From your Q.
Because I put together the same main point, It may be hard to see it a little. sorry..
Steel
Because it is good music, MOD was fun. GL
Because I put together the same main point, It may be hard to see it a little. sorry..
01:14:999 (4) - NC? I think it in the same way as 01:00:454 (1) - and 01:07:727 (1) -
03:03:788 (7) - ^
03:03:788 (7) - It is the same as the above. Similar point 01:36:515 (1) -
01:35:605 (1,2) - Would you like to get rid of overlap? It is easy to play. (it easier to see.)
03:02:878 (1,2) - ^
02:12:121 - 02:12:196 - Would you like to add a circle to these two places? With a sound sounding here, and I think that triple becomes easy to take rhythm at twice.
02:19:318 - Would you like to add a circle here? It is a reason same as the above. However, because current placement is beautiful, It is not necessary to add forcibly.
05:00:681 - ^
05:28:408 - ^
05:28:863 - ^
02:44:546 (5,1,2) - I feel rhythm to be oddly. Probably I think that this is because it takes the rhythm of the back. Would you like to take rhythm in a white line? How about this?
03:06:515 (1) - I think that the whistle here is not necessary.
03:03:788 (7) - ^
03:03:788 (7) - It is the same as the above. Similar point 01:36:515 (1) -
01:35:605 (1,2) - Would you like to get rid of overlap? It is easy to play. (it easier to see.)
03:02:878 (1,2) - ^
02:12:121 - 02:12:196 - Would you like to add a circle to these two places? With a sound sounding here, and I think that triple becomes easy to take rhythm at twice.
02:19:318 - Would you like to add a circle here? It is a reason same as the above. However, because current placement is beautiful, It is not necessary to add forcibly.
05:00:681 - ^
05:28:408 - ^
05:28:863 - ^
02:44:546 (5,1,2) - I feel rhythm to be oddly. Probably I think that this is because it takes the rhythm of the back. Would you like to take rhythm in a white line? How about this?
03:06:515 (1) - I think that the whistle here is not necessary.
Because it is good music, MOD was fun. GL