Actually, I did not. I just checked it, nice. 
BTW, will there be mobile support for it?

BTW, will there be mobile support for it?
I actually agree with this too. Sadly, lately the only place I can actually browse the forums is from my workplace, and I am doing it on a small resolution on a 19" screen, and that thing takes way too much space and is not really neutral enough for that particular environment.Kert wrote:
2. The image on the top takes 1/3 of the screen --- I'd prefer to see more actual forum stuff, instead of an image (even a cute one)
this one exists, it's the big magnifying glass button above the wheelYauxo wrote:
Hell, maybe even enter the post number as a jump-to type of function
I assure you i know what im looking at here, i even said i know its WIP; i've mentioned the missing features as it ties into how the new design is not fit for mass testing yet, at least in my oponion.peppy wrote:
If white hurts your eyes, you need to TURN DOWN YOUR MONITOR BRIGHTNESS.
The "simplicity" is not because it was made for phones. It's to make it simple.
Missing features are because it's a WIP. Are you retarded? Stop posting in a feedback thread without understanding what you are looking at first, please.
It's called jizz because I chose that for the testing subdomain. It's a WIP and will eventually replace the original site (and no longer be fjizz?).
Infinite scrolling is not going anywhere, but the navigation control (bottom right) is not final.
what is that aberration masquerading as the american flag?piruchan wrote:
Overall I think there are too many wasted space.
I agree with everyone who thinks posts are too narrow. White space on the right side of each post needs to be trimmed off a bit.
A separation between the avatar area and post area would be nice. Right now everything is on a white background and it feels like they're just thrown there creating a mess. Something along the line of the current forums with different background colors would be nice.
I personally dislike the avatar box thing. The contrast with the background is way too high and it looks bulky. I suggest removing it entirely. With that box away there are more space for longer usernames and larger display space for avatars. Seriously though, why the smaller avatars?
My only complain about the profile page is how the profile details are displayed. Does everything really need to be represented as characters? I think the current design with images and tooltips are a lot better and faster to read.
Another thing, something should be done to the username on top right of the page tomake it look more important because I like feeling importantget user attention. Right now it feels like it's just a bunch of characters thrown randomly and it doesn't feel much different than being a guest. I think making it bold like on the current design would work just fine.
Kudos for the new editor at the bottom of the page, I really like it.
Edit: ctrl + enter still works
White stings my eyes a lot less nowpeppy wrote:
Have you checked today? There have been some changes to contrast levels.
Gumpyyy wrote:
Why does everything have to be so big?
having that big achieves nothing besides making it more clunky.erikG wrote:
Simplicity i guess
Personally, I like the clean look
Endaris wrote:
[spoiler]I miss spoilers[/spoiler]
This exact box you can't see and that doesn't get converted in the new forum.H3X0RZ wrote:
Spoilers? As in the boxes you can expand? Or spoiling someone about something?Endaris wrote:
I miss spoilers
peppy wrote:
Pagination as you know it is gone forever. It makes no sense.
Halogen- wrote:
peppy wrote:
Pagination as you know it is gone forever. It makes no sense.
Tell that to a person looking for specific information/a particular post in a massive thread that just so happens to be directly in the center of the thread.
EDIT: and if you're very deliberately ignoring corner-cases in your development, that's hardly a good precedent.
Probably he means jumping to a specific page from herepeppy wrote:
how is remembering a page number different from remembering a post number? you can already jump to a specific post.
fewer digits with page numberspeppy wrote:
how is remembering a page number different from remembering a post number?
You kind of have a problem if you think you need a tutorial though. The design should be as intuitive as possible, meaning anyone should be able to figure it out.Endaris wrote:
I think we need a small tutorial on how to use the new forum.
Infinite scrolling seems to be an unknown/unintuitive concept for most people. Can't say that I would miss pages that much either though @Halogen and I've spent a big amount of my time online in forums for the past years. I think it works just as well and it doesn't even compare to shittyness of redditstyle they used for the LoL-forums
As for the small arrows on the post number it would probably be the easiest if you removed the one pointing to the threadstart and make the one pointing to the end bigger. No clue how you can make this goodlooking while keeping the circle-shape but for usability this would be very good I think.
As for the top-bar, I think it would be best if it grew larger on hovering over it so you have an easier time clicking on the navigation links.
And smileys seem to be a bit too small/misplaced compared to the text as their lower edge is way below the baseline of text but don't get to the topline of it either.
The problem here is that it's mostly complaining with lack of proper constructive criticism. I'm not saying all the posts are like that, but a majority of them are (even the longer posts which pretend like they go into detail when it's really just pointing more directly at what they're complaining about). At the very least people should say why they dislike something and what can be done to further fix/improve it. Especially considering the new site design will be implemented regardless of the people who dislike it. So instead of those complaining without a basis, they should at least attempt to make reasonable suggestions.CXu wrote:
@Top Bunk: Most people will "complain" or give critisism, since that's what's generally helpful and a reason to post in the first place. Saying "Omg this looks great!!!" doesn't really help getting things better. In general, if people don't mention something, you can assume they thought that was fine, and works well as it is.
