstrata wrote:
00:26:544 (2,3) - Without using AR/just eyeballing. Takes like 5 seconds.
with my comment about blankets. Nothing to do with blankets being higher quality than not blanketting xD. Just showing its very possible to create blankets and very easy to accomplish anyways.Yuii- wrote:
1) At this level of SV speed it's almost impossible to create such perfect blankets. Please, understand that.
It's not like you don't want or need mods. If you get 12SP, it doesn't make further modding any worse or any useless. You are just spitting into modder's face. If you don't want anyone else to touch your map, don't take it on qualification or learn to accept the fact that anyone is eligible to mod. Even if you got 100 mods before Okoratu's qualification, you'd be obligate to answer them. It's not about speed or how many mods come. If you didn't want to be 'unfair' to Oko, because he was already modding it, how could you be 'unfair' to me completely denying me to say a word?Hula wrote:
Wafu, I didn't want/need anymore mods, this has been modded by many people now, especially consider it's a ENN set. So I'm not gonna wait on a placeholder which was posted whilst Okoratu was half way through modding for the rank, why would I do that? I had been spamming this set on modhelp and modreqs since I submitted it over 2 weeks ago every day, that's how i got BNs and mods . I'm not obliged to wait for every person in osu to mod my map.
Actually, no. CS have nothing to do with difficulty alone. Its more about [SV / HitObjectRadius] (or something close to that, I'm not so sure atm). THAT is what determinates how hard a map will be.Monstrata wrote:
Also, what's with the difficulty settings on Voli's Medium. CS size plays an important role in determining how difficult a map will be. A change from CS 3 to CS 5 may not be much for experienced players, but it's a huge jump for the playerbase that this set is aimed at. CS is a design choice, and people usually decide on that right when they map, but this is a poor choice imo, sry Voli .
By "recent" I mean a map that has been ranked before ranking criteria changed, which I highly doubt had a change, or at least something about this case.HappyRocket88 wrote:
Dirai, the map you referred isn't "recent". It was ranked 5 months ago.