Actually we know full well that this thread is a farce that doesn't matter because Peppy will do what he wants to regardless of what anyone and everyone thinks because fuck you that's why.Top Bunk wrote:
The problem here is that it's mostly complaining with lack of proper constructive criticism. I'm not saying all the posts are like that, but a majority of them are (even the longer posts which pretend like they go into detail when it's really just pointing more directly at what they're complaining about). At the very least people should say why they dislike something and what can be done to further fix/improve it. Especially considering the new site design will be implemented regardless of the people who dislike it. So instead of those complaining without a basis, they should at least attempt to make reasonable suggestions.CXu wrote:
@Top Bunk: Most people will "complain" or give critisism, since that's what's generally helpful and a reason to post in the first place. Saying "Omg this looks great!!!" doesn't really help getting things better. In general, if people don't mention something, you can assume they thought that was fine, and works well as it is.
Also, let's not forget important things here. 1) Peppy gets the final say in the direction everything goes in. 2) You can't please everybody, so people will be forced to settle on compromises and deal with things they're not satisfied with either way.
Yeah, pages works way better. Also, where's "View your posts"? :cRaiken- wrote:
The design and layout looks nice but the "Scroll up for the previous 10 posts" thing is just weird and annoying tbh.
Good point :vKhelly wrote:
Actually we know full well that this thread is a farce that doesn't matter because Peppy will do what he wants to regardless of what anyone and everyone thinks because fuck you that's why.
↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓Jieshengwoo wrote:
imo the design is beautiful but just need needs more work on the feature
anyway is the forum will be called jizz forever?
read previous postpeppy wrote:
It's called jizz because I chose that for the testing subdomain. It's a WIP and will eventually replace the original site (and no longer be fjizz?).
JMC wrote:
Jieshengwoo wrote:
imo the design is beautiful but just need needs more work on the feature
anyway is the forum will be called jizz forever?
↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓peppy wrote:
It's called jizz because I chose that for the testing subdomain. It's a WIP and will eventually replace the original site (and no longer be fjizz?).
read previous post
Given how this current design and the new design are using different software (iirc), I highly doubt there will be an option to choose one or the other.Ruineko wrote:
There is a chance that final version can be good, but now I'm really sad.
Only thing I really want is an option to choose between new/old forum style, since I'm satisfied with old one most of all. This new one is too... modern for me personally. I like old paging and old spoilerboxes way more, because it was easier to press them as a pagewide link/hovering, not like it is now.
Hope for keeping both styles to make everyone happy.
En nordmannCXu wrote:
Since there's a thread. One thing that's been kinda bothering me both on the old forums and the new ones, is that you don't really scale it with the browser window:
Is there any particular reason you don't prefer more automatic scaling? It looks kinda silly to me with that long pink bar at the top, but then only half the space is actually being used.
Also, I'm also one of those people that prefer to have pagination. Having autoscrolling is fine, but I'd like there to be both tbh, since there are cases where one or the other is more intuitive or preferable.
I thought the circle/wheel was something you could click on to scroll through posts quickly, but instead clicking on the upper or lower half of it (probably the arrows) just takes me to the top or bottom, which I didn't find that intuitive. And what's the purpose of clicking on the page number? For now it seems like it just goes down a few posts or something, but I think clicking into a textfield where you can put in a page number would be more intuitive than having the page jump thing inside the search button.
And the quote thing is nice, but I think you need a dismiss/discard button, and make it a bit clearer that the button is for quoting.
Well, you're probably aware of some of this already, so eh.
Ikarugamesh wrote:
I have tried the new forum on my Android tablet. It works well on the default, stock browser, simply dubbed "Browser". However, I also have tried it in Chrome (on my Android tablet, too) and the reply box doesn't appear, only a button which says "Load more". Is anyone else experiencing the same issue as me?
Pittigbaasje wrote:
I really like the design but 2 things which dissappoint me:
1) You need to scroll down to the very bottom to reply to a post? Makes it kinda weird when a post has 100 replies like this one.
Pittigbaasje wrote:
2) You can't click on the timestamps when you get a mod (I hope this isn't intentional)
peppy wrote:
Ikarugamesh wrote:
I have tried the new forum on my Android tablet. It works well on the default, stock browser, simply dubbed "Browser". However, I also have tried it in Chrome (on my Android tablet, too) and the reply box doesn't appear, only a button which says "Load more". Is anyone else experiencing the same issue as me?
Do you happen to have javascript disabled?
CXu wrote:
is the part where you should type to jump to a specific post, and use the magnifying glass for actually searching for words within the thread, since a magnifying glass almost always means searching.
Maybe you can add a reply button onto the navigation bar as well, since you can't post in a thread without either going to the bottom or quoting someone.
peppy wrote:
Xanandra wrote:
It still doesn´t have the option to go directly to last read post
Yes it does? Clicking a thread will take you to the last read.
deadbeat wrote:
i've been here for 6 years. i welcome any change![]()
also enjoy https://youtu.be/tICLLkOlpno?t=10m32